What's better depends on your threat model and tolerance for inconvenience.
Personally, I prefer a hardware security token PLUS a lengthy and complex passphrase (both required to unlock). That way someone can't access my system simply by stealing my hardware token.
No, there's a longstanding pattern to solve the group issue.
Add users that need write perms to the same group (create a new group if it makes sense to do so)
Set the directory's group to that group
Set the directory perms to group writable
Set the SGID bit for the directory (chmod g+s for existing dirs, but you can set the umask so new dirs get it too)
1-3 ensures everyone that needs to write can, and 4 will make any file created in that dir inherit the group from the dir instead of the creating user. So future files will still be writable due to group write perms.
The last 4 slots are tougher. They're likely to change the longer I think about it.
Some version of Civilization. I'm not sure which I'd prefer.
Something technical. Shenzen IO, Human Resource Machine, MHRD, etc
EverQuest. If a live service MMO isn't allowed, I could arguably run a private, emulated server using the EQ emu project.
If I can pick a sold-as-one collection that I bought years ago but is no longer available for purchase, it would probably be a collection of Infocom text adventure games.
My wife and I love going to the theater. We have a couple of local playhouses, so therefore options, but still find it difficult to go with any regularity.
I think the last thing we saw was Primary Trust in 2024 (!! I can't believe it's been that long)
If you decide you do want to be a belt and suspenders guy, look up Perry suspenders.
They make suspenders that hook under your belt. More reliable than the little metal clips, no buttons to add to your pants, and you still have a place to attach your Leatherman.
I've got several pairs and I've been pretty happy with them.
Really it depends on how your employer handles expenses for travel, and how lax they are about verifying receipts.
Several places where I've worked have had things in place that would stop this kind of thing from occurring (whether that was the intended purpose behind those things or not)
But if they only require you submit the purchase receipt, then you might be able to do what you suggest. But if there's any info on the receipt that could lead them back to the canceled ticket (confirmation number, etc) then it could backfire on you if they check it. They could probably even use the credit card transaction number to the same end. But I'd expect that to be more involved and less likely unless you did something to make them suspicious.
I think you're misunderstanding what they're asking. It's not about scamming the airline or the bank that issued the credit card. It's about scamming their employer.
What's better depends on your threat model and tolerance for inconvenience.
Personally, I prefer a hardware security token PLUS a lengthy and complex passphrase (both required to unlock). That way someone can't access my system simply by stealing my hardware token.
No, there's a longstanding pattern to solve the group issue.
1-3 ensures everyone that needs to write can, and 4 will make any file created in that dir inherit the group from the dir instead of the creating user. So future files will still be writable due to group write perms.
Caveat: I've used LUKS quite a bit, but never to do exactly what you're trying to do, so the following is a guess.
If the root disk was the encrypted one, the tooling would add scripts to your initramfs to handle the prompting and unlocking at boot.
Since it's not the root, those scripts may not be getting added.
I'm not sure about the "right" way to force it to add them, but you should be able to manually tweak your initramfs setup to add them.
Apparently you've never heard of figging.
In no particular order:
Those are my main games and easy for me to pick.
The last 4 slots are tougher. They're likely to change the longer I think about it.
Well, did he cum, or what?
Looks like Albizia julibrissin
She could say no, but she won't. Because of the implication.
Will I crush my enemies? See them driven before me? Hear the lamentations of their women?
launches spring across room
I feel like that's context dependent. Or maybe regional.
I'd certainly say "I need 30 or so feet of rope".
But if asked "how much rope do you need?" My answer would be "30 feet or so".
My wife and I love going to the theater. We have a couple of local playhouses, so therefore options, but still find it difficult to go with any regularity.
I think the last thing we saw was Primary Trust in 2024 (!! I can't believe it's been that long)
Me too!
Although someone (steam maybe? I don't remember) updated their system and won't take it anymore. So now it's 1930-01-01.
You should try it. It's like I'm 30 years younger!
If you decide you do want to be a belt and suspenders guy, look up Perry suspenders.
They make suspenders that hook under your belt. More reliable than the little metal clips, no buttons to add to your pants, and you still have a place to attach your Leatherman.
I've got several pairs and I've been pretty happy with them.
Now we know why the comparison in Monty Python's song "Henry Kissinger" was
rather than the other way around.
Really it depends on how your employer handles expenses for travel, and how lax they are about verifying receipts.
Several places where I've worked have had things in place that would stop this kind of thing from occurring (whether that was the intended purpose behind those things or not)
But if they only require you submit the purchase receipt, then you might be able to do what you suggest. But if there's any info on the receipt that could lead them back to the canceled ticket (confirmation number, etc) then it could backfire on you if they check it. They could probably even use the credit card transaction number to the same end. But I'd expect that to be more involved and less likely unless you did something to make them suspicious.
Possible? Maybe. Risky? Also maybe.
I think you're misunderstanding what they're asking. It's not about scamming the airline or the bank that issued the credit card. It's about scamming their employer.
I've heard so much great stuff about the series, but I've heard conflicting things about where to start.
If you were going to start over, never having read any of them, what would be your preferred order?
Agree about the hair, though.