Oui à part que c'est devenu l'un des outils favoris de l'extrême droite. Tu fais des "erreurs" un peu partout, et si on te critique tu joues la victime en disant que tu savais pas, et tu recommences.
But licensing is trying to remove the water without doing anything about the hole. Or, best case situation, saying "we will fix the hole when the water is unmanageable, but for now we'll just try to empty it faster than it fills".
If you ban LLMs, the problem will disappear. It's not like you can really hide a datacenter so easily, or the size of the data required. Anything less than that will do nothing
L'histoire n'a jamais été quelque chose que la droite connait ou apprécie.
Le concept n'est rien de plus que de chercher des leviers qui fonctionnent, et rien d'autre n'a d'importance. Mais c'est pas comme si en France, avec notre propagande Louis XIV - Napoléon - De Gaulle on avait jamais cherché à connaitre ni comprendre l'histoire.
"Les chaines TV tentent d'attirer les investissement en misant sur la mode débile du moment, tout en en profitant pour réduire leurs efforts (et le nombre d'employés ou leurs salaires, probablement) sans se soucier de la qualité de leur contenu"
If the shelters have more money, they'll have more capacity as well.
On top of that, nothing prevents people from adopting multiple pets or of taking care of them properly.
People manage to pop kids endlessly and find ways to take care of them all day even if they have to go to work, they definitely can manage with pets too. They just don't give a shit.
Yeah ok, I don't want to know your stances on other various social subjects, if for you caring about another sentient being is "rigid and off-putting".
That's not what puts off people from adopting. What puts them off is that they want the perfect, convenient, good-looking, cheapest option.
It's like saying that people don't adopt kids because they don't feel perfect enough; no, they don't do it because there's an easier, cheaper alternative, where they don't have to prove that they are good enough to take care of a kid beforehand. And that's why they just keep on popping kids in an overpopulated world.
You don't have to be perfect, but not making a social animal spend most of the day alone is a basic requirement.
On top of that, if you have the money to adopt and take care of a cat, but not the possibility of taking care of them properly, nothing prevents you from using this money to support a shelter or equivalent, which will in the end also take in stray cats.
But people don't want that because they care about themselves first, and want to get something from it first. They want a pet, and then they'll think about their wellbeing later, if it's not too inconvenient. And that's the mentality that leads to stray cats, dogs, and whatnot.
People don't have pets to help innocent creatures. They have pets to have a nice company that depends on them and will make them feel good after a long day of work, and they don't really care about anything else. As long as you don't change that, that's how you get people that get annoyed with their dogs and drop them on the side of the road, because they just don't get as much benefit from it as before.
Tldr: as long as you treat animals carelessly, people will be careless about them.
Yeah, we've all been naive once.
Not sure why the crying emoji though.
Oui à part que c'est devenu l'un des outils favoris de l'extrême droite. Tu fais des "erreurs" un peu partout, et si on te critique tu joues la victime en disant que tu savais pas, et tu recommences.
Plus c'est gros plus ça passe.
Yeah, I forgot how easy it is to hide datacenters and massive data collection. Really, really hard to enforce, huh.
Ah yes, the reality that consists in giving up on all proper solutions out of being "down to earth", effectively solving nothing.
But licensing is trying to remove the water without doing anything about the hole. Or, best case situation, saying "we will fix the hole when the water is unmanageable, but for now we'll just try to empty it faster than it fills".
If you ban LLMs, the problem will disappear. It's not like you can really hide a datacenter so easily, or the size of the data required. Anything less than that will do nothing
No, like banning LLMs.
L'histoire n'a jamais été quelque chose que la droite connait ou apprécie.
Le concept n'est rien de plus que de chercher des leviers qui fonctionnent, et rien d'autre n'a d'importance. Mais c'est pas comme si en France, avec notre propagande Louis XIV - Napoléon - De Gaulle on avait jamais cherché à connaitre ni comprendre l'histoire.
Exactly, and that's where the problem lies and where something needs to be done.
We don't need to find ways to license something that shouldn't exist.
Not as much as from Macron
"Les chaines TV tentent d'attirer les investissement en misant sur la mode débile du moment, tout en en profitant pour réduire leurs efforts (et le nombre d'employés ou leurs salaires, probablement) sans se soucier de la qualité de leur contenu"
I mean there are ways to do it humanely, but most people wouldn't be satisfied with a peaceful death anyway.
J'appellerais pas ça un "retour" du fascisme, étant donné qu'il était déjà bien installé avant la popularisation des genAI.
Poor nazi, he was only trying to do his job!
It would be funny if it wasn't the current reality.
The quality of your reply is already torture, don't worry
Edit: nevermind, your comment is mild compared to your comment history. Who doesn't love a good nazi, huh?
Ah yes, more fish torture, amazing.
If the shelters have more money, they'll have more capacity as well.
On top of that, nothing prevents people from adopting multiple pets or of taking care of them properly.
People manage to pop kids endlessly and find ways to take care of them all day even if they have to go to work, they definitely can manage with pets too. They just don't give a shit.
Yeah ok, I don't want to know your stances on other various social subjects, if for you caring about another sentient being is "rigid and off-putting".
Which means that they're not waiting for you all day, as they have company
That's not what puts off people from adopting. What puts them off is that they want the perfect, convenient, good-looking, cheapest option.
It's like saying that people don't adopt kids because they don't feel perfect enough; no, they don't do it because there's an easier, cheaper alternative, where they don't have to prove that they are good enough to take care of a kid beforehand. And that's why they just keep on popping kids in an overpopulated world.
You don't have to be perfect, but not making a social animal spend most of the day alone is a basic requirement.
On top of that, if you have the money to adopt and take care of a cat, but not the possibility of taking care of them properly, nothing prevents you from using this money to support a shelter or equivalent, which will in the end also take in stray cats.
But people don't want that because they care about themselves first, and want to get something from it first. They want a pet, and then they'll think about their wellbeing later, if it's not too inconvenient. And that's the mentality that leads to stray cats, dogs, and whatnot.
People don't have pets to help innocent creatures. They have pets to have a nice company that depends on them and will make them feel good after a long day of work, and they don't really care about anything else. As long as you don't change that, that's how you get people that get annoyed with their dogs and drop them on the side of the road, because they just don't get as much benefit from it as before.
Tldr: as long as you treat animals carelessly, people will be careless about them.