Don't you remember all those times they were threatening to go nuclear? A nuclear meltdown lasts ages and continues throwing off toxic byproducts the whole time.
I think we're underestimating the importance of encasing mega in cement and burying it under a mountain as quickly as possible.
Anyone who has actually had to clean public bathrooms knows that mens restrooms are usually cleaner than women's.
That said, women's restrooms might have dispensers for hygiene products that occasionally get restocked. Not often enough to be reliable but often enough to give you hope.
They won't stop until all that's left is a dessicated powder of nonvolitiles. Then they will look across their borders and start making lists of who's next.
Shoplifting is a drop in the bucket compared to wage theft. Every one of these articles that doesn't mention wage theft is a new reason to not trust the publication.
For me it's just so obvious that if you bring up theft you should talk about all theft and the context of theft especially if the whole articles about economic impact of theft. Wage theft doesn't sell advertisements I guess.
"I asked the question I intended to ask using the words that I intended to use because they have the meaning that I intend them to have. There's no secret subtext to read into, I am asking this question literally with the words coming out of my actual human mouth" And people will still think I'm fucking sarcastic.
I want to eat the cake I bought. I don't want to buy a cake and then have it taken away from me before I'm finished eating it.
I understand you don't want to deliver cake anymore. That's fine. You need to open the rest of the box so I can get the rest of my cake out. You don't need to deliver anymore to me You just need to not take away the cake I already have.
For now you have access to the ability to connect to the internet for multiple places and not have businesses immediately know exactly who you are. That is gradually going to be eliminated until you can be assured that every interaction you have on every website and every service will know exactly who you are at all times.
Then it becomes a lot harder to investigate this kind of stuff for yourself.
I'm all for building out infrastructure for bikes and teaching car brains to share the road, but this isn't sharing. It's a slow moving vehicle monopolizing the road rather than sharing it.
It's no different than pedestrians on the sidewalk making room for faster walkers to go by. It costs you nothing to be more accommodating to other people's needs. There should be at least one bypass lane when there are this many lanes.
It just makes sense for efficiency since the faster moving vehicles will clear the road more quickly when infrastructure is available for their use.
It actually makes a great case for having bike lanes as this would reserve infrastructure for the separate uses without making a value judgment about who's more important or whatever the fuck you're on about.
There's not enough minable copper or lithium to make all of the batteries we will need. So e alternatives will have to emerge if we are to reduce the need for generating power on demand with fuels.
This CO2 is acting as a reusable fluid in a closed loop. The initial capture of the CO2 costs energy, but the battery keeps using the same CO2 over and over again. So the question of efficiency should be more about land usage and maintenance of the rest of the parts and the labor needed for each megawatt stored vs what other grid scale energy storage costs in materials and labor.
The rough reality is that batteries aren't going to be up to the task of grid scale energy storage unless they have a couple huge breakthroughs. Something like this is a far less materially expensive way to store energy for later use.
Currently most grid scale energy storage is just pumping water up a hill and letting it back down through a generator. It is extremely limited in where it can be used and requires tremendous space to be effective.
This is only a symbolic gesture until we see actual literal results. Those results are already questionable because we know they won't be arresting these criminals.
I'm not sure what you see this officer having done other than talk about encouraging his officers to do part of their job or risk losing it.
This isn't actually doing anything. This is barely an announcement of public intent to in the future do something. Every time the police don't do something will be evidence that this was full of shit. If an officer does something as a result of this order it can't even be praised because of what it's taken to force them to do it.
They aren't actually going to do it though. This is all marketing and public relations nonsense. This is purely performative. If I'm wrong I will be so happy to be wrong.
Has anyone ever tried to communicate to open AI support? Their support is basically nothing but chat GPT with a filter on it. I am trying to help somebody set up SSO with Open AI and it's been two weeks of back and forth sharing videos showing screenshots that their AI system completely ignores and asks me if I've tried clearing my cache for the umpteenth time.
I'm helping a company set it up but they are wholly unprepared for how unreliable and shitty it is. So often I hear people excited about all of the things they can do with it and I worry that they actually believe it works as advertised.
In fairness a government should be the only entity surveilling people in its own borders under most any circumstances.
I'm pretty opposed to most any kind of surveillance outside of warranted due process, and I don't think that any domestic surveillance needs privacy for longer than it takes to do an investigation and prosecution.
It's when governments are allowed to do things in secret and outside of the law that the whole concept of the law is undermined.
Don't you remember all those times they were threatening to go nuclear? A nuclear meltdown lasts ages and continues throwing off toxic byproducts the whole time.
I think we're underestimating the importance of encasing mega in cement and burying it under a mountain as quickly as possible.
I feel like this is why we keep seeing him in movies despite the fact he's box office kryptonite.
He's somebody's favorite sex pest.
Would you really ban someone for a few down votes?
Anyone who has actually had to clean public bathrooms knows that mens restrooms are usually cleaner than women's.
That said, women's restrooms might have dispensers for hygiene products that occasionally get restocked. Not often enough to be reliable but often enough to give you hope.
It's a distillation.
They won't stop until all that's left is a dessicated powder of nonvolitiles. Then they will look across their borders and start making lists of who's next.
Shoplifting is a drop in the bucket compared to wage theft. Every one of these articles that doesn't mention wage theft is a new reason to not trust the publication.
For me it's just so obvious that if you bring up theft you should talk about all theft and the context of theft especially if the whole articles about economic impact of theft. Wage theft doesn't sell advertisements I guess.
"I asked the question I intended to ask using the words that I intended to use because they have the meaning that I intend them to have. There's no secret subtext to read into, I am asking this question literally with the words coming out of my actual human mouth" And people will still think I'm fucking sarcastic.
I want to eat the cake I bought. I don't want to buy a cake and then have it taken away from me before I'm finished eating it.
I understand you don't want to deliver cake anymore. That's fine. You need to open the rest of the box so I can get the rest of my cake out. You don't need to deliver anymore to me You just need to not take away the cake I already have.
For now you have access to the ability to connect to the internet for multiple places and not have businesses immediately know exactly who you are. That is gradually going to be eliminated until you can be assured that every interaction you have on every website and every service will know exactly who you are at all times.
Then it becomes a lot harder to investigate this kind of stuff for yourself.
As an atheist that grew up in the Bible belt I have to say of all the books in the Bible, Matthew is probably my favorite.
I don't see the article with the headline mentioned. Instead I see something else.
I'm all for building out infrastructure for bikes and teaching car brains to share the road, but this isn't sharing. It's a slow moving vehicle monopolizing the road rather than sharing it.
It's no different than pedestrians on the sidewalk making room for faster walkers to go by. It costs you nothing to be more accommodating to other people's needs. There should be at least one bypass lane when there are this many lanes.
It just makes sense for efficiency since the faster moving vehicles will clear the road more quickly when infrastructure is available for their use.
It actually makes a great case for having bike lanes as this would reserve infrastructure for the separate uses without making a value judgment about who's more important or whatever the fuck you're on about.
There's not enough minable copper or lithium to make all of the batteries we will need. So e alternatives will have to emerge if we are to reduce the need for generating power on demand with fuels.
This CO2 is acting as a reusable fluid in a closed loop. The initial capture of the CO2 costs energy, but the battery keeps using the same CO2 over and over again. So the question of efficiency should be more about land usage and maintenance of the rest of the parts and the labor needed for each megawatt stored vs what other grid scale energy storage costs in materials and labor.
The rough reality is that batteries aren't going to be up to the task of grid scale energy storage unless they have a couple huge breakthroughs. Something like this is a far less materially expensive way to store energy for later use.
Currently most grid scale energy storage is just pumping water up a hill and letting it back down through a generator. It is extremely limited in where it can be used and requires tremendous space to be effective.
This is only a symbolic gesture until we see actual literal results. Those results are already questionable because we know they won't be arresting these criminals.
I'm not sure what you see this officer having done other than talk about encouraging his officers to do part of their job or risk losing it.
This isn't actually doing anything. This is barely an announcement of public intent to in the future do something. Every time the police don't do something will be evidence that this was full of shit. If an officer does something as a result of this order it can't even be praised because of what it's taken to force them to do it.
They aren't actually going to do it though. This is all marketing and public relations nonsense. This is purely performative. If I'm wrong I will be so happy to be wrong.
This reminds me of that teen parody of Stargate from episode 200 of Stargate.
Abusing children is not an unusual thing for a Christian organization to do.
Has anyone ever tried to communicate to open AI support? Their support is basically nothing but chat GPT with a filter on it. I am trying to help somebody set up SSO with Open AI and it's been two weeks of back and forth sharing videos showing screenshots that their AI system completely ignores and asks me if I've tried clearing my cache for the umpteenth time.
I'm helping a company set it up but they are wholly unprepared for how unreliable and shitty it is. So often I hear people excited about all of the things they can do with it and I worry that they actually believe it works as advertised.
I was told I was a bright kid, ignored and only complimented as criticism so I deeply mistust compliments.
In fairness a government should be the only entity surveilling people in its own borders under most any circumstances.
I'm pretty opposed to most any kind of surveillance outside of warranted due process, and I don't think that any domestic surveillance needs privacy for longer than it takes to do an investigation and prosecution.
It's when governments are allowed to do things in secret and outside of the law that the whole concept of the law is undermined.