cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/9457076
The US and China are competing for global leadership in artificial intelligence as the technology rapidly advances. Photo: Shutterstock
The United States should start preparing for scenarios where extreme measures must be taken to stop China from achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI), according to a former White House official, including state-backed espionage and military strikes on Chinese data centres.
Jacob Stokes, deputy director of the Indo-Pacific Security Program at the Centre for a New American Security (CNAS), said at an online event on Thursday that various US agencies, including the Department of Defense and the National Security Agency, should begin assessing what intelligence they need to justify taking such actions.
“Trying to think through the particulars of that will be especially important, in part because it will help policymakers … start to work backwards based on the unique nature of the technology, in the same way that in a past era, policymakers would learn about nuclear weapons and … work backwards from the science to the policy implications,” he said.
In a new CNAS report published last week, the former Obama administration national security staffer called for the US government to consider the feasibility of diplomatic, espionage, cyber and kinetic measures to prevent China from achieving AGI first.
AGI is a hypothetical AI system that can achieve human levels of performance across a wide variety of tasks. The report, titled “Superpowers and AGI”, explores how the imminent arrival of AGI might affect US-China geopolitical competition.
The US currently enjoys a months-long lead over China in frontier AI models, according to Epoch AI. However, China could make a “surprise technological breakthrough” that means it is close to achieving or achieves AGI first, Stokes wrote, citing China’s advances in areas such as robotics and other forms of “embodied AI”.
If this were the case, the US government should consider extreme actions such as military strikes on the data centres that train and run the Chinese AGI system, Stokes wrote, including preventive strikes before China develops AGI.
As AI technology grows in importance economically and militarily, the data centres that form the backbone of the AI industry have emerged as military targets. In March, Iran bombed Amazon data centres in the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain as part of its conflict with the US.
According to Stokes, US government agencies would have to work out what facilities to attack and with which weapons, while considering the risk that the strikes lead to a general war between the two countries.
William Hartung, an arms analyst at the Project on Government Oversight, a Washington non-profit organisation, also warned that any strikes on Chinese data centres would “risk starting a shooting war between two nuclear armed powers that could have tragic consequences for all concerned”.
“Striking Chinese data centres based on how they might or might not be used in the future would be the height of recklessness,” he said.
Another option would be to reverse engineer or “steal” China’s AGI technology, Stokes wrote, which would be justified “legally and normatively” because of China’s own alleged history of stealing US intellectual property.
However, he noted that the US government and intelligence apparatus have “not been organised for espionage to gather technological secrets for decades”.
The stark assessment comes as US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are set to have talks in Washington later this month on AI governance as the technology continues to improve, posing growing risks to national and global security.
The “best case scenario” for the talks is that the two sides find the talks “constructive”, Stokes said on Thursday, rather than any expectations of any breakthroughs on key governance issues.

13 Comments
Steve@startrek.website · 7 pts · 4d
China would stomp the shit out of the US at this point.
Trying2KnowMyself@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 4d
Now just convince the US of that. Good luck!
Eternal192@anarchist.nexus · 6 pts · 4d
Dude if they attack China that's the end of them.
Anything short of a surprise nuclear attack and even then it could be M.A.D.
Trying2KnowMyself@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 4d
Feasibility of winning doesn’t matter to them, or they wouldn’t be attacking Iran.
watson387@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 4d
Sounds like Jacob Stokes should go fuck himself.
Trying2KnowMyself@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 4d
Kinda sounds like getting fucked is the goal.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 4d
Trying2KnowMyself@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 4d
arctanthrope@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d
if we don't act quick, they'll beat us to antigravity and scrying mirrors too
thesohoriots@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d
I hear they’re reticulating splines already
Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 3d
This man is a delusional idiot, both because he believes AGI is happening in our lifetimes, and because he believes the US has any ability to militarily strike at China.
CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d
Isn’t the US basically out of missiles after Iran? Not to mention interceptors. China’s has a whole Rocket Force that’s so far wasted… 0 missiles?
AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d
Not out, but low enough that we have to ration interceptors. If we got into it with a power that could target the homeland (like China), the US could be in a position where it has to choose between protecting targets based on how many more lives they'll save, or how strategically valuable human lives are vs infrastructure. I don't take another to test how vulnerable we are, so I prefer this dude just shut the fuck up.
But at this point I think the point is to get us killed.