Dont forget these fun ones you will see on farming and grain handling equipment.
And dont forget, usually these warning signs are created in reponse to incidents.
Look mate, all i am saying is that cutting edge technology shouldnt be used for critical areas until it is proven safe, i really am not invested enough in the cenversation to continue this thread, i support the descision being made to restrict LLM use for these areas at this point in time.
LLMs have been linked to mental health impacts, specifically demonstrably in suicide cases (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deaths_linked_to_chatbots) and i do believe in a lot of these cases the LLMs caused greater harm than would have been presented without the LLM interference, and definitely less harm than if these people saw a human professional to talk about their issues rather than a program. Yes there is a cost of seeing a health professional but this is not a case of 'somethings better than nothing'.
WebMD is just a website with information pages on health topics, not a program or custom response, is it not?
I think that there is a future that it may be a reasonable first step for people with restricted access barriers, but at this stage its too much of the wild west to be using it for these higher level cases.
But regardless i dont have specific information to present you, i woild argue the amount of people that have committ suicide after interacting with LLMs rather than seeing a mental health professional would be a fairly relevant example though.
I think the distinction is that looking up wikipedia or any other website that appears to have topics of information you can learn from is different from asking a tailored answer to your specific query.
One feels like more like research to improve your understanding, but you know you would have to go to a professional to ask specific questions around your circumstances.
And the other feels like your own 'personal professional' that answers all your little specific questions, but is really just a complex algorithm trying to make you happy and doesnt know if is telling you right or wrong, only that it shouldnt say it doesnt know.
A program that can be very confidently wrong while giving people advice that can mess up their life (healthcare, finiancial, legal advice, etc) could benefit some, but will ruin others make it not worth the risk?
I would say its to protect people, if you ask a LLM for a legal answer and trust it, then you could get into legal trouble when it turns out to be wrong.
Not only are LLMs wrong like ~1/10th of the time (for the more advanced ones) but law is also an area where there is black and white rules, but also there is interpretation of some aspects.
Some things are set in stone and some are about understanding the intention of the law and being able to back that up in a court if it was challenged.
Do you want the public trusting a LLM that says "oh yes you can claim a tax deduction for an Xbox because its for stress relief related to your job" and then you get whacked with a fine for incorrectly filing your tax.
Using a LLM to help your draft an email to your uncle = low risk.
Using a LLM to help you decide if you actually need a medical procedure your doctor has reccomended = high risk.
Open AI? The company whos product has helped and encouraged multiple people (primarily teenagers) to commit suicide?
If putting the appropriate gaurdrails and safety systems in place to prevent this kind of output from your product is avoided because it eats too much into your profit margin i would say thats fairly sinister decision making.
Yes, an entree is also known as an appetiser, as per the definition of the word ;)
We would say sunny side up here too, but we would probably more commonly just say 'flipped'.
And i order myne "cooked through" or "flipped and crucified", because i really prefer theres no runny yolk unless its mi goreng or over steak tartare.
I think the easiest way to make an immediate change is to never call/talk to, or about it, as you would a person.
I dont use LLMs at all, but my wife does an i always correct her to say "It said..." when she tells me "He said..." every time she uses it instead of google to get an answer. (And then tell her to find me a trusted website that backs up the LLM as well)
Dehuminise it so theres always a part of your brain treating it as a machine/device, not a person you can trust.
Its like saying "my car broke down, she isnt feeling well".
The car broke down, it needs a part, do i trust my car? Usually but i wont be suprised if it doesnt work some times.
And i dont expect it to be able to swim if i try make it instead of using the vehicle i should have been using.
What the fuck.
Have never heard anyone call lunch anything other than that, unless it is a tradie who might say 'smoko' for lunch or a 15 minute snack break.
Aussie terms for meals:
Breakfast/brekkie
Morning tea/smoko*
Lunch (or brunch if its ~9-11am)
Afternoon tea/arvo tea*
Dinner/Tea
Dessert/Sweets*
*morning/arvo tea are primarily for social sit downs and would be like biscuits/scones and a cup of tea/coffee (having a cuppa with friends/family, small meetings with clients, retirees with nothing better to do)
dessert/sweets is if your having something after dinner, like some pie/crumble with ice cream, pancakes, etc)
Also 'entree' is a small course before the main meal in dinner, the USA confused the fuck out of me when i visited.
Weird, you're acting as if the law system in the USA has been demonstrating predictable, reasonable and lawful actions this last year or so...
Suprise motherfucker!
Fucked On Race Day is an aussie one
Abadakus
Dont forget these fun ones you will see on farming and grain handling equipment.
And dont forget, usually these warning signs are created in reponse to incidents.
Look mate, all i am saying is that cutting edge technology shouldnt be used for critical areas until it is proven safe, i really am not invested enough in the cenversation to continue this thread, i support the descision being made to restrict LLM use for these areas at this point in time.
LLMs have been linked to mental health impacts, specifically demonstrably in suicide cases (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deaths_linked_to_chatbots) and i do believe in a lot of these cases the LLMs caused greater harm than would have been presented without the LLM interference, and definitely less harm than if these people saw a human professional to talk about their issues rather than a program. Yes there is a cost of seeing a health professional but this is not a case of 'somethings better than nothing'.
WebMD is just a website with information pages on health topics, not a program or custom response, is it not?
I think that there is a future that it may be a reasonable first step for people with restricted access barriers, but at this stage its too much of the wild west to be using it for these higher level cases.
But regardless i dont have specific information to present you, i woild argue the amount of people that have committ suicide after interacting with LLMs rather than seeing a mental health professional would be a fairly relevant example though.
I think the distinction is that looking up wikipedia or any other website that appears to have topics of information you can learn from is different from asking a tailored answer to your specific query.
One feels like more like research to improve your understanding, but you know you would have to go to a professional to ask specific questions around your circumstances.
And the other feels like your own 'personal professional' that answers all your little specific questions, but is really just a complex algorithm trying to make you happy and doesnt know if is telling you right or wrong, only that it shouldnt say it doesnt know.
A program that can be very confidently wrong while giving people advice that can mess up their life (healthcare, finiancial, legal advice, etc) could benefit some, but will ruin others make it not worth the risk?
I would say its to protect people, if you ask a LLM for a legal answer and trust it, then you could get into legal trouble when it turns out to be wrong.
Not only are LLMs wrong like ~1/10th of the time (for the more advanced ones) but law is also an area where there is black and white rules, but also there is interpretation of some aspects.
Some things are set in stone and some are about understanding the intention of the law and being able to back that up in a court if it was challenged.
Do you want the public trusting a LLM that says "oh yes you can claim a tax deduction for an Xbox because its for stress relief related to your job" and then you get whacked with a fine for incorrectly filing your tax.
Using a LLM to help your draft an email to your uncle = low risk. Using a LLM to help you decide if you actually need a medical procedure your doctor has reccomended = high risk.
Does he peg it up to eat, or does he prefer to just dive into the ocean for krill?
They might want to get fucked by you which is a slightly weirder, given their outward expressions
Open AI? The company whos product has helped and encouraged multiple people (primarily teenagers) to commit suicide?
If putting the appropriate gaurdrails and safety systems in place to prevent this kind of output from your product is avoided because it eats too much into your profit margin i would say thats fairly sinister decision making.
Ok, how about CEO of palantir?
Yes, an entree is also known as an appetiser, as per the definition of the word ;)
We would say sunny side up here too, but we would probably more commonly just say 'flipped'.
And i order myne "cooked through" or "flipped and crucified", because i really prefer theres no runny yolk unless its mi goreng or over steak tartare.
Arterial ventilation?
I feel like im having a stroke deciphering those messages in grey.
I would add, 'dacks' is a bit more specifically closer to 'undies', at least in my area.
And track pants are also called Trackies.
Isnt the answer to then send on the un-fixed reports and say "Oh i had AI check it and it said that was all good, are you saying AI isnt working?"
I think the easiest way to make an immediate change is to never call/talk to, or about it, as you would a person.
I dont use LLMs at all, but my wife does an i always correct her to say "It said..." when she tells me "He said..." every time she uses it instead of google to get an answer. (And then tell her to find me a trusted website that backs up the LLM as well)
Dehuminise it so theres always a part of your brain treating it as a machine/device, not a person you can trust.
Its like saying "my car broke down, she isnt feeling well". The car broke down, it needs a part, do i trust my car? Usually but i wont be suprised if it doesnt work some times.
And i dont expect it to be able to swim if i try make it instead of using the vehicle i should have been using.
Also while feeding personal health information into a black box somewhere with no real way of knowing what BlackBox© company is collecting or selling in the mean time.
What the fuck.
Have never heard anyone call lunch anything other than that, unless it is a tradie who might say 'smoko' for lunch or a 15 minute snack break.
Aussie terms for meals:
Breakfast/brekkie
Morning tea/smoko*
Lunch (or brunch if its ~9-11am)
Afternoon tea/arvo tea*
Dinner/Tea
Dessert/Sweets*
*morning/arvo tea are primarily for social sit downs and would be like biscuits/scones and a cup of tea/coffee (having a cuppa with friends/family, small meetings with clients, retirees with nothing better to do)
Also 'entree' is a small course before the main meal in dinner, the USA confused the fuck out of me when i visited.