There's literally nothing weird about a woman preferring to avoid the demographic that routinely harasses, stalks, threatens, and assaults women. I have known so many women who thought their male friend was safe only to be assaulted when they're alone and at their most vulnerable.
Its not like all men are creeps, but the overwhelming majority if creeps are men. And its made infinitely worse by the fact that a cis man's word will almost always be taken over a woman's in cases where a man aggresses against a woman.
That's literally my entire point. This station is entirely inaccessible by foot. Are you people just being willfully obtuse? Nobody wants to walk a mile and a half along a highway just to get to a train station. This kind of garbage infrastructure is why transit use is so low in the united states.
Hospitals contribute massively to regional economies. They are a net benefit to society both in terms of public health and economic impact. Similarly to libraries, they improve land values and GDP in addition to their less quantifiable impacts on peoples's lives.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/44950667
All of this is besides the point that transit systems should be accessible by foot. It is so fucking weird to pretend that its okay for a metro station to he completely encircled by massive roads for cars. This sort of car-brained infrastructure has led to decades of wasted public investment in cities like Denver and Los Angeles, where this exact sort of station characterizes sprawling train systems that almost nobody uses. People don't like actually using these kinds of train stations. That's not to say that park-ride stations can't ever work, Seattle actually does a great job of integrating them into neighborhoods while also promoting walkability and development around the station.
Yes, actually, hospitals and libraries should contribute value to their communities. How is that even a question? Are you saying that libraries and hospitals should be poorly run and not contribute to society?
We should have libraries that are well-run and have lots of books. We should also have transit that is accessible, fast, and reliable. Train stations like this make it so transit is difficult to access for most people that would actually use it. Park-and-ride stations are fine, but not if they're out in the middle of nowhere with nothing useful within a half mile radius of the station. This station is literally surrounded by high-speed roads and would be horrible to get to on foot. This is the sort of thing that makes American transit bad at its job.
What's the point of a metro station if its completely inaccessible by foot? If you're going to invest billions into a metro line, each station should be maximizing its economic contribution by building housing and mixed use development around it. Otherwise what's the point of building transit if you need to drive a car just to get to the train?
ETA: Just to be clear, I'm not saying that park-ride can never work. There are plenty of examples of park-ride stations in cities like Seattle that are actually accessible by foot, with transit oriented development near the station. This isn't that. This is a train station that will never actually get major ridership because its builders have decided that the only people with access should be people with cars. If they wanted this to actually be useful, there would be proper sidewalks, a pedestrian bridge over the roadway, and some level of Transit Oriented Development around the station. There is absolutely no evidence that there's even a half-decent park near the station. Just a parking lot and some roads.
Who's to say that they're only gardening on this single plot of land? Why not plant a food forest in your front and back yard, and coordinate with your neighbors to have the whole neighborhood build a food coop?
Also, how do you get "feed your neighbor every single calorie they will ever need" out of this meme? You're literally just loading a whole bunch of extra baggage onto a simple point that we should be growing and sharing food for our community. There's no reason to make perfect the enemy of good.
In a world where people controled their own work and lived in community with each other, AI could have been one of the greatest technological advances of the last fifty years. In the current system where everyone is subordinated to a tiny class of economic dictators who own every technology and piece of infrastructure, AI mostly just serves to advance the interests of its owners.
Its excellent as a standalone novel. I'm pretty sure that the other books in the series follow completely different characters set in the same universe at other points in the timeline.
The Dispossessed. No question. No other work of fiction has made me question more about my beliefs and worldview than that book. It makes you question everything you believe about society and your role in it. It's both an engaging science fiction work and an incredible work of philosophy. The author's worldview very clearly bleeds through into every page, and she does an excellent job of creating characters that actually feel like real people. The heroes are deeply flawed yet morally engaging, the villains are sophisticated and well-spoken.
The Dispossessed made me rethink how I see my purpose in my life, my relations to the society around me, the ways we perform gender, and whether or not it's actually possible for equality to exist. Whether or not you agree with Le Guin's politics, she is easily one of the best authors of the 20th century.
There's literally nothing weird about a woman preferring to avoid the demographic that routinely harasses, stalks, threatens, and assaults women. I have known so many women who thought their male friend was safe only to be assaulted when they're alone and at their most vulnerable.
Its not like all men are creeps, but the overwhelming majority if creeps are men. And its made infinitely worse by the fact that a cis man's word will almost always be taken over a woman's in cases where a man aggresses against a woman.
That's literally my entire point. This station is entirely inaccessible by foot. Are you people just being willfully obtuse? Nobody wants to walk a mile and a half along a highway just to get to a train station. This kind of garbage infrastructure is why transit use is so low in the united states.
I do not understand people who get this upset over an internet argument when they're so confidently wrong. Chill, dude.
Libraries strengthen GDP and improve land values. They are a net benefit to society both economically and culturally. https://criticaldebateshsgj.scholasticahq.com/article/117035-how-public-libraries-drive-economic-vitality-in-surrounding-communities
Hospitals contribute massively to regional economies. They are a net benefit to society both in terms of public health and economic impact. Similarly to libraries, they improve land values and GDP in addition to their less quantifiable impacts on peoples's lives. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44950667
All of this is besides the point that transit systems should be accessible by foot. It is so fucking weird to pretend that its okay for a metro station to he completely encircled by massive roads for cars. This sort of car-brained infrastructure has led to decades of wasted public investment in cities like Denver and Los Angeles, where this exact sort of station characterizes sprawling train systems that almost nobody uses. People don't like actually using these kinds of train stations. That's not to say that park-ride stations can't ever work, Seattle actually does a great job of integrating them into neighborhoods while also promoting walkability and development around the station.
Yes, actually, hospitals and libraries should contribute value to their communities. How is that even a question? Are you saying that libraries and hospitals should be poorly run and not contribute to society?
We should have libraries that are well-run and have lots of books. We should also have transit that is accessible, fast, and reliable. Train stations like this make it so transit is difficult to access for most people that would actually use it. Park-and-ride stations are fine, but not if they're out in the middle of nowhere with nothing useful within a half mile radius of the station. This station is literally surrounded by high-speed roads and would be horrible to get to on foot. This is the sort of thing that makes American transit bad at its job.
What's the point of a metro station if its completely inaccessible by foot? If you're going to invest billions into a metro line, each station should be maximizing its economic contribution by building housing and mixed use development around it. Otherwise what's the point of building transit if you need to drive a car just to get to the train?
ETA: Just to be clear, I'm not saying that park-ride can never work. There are plenty of examples of park-ride stations in cities like Seattle that are actually accessible by foot, with transit oriented development near the station. This isn't that. This is a train station that will never actually get major ridership because its builders have decided that the only people with access should be people with cars. If they wanted this to actually be useful, there would be proper sidewalks, a pedestrian bridge over the roadway, and some level of Transit Oriented Development around the station. There is absolutely no evidence that there's even a half-decent park near the station. Just a parking lot and some roads.
Republicans and tankies fantasizing about murdering Democrats, name a more iconic duo.
I'm pretty sure that this mostly comes down to whether or not you have an HOA. HOAs are the literal devil.
Who's to say that they're only gardening on this single plot of land? Why not plant a food forest in your front and back yard, and coordinate with your neighbors to have the whole neighborhood build a food coop?
Also, how do you get "feed your neighbor every single calorie they will ever need" out of this meme? You're literally just loading a whole bunch of extra baggage onto a simple point that we should be growing and sharing food for our community. There's no reason to make perfect the enemy of good.
In a world where people controled their own work and lived in community with each other, AI could have been one of the greatest technological advances of the last fifty years. In the current system where everyone is subordinated to a tiny class of economic dictators who own every technology and piece of infrastructure, AI mostly just serves to advance the interests of its owners.
Its excellent as a standalone novel. I'm pretty sure that the other books in the series follow completely different characters set in the same universe at other points in the timeline.
Tankies just want to replace them with other pediphile warmongers
The Dispossessed. No question. No other work of fiction has made me question more about my beliefs and worldview than that book. It makes you question everything you believe about society and your role in it. It's both an engaging science fiction work and an incredible work of philosophy. The author's worldview very clearly bleeds through into every page, and she does an excellent job of creating characters that actually feel like real people. The heroes are deeply flawed yet morally engaging, the villains are sophisticated and well-spoken. The Dispossessed made me rethink how I see my purpose in my life, my relations to the society around me, the ways we perform gender, and whether or not it's actually possible for equality to exist. Whether or not you agree with Le Guin's politics, she is easily one of the best authors of the 20th century.