I also think they aren't understanding your problem. You have a function f(w,t) = sin(wt)/w which is well defined everywhere (in the sense of limits at w=0 ), but for which the naive implementation (compute sin(wt), then divide by w) gives the "wrong" output for w=0 (an error instead of t).
Note that the function sin(x)/x has a name, sinc(x). Using this to rewrite your function gives
f(w,t) = sin(wt)/w = tsin(wt)/(wt) = tsinc(wt).
Now you just need to find a quality implementation of sinc from a math library.
Also, it's interesting that the situation in the OP's graph looked to be getting better over time, in that around 2015 the ratio was more like 10-12x (apparently down to 6x).
Dumb question, but have you looked at a "complete" list of all SNES games (like this)? If yes, have you watched gameplay of all these games?
Should only take a few hours.
I would recommend learning vim in that case. I'm not sure about the availability of vi(m)/emacs on the systems you remote into, but if I was a betting man I'd say vi is more available than vim is more available than emacs.
But if you learn vim and are stuck with vi one time it's still better than nano (for me, but I'm sure you're quite good with nano).
Another benefit that extends outside of your text editing experience is that vim motions are offered out of the box for a lot of linux utilities (less) with no setup, or can be trivially added (tmux), which gives you familiar keybinding almost everywhere as well as an improved ergonomic (and likely speed) advantage.
Good on you for knowing what you deserve. I'm sure it was hard, but I think you made the right choice.
Hoping the next one comes correct with the giant cookies!
People are being kind of rude, sorry about that.
I also think they aren't understanding your problem. You have a function f(w,t) = sin(wt)/w which is well defined everywhere (in the sense of limits at w=0 ), but for which the naive implementation (compute sin(wt), then divide by w) gives the "wrong" output for w=0 (an error instead of t).
Note that the function sin(x)/x has a name, sinc(x). Using this to rewrite your function gives f(w,t) = sin(wt)/w = tsin(wt)/(wt) = tsinc(wt).
Now you just need to find a quality implementation of sinc from a math library.
Also, it's interesting that the situation in the OP's graph looked to be getting better over time, in that around 2015 the ratio was more like 10-12x (apparently down to 6x).
She's married!?
Jambalaya
I loled at "Rust was invented" :)
At least that one looks alarmed about the whole thing.
Damn, nice.
Pretty situational, but I LOVE this meme format.
Is it possible there are other 3rd party repositories that have a more up to date version than the Pop_OS repos?
You can tell the artist watches basketball.
Not a BBQ expert, but regarding point 2/3 I always cut my chicken breasts in half essentially regardless of how I cook them.
Is it usually more or less than this?
Nobody should be rich and tall! \s
Dumb question, but have you looked at a "complete" list of all SNES games (like this)? If yes, have you watched gameplay of all these games? Should only take a few hours.
EndeavourOS has an i3 version. That's how I started i3, and I'm still running it after almost 2 years. Comes pretty well set up in my opinion.
Manjaro has me dying, lol.
I would recommend learning vim in that case. I'm not sure about the availability of vi(m)/emacs on the systems you remote into, but if I was a betting man I'd say vi is more available than vim is more available than emacs. But if you learn vim and are stuck with vi one time it's still better than nano (for me, but I'm sure you're quite good with nano). Another benefit that extends outside of your text editing experience is that vim motions are offered out of the box for a lot of linux utilities (less) with no setup, or can be trivially added (tmux), which gives you familiar keybinding almost everywhere as well as an improved ergonomic (and likely speed) advantage.
Thanks for the insight. Just to be clear, your suggestion is: auto-update as much stuff as possible and don't worry about it?
Nice photo!