No not really. The problem with human cryogenic freezing is our size. You can freeze animals up to around the size of a hamster, as you can freeze and thaw them fast enough. Anything bigger than that, you run into issues.

Throw some oatmeal in a bowl with milk (or water) and leave it overnight. Then throw in some fruit and other things to make it tasty. It is actually quite good and very quick.

20% is rare?

Nah, one thing Dutch healthcare does not do is regular checkups and interventions. I guess that free GP visits could have helped though...

It's not actually that rare, about 1 in 5 red cats is female. Male turtle shell patterned cars are truely very rare and only occur in chromosomal disorders.

Adding it into the weights would be quite hard, as you would need many examples of text where someone is not sure about something. Humans do not often publish work that have a lot of that in it, so the training data does not have examples of it.

The UV nail polishes generally have some kind of acrylate. Every time you come into contact with uncured acrylates, there is a chance of developing an allergy to it, which means that the use of medical acrylates becomes much more dangerous if not impossible.

I don't think that the forcing of an answer is the source of the problem you're describing. The source actually lies in the problems that the AI is taught to solve and the data it is provided to solve the problem.

In the case of medical image analysis, the problems are always very narrowly defined (e.g. segmenting the liver from an MRI image of scanner xyz made with protecol abc) and the training data is of very high quality. If the model will be used in the clinic, you also need to prove how well it works.

For modern AI chatbots the problem is: add one word to the end of the sentence starting with a system prompt, the data provided is whatever they could get on the internet, and the quality controle is: if it sounds good it is good.

Comparing the two problems it is easy to see why AI chatbots are prone to hallucination.

The actual power of the LLMs on the market is not as glorified google, but as foundational models that are used as pretraining for actual problems people want to solve.

Also think about more local options and forums that have buy and sell theads. E.g. in the Netherlands we have the tweakers forum, which would be an ideal place for this.

My chemistry teacher once made salmiak as a demonstration. The only experiment we were ever allowed to taste and quite cool to look at too.

Probably an accident. It can't even physically swallow something of human size.

This is exactly why on most phones you can turn this feature off, which is also good to know.

If you are really really curious, you can find a phlebotomist that is game and use your own blood. This is the most ethical way to get some cooking blood and it can be done. (For proof see article)

https://www.vice.com/en/article/i-made-meringues-out-of-my-own-blood-and-ate-them/

You don't even need the movies to have some dystopian implant horror. Second sigh used to produce a sight restoring implant. After some financial trouble they stopped manufacturing and support for one of their products. Leaving recipients of the implant sightless in the case the hardware breaks.

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-60416058

He is not quite a dictator yet. Let's call him an aspiring dictator, to make it clear that action can still prevent it from getting that bad.

No way he didn't know what het was doing. He hesitates before he does it the first time, then when he get's a positive reaction he does it the second time. This was deliberate and from what I can see many people in the the US are underreacting to it big time.

Funny thing, we actually call the calling someone jij tutoyeren and calling someone u vousvoyeren. This comes from the French.

Python

::: spoiler

def read_input(path):
    with open(path) as f:
        lines = f.readlines()
        for i, line in enumerate(lines):
            ln = line.replace("\n","")
            lines[i] = ln
    return lines

def find_X(lines):
    Xes = []
    for j, line in enumerate(lines):
        ind = [i for i, ltr in enumerate(line) if ltr == "X"]
        for i in ind:
            Xes.append((j,i))
    return Xes

def find_M(lines, x, dim):
    # Check for Ms
    M_dirs = []
    for i in [-1, 0, 1]:
        x_ind = x[0] + i
        if x_ind>=0 and x_ind<dim:
            for j in [-1, 0, 1]:
                y_ind = x[1]+j
                if y_ind>=0 and y_ind<dim:
                    if lines[x_ind][y_ind] == "M":
                        M = [(x_ind, y_ind), (i,j)]
                        M_dirs.append(M)
    return M_dirs

def check_surroundings(loc, lines, check_char, direction):
    max = len(lines)-1
    check_lock = [loc[i]+direction[i] for i in range(len(loc))]
    if all(i>=0 and i<=max for i in check_lock) and check_char in str(lines[check_lock[0]][check_lock[1]]):
        return True
    else:
        return False

def part_one(lines):
    ans = 0 

    X = find_X(lines)
    dim = len(lines[0])
    for x in X:
        M = find_M(lines, x, dim)
        for m in M:
            loc = m[0]
            dir = m[1]
            
            if not check_surroundings(loc, lines, 'A', dir):
                continue
            
            loc = [loc[0]+dir[0], loc[1]+dir[1]]
            if not all(i>=0 and i<=dim-1 for i in loc):
                continue
            if not check_surroundings(loc, lines, 'S', dir):
                continue
            
            ans+=1
    return ans

def extract_square(lines, loc):
    str = ""
    for i in range(-1,2,1):
        for j in range(-1,2,1):
            x_ind = loc[0]+i
            y_ind = loc[1]+j
            if not all(p>=0 and p<=len(lines[0])-1 for p in [x_ind, y_ind]):
                raise ValueError("The given lock is at the edge of the grid and therefore will not produce a square")
            str += lines[x_ind][y_ind]
    return str

def check_square(square):
    if not square[4]=="A":
        return False
    elif not ((square[0]=="M" and square[8]=="S") or (square[0]=="S" and square[8]=="M")):
        return False
    elif not ((square[2]=="M" and square[6]=="S") or (square[2]=="S" and square[6]=="M")):
        return False
    else: return True

def part_two(lines):
    ans = 0
    dim = len(lines[0])
    for i in range(1,dim-1):
        for j in range(1,dim-1):
            square = extract_square(lines, (i,j))
            if check_square(square):
                ans += 1
    return ans

path = r'Day_4\input.txt'
lines = read_input(path)
print("Answer part 1: ", part_one(lines))
print("Answer part 2: ", part_two(lines))

:::

It's not weaponized politeness. It's a love for efficient communication; everyone speaks English, so why not use it.

Just like house cats