I fight my demons head on thank you very much. Seems quiet selfish to release them to torture the world. I am resistant to heat and freeze damage, I can take it.
Subnetting is so much simpler. Sure, it does seem more complex at first because we've been using IPv4 all our lives so that's our baseline for "what makes sense" but it's actually so much more elegant of a solution than IPv4 and I would suspect that once IPv6 firmly passes over 50% adoption (now stands at ~47%) it will be reasonable to start pushing to teach IPv6 first and IPv4 viewed as supplemented but deprecated.
Actually, that 47% was just overall, but if you look at it, many major countries are well past 50% adoption, including Vietnam, Malaysia, Japan, Russia, India, Saudi Arabia, Greece, UK, Estonia, Germany, France, Norway, Brazil, Uruguay, Mexico, Guatemala, and the USA (and Puerto Rico specifically).
I think it's beginning to be arguable that in many major countries IPv6 should be taught primary and IPv4 supplementary.
The only thing I would add, and it may not be helpful since you seem to focus on technical rather than metaphorical, but the best description I ever heard of UDP that UDP is like a garden hose. It's either on or off, and it doesn't matter if the stream ends up where it's supposed to be, its streaming anyway.
Nice, this has grown and become a lot more detailed since I last saw it, and fixed the most glaring omission at the time, which was no mention of IPv6 at all. Now there is a good quick breakdown of why it exists while moving back to why IPv4 is the better place to start.
Those indeed can be fun but be aware they're almost assuredly doing facial recognition on their users, and the whole system works by always retrieving the files themselves from a remote server, I'm fairly sure they don't even cache on your phone (I could be wrong there, though). It's really up to you if you think it's all fun enough and worth having fun socializing with your friends with the risk of lack of privacy in that respect. Maybe you can keep it to a minimum of anything important being talked about? Unless you have a major reason to worry about being targeted, most people can probably safely dip in just for a handful of throwaway conversations with friends.
I learned a decent bit about how biometric authentication works (or at least this specific implementation) by installing, setting up, and tweaking settings for Biopass. I also learned about how when you do first login using this method, it can fail to unlock keyrings because the password authentication has been bypassed so no password has been provided to unlock the keyring. It includes anti-spoofing local AI models, and the dev plans to have the option for the user to download and use any model for anti-spoofing/recognition. Interesting stuff.
and providing you take into account that it cannot plan ahead for contingencies or consider negative possible outcomes. they have no sense of the past or the future, existing entirely within the moment of a prompt.
It's path down the hill was algorithmically determined but it's actually a black box so I can't tell you why it followed the path it did at all actually.
Not the field you're talking about, but I worked in television news broadcasting for a while, and yes, the goal was absolutely to get a job at a bigger station with more news and thus more work and faster pace.
Our production manager used to try to train us for the bigger markets as well, he described it as making sure the team could "think on their feet" and deal with unexpected scenarios calmly and quickly.
So at least in that industry, yes, the goal is to end up in a more high stress workplace.
Believe it or not, some people actually really thrive in high-stress environments and do terribly in low-stress environments because it's simply not exciting enough to keep them engaged with the work.
The historic one is probably the resolution of the murder of Laura Palmer, which took the wind out of the sails of the series and according to Lynch had never been meant to be resolved until the very end of the series.
This brings the same energy as "somehow Palpatine returned." Come on, we all know how.
Is this what it feels like to chew 5 gum?
I fight my demons head on thank you very much. Seems quiet selfish to release them to torture the world. I am resistant to heat and freeze damage, I can take it.
Subnetting is so much simpler. Sure, it does seem more complex at first because we've been using IPv4 all our lives so that's our baseline for "what makes sense" but it's actually so much more elegant of a solution than IPv4 and I would suspect that once IPv6 firmly passes over 50% adoption (now stands at ~47%) it will be reasonable to start pushing to teach IPv6 first and IPv4 viewed as supplemented but deprecated.
Actually, that 47% was just overall, but if you look at it, many major countries are well past 50% adoption, including Vietnam, Malaysia, Japan, Russia, India, Saudi Arabia, Greece, UK, Estonia, Germany, France, Norway, Brazil, Uruguay, Mexico, Guatemala, and the USA (and Puerto Rico specifically).
I think it's beginning to be arguable that in many major countries IPv6 should be taught primary and IPv4 supplementary.
The only thing I would add, and it may not be helpful since you seem to focus on technical rather than metaphorical, but the best description I ever heard of UDP that UDP is like a garden hose. It's either on or off, and it doesn't matter if the stream ends up where it's supposed to be, its streaming anyway.
Nice, this has grown and become a lot more detailed since I last saw it, and fixed the most glaring omission at the time, which was no mention of IPv6 at all. Now there is a good quick breakdown of why it exists while moving back to why IPv4 is the better place to start.
Those indeed can be fun but be aware they're almost assuredly doing facial recognition on their users, and the whole system works by always retrieving the files themselves from a remote server, I'm fairly sure they don't even cache on your phone (I could be wrong there, though). It's really up to you if you think it's all fun enough and worth having fun socializing with your friends with the risk of lack of privacy in that respect. Maybe you can keep it to a minimum of anything important being talked about? Unless you have a major reason to worry about being targeted, most people can probably safely dip in just for a handful of throwaway conversations with friends.
Sorry other folk don't read modern slang.
I learned a decent bit about how biometric authentication works (or at least this specific implementation) by installing, setting up, and tweaking settings for Biopass. I also learned about how when you do first login using this method, it can fail to unlock keyrings because the password authentication has been bypassed so no password has been provided to unlock the keyring. It includes anti-spoofing local AI models, and the dev plans to have the option for the user to download and use any model for anti-spoofing/recognition. Interesting stuff.
https://github.com/TickLabVN/biopass
I didn't even have to pull this dusty old meme out for you to tell me.
the ifunny.co watermark sells it
Any-cock'll-doo!
That's an... interesting... way to define a person...
Also:
Ol' Ironsides
...find this and more at Cock Ring Warehouse.
If it does it's honestly excellent design, even if questionable as a fashion accessory.
and providing you take into account that it cannot plan ahead for contingencies or consider negative possible outcomes. they have no sense of the past or the future, existing entirely within the moment of a prompt.
It's path down the hill was algorithmically determined but it's actually a black box so I can't tell you why it followed the path it did at all actually.
You're familiar with cats... Can you tell me how to get Cat Party as a ringtone?
Not the field you're talking about, but I worked in television news broadcasting for a while, and yes, the goal was absolutely to get a job at a bigger station with more news and thus more work and faster pace.
Our production manager used to try to train us for the bigger markets as well, he described it as making sure the team could "think on their feet" and deal with unexpected scenarios calmly and quickly.
So at least in that industry, yes, the goal is to end up in a more high stress workplace.
Believe it or not, some people actually really thrive in high-stress environments and do terribly in low-stress environments because it's simply not exciting enough to keep them engaged with the work.
The historic one is probably the resolution of the murder of Laura Palmer, which took the wind out of the sails of the series and according to Lynch had never been meant to be resolved until the very end of the series.
It effectively killed Twin Peaks at the time.