To identify a “safe” level of alcohol consumption, valid scientific evidence would need to demonstrate that at and below a certain level, there is no risk of illness or injury associated with alcohol consumption. The new WHO statement clarifies: currently available evidence cannot indicate the existence of a threshold at which the carcinogenic effects of alcohol “switch on” and start to manifest in the human body.
Apparently according to something I also read the amount of carcinogen you are exposed to on a 18 minute walk next to a low but noticeable traffic (I remember it saying 20ish cars per minute) is orders of magnitude stronger in regards to cancer causing factors in daily life.
I'm not 100% certain about equating carcinogenic effects to causing cancer but I don't know any other reason to talk about carcinogens.
Sorry to bother you, this was all a nothing burger. Sorry I asked and wasted your time, and mine too
Old latin wise people used to say "in vino veritas", the truth is in the wine... and so it is likely to harm crypto and security... if we accept mythology as a reliable source...
no, you need to make the AI drink enough wine so it doesn't hallucinate ; and it is a truth know since antiquity: if you drawn the datacenters electronic components into wine, there are no more AI hallucination... try it!
I have a decidated, dirty windows 10 laptop for all my windows needs.
"What windows needs do you have?"
CompTIA won't let you take certs on Linux lol. Trust me, I tried. My professor was a fat, angry, scottish guy who also hates windows and took my side, but nothing we did made that shit work.
...and also yeah, online gaming. Fuck anticheat software.
I mean I get you, but it does need to be totally open for editting, and that's what the history and discussion pages are for--to add some hive mind filtering.
It bothers me when wiki becomes seen as gospel by those that may not have history on something, and so it needs a method of alteration. Sure that will be abused, but then it gets rolled back.
38 Comments
OpenStars@discuss.online · 43 pts · 1d
This was before climate change. Nowadays the glasses are hot.
jdr@lemmy.ml · 40 pts · 1d
Those glasses aren't that cool
notabot@piefed.social · 13 pts · 1d
They've been in the freezer for an hour, they're not just cool, they're positively chilly.
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 1d
No amount of alcohol is safe to drink, and this is why.
Haaveilija@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 6h
Running Microsoft Windows applications in your head is probably not memory safer or safe in other ways either.
Jarix@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 21h
What do you mean when you used the word safe? Genuinely curious, not just being a dick
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 21h
No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health
Jarix@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 20h
Oh that. Bloody useless as I understand it.
Apparently according to something I also read the amount of carcinogen you are exposed to on a 18 minute walk next to a low but noticeable traffic (I remember it saying 20ish cars per minute) is orders of magnitude stronger in regards to cancer causing factors in daily life.
I'm not 100% certain about equating carcinogenic effects to causing cancer but I don't know any other reason to talk about carcinogens.
Sorry to bother you, this was all a nothing burger. Sorry I asked and wasted your time, and mine too
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · -1 pts · 1d
Nonsense.
kadotux@sopuli.xyz · 16 pts · 1d
Wine Is Not an Emulator
lordziv@lemmy.nz · 2 pts · 21h
Omg is it a recursive acronym :o
bertlewirth@lemy.lol · 4 pts · 21h
Wait till I tell you what gnu means
thestrike@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 18h
gonna nut unggghhhhhh
lordziv@lemmy.nz · 1 pts · 5h
I was actually thinking of PHP myself, that one always gets me lol
peacepath@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 1d
Wine is to be drank, not to pour on your computer!
general_kitten@sopuli.xyz · 7 pts · 1d
what about using it in water cooling instead of water
peacepath@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1d
Old latin wise people used to say "in vino veritas", the truth is in the wine... and so it is likely to harm crypto and security... if we accept mythology as a reliable source...
general_kitten@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 1d
But does that make me immune to AI hallucinations also then?
peacepath@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1d
no, you need to make the AI drink enough wine so it doesn't hallucinate ; and it is a truth know since antiquity: if you drawn the datacenters electronic components into wine, there are no more AI hallucination... try it!
SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social · 2 pts · 23h
If it runs windows it can be understandable to throw stuff at it in disgust.
arudesalad@piefed.ca · 11 pts · 1d
Linux users are actually served wine in prefixes
Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 1d
Ahh, that's how we enter The Matrix!
18107@aussie.zone · 16 pts · 1d
It runs on Windows XP
certified_expert@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1d
Dear... you make the internet a better place :)
hexagonwin@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 1d
holy shit i've seen this a decade (or more?) ago!
CaperGrrl79@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 1d
I hadn't, but I love it!
PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space · 4 pts · 1d
I miss the 2000s...
Well, at least the dedicated fun videos.
LeftReddit2@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 23h
I have a decidated, dirty windows 10 laptop for all my windows needs.
"What windows needs do you have?"
CompTIA won't let you take certs on Linux lol. Trust me, I tried. My professor was a fat, angry, scottish guy who also hates windows and took my side, but nothing we did made that shit work.
...and also yeah, online gaming. Fuck anticheat software.
forbiddencherry@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 4h
Hardware-facing software as well. Usually involving some proprietary super sketchy driver and it might even only work on specific versions of Windows.
morto@piefed.social · 7 pts · 1d
We already have tux. Wine just makes us fancier.
Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 1d
Those glasses do be pretty cool
BilSabab@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 4h
when i get drunk my mind runs on AmigaOS because i'm from the old school and I shouldn't have to explain myself
Rusty@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 1d
I never found Wikipedia vandalism to be funny.
fonix232@fedia.io · 23 pts · 1d
Doesn't have to be vandalism, you can edit the site with Developer Tools and take a screenshot...
communism@lemmy.ml · 9 pts · 1d
Inspect element? Or many other various ways of making a fake wikipedia screenshot that don't involve editing the actual article.
Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org · 8 pts · 1d
Probably never found any friends either
Redjard@reddthat.com · 6 pts · 1d
This seems to be from a dedicated joke wiki not wikipedia. Mediawiki is a software anyone can set up.
BCsven@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 1d
I mean I get you, but it does need to be totally open for editting, and that's what the history and discussion pages are for--to add some hive mind filtering.
It bothers me when wiki becomes seen as gospel by those that may not have history on something, and so it needs a method of alteration. Sure that will be abused, but then it gets rolled back.