CorrectAlias

u/CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
176 posts · 915 comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

Just wanted to say that in many of the mail-only states, you can still cut out the post office. For example, in WA, you can print out your ballot at home and drop it into a ballot box. There's no requirement to use the postal service.

For WA, simply sign into votewa.gov, navigate to "Your Ballot & Voting Materials", then "Get a replacement ballot", and finally, select "Print a replacement ballot". Additionally, you can request pick up a new ballot in person on the same "Get a replacement ballot" page.

While everyone should be able to vote through mail, I highly discourage returning your ballot through the postal service for obvious reasons. Most counties in WA have placed plenty of ballot boxes, usually there is one within a mile or so of you. VoteWA shows drop box locations as well.

This isn't to blame the people using the postal service to mail back ballots, they totally should be allowed to do so. I feel for those with disabilities that are not able to use drop boxes.

However, I haven't had any trust in the postal service since Trump 1.0, and wouldn't ever personally risk returning my ballot through them. People who are able should always, always use the drop boxes. In addition to that, if your ballot doesn't arrive on schedule, print it at home through VoteWA. It invalidates your mail ballot and you'll be able to put it into a local drop box.

I'm painfully aware of how LLMs function, I'm unfortunately in the IS industry. It doesn't change the fact that corporations can and do assist fascist states when they see fit, either for profit or for the personal goals of those in charge. It's a bad example to make your point to be honest, because while an LLM has no living parts and is not able to think, companies are made up of living, thinking human beings with their own ideals. A company is not a person, they're groups of them though. And thanks to the supreme court and US government, in the US, they sometimes have more rights than an individual does.

Intent does not matter - the result is the same, that they're assisting with fascism. They are "bending the knee". There is nothing with that expression that necessarily requires explaining intent, it can exist on its own or with intent. Bending the knee is an action with results, it's not necessarily an intent, although it certainly can be.

I acknowledge that they are profit driven, but these companies are also run and operated by billionaires who have their own personal interests, including authoritarianism. This shows in their leader's personal actions and how the companies lobby. While most of it is to drive profit and "make line go up", you also have sick fucks like Peter Thiel who use their wealth to spread their own ideals. He spreads those ideals by convincing billionaire company owners like Musk to further spread authoritarianism through lobbying and company policy.

The point is not these semantics that you keep bringing up when we are on the same page. The point is that, intentional or not (and reasoning aside), they are doing what a fascist wants, using the power that they have to spread misinformation and falsehoods. They have the power to not fall in line, and instead are being good lapdogs to Trump. That is what people need to remember, regardless of intention.

You bringing intention into this is exactly the excuse they will use if Trump & Co ever lose power: that they had no intention of helping authoritarianism, that they were just looking out for shareholders, that their guidelines were broad enough to allow outsiders to influence changes on their platform, etc. That line of thinking is exactly what should be avoided, they will say anything to make their "line go up". The reasoning doesn't matter when the result is helping a fascist state be fascist.

Bend the knee is an expression, and groups and organizations can definitely do so. Just because it's a group or organization deciding to do practices which are in line with fascism doesn't mean they aren't bending the knee. You are semantically taking the expression of "bend the knee" as a literal and not figuratively. Bend the knee is almost never used to describe someone literally bending their knee for someone else.

At multiple points, I have emphasized that people should never forget that Google was on the wrong side of history.

What you're describing is generally referred to as localization. Executive orders are not country wide, and no one outside of the executive branch is required to follow them. Because of that, they are not able to make them nationally recognized, as that would require an act of congress. Even then, it will not ever be internationally recognized since that would require the relevant parties to agree on the change.

Organizations have varied approaches to localization. For example, OSM's guidelines center around either official or common names for map features. Trump's names are not official outside of the executive branch, and are not commonly used by anyone. This means the original names have remained the primary name tag, even inside the US.

MapQuest, while I don't know their guidelines, is also on the side of not changing names of international festures based on an executive order.

This isn't just a localization thing. The problem, at the root, is that either Google's localization guidelines are loose enough to force them to bend the knee for fascists, or, more likely, Google wants to continue to glaze up Trump, and is therefore more than happy to bend the knee. Either way, the result is the same.

The president cannot force Canada to follow along, however.

The president also cannot force companies to change the name, either. Not through executive orders. Google did so voluntarily because they love fascism.

Everyone needs to remember how Google was more than willing to assist fascist pedophiles if this ever ends. They will definitely say some bullshit like they do in this article, "our long-standing policy for bodies of water with names that vary from country to country."

While true that all maps do this, so far, only Google has changed the names to match executive orders. Generally, the names of features on maps are based on what people actually call them, not what a whining piece of shit says they're called.