A VeraCrypt volume resides on a device/filesystem that utilizes a wear-leveling mechanism (e.g. a flash-memory SSD or USB flash drive). A copy of (a fragment of) the VeraCrypt volume may remain on the device. Therefore, do not store hidden volumes on such devices/filesystems.
I understand that page is a bit dense, so I'm quoting the relevant text from the above source.
Removing its no logging policy after being compelled by court order to log and disclose a user’s IP and browser fingerprint.
Personally, I gave up on Proton after they amended their TOS to include a mandatory arbitration clause, including a ban on class action lawsuits. IMO only the dirtiest of corporations rely on mandatory arbitration clauses. Without the spectre of a class action lawsuit, if a VPN were to get caught breaking its promises to its users, the only real damage the company would likely suffer would be reputational. These are for-profit corporations. The only way we can hold them accountable is to put their profits at risk.
I really like this idea. The world would be so much better if we shared resources. Unfortunately I've found that most of the few things that I need to print are pretty sensitive. For me that means publicly accessible print shops aren't really an option. YMMV.
I've never liked the idea that I have to trust my VPN, and this news raises a pretty significant trust issue. Makes me think I've been approaching this from the wrong angle.
It’s one of those things I’d love to see done as an experiment
I believe you've got a fantastic idea here, not only to see how this one idea pans out, but to learn how we might build a better society. There's little reason we couldn't simultaneously have multiple test centres, each using a different system. Scientific method 101.
China famously began its modern transformation in the 80s by creating Special Economic Zones. These were cities where many of the economic rules for the rest of the country wouldn't apply, and where new theories could be tested. There's no need to agree with the goals China was pursuing, and for-better-or-for-worse have subsequently achieved, to acknowledge the method is brutally effective.
There's a name for this phenomenon: the Software Imprinting Dilemma.
I was pro for a long time until I read Nassim Taleb on the tail risk associated with nuclear power.
Look at Fukushima.
Look at nuclear power plants becoming targets in war.
Look at how the capitalists who will be running these things treat risk generally.
There are better options available.
I understand that page is a bit dense, so I'm quoting the relevant text from the above source.
EFF leading by example in their post yesterday Who (or What) Generates Images for EFF?
PSA: Veracrypt recommends against using hidden volumes on USB flash drives (source)
Shock Doctrine 101
Any chance you got a site where freelancers who work with FLOSS can take individual jobs?
You would think so, but it's not.
From the Fedora wiki:
Public statements of support from its CEO for a regime actively weaponizing technology to build a mass-surveillance state.
Removing its no logging policy after being compelled by court order to log and disclose a user’s IP and browser fingerprint.
Personally, I gave up on Proton after they amended their TOS to include a mandatory arbitration clause, including a ban on class action lawsuits. IMO only the dirtiest of corporations rely on mandatory arbitration clauses. Without the spectre of a class action lawsuit, if a VPN were to get caught breaking its promises to its users, the only real damage the company would likely suffer would be reputational. These are for-profit corporations. The only way we can hold them accountable is to put their profits at risk.
edit: looks like @oce beat me to it
I really like this idea. The world would be so much better if we shared resources. Unfortunately I've found that most of the few things that I need to print are pretty sensitive. For me that means publicly accessible print shops aren't really an option. YMMV.
ffs - first Proton, now this.
I've never liked the idea that I have to trust my VPN, and this news raises a pretty significant trust issue. Makes me think I've been approaching this from the wrong angle.
Anyone have experience with the TOR daemon?
Zitron?
He talked about the book in his interview on Democracy Now! this morning too.
source: http://www.nber.org/papers/w34836
I believe you've got a fantastic idea here, not only to see how this one idea pans out, but to learn how we might build a better society. There's little reason we couldn't simultaneously have multiple test centres, each using a different system. Scientific method 101.
China famously began its modern transformation in the 80s by creating Special Economic Zones. These were cities where many of the economic rules for the rest of the country wouldn't apply, and where new theories could be tested. There's no need to agree with the goals China was pursuing, and for-better-or-for-worse have subsequently achieved, to acknowledge the method is brutally effective.
This post is fantastic for 2 reasons:
It's so important to raise awareness of how these 'conveniences' like the Ring Doorbell are being turned into the chains that will bind society
This post includes an in-image cite with both text url and a QR! This should be standard on any image post like this.
Well played.
Nailed it.
A solid grasp of the underlying principle is really useful in understanding most government action.
My 2￠:
David Allen's GTD for the overarching structure and routine.
Rainer König's Getting Yourself Organized with Org-mode for application within Org-mode.
YMMV