This currently isn't and in the long run is extremely unlikely to be a viable Wikipedia alternative, for a myriad of reasons. Perhaps it could be an alternative to Fandom/Wikia, IMO it may be more worthwhile to lean into that option instead.
What they're going to demand is preventing arbitrary layoffs, less bullying in the workspace, etc. Supposedly the Foundation is very toxic workplace. It's not (just) about the money.
Don't abandon Wikipedia over this, if it's useful it's useful (though it shouldn't be overrated). Do reconsider donating to Wikimedia Foundation, since the money apparently can be spent even on union-busting.
“We have heard a range of views from staff, including concerns from those who have felt pressured to support union efforts and those who are confused by the unionization process,” the foundation added in a frequently asked questions section. “We have also seen a misunderstanding around what the union can do for global staff and Wikimedia movement communities.”
LMAO, fuck off with this bullshit. I noticed WMF spokepersons love this vocabulary, everyone except for them is "confused", if you disagree with WMF's actions it's just a "misunderstanding".
Allegedly they fire and bully the employees a lot. Recently they fired the entire team that was dealing with the "Community Wishlist", the most direct way WP editors had to make requests for technical improvements and tools to WMF.
I wondered as well. Apparently, it's a painting by some Russian artist who liked to paint cats and Pushkin for no clear reason: https://a-i-z.livejournal.com/112407.html
Russia is much bigger than Ukraine. You might succeed in wrestling someone to the ground in a one on one fight, much less likely (to say the least) if you're up against two or three people. Ukraine is far from a position where they can pick and choose the nicer methods to win the war.
The thing that pisses me off is the fact that they demonstratively did move away from Twitter, acknowledging its usage as problematic, but now have changed their mind and provided a dumb non-explanation. Either way they've taken a dump on their own decision-making.
This currently isn't and in the long run is extremely unlikely to be a viable Wikipedia alternative, for a myriad of reasons. Perhaps it could be an alternative to Fandom/Wikia, IMO it may be more worthwhile to lean into that option instead.
WMF has 650 employees.
What they're going to demand is preventing arbitrary layoffs, less bullying in the workspace, etc. Supposedly the Foundation is very toxic workplace. It's not (just) about the money.
Don't abandon Wikipedia over this, if it's useful it's useful (though it shouldn't be overrated). Do reconsider donating to Wikimedia Foundation, since the money apparently can be spent even on union-busting.
Relevant to mention: I've just posted a thread about users reporting that apparently WMF has hired a union-busting firm.
https://lemmy.world/post/50205578
(I also posted it to this community but it got deleted by the autobot.)
Edit: I just realised the OP link/article talks about this as well, ah 🤦♂️
Also may be worth mentioning the later part of the article, talking about Abstract Wikipedia, a beta project regarding whose future a request for comments has been called. Many editors believe it is unviable and a waste of money and time: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia
Bóbr kurwa... uh, actually bobr kurva, I guess?
Mind providing the parts that you think are more relevant?
I'm not a lawyer, but producing and distributing malware sounds like it might be illegal. Or should, at least.
LMAO, fuck off with this bullshit. I noticed WMF spokepersons love this vocabulary, everyone except for them is "confused", if you disagree with WMF's actions it's just a "misunderstanding".
Allegedly they fire and bully the employees a lot. Recently they fired the entire team that was dealing with the "Community Wishlist", the most direct way WP editors had to make requests for technical improvements and tools to WMF.
They are still counted on the downvoter's instance.
Btw what are the realistic chances the guy suffers some actual consequences for the bullshit he has done?
Probably not. The image does not really say what languages the points represent.
Bro is also the artist, ackshually ☝️🤓
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulay
Their pieces were collaborative.
Your point is that you're vaguely concerned about something but won't provide realistic alternatives.
I wondered as well. Apparently, it's a painting by some Russian artist who liked to paint cats and Pushkin for no clear reason: https://a-i-z.livejournal.com/112407.html
Russia is much bigger than Ukraine. You might succeed in wrestling someone to the ground in a one on one fight, much less likely (to say the least) if you're up against two or three people. Ukraine is far from a position where they can pick and choose the nicer methods to win the war.
That's news to me, thank you.
The thing that pisses me off is the fact that they demonstratively did move away from Twitter, acknowledging its usage as problematic, but now have changed their mind and provided a dumb non-explanation. Either way they've taken a dump on their own decision-making.
That's a search engine (like Google Search and DuckDuckGo), not a browser (like Google Chrome and Firefox).
Ah, the heaviest artillery of art criticism: food comparisons.