Werner Herzog: “I don’t like the term neurodivergence/ADHD/whatever — it sounds like political correctness”

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/sep/05/werner-herzog-bucking-fastard-kate-rooney-mara

Contemporary psychiatrists might detect behaviour (in the plot of Herzog's latest film) consistent with autism or ADHD hyper-focus. Not Herzog. “I do not relate to all these trendy terms – I just can’t hear it, it dusts out of my ears,” said the Bavaria-born US-based director, speaking in the idiosyncratic, heavily accented English familiar to viewers of documentaries like My Favourite Fiend. “Neurodivergence sounds like there’s some sort of clinical aberration – these sisters are dead centre.”

46 points · 12 comments · view on lemmy.world

12 Comments

Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world · 51 pts · 5d (2 replies)

Werner thinks it's completely normal. Which makes me think someone hasn't been diagnosed yet.

AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space · 12 pts · 5d

I wonder how strong the correlation between appreciation of Herzog’s work and ADHD/autism would be. I imagine it’s significantly positive.

queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 5d

Diagnosis isn't necessary or even helpful for everyone who falls into the "neurodivergent" category, whatever that is. Getting a diagnosis only helps if the medical community has recognized a disease (say, ASD or ADHD) that also has therapies that make life easier for for the person diagnosed. That doesn't apply to everyone who has autistic or neurodivergent traits.

As for whether it's normal: who the hell knows what normal means? We all have our own judgements about what "normal" should mean, but precious little actual theory or data on what constitutes "neurotypical". My own journey with defining autism has convinced me that we have a long way to go before we can confidently label people with words like "neurodivergent". Even specific diagnoses like ASD and ADHD could use some significant refinement. Maybe Herzog is neurodivergent or autistic, who knows? Besides him and his doctor, who cares?

I think "neurodivergent" is a clinical stepping stone that we'll discard as we get a clearer picture of how different brains function. Like so much clinical jargon, it has seeped out into non-medical usage as a smarter-sounding version of "weird". I'm with Werner, I don't care for how they're used in everyday language.

FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 5d (2 replies)

An argument i heard along these lines:

"What is neurodiversity? What is neurotypicality? Because if you're definining a "normal" and a "non-normal" brain, then what datum (baseline) or point of reference do you use to determine who is normal or not?

The answer is productivity and subservience. The neurodiverse person is generally just someone who breaks from the anticipated program, doesn't produce value for an employer ... "

Same guy went on to suggest that ADHD people thrived throughout history when we weren't all tied to such

My thoughts on this are that even if ADHD is "not real" in some way, the help available for it is essential healthcare and should be made available to people anyway. If it is real in a very definite way (e.g an ADHD gene that could be turned on or off) then it should be noted that even non-ADHD people benefit from the psychological and medical help directed towards sufferers of ADHD. So nobody should take our care away.

If ADHD is 'not real' in some way, we are all still suffering those symptoms; smartphone addiction, crippling disconnection, brain fog, exhaustion, difficulty socialising and anxiety. They've gone up more recently, suggesting either than modern times are worse for ADHD people or that ADHD is "not real" and rather the combination of multiple symptoms like these - hence the problem being modern life in general.

applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 10 pts · 5d (1 reply)

its definitely real though. the way my brain responds to stimulants is completely different from how people without ADHD respond. often caffeine has no effect on my wakefulness at all, and usually makes me sleepy, unless i have a lot. and taking my prescribed stimulants makes me calm and focused where others would be euphoric and amped up. thats the most clear evidence that my brain literally functions differently, but theres also a mountain of other more subtle evidence.

Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 2d

same, i can chug 400mg of caffeine pills and barely even notice a difference

GrackleBirb@lemmy.ca · 28 pts · 5d

So I kind of understand his perspective.

I am an older Millennial so my perspective likely differs from that of a lot of Gen Z / Gen Alpha folks.

I was diagnosed and began treatment when this was still ADD and Vyvanse didn't even exist yet (released 2007 and I still prefer Adderall XR but hey everyone should find their preferred med if you choose to pursue medication as a path to manage your condition)

I don't think ADHD makes one "not normal" - it's a condition to manage with medication, therapy, alternative learning and organizational techniques - similar to how GERD (acid reflex) is managed with medication or diet.

I find that in the TikTok/Reddit era people have decided that conditions can become their entire personality so we have "POTS Warriors" and "ADHDers" (or even more cringe "ADHDSters") as if having a condition makes one part of a special club and is something on which to dwell and focus constantly by consuming content and participating in spaces related to that condition.

ADHD already lends itself to becoming intensely interested in certain things (for a while...then not so much and on to the next thing haha!) but that isn't a bad thing nor is it abnormal - it's very much normal if you have ADHD.

ADHD is part of my life like my acid reflux, like the bad foot I have from a childhood break that never healed quite correctly leaving me with a slightlly weird gait when I run - I am glad there is information about all of these things online but none of them makes me abnormal no do I seek to be part of a club to talk about these conditions endlessly - there's too much else to do in life to make this a large part of my personality. I would never say "OMG guys I belched at a dinner tonight right in front of everyone because of my reflux what a GERD moment so glad for my fellow GERDIES who get me!" - no, I would a) try not to do that because it's rude regardless of my medical condition or b) simply apologize and move on.

I understand how the term neurodivergent appeals to some people in the era of wanting to form community and be unique when everyone is online consuming the same content but it also implies we are fundamentally totally different from everyone else and that's simply not true - we have some traits that are different and that we manage or don't but everyone to some degree has something going on.

When I read stories about people needing "support stuffies" or who say things like "my Crocs are my ADHD self-care" I wonder if we have the same condition because a stuffed animal and fugly plastic shoes adorned with cheap trinkets made in China don't do anything for ADHD but medication, therapy, and learning to accept yourself as your own normal certainly do.

This will get downvoted to hell but I am fine with that. And yes, Crocs are fugly.

GottaHaveFaith@fedia.io · 17 pts · 5d

what a nothing burger

atrielienz@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 5d

I don't like the term cervical cancer. It feels like political correctness.

That's what this sounds like. ADHD is a neurological condition. It's a medical condition. What even.

Pomal@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 5d (1 reply)

It’s like we (humanity) are clustering similar symptoms until specific patterns emerge that forward our ability towards treatment… like modern viral theory.

moondoggie@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 5d

I read that in Herzog’s voice

thoughtfuldragon@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 5d

It is a political term. Is used as a way of self organizing.