Did I? I was thinking in the sense that when climbing a steep hill, gravity isn't actually any stronger, you're just fighting against it more, since you're travelling more vertically than normal. "Vertical" on a flat disk would be basically toward the edges. Falling there would be the same as tumbling down a mountain that gradually slopes to flat ground, but you'd still experience the same gravitational pull, no?
It seems he edited his comment. "Always towards the center" means the direction of gravity, not it's magnitude, absolutely would change. Most of the mass of a disk is towards the center, rather than the edge. That's why gravity would pull you that way, but not with any more force than it would push you downward against the ground at the pole. As explained in the video, standing at the pole would feel totally normal (i.e. gravity is pushing straight down). At the edge, it would feel like hanging from a vertical surface (i.e. gravity is pushing sideways). If I'm not mistaken, that's completely in line with what I said before. If anything, I suppose it's possible gravity would be slightly weaker at the edges, just like objects in LEO don't actually fall at quite 9.8m/s, it'll be just a little slower, but that wasn't covered in the first few minutes of the video, which is what the scope of my comment referred to. Without actually leaving the surface of the disk far behind, however, I'm not sure the difference would be appreciable.
I'm no physicist, so I could be wrong, but I don't think the magnitude would change, only the direction gravity pulls you in. Gravity would always want to pull you towards the center on disk-shaped planet. It might "feel" stronger the same way gravity might "feel" stronger when ascending an ever-steepening hill, though.
Nice additions, thanks! It's been awhile since my college nutrition class, so maybe I'm misremembering, but is the starch found in bread, potatoes, and rice not a complex carbohydrate after all? Obviously it'll be digested faster than dietary (insoluble) fiber, which doesn't digest at all, but I was under the impression starches still don't finish digesting until they'd been fermented by our gut bacteria in the small intestine.
Calories - the basic unit used to measure dietary energy. The unit used for nutrition (as opposed to Calories used in physics) are actually kilo-Calories, but they're usually just called calories (though I think many European countries list them as "kcals"). Excess calories will be converted and stored as fat.
Glucose - a simple sugar monosaccharide (just 1 sugar component). Sugars are calorie-dense. There are other basic, simple sugars like galactose and fructose. Combining two of these simple sugars yields a disaccharide, which requires breaking down into its constituent sugars before it can be digested and absorbed, but this is done quickly. Sugars, both simple and complex, are carbohydrates. Simple sugars/carbs (mono/disaccarides) are quickly digested and absorbed into the blood stream, but complex sugars take a little longer.
Complex carbohydrates - these are long strings of sugars (polysaccharides), such as starch. As a result, they are very calorie dense (provided they can be digested by humans). They're typically what is being referred to if someone is talking about "carbs". Since they are strings of sugars, they require more breaking down before they can be digested than simple sugars.
Gluten - a structural protein formed mainly of the naturally-occurring glutenin and gliaden proteins found in some grains. If you add water and knead wheat flour, like in bread dough, it will form a network of these proteins into gluten. This is what gives bread its elasticity. Around 80% of all the protein in bread is gluten. Because it's sort of a dietary buzzword, I'll add that it's typically perfectly safe to consume unless you've been directed by a doctor to avoid it; avoiding it will produce no health benefits at all for the vast majority of people. There is some debate on whether gluten sensitivity truly exists outside of celiac disease (which is autoimmune in nature). Triple-blind experiments where subjects who claimed non-celiac sensitivity were given high-gluten diets, but reported no more symptoms on average than those given low-gluten or gluten-free diets. It's possible that the true cause of intestinal discomfort for some is instead from a group of compounds called FODMAPs, which are also present in many gluten-containing grains. Follow-up experiments with diets high in FODMAPs with the same group yielded more reporting of symptoms than with the gluten.
Of course, always go for jury nullification (or be the lone dissenting vote if your state requires a unanimous jury) if you can, but this is for when you aren't able to put in the time for whatever reason
Pretty easy to get out of, right? I'm sure no prosecutor would keep you if you stated plainly that you detest cops and would never trust a word that comes out of their snouts. I've also heard of people claiming to have biases against all races but their own just to get out of jury duty, although at least once, I've heard of a judge asking jurists who made such claims for proof of past statements along those lines or be slapped with contempt of court charges. Not sure proclaiming to be a racist is the direction I would go in, but to each their own, I suppose.
Langue can also be interpreted as "language" (English has the same double meaning for "tongue"), but yes, you're right; in this case it does refer to actual cat tongues because langues de chat are usually shaped somewhat like actual cat tongues, rather than squared off like we see here. I just thought the idea of a cat language cookie would be kinda funny
The harrier was good except for the times it would inexplicably lose control and kill the pilot, which was a lot more than most planes. They called it "the widow-maker" for a reason. I think it was improved in later versions, but the earliest ones were notoriously unstable.
I know a guy who almost got hit by a harrier that had suddenly flipped above the pad during a vertical take off, crashed upside down with full throttle engaged, and then slid right through a big-ass hanger he was right outside of. He had to literally dive out of the way and be among the very first on scene to fight the flames. MCAS Cherry Point 5/1/1980. Yeah, this happened on May Day lol
It happened again, also at Cherry Point, less than a year later when an experienced pilot was killed in very similar circumstances after his harrier also randomly lost control during vertical take off. 1/18/81. Interestingly, this was just 5 days after they had officially stricken the aircraft from the previous crash.
Maybe the trick is to leave some food (like diced and crushed fruit, unsalted peanuts in the shell, or mealworms) where they hang out when you see them? Them being out of your sight doesn't necessarily mean you're out of their sight. They could be watching nearby. If they're in the area often, they'll probably find it. If you always see them at a certain time of day, try leaving it out there a bit before they show up. Maybe if you put up some feeders that have crow-friendly foods closer to the house, they'll warm up to it and you, You could also try leaving some food out for them a ways away and just hanging out for awhile reading or something, then gradually over time, leave the food closer. I'd imagine it could take some time and persistence to get the crows to warm up to you.
I've heard that crows seem to recognize offerings made to them and respond well. Try going outside and, while in their sight (not too close, though), present some food to them where they can see it, carefully place it on the ground, and slowly back away out of sight once more. You may have to do this for multiple days or maybe even weeks, not sure. Otherwise, you can take solace in the fact that nesting season will probably be over shortly as crows usually only raise 1 brood a year. They also don't usually reuse nests, but have been known to build on top of prior successful nests.
You should post an update somewhere in a week or two because this is pretty interesting!
Man, imagine slowly dying of late-stage lung cancer, then getting picked to be in a trial for a drug that could greatly improve your situation, but you get put in the control group. Placebos will still cure cancer if you think they will, right?
Rice doesn't have to be grown in flooded paddies, that's just an ancient, chemical-free way to prevent weeds from growing. You could still grow rice the same way you'd grow wheat or corn and it can actually be less work to do it that way. It would, of course, require more reliance on herbicides for weed control, though, which is its own can of worms. The water also allows other means of food production to happen alongside the rice growing, such as raising fish or ducks. I wonder if symbiotic dual-use of the water would offset, or even directly reduce, the relatively higher methane levels that might be generated within the water. Bonus points if you hook up a turbine to the outflow when you go to drain your paddies.
Did I? I was thinking in the sense that when climbing a steep hill, gravity isn't actually any stronger, you're just fighting against it more, since you're travelling more vertically than normal. "Vertical" on a flat disk would be basically toward the edges. Falling there would be the same as tumbling down a mountain that gradually slopes to flat ground, but you'd still experience the same gravitational pull, no?
It seems he edited his comment. "Always towards the center" means the direction of gravity, not it's magnitude, absolutely would change. Most of the mass of a disk is towards the center, rather than the edge. That's why gravity would pull you that way, but not with any more force than it would push you downward against the ground at the pole. As explained in the video, standing at the pole would feel totally normal (i.e. gravity is pushing straight down). At the edge, it would feel like hanging from a vertical surface (i.e. gravity is pushing sideways). If I'm not mistaken, that's completely in line with what I said before. If anything, I suppose it's possible gravity would be slightly weaker at the edges, just like objects in LEO don't actually fall at quite 9.8m/s, it'll be just a little slower, but that wasn't covered in the first few minutes of the video, which is what the scope of my comment referred to. Without actually leaving the surface of the disk far behind, however, I'm not sure the difference would be appreciable.
I'm no physicist, so I could be wrong, but I don't think the magnitude would change, only the direction gravity pulls you in. Gravity would always want to pull you towards the center on disk-shaped planet. It might "feel" stronger the same way gravity might "feel" stronger when ascending an ever-steepening hill, though.
The answer to your question is illustrated here in the first couple minutes of this old Vsauce video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNqNnUJVcVs
Thank you for creating Modigliani content
Nice additions, thanks! It's been awhile since my college nutrition class, so maybe I'm misremembering, but is the starch found in bread, potatoes, and rice not a complex carbohydrate after all? Obviously it'll be digested faster than dietary (insoluble) fiber, which doesn't digest at all, but I was under the impression starches still don't finish digesting until they'd been fermented by our gut bacteria in the small intestine.
Calories - the basic unit used to measure dietary energy. The unit used for nutrition (as opposed to Calories used in physics) are actually kilo-Calories, but they're usually just called calories (though I think many European countries list them as "kcals"). Excess calories will be converted and stored as fat.
Glucose - a simple sugar monosaccharide (just 1 sugar component). Sugars are calorie-dense. There are other basic, simple sugars like galactose and fructose. Combining two of these simple sugars yields a disaccharide, which requires breaking down into its constituent sugars before it can be digested and absorbed, but this is done quickly. Sugars, both simple and complex, are carbohydrates. Simple sugars/carbs (mono/disaccarides) are quickly digested and absorbed into the blood stream, but complex sugars take a little longer.
Complex carbohydrates - these are long strings of sugars (polysaccharides), such as starch. As a result, they are very calorie dense (provided they can be digested by humans). They're typically what is being referred to if someone is talking about "carbs". Since they are strings of sugars, they require more breaking down before they can be digested than simple sugars.
Gluten - a structural protein formed mainly of the naturally-occurring glutenin and gliaden proteins found in some grains. If you add water and knead wheat flour, like in bread dough, it will form a network of these proteins into gluten. This is what gives bread its elasticity. Around 80% of all the protein in bread is gluten. Because it's sort of a dietary buzzword, I'll add that it's typically perfectly safe to consume unless you've been directed by a doctor to avoid it; avoiding it will produce no health benefits at all for the vast majority of people. There is some debate on whether gluten sensitivity truly exists outside of celiac disease (which is autoimmune in nature). Triple-blind experiments where subjects who claimed non-celiac sensitivity were given high-gluten diets, but reported no more symptoms on average than those given low-gluten or gluten-free diets. It's possible that the true cause of intestinal discomfort for some is instead from a group of compounds called FODMAPs, which are also present in many gluten-containing grains. Follow-up experiments with diets high in FODMAPs with the same group yielded more reporting of symptoms than with the gluten.
Old.reddit just started requiring an account recently, too
Of course, always go for jury nullification (or be the lone dissenting vote if your state requires a unanimous jury) if you can, but this is for when you aren't able to put in the time for whatever reason
Pretty easy to get out of, right? I'm sure no prosecutor would keep you if you stated plainly that you detest cops and would never trust a word that comes out of their snouts. I've also heard of people claiming to have biases against all races but their own just to get out of jury duty, although at least once, I've heard of a judge asking jurists who made such claims for proof of past statements along those lines or be slapped with contempt of court charges. Not sure proclaiming to be a racist is the direction I would go in, but to each their own, I suppose.
Langue can also be interpreted as "language" (English has the same double meaning for "tongue"), but yes, you're right; in this case it does refer to actual cat tongues because langues de chat are usually shaped somewhat like actual cat tongues, rather than squared off like we see here. I just thought the idea of a cat language cookie would be kinda funny
Oh boy, Cock of Asses cat language cookies, my favorite! Miiiii-aouuuuu!
The harrier was good except for the times it would inexplicably lose control and kill the pilot, which was a lot more than most planes. They called it "the widow-maker" for a reason. I think it was improved in later versions, but the earliest ones were notoriously unstable.
I know a guy who almost got hit by a harrier that had suddenly flipped above the pad during a vertical take off, crashed upside down with full throttle engaged, and then slid right through a big-ass hanger he was right outside of. He had to literally dive out of the way and be among the very first on scene to fight the flames. MCAS Cherry Point 5/1/1980. Yeah, this happened on May Day lol
It happened again, also at Cherry Point, less than a year later when an experienced pilot was killed in very similar circumstances after his harrier also randomly lost control during vertical take off. 1/18/81. Interestingly, this was just 5 days after they had officially stricken the aircraft from the previous crash.
Maybe the trick is to leave some food (like diced and crushed fruit, unsalted peanuts in the shell, or mealworms) where they hang out when you see them? Them being out of your sight doesn't necessarily mean you're out of their sight. They could be watching nearby. If they're in the area often, they'll probably find it. If you always see them at a certain time of day, try leaving it out there a bit before they show up. Maybe if you put up some feeders that have crow-friendly foods closer to the house, they'll warm up to it and you, You could also try leaving some food out for them a ways away and just hanging out for awhile reading or something, then gradually over time, leave the food closer. I'd imagine it could take some time and persistence to get the crows to warm up to you.
I've heard that crows seem to recognize offerings made to them and respond well. Try going outside and, while in their sight (not too close, though), present some food to them where they can see it, carefully place it on the ground, and slowly back away out of sight once more. You may have to do this for multiple days or maybe even weeks, not sure. Otherwise, you can take solace in the fact that nesting season will probably be over shortly as crows usually only raise 1 brood a year. They also don't usually reuse nests, but have been known to build on top of prior successful nests.
You should post an update somewhere in a week or two because this is pretty interesting!
Man, imagine slowly dying of late-stage lung cancer, then getting picked to be in a trial for a drug that could greatly improve your situation, but you get put in the control group. Placebos will still cure cancer if you think they will, right?
Not enough bread, too many circuses
Rice doesn't have to be grown in flooded paddies, that's just an ancient, chemical-free way to prevent weeds from growing. You could still grow rice the same way you'd grow wheat or corn and it can actually be less work to do it that way. It would, of course, require more reliance on herbicides for weed control, though, which is its own can of worms. The water also allows other means of food production to happen alongside the rice growing, such as raising fish or ducks. I wonder if symbiotic dual-use of the water would offset, or even directly reduce, the relatively higher methane levels that might be generated within the water. Bonus points if you hook up a turbine to the outflow when you go to drain your paddies.
Yeoman, what's up?