As so often in life: there is no line! If you are immersed in the game then it is, really that simple!
"Immersion" itself doesn't have an absolute clear definition, people sometimes mean "feel like a part of it" and sometimes "getting lost in". Both is fine :)
For games specifically it's along the lines of "what does a majority feel"? To give a specific example: Legend of Zelda is often described as an immersive game - and I never saw why, just accepting that for many people it seems to be.
Counter question: where does it say on there that it's PD3.0?
From the power source it looks like PD2.
Perhaps it follows since stuff from the PD3 specs and that's why that tester said it, but this is guesswork.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding you but the gist of your text is "why is this item not saying what a random guy said it should say??"
I've checked another Dell power plug, they don't claim anything on the box concerning standards they follow from what I can tell. Third party ones often do though.
My Lenovo doesn't say anything about that either interestingly, thanks for the rabbit hole! :D
Edit: remember that companies need to pay fees when they advertise with the standard - they can just follow its spec without advertising it at all, I can see that happening for laptop producers specially as they don't sell their power units as generic products (i.e. with a focus to market them).
"not enough space in the used server for a standard power unit"
I wanted to put a dedicated graphics card in there for interference experiments - but the server is, well, a server - and those high availability PUs are expensive and a hell to cable manage
But a Dremel I had at hand ... And a second PU as well.
Now my server has a second power unit which is only powering the graphics card and is short circuited to be always-on.
And a few lines later "it's confusing that there is no age based guidance".
This article is... A bit too high level for me. "When the child is ready" well yeah, thank you neuroscientist. That's educational guidance since the 90s (perhaps not in Canada) but nothing that can be framed as state law obviously.
I'm with you, I'm torn apart quite strong: I really enjoy what I can do for myself with LLMs and I often see individual actions of the Linux foundation positive - but the whole thing is... You've or it perfectly: 'concerning' fits perfectly.
Your treat is correct by the way, the kernel is officially a foundation project - it's pure historical observation that the kernel ran ahead of the foundation. I.e. I very well might have missed changes!
The AAIF is actively developing a harness for example as well, goose - which I really liked but ... Ah damn I'm not sure what to think, not even what to write.
Thanks for the dialogue and links! I think, now rereading your original post and my replay, that I've projected a lot into your post that isn't there - highly appreciate your reply!
The Linux kernel dev and the LF (famously l, in the past) are independent of each other - with the LF being the slower one.
So if you want to forcefully find a connection then it's "Linus stand made the LF take on AI". But even then it's ... Well just another conspiracy: two (of ... "All") institutions talk about the biggest tech hype since .com.
Oh and to be very clear: The LF and with that the AAIF is a corporate organization whose sole purpose is that everyone (read: every corporation) benefits from Linux.
Sounds reasonable. I'd you, like me, need to protect yourself from sabotaging your own system you could even make NAS documents read only to force a manual step in before editing there.
For me the amount of items that should be there are zero following my own concept ... But for some (especially shared sheets specifically) I'm too lazy.
Paperless specifically: yes, shoving everything in it.
But I have honestly no idea what kind of data you have that are suitable for paperless AND have different versions.
I just checked mine, for me it's... Zero. Not a single item, by definition, is in Paperless that can receive an update.
If it's updatable personally I have everything version controlled - and I mean EVERYTHING, from CV over tutorials to construction ideas - hosted locally on forgejo.
Hey, Welcome! You're having a wonderful and sometimes exhausting journey in front of you :)
I'll just brain dump based on your questions and my associations. Hope something useful is in between!
First the basic setup options because they tie into how to handle your date flow:
basic
Most popular I think is docker compose: here I suggest splitting it into one compose file per service though with one file holding your port config. This prevents you yourself getting confused by your port mappings :)
Second in line is a proxmox setup - similar vein and I lack the hands-on experience to talk about the difference.
Then there's the "everything native" approach where you don't rely on containers but manage it yourself or via a dedicated OS that makes life easier (after the learning curve) like nixos.
DATA
All this foundational stuff is important because it changes your approach. In general: don't fear data duplication. Duplicate it until you learn where you want your data to life and only then define your flow.
Specific example: after I got used to paperless I don't look into my opencloud anymore, at all. I still duplicate them there but as distributed backup, not for consumption.
If a dataset has a clear place ten it's easy. If not then your options are different depending on your setup:
For the *arr stack the official recommendation is to use one shared folder and mount that into each part for example. I personally don't like that and have hard links for everything - that's basically a pointer to the file that looks like the file itself everywhere.
As long as one pointer exists the file still stays on your drive but when the last pointer is gone, the file is effectively deleted. On Linux, you can think of every file this way but by default only one pointer exists (which often people test as synonymous to "the file".
Drawdown: this only works really well if you manually keep either track of which tool links where or you don't containerize everything.
Again a specific example:
My downloaded torrents never get moved - instead hard links are created into whichever path and naming scheme I defined for each consumer - this way, out of murdrrbot_07.mp3 a new author/series/booktitle.mp3 was created, both pointing to the same data and seeing it as a proper file.
But then there is one more thing: I suggest you split your thinking into data consumption and manipulation - because for the first, data duplication doesn't matter. Especially for documents you're talking about a ridiculous small amount of disk space and if it's only reading/watching/hearing you as manager have no problem that data might exist multiple times.
If you want to keep it clean by design then you're leaving the starter mode self holster - welcome to system design and infrastructure architecture!
Here your approach could be to define lifecycles for each data type that you have. What a "data type" is in this context btw is a user term, NOT the underlying tech stack. You need to understand and document how an invoice should be treated and consumed by you differently than an invitation or a informal letter.
Only then do you map file types, incoming channels, transformation steps, etc etc.
In my opinion: huge overkill to this upfront.
In short: spin everything up, observe how you use it and only then decide where things need to stay unique and cleaned up. Don't break your head over something that's actually quite easy to repair!
Not really but you're thinking in the right direction!
There is no correct answer because the question and the answers exclude themselves:
For four different options it is 25% but here two options are the same - so you have a 50% chance to land on a 25% - but this means that the correct answer is only in one of the four answers, therefore you're having a 25% chance.
It's a nice demonstration of what happens when the answer and question are intervined and any result changes an aspect of the answer - you're fucked, basically.
If that's the base level you're actually making a case FOR handing the education system to AI.
I managed to trigger some bad halluzinations but I couldn't pull it off (in a few min to be fair) to even trick my local stupid model into "chickens are mammals" (went this route because reframing is easier for tiny models than negation)
I'm curious: what do you mean?
Starlink is internationally blacklisted for use in Russia and a citizen of an attacked nation helped circumvent this ban.
Ukraine caught their citizen and prosecuted under local law.
How can a nation "be in the right" or not in such a case, even leaving the international situation aside?
Check if you can get the 2273 series for permanent connections.same principles but push in and therefore way more compact.
Plus at least here getting the sizes individually will save you plenty money over a projects lifetime (i.e. greb a 100 piece box of the five connectors and several more of the two and three and you'll be good to go!)
There is no dialogue for "do I tolerate another human being".
This is not about sports competition where you could at least manufacture some kind of perhaps argument - this is about telling other people how they should identify and feel.
It's one of the easiest examples for the axiom of tolerance that you're pushing. And my answer is: No. I don't need dialogue - these people need to be made ashamed and socially outcast just like other fascists . I will not develop tolerance for intolerance.
These ads are not targeted at Rowling. They are targeted at the mass of people, the ones who already feel that it seems wrong to escalate a topic that is so personal and rare in such a way but have a dissonance (see what I'm doing here?) between what "conservative" media and their own perception tells them.
What kind of "reasonable debate" would look like? Ask people to be a little bit less themselves? Bring back perhaps a little bit of chemical castration?
As so often in life: there is no line! If you are immersed in the game then it is, really that simple!
"Immersion" itself doesn't have an absolute clear definition, people sometimes mean "feel like a part of it" and sometimes "getting lost in". Both is fine :)
For games specifically it's along the lines of "what does a majority feel"? To give a specific example: Legend of Zelda is often described as an immersive game - and I never saw why, just accepting that for many people it seems to be.
Counter question: where does it say on there that it's PD3.0?
From the power source it looks like PD2.
Perhaps it follows since stuff from the PD3 specs and that's why that tester said it, but this is guesswork.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding you but the gist of your text is "why is this item not saying what a random guy said it should say??"
I've checked another Dell power plug, they don't claim anything on the box concerning standards they follow from what I can tell. Third party ones often do though.
My Lenovo doesn't say anything about that either interestingly, thanks for the rabbit hole! :D
Edit: remember that companies need to pay fees when they advertise with the standard - they can just follow its spec without advertising it at all, I can see that happening for laptop producers specially as they don't sell their power units as generic products (i.e. with a focus to market them).
"not enough space in the used server for a standard power unit"
I wanted to put a dedicated graphics card in there for interference experiments - but the server is, well, a server - and those high availability PUs are expensive and a hell to cable manage
But a Dremel I had at hand ... And a second PU as well. Now my server has a second power unit which is only powering the graphics card and is short circuited to be always-on.
self-made problems require self-made solutions.
"there can't be an age based guidance"
And a few lines later "it's confusing that there is no age based guidance".
This article is... A bit too high level for me. "When the child is ready" well yeah, thank you neuroscientist. That's educational guidance since the 90s (perhaps not in Canada) but nothing that can be framed as state law obviously.
In short: yes. You can tune these values when self hosting - it basically changes the b chance which tokens will be used under which circumstances.
I'm with you, I'm torn apart quite strong: I really enjoy what I can do for myself with LLMs and I often see individual actions of the Linux foundation positive - but the whole thing is... You've or it perfectly: 'concerning' fits perfectly.
Your treat is correct by the way, the kernel is officially a foundation project - it's pure historical observation that the kernel ran ahead of the foundation. I.e. I very well might have missed changes!
The AAIF is actively developing a harness for example as well, goose - which I really liked but ... Ah damn I'm not sure what to think, not even what to write.
Thanks for the dialogue and links! I think, now rereading your original post and my replay, that I've projected a lot into your post that isn't there - highly appreciate your reply!
Sorry but you're finding patterns in the wind.
The Linux kernel dev and the LF (famously l, in the past) are independent of each other - with the LF being the slower one.
So if you want to forcefully find a connection then it's "Linus stand made the LF take on AI". But even then it's ... Well just another conspiracy: two (of ... "All") institutions talk about the biggest tech hype since .com.
Oh and to be very clear: The LF and with that the AAIF is a corporate organization whose sole purpose is that everyone (read: every corporation) benefits from Linux.
It is absolutely refreshing to have a press trailer open with: "Scaling post-training is all we did for GLM-5.3."
Sure it continues with how cool it is but answering the core question with a negative on the first sentence is very welcome to me.
The issue is the whole UX behind it. I have yet to see someone review the 30th prompt of "grep" - there is no same default or middle ground.
For example whitelist read actions or harness side limitations to the project folder.
This is just lazy - again. "Users don't use or very bad security feature so they just want us to disable it".
Sounds reasonable. I'd you, like me, need to protect yourself from sabotaging your own system you could even make NAS documents read only to force a manual step in before editing there.
For me the amount of items that should be there are zero following my own concept ... But for some (especially shared sheets specifically) I'm too lazy.
Perhaps I should listen to my own advice here zzz
Paperless specifically: yes, shoving everything in it.
But I have honestly no idea what kind of data you have that are suitable for paperless AND have different versions.
I just checked mine, for me it's... Zero. Not a single item, by definition, is in Paperless that can receive an update.
If it's updatable personally I have everything version controlled - and I mean EVERYTHING, from CV over tutorials to construction ideas - hosted locally on forgejo.
Hey, Welcome! You're having a wonderful and sometimes exhausting journey in front of you :)
I'll just brain dump based on your questions and my associations. Hope something useful is in between!
First the basic setup options because they tie into how to handle your date flow:
basic Most popular I think is docker compose: here I suggest splitting it into one compose file per service though with one file holding your port config. This prevents you yourself getting confused by your port mappings :)
Second in line is a proxmox setup - similar vein and I lack the hands-on experience to talk about the difference.
Then there's the "everything native" approach where you don't rely on containers but manage it yourself or via a dedicated OS that makes life easier (after the learning curve) like nixos.
DATA
All this foundational stuff is important because it changes your approach. In general: don't fear data duplication. Duplicate it until you learn where you want your data to life and only then define your flow.
Specific example: after I got used to paperless I don't look into my opencloud anymore, at all. I still duplicate them there but as distributed backup, not for consumption.
If a dataset has a clear place ten it's easy. If not then your options are different depending on your setup: For the *arr stack the official recommendation is to use one shared folder and mount that into each part for example. I personally don't like that and have hard links for everything - that's basically a pointer to the file that looks like the file itself everywhere. As long as one pointer exists the file still stays on your drive but when the last pointer is gone, the file is effectively deleted. On Linux, you can think of every file this way but by default only one pointer exists (which often people test as synonymous to "the file". Drawdown: this only works really well if you manually keep either track of which tool links where or you don't containerize everything.
Again a specific example: My downloaded torrents never get moved - instead hard links are created into whichever path and naming scheme I defined for each consumer - this way, out of murdrrbot_07.mp3 a new author/series/booktitle.mp3 was created, both pointing to the same data and seeing it as a proper file.
But then there is one more thing: I suggest you split your thinking into data consumption and manipulation - because for the first, data duplication doesn't matter. Especially for documents you're talking about a ridiculous small amount of disk space and if it's only reading/watching/hearing you as manager have no problem that data might exist multiple times.
If you want to keep it clean by design then you're leaving the starter mode self holster - welcome to system design and infrastructure architecture! Here your approach could be to define lifecycles for each data type that you have. What a "data type" is in this context btw is a user term, NOT the underlying tech stack. You need to understand and document how an invoice should be treated and consumed by you differently than an invitation or a informal letter. Only then do you map file types, incoming channels, transformation steps, etc etc.
In my opinion: huge overkill to this upfront.
In short: spin everything up, observe how you use it and only then decide where things need to stay unique and cleaned up. Don't break your head over something that's actually quite easy to repair!
Not really but you're thinking in the right direction!
There is no correct answer because the question and the answers exclude themselves:
For four different options it is 25% but here two options are the same - so you have a 50% chance to land on a 25% - but this means that the correct answer is only in one of the four answers, therefore you're having a 25% chance.
It's a nice demonstration of what happens when the answer and question are intervined and any result changes an aspect of the answer - you're fucked, basically.
I think I'm one of the most "vibe coded stuff can be okay" people on here.
But the codebase looks to be fully LLM written without implementation guardrails.
Something claiming to be fully private and offline with this mentioned just at the very end as a half sentence in the credits I see very critical.
And it of course has full internet permissions because of the model download. Which makes sense but removes the only hard protection android offers.
Just flying over the repo and code just gave me ... Bad vibes.
Oh. That.
Interestingly a position not shared but Russians nor Ukraines I've talked to. Like, people? Not news outlets.
But now I get it, you're maliciously evil, not just having different point of views.
If that's the base level you're actually making a case FOR handing the education system to AI.
I managed to trigger some bad halluzinations but I couldn't pull it off (in a few min to be fair) to even trick my local stupid model into "chickens are mammals" (went this route because reframing is easier for tiny models than negation)
I'm curious: what do you mean? Starlink is internationally blacklisted for use in Russia and a citizen of an attacked nation helped circumvent this ban.
Ukraine caught their citizen and prosecuted under local law.
How can a nation "be in the right" or not in such a case, even leaving the international situation aside?
True!
Hey friend,
Check if you can get the 2273 series for permanent connections.same principles but push in and therefore way more compact.
Plus at least here getting the sizes individually will save you plenty money over a projects lifetime (i.e. greb a 100 piece box of the five connectors and several more of the two and three and you'll be good to go!)
Have fun! :)
There is no dialogue for "do I tolerate another human being".
This is not about sports competition where you could at least manufacture some kind of perhaps argument - this is about telling other people how they should identify and feel.
It's one of the easiest examples for the axiom of tolerance that you're pushing. And my answer is: No. I don't need dialogue - these people need to be made ashamed and socially outcast just like other fascists . I will not develop tolerance for intolerance.
These ads are not targeted at Rowling. They are targeted at the mass of people, the ones who already feel that it seems wrong to escalate a topic that is so personal and rare in such a way but have a dissonance (see what I'm doing here?) between what "conservative" media and their own perception tells them.
What kind of "reasonable debate" would look like? Ask people to be a little bit less themselves? Bring back perhaps a little bit of chemical castration?