"'I don’t like that he made this donation' — Mullvad CEO reacts to co-founder’s donation to controversial Swedish populist party"

https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/i-dont-like-that-he-made-this-donation-mullvad-ceo-reacts-to-co-founders-donation-to-controversial-swedish-populist-party

808 points · 254 comments · view on lemmy.world

254 Comments

FauxLiving@lemmy.world · 398 pts · 38d (16 replies)

Saying he 'made a donation' is downplaying his role. It makes it sound like he's just some guy doing what everyone else does to participate in politics...

The 2025 donation accounted for 72% of the party's total income last year. ... According to data collected by DonationWatch, 2025 was the most lucrative year in the party’s history, netting a total of 5.58 million SEK. For comparison, the party received just 202,000 SEK in total donations throughout 2024.

Just the annual interest on his donation is more that all of their other donations for the entire year combined.

He didn't just make a donation, he is practically their sole source of financing.

jjlinux@lemmy.zip · 84 pts · 38d (14 replies)

Oh shit, that has got to be the poorest political party I've heard of 🤣

frunch@lemmy.world · 97 pts · 38d (1 reply)

Bankrupt morally and financially 🤷‍♂️

anomnom@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 37d

The emigration stuff makes the rest of their positions so confusing.

The leader was allegedly kicked out of the left party for liking anti fascists on Facebook, and they want free preschool, 30 hour work weeks, and a bunch of other social things.

But then the remigration bullshit. Dumb.

ptu@sopuli.xyz · 15 pts · 38d (1 reply)
Goldenface@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 37d

Their colors are literally red, black and white 😭

VibeSurgeon@piefed.social · 14 pts · 37d

It's basically just one really annoying dude stirring up shit in the municipal politics of Örebro.

Make no mistake, he's a massive piece of shit still

Redjard@reddthat.com · 2 pts · 37d

Did noone tell them they can just apply for funding in russia?

HereIAm@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 38d (7 replies)

I mean, yeah they are a shit party, but isn't smaller and local parties kinda what we want? I'd rather have a 20 small parties in parliament than 2 big ones with some on the side lines.

stickyprimer@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 37d (1 reply)

This is like saying sure he murdered the guy with his bare hands, but doesn’t society need more face to face human interaction?

HereIAm@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 37d

No, I just don't think the size of the party is the thing we should criticise/make fun of it for. They're clearly influential enough to snap up a big sponsor, and will now decide to actually try and run for parliament. UKIP was never large enough to get elected into parliament afaik, but they still managed to influence politics enough to cause brexit.

Cavemanfreak@programming.dev · 3 pts · 37d (4 replies)

These small parties are not up for a parliamentary position though. They are only active in their municipality. There are 8 parties in the Swedish parliament (though it looks like it's going to be 7 after the election in fall).

Dojan@pawb.social · 2 pts · 37d (2 replies)

I'm not following the polls at all. Who is falling out, the liberals?

Cavemanfreak@programming.dev · 1 pts · 37d (1 reply)

Hah, yeah. They are at ~2% or so (with 4% being the minimum needed to get seats)

Dojan@pawb.social · 2 pts · 37d

Damn. I can't recall when they didn't make the bar last.

I mean it is funny - the incest bit I mean - but it kind of epitomises why I don't really follow politics anymore. Our leaders aren't serious, and for the past few decades it's devolved into a spectacle. It stresses me the fuck out.

The past week I've lived with my windows wide open, so I need to take particular care that I don't just... tip out of them. Our idiot politics don't help in that regard.

kungen@feddit.nu · 1 pts · 37d

You're forgetting the 12% exception, but they'd probably need an even larger amount than that.

Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 18 pts · 38d

5,58 million SEK is around 600 thousand dollars. 202 thousand SEK is slightly more than 20 thousand dollars.

artyom@piefed.social · 266 pts · 38d (75 replies)

Mullvad co-CEO Fredrik Strömberg confirmed that neither Mullvad VPN AB, its parent company Amagicom AB, nor its sister company Tillitis AB played any role in supporting the political party.

It doesn't matter if the company itself was directly involved or not, the money came from the company, and from its' customers.

whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works · 149 pts · 38d (56 replies)

yeah it's like saying Elon is only a piece of shit on his free time so it's okay

edit: piss of shit

Hund@feddit.nu · 70 pts · 38d (55 replies)

I'm not taking side here, but to be fair, Elon Musk is a shitty person doing shitty things both professionally and private. Mullvad VPN is at least only doing good things!

With that said. I have stopped using Mullvad VPN for now. We'll see how this all plays out.

acosmichippo@lemmy.world · 45 pts · 38d (24 replies)

gonna get downvoted to hell here but making EVs and charging infrastructure is a good thing. also rooftop solar and batteries.

still, fuck nazi elon.

edit: this isn’t even about “credit” for developing the tech or whatever. even if we all agree this stuff was going to happen with or without elon, the Tesla business is still putting these products on the market. That is good, just like Mullvad and VPN. They didn’t invent VPN or anything, they are just one (good) provider.

Hund@feddit.nu · 45 pts · 38d (7 replies)

The only issue with Tesla is that the quality of their cars is mediocre at best, while you're paying premium, and that Tesla is the most childish and obstinate company to work with.

We have something called Råd & Rön's Blacklist, which is respected Swedish consumer magazine's list of products to avoid. Tesla is one of the brands that's listed there. Partly because of the poor quality of the cars and partly because they don't follow the rulings from the National Board for Consumer Complaints here in Sweden.

And they don't give a **** about insurance companies either. If something happens to your Tesla, you're on your own buying a new one yourself. You can forget about getting any sort of help from Tesla.

0x0@infosec.pub · -2 pts · 38d

I stopped reading what you wrote after your first sentence. There are so many other issues than that with Tesla, what dimension are you from?

CannonFodder@lemmy.world · -22 pts · 38d (5 replies)

The cars since 2020 have been decent quality. What you are paying for is an EV with good range and good power. Tesla definitely pushed the U.S. ev adoption ahead by a number of years.
I'm curious about how that board works - is it a judicial system that other car manufacturers follow? What kind of rulings have they made against Tesla? I found that Tesla follows their own warranty quite well, and after that I don't think any a car manufacturers will fix stuff for free.
And what support do you expect to get regarding insurance? You can buy a bew car like anyone, can't you?

Hund@feddit.nu · 15 pts · 38d (2 replies)

The cars since 2020 have been decent quality. What you are paying for is an EV with good range and good power. Tesla definitely pushed the U.S. ev adoption ahead by a number of years.

I guess everything is relative. Tesla is still a crappy car in terms of quality here, with tons of unresolved issues with faulty cars that Tesla refused to help their customers with.

I’m curious about how that board works - is it a judicial system that other car manufacturers follow?

Råd & Rönis is an independent, non-profit consumer magazine owned by the Swedish Consumer Agency. Their funding comes from subscriptions and government grants (no advertising and no corporate money). They test products, expose bad companies and protect consumers. Their "Black List" (Svarta Listan) is highly influential, and being on it can destroy sales completely.

Customers can file a complaint at The National Board for Consumer Disputes (ARN), a government-run arbitration(?) service. Their decisions are not legally binding, but companies that ignore them get publicly shamed (and often blacklisted by Råd & Rön). Tesla has ignored basically every single case. Any remotely serious company here in Sweden comply with ARN. We take ARN very seriously here.

What kind of rulings have they made against Tesla?

Our law is equal for everyone. We don't care if you're some local dude selling hotdogs or Elon Musk selling Teslas.

I found that Tesla follows their own warranty quite well [...]

That's the issue. Their warranty basically means that they ignore you and will fuck you over, even if the issue is their own fault. People have ended up with repair costs close to what a new car costs, and even if it's Teslas fault, they refuse to do shit.

[...] and after that I don’t think any a car manufacturers will fix stuff for free.

Of course they have to, if the issue is their own fault.

CannonFodder@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 38d

Sounds like a good system. But I guess it only works if people pay attention to the blacklist so it's a good threat since it's not enforceable. I haven't heard of Tesla not honoring drivetrain issues under warranty here in Canada. They wouldn't do a second windshield replacement on my wife's T3 because what they said was evidence of a rock chip, but that was kinda fair.

Anivia@feddit.org · 3 pts · 37d (1 reply)

The cars since 2020 have been decent quality

https://www.adac.de/news/tuev-report-2026/

German source, since murica doesn't have mandatory safety inspections. Literally no other car brand has a higher failure rate than Tesla, and the car with the highest failure rate was the Model Y, which released in 2022

CannonFodder@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 37d

Interesting. Seems that most the failures are the breaks because the pads get rusty with non-use because of the regenerative breaking. The Tesla manuals say to use the breaks fully every once in a while, but of course people don't read the manual. And it just make then grunchy - they work fine. The suspension issues are real and I think the problem is that they start to go but it's not obvious. Tesla will change them in warranty no problem but you have to notice the extra play and sounds, which is quite subtle. I wish we had annual safety inspections in Canada, they only do that for older cars.

Zagorath@quokk.au · 19 pts · 38d (7 replies)

Rooftop solar is definitely not something Musk can take any credit for.

EVs maybe, but charging infrastructure that he made proprietary rather than using the open standard is not especially worthy of praise.

Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 28 pts · 38d (4 replies)
[ removed ]
Zagorath@quokk.au · 4 pts · 38d (3 replies)

I mean yeah, obviously. But Musk is very obviously excellent at marketing, and there's an argument to be made that it was thanks to his marketing that Tesla became as popular as it did, and that that helped pull up the EV market more broadly.

Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 pts · 38d
[ removed ]
x00z@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 38d (1 reply)

Not even EVs. The work was getting done by researchers improving electric motors and batteries. As soon as the technology was viable Elon jumped on it and marketed himself as the person behind it all. Same goes for PayPal which he stole credit for, rockets that people already worked decades on, tunnels that are just bad metros, and machine learning (AI) that people were already doing since the 70's and only recently had breakthroughs because of the increased ability to feed it data en masse.

The only credit he should get is having the power and charisma to capitalize on the work of others. He's a Thomas Edison and not a Nikola Tesla.

orclev@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 38d

Calling him Thomas Edison is giving him far too much credit. Edison may have been a self aggrandizing asshole, but he also did have a few accomplishments to his name. Musk is a glorified venture capitalist, only instead of just taking a chunk of the profits he buys the whole company so he can steal credit for the company's achievements. Elon Musk has never created a single thing in his life. He has in fact been a net negative as every company he has ever been involved with would have been better off without Musk's "help".

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 12 pts · 38d

Elon Musk didn't do any of that though. Engineers did.

Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 38d

Those things were happening before him and continue DESPITE him. If you get downvoted it’s because you insinuated he had anything to do with that.

Squizzy@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 38d

He didnt make shit. He saw there was opportunity and ran with it, now that he has it sustainabikity is nowhere close to his goals.

The solar tiles suck The battery is a whitelabelled product The boring company was strategic interference to stop public infrastructure development.

godsammitdam@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 38d

I mean, to be fair, it was the engineers and founders who have done a lot of the work. They deserve the credit for making good products. Not Elon. He just profits off of them and the labor of the engineers.

Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 38d

Elon is just a propaganda machine (see his "in 4 or 5 years we'll have datacenters in space" bullshit, or all the other things that he promised but it didn't happen), a shame so many people fall for it.

nevyn@slrpnk.net · 5 pts · 38d
[ removed ]
Sumocat@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 38d

Yes, but I do not give Musk credit for recognizing a good thing and then taking it from Tesla’s founders.

username123@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 38d

Yeah but it's not exactly the south African doing those things, if anything they are doing them despite him.

nevyn@slrpnk.net · 4 pts · 38d
[ removed ]
garbage_world@lemmy.world · -9 pts · 38d (28 replies)
[ removed ]
Hund@feddit.nu · 5 pts · 38d (26 replies)

They are? How?

garbage_world@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 38d (25 replies)
[ removed ]
RobotToaster@mander.xyz · 15 pts · 38d (18 replies)

Monero is anonymous, so it makes sense.

garbage_world@lemmy.world · -10 pts · 38d
[ removed ]
kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com · 5 pts · 37d (4 replies)

because the buyer pays transaction fees and there is no risk of chargeback so their costs are inherently lower if you pay that way?

garbage_world@lemmy.world · -5 pts · 37d
[ removed ]
Hund@feddit.nu · 3 pts · 38d

Oh! You mean crypto currencies, not crypto. I was confused there for a bit. :D

kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com · 2 pts · 38d
[ removed ]
stickyprimer@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 37d (3 replies)

A commonly known US analog is the Chik-Fil-A restaurant chain. They are proudly Christian and got tons of flak for donating to “traditional family” organizations that spread gay hate and so on.

They stopped, but the owner still personally donates. So every dollar you spend there still fuels those hate groups. It just takes a slightly different path.

So the question isn’t “is the company bad,” it’s “what is your money funding?”

dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 37d (1 reply)

I still call it Bigot Chicken to this day. My family who enjoys it is annoyed by me harping on the company's general suckitude.

Too bad.

stickyprimer@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 36d

Yeah gee, shame on you for complicating their fast food gluttony with your ethical sensibility!

sudoer777@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 37d

Funny thing about Chic Fil A is that unlike McDonald's it's not a BDS target

stoy@lemmy.zip · -56 pts · 38d (13 replies)

So you believe that customers of a company should have a say how the staff uses their wages?

protist@retrofed.com · 99 pts · 38d

You have that backwards. Customers of a company get to decide whether or not they want to give that company their money for any reason they fucking please

I'd also argue that no one would care if this were some mid-level manager making a donation. This is the owner of a company, not "staff."

artyom@piefed.social · 39 pts · 38d

I believe consumers have an ethical obligation to exercise their right to discontinue business with a company when its owners do something unethical.

loke@fedia.io · 32 pts · 38d (7 replies)

Legally? No.

Morally? Yes. Customers give their say as to whether or not they want to give their money to some specific company every single time they engage in a business transaction. There is also nothing wrong with telling others to make the same consideration.

kevinsky@feddit.nl · -22 pts · 38d (6 replies)

Morally? Yes.

How do you figure? I'd argue the opposite and state morally it's quite litterally nobody's business what any private person spends their money on. Especially when you're talking about people outside the c-suite.

It's also the only thing that is remotely managable. Otherwise, where does that crap start and end?

We are talking about some nationalist populists now (and more than "a donation"), but what about a membership of a more moderate political party? Or say your customer base for any reason is in large part Vegan, should you tell your employee's to stop buying meat? Should they stop taking money from the non-vegan customers? How is anyone going to navigate this?

MightyPez@fedia.io · 18 pts · 38d (5 replies)

Are you contending unless otherwise specified, people should be mandated to continue spending money with companies?

I'm allowed to do business or not do business with any company for any reason I like. Cofounder funding a political party with one of their goals being to brutalize immigrants? No thanks. Contractor wearing a company shirt was rude to me on the elevator? I'll check the competition. Maybe I just don't like the color of their logo?

I'm allowed to define my morals and what I would consider violating those morals would be with monetary support and no half baked slippery slope argument is going to change that.

What exactly is the allowed reasons for doing or not doing business with people?

kevinsky@feddit.nl · -6 pts · 38d (4 replies)

Are you contending unless otherwise specified, people should be mandated to continue spending money with companies?

No. I'm just of the opinion that I'm in no way obliged to disclose to you what I spend my money on, just because I work somewhere you spend money on.

What exactly is the allowed reasons for doing or not doing business with people?

Anything, including having no reason at all, obviously.

MightyPez@fedia.io · 9 pts · 38d

The co-founder publicly stated he made the donation on social media. What made him obliged to disclose this? He seems rather proud of it, in fact.

As a result, people feel they may have a moral obligation to not funnel money to him. Your stance also doesn;t really line up with your examples like

Or say your customer base for any reason is in large part Vegan, should you tell your employee's to stop buying meat? Should they stop taking money from the non-vegan customers? How is anyone going to navigate this?

You don't mention the specific problem you have with this, which would be mandated disclosure. By your own words, this is perfectly fine since people can chose the reasons "Anything, including having no reason at all, obviously." to not do business with someone so I'm not sure why it's a slippery slope to you.

orclev@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 38d (2 replies)

No. I'm just of the opinion that I'm in no way obliged to disclose to you what I spend my money on, just because I work somewhere you spend money on.

That's not what you said though. I don't think anyone is arguing that employees of a company are obligated to disclose their spending habits, that would just be ludicrous. However, if that information was available or if the company itself made donations/purchases it's perfectly reasonable as a customer to decide not to support that kind of behavior by continuing to do business with that company.

Just as one example Chick-fil-A is rather famously anti-lgbtq and regularly donates part of their profits to anti-lgbtq organizations. As a consumer it's entirely reasonable and moral to refuse to do business with them in order to reduce the money being funnelled to morally repugnant organizations.

kevinsky@feddit.nl · -4 pts · 38d

That’s not what you said though.

Where do you feel I've deviated from this point exactly?

Keep in mind that this is the question at the top of this particular thread we are responding to:

So you believe that customers of a company should have a say how the staff uses their wages?

To which loke responded, among other things:

Morally? Yes.

To which I responded what you then replied to.

I'm not quite sure where you see space for interpretation, but I feel i've been pretty solid with my point.

nevyn@slrpnk.net · 17 pts · 38d
[ removed ]
fonix232@fedia.io · 5 pts · 38d (1 reply)

On one hand, no, they shouldn't, on the other hand they're free to voice their opinion and choose a different service if this is the breaking point.

Problem is, it's hard to find a good VPN service that doesn't fuck with alt right chuds and isn't US based.

nevyn@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 38d
[ removed ]
gointhefridge@lemmy.zip · 114 pts · 38d (33 replies)

I’m tired boss…..

Just when you think you find good companies to support they end up being run by shitbags.

Ok, where to next for my VPN needs?

TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de · 56 pts · 38d (21 replies)

I highly doubt you'll find any company composed solely of people that support ideologies you agree with. I know that sounds flippant and dismissive but ultimately we should support the best options we have. Or I guess you can roll your own solution and trust that you have the skills to stay ahead of the opposition.

gointhefridge@lemmy.zip · 33 pts · 38d (16 replies)

TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de · 6 pts · 38d (5 replies)

Not using a VPN feeds other companies valuable data. Or are you suggesting we all become hermits on public land?

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 37d
RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world · -7 pts · 37d (3 replies)

What info?

If you encryption & use DoH for DNS resolution, they can see the IPs you are connecting to, yes a sufficiently motivated ISP can use reverse DNS lookups to tell what sites you are accessing, but if you're ISP is that bad, find a new one.

do you trust your ISP or some guy that donated to political parties that want to kick out immigrants more?

chillpanzee@lemmy.ml · 12 pts · 37d

There are many parts of the world where the ISPs really are that bad, and consumers don't have the choice to switch to a competitor that isn't equally bad.

aphonefriend@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 37d (1 reply)

Switch to what, starlink? Because that's the only other option for the majority of rural America. You think this issue, Elon musk, or my Trump ass kissing aligned isp is the lesser evil?

RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 37d

Sometimes a VPN is more trustworthy, it's just wild that people think they are always better, giving money to the main guy funding a far-right party or Comcast, seems like an easy call.

TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de · -10 pts · 38d

Not using a VPN feeds other companies valuable data. Or are you suggesting we all become hermits on public land?

sbrodolino_21@lemmy.world · -36 pts · 37d (8 replies)

Everything you see, use, touch, eat every day has been made possible by capitalism. If not for capitalism, we'd all still be farming and dying by 40.

tixnou@feddit.cl · 12 pts · 37d (1 reply)

yeeaah it's all thanks to the feudalism 2.0 that we live in. long live the parasitic bourgeoisie. life is absolutely perfect nothing to see here

sbrodolino_21@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 33d

This is basically a list of things that are wrong with the U.S. or problems in the world.

I don't understand how this proves that capitalism is bad. If the world still hasn't solved all its problems, then capitalism is inherently bad?

By all metrics, the world is much much better now than it was 100 years ago. And it's mostly thanks to market economy.

All countries that have tried something different have had to resort to some flavour of capitalism in order to have any meaningful development.

Also, nobody said our economic system in its current form it's perfect.

inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 37d

Well that comment wins my Billy Madison comment of the day.

mriormro@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 37d

fucking lol

stickyprimer@lemmy.world · -15 pts · 37d (3 replies)

We’d be dying ethically, though! I’m kidding. Did you not know this place is an extreme-left echo chamber?

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 37d (1 reply)

not really extreme left tbh, thats .ml hexbear and grad.

stickyprimer@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 37d

I don’t know what those are - I just waded into Lemmy on a very large instance but I constantly see large numbers of people who proceed as if we’re all in agreement that capitalism is a proven evil and should definitely be put behind us in favor of a Marxist economy. This is what I consider extreme left. Now is it the uttermost tip of extreme? Surely not. But literal communism is not moderate left, or center left, it is far left. We could probably argue over the semantics of this for a long time.

sbrodolino_21@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 33d

I know it is. I'll still interact with it and say my opinion. Don't really care about the down votes.

Prior_Industry@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 37d

I guess there is a difference between the founder being a shit head and one of the rank and file being a shit head. Would be nice if just a few of the CEO class weren't psychopaths.

inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 37d

There's a big difference between a CEO that openly hates unions and has affairs or a software developer making 100k a year that makes racist AF on Facebook vs a CEO that's literally keeping a bunch of Nazis afloat and giving them an outsized voice.

Also, there's no best option when it comes to Nazis because if you give them an inch, they'll subvert democracy and human decency.

gerryflap@feddit.nl · 2 pts · 37d

I agree, but there's a difference between simply differing opinion and dumping a boat load of money, presumably some of it from Mullvad subscriptions, into a party that advocates for "remigration". If the dude just had some weird opinions I wouldn't necessarily switch, but I don't like the idea of my money directly helping with helping the far right. Honestly, I wouldn't even remotely care enough if one of the founders was part of a "normal" European neoliberal or conservative party, I have plenty of friends across the political spectrum. But I don't like giving extremists my momey

stickyprimer@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 37d

In particular, privacy-oriented services seem to occupy an amoral zone. Probably because if you’re truly going to deliver on privacy promises, you have to be okay with giving them to everybody, including nefarious people doing bad things with them.

TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 37d (1 reply)

"Absolute power corrupts absolutely ", unfortunately. I heard that studies have shown the neurophysiology of a person changes the longer they are in power and influence.

bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 37d

That's interesting, but did they control for becoming a raging K-head?

JcbAzPx@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 37d

There is no such thing as an ethical corporation. I'm going to tell you now, if you cannot ever compromise then learn subsistence farming as soon as you can.

wewbull@feddit.uk · -5 pts · 37d (2 replies)

I think the response makes it obvious that a company is not it's co-CEO, and a co-CEO is not a company.

Granted a tiny amount of your fees may make their way to a political party you vehemently oppose, but I think you're also supporting a lot of other people in the organisation that are on your side.

inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 37d (1 reply)

It's not a "tiny" amount of money, this dude is the CEO who makes all of the money in the company and any money going to Nazis is problematic especially when the Nazis in question are almost fully funded by this CEO and yes the CEO is the face and moral driver of a company.

Pretty ironic saying the company supports free speech when the biggest money maker is bankrolling a group that specifically gasses free speech and I doubt the other working there have even a sliver of speech that the CEO does.

wewbull@feddit.uk · -2 pts · 37d

Before your fee gets into a CEOs hands it pays for people's salaries and the costs of the company. That's what I mean by a tiny amount. It's only what's left after that that the CEO can benefit from.

0x0@infosec.pub · -42 pts · 38d (4 replies)

You don't have to agree with the chef in politics to enjoy their food.

Acting like that zealously would make you quickly run out of options if you actually talked to most chefs.

luciferofastora@feddit.org · 63 pts · 38d

There's a difference between a chef having an opinion and a high-ranking decision maker having an opinion and the money to amplify it.

If the chef thinks he shouldn't have to make food for immigrants, that's too bad. He'll have to do his job anyway. If the CEO thinks his establishment shouldn't serve immigrants and donates to politicians that promise to let him segregate his diner, that might actually have an impact far greater than the chef's opinion.

some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org · 34 pts · 38d

And contributing money to shitbags allows them to keep funding terrible values. See Musk.

ProfThadBach@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 38d

True but the only thing these fuckers understand the minus to their wallet.

stickyprimer@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 37d

It’s more a question of “know where your money is going.” You can stick your head in the sand and pretend not to know if you wish, but don’t presume to lecture others who won’t.

Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world · 81 pts · 37d (6 replies)

All private financing of political parties and politicians everywhere must stop.

Just as religion and state must be separated so must politics and money. If you hold more than $10 million in assets you don't get to influence politics. It's one or the other, not both.

Samskara@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 37d

The state financing parties is pretty valid and is practiced in many countries.

For example in Germany parties get paid around 1 € per vote received in elections.

millions in assets

Rich people and corporations will always be able to use their money to influence politics towards their interests.

Influencing politics works in other ways besides direct donations. The rich can put money into:

  • media
  • interest groups
  • education
  • studies
  • events
  • scholarships
  • NGOs

Influencing voters to support your desired policies works well.

Then there’s of course the promise of investments, if policies are changed to your interests. In the simplest case this is a local government changing zoning, building infrastructure, softening environmental or noise regulations in order to for an investor to build a factory. This in turn brings money, employment, and tax revenue to the local government.

Instead of direct donations, a politician can be hired to give a speech somewhere.

Or less directly, hire the politician’s child into a well paying position.

Promising a politician a well paid job for their time outside government is of course also a popular way.

Of course you can regulate all of that in various ways to make it more difficult or at least more transparent.

Jason2357@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 37d

Its the last remnant of the various property owning/landed gentry/aristocracy control of government. They had to give up their exclusive right to sit in court and then "democratic" government, and then their exclusive right to vote.

They are holding on to money-as-influence, trying to convince us its fair because everyone can make donations (you get a great tax receipt!!). However, even donation limits are mainly just a way to cover up their thumbs on the scale, because all they require the rich to do is spread out their money.

Hiplobbe@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 37d

Giving tax money so politicans can market themselves needs to stop. We all here understand how crowdfunding works, it would work just as well with political parties.

The funding they receive from their own members should be enough.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 37d (2 replies)

i mean, that's not quite how it worked for me. politics (at least the kind i did) is basically getting the people with $10 million or more in assets to donate to and get involved with their communities. we had to trade some favors (there are a few musicians on the board who lend their services for such instances. most of the time it was that, once or twice it was "teach my fuckup kid how to work"), but we got funding for homelessness services.

if we couldn't trade those favors, we wouldn't have any homeless shelters in my county. they ran off grants mostly (during democrat administrations. during republican administrations, we ran off hope and loan forgiveness), but they can't expand without extraordinary help. which unfortunately takes politicking (which i hate, but they wanted me doing it)

Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 19 pts · 37d (1 reply)

Then your state is not capable of taxing those with money to extract the value it needs to run said country...
Why do we need private money to fix public things because the politic-people can't be bothered to look anywhere but the next donation goal.
This isnt a donation but a "Pretty please, pay me a standard contractor rate in the disguise of a 'donation'".

Man I hate this illusionary and superficial bullshit

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 37d

the taxes weren't changing, but the grants dried up. yet you blame the taxes.

it's like you're a one trick pony. figure out some other thing to harp on

jlow@slrpnk.net · 65 pts · 37d (1 reply)

"I don't like co-owning a nazi bar." Well, boohoo, grow a spine and do something about it.

pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 37d

lol. Yes.

I will sign up for Mullvad tomorrow if he actually does something meaningful about it.

I haven't even looked up the price, but I'll keep my word.

Only I won't have to, because the odds are this guy is another spineless piece of shit.

southsamurai@sh.itjust.works · 53 pts · 38d (7 replies)

I'm not at the point where this outweighs the reasons I picked mullvad yet. And the other cofounder's statement does at least give me hope that it might work itself out in a way I can accept before my current term is finished.

That being said, I'm not sure I can give money to the company when someone is profiting from that money and spending part of it on a political organization that expressly espouses a stance I believe to be harmful and dangerous. And it isn't like you can pirate a VPN, so it differs significantly from when actors or musicians do stupid shit.

That being said, I also don't think that using mullvad would be something other people would be obligated to avoid just because the CEO donated to a small and shitty political party. By itself, it isn't something so bad that it's possible to point to a customer and do more than inform them of the donation and maybe give them links to see for themselves that it's a shitty party. Or, at least that it's a party with some really shitty platforms.

But the guy needs to show a major shift in how he donates before I'll renew.

nevyn@slrpnk.net · 41 pts · 38d
[ removed ]
Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 37 pts · 38d (3 replies)

Just a rich person trying to get proto fascist powers. Yeah you wait a bit, but I won't and I hope it's the end of his company and career.

nevyn@slrpnk.net · -1 pts · 38d (2 replies)
[ removed ]
Creat@discuss.tchncs.de · 13 pts · 38d (1 reply)

It's no longer good if the money made from said company are used this way. It was good until last week or so.

nevyn@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 37d
[ removed ]
Pelicanen@fedia.io · 2 pts · 37d

The party is using this money to push their reach hard. It's hard to use social media in Sweden without coming across clips of Markus Allard doing an "epic takedown" of another local politician or ranting with righteous fury against some waste of taxpayer money and the message is resonating with a lot of voters, for a lot of them the Örebro Party just seems like the "common sense" choice. There is a strong possibility that they will make it into parliament at this fall's election and they would not have been able to have this reach without this funding.

stickyprimer@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 37d

Given the poor alternatives, I may fall back on the utilitarian argument. Yes the guy is donating to evil, but it’s a closet full of evil clowns who aren’t accomplishing anything. So my money is briefly passing through evil without much consequence. And back to the lack of good alternatives…

godsammitdam@lemmy.zip · 45 pts · 37d (16 replies)

"I like this burger made by fascists. I'm going to keep eating this burger, I don't care where it came from or where my money buying the burger goes to."

So many comments here sound like this, geez. Same people saying "we can be friends, can't we, even if our politics differ?" Morality and respecting humans isn't politics. And no. We can't.

Also, yes, enforcing racial and national purity (remigration) is, in fact, fascist ideology. Get over it. It's not extreme, it's calling a spade a spade. https://lemmy.zip/comment/27359847

traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 18 pts · 37d (9 replies)

Also it’s a damn VPN. Pick another one. It’s not even like they can use the excuse that it’s the best in the field (still not an excuse but loads better than, I just “like” it)

nevyn@slrpnk.net · 13 pts · 37d (2 replies)
[ removed ]
traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 37d (1 reply)

AirVPN and IVPN are both fine. I don’t know why your hemisphere should matter aside from straight up being blocked so kind of hard for me to recommend without knowing that.

nevyn@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 37d
[ removed ]
NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 37d (5 replies)

Which one? The Pro-Israel vpn at PIA? The one thats Pro-Trump at ProtonVPN? NordVPN?

ZenAspirate@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 37d (3 replies)

The other respectable option besides mullvad is ivpn

sudoer777@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 37d (2 replies)

AirVPN seems to be the go-to for torrenting, and RiseUp exists but I don't know how good it is

rockandsock@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 37d (1 reply)

Air VPN was good for torrenting for years but most of the servers in torrent friendly countries are pretty full and slow these days.

I had them from 2020 until last fall. Unfortunately there aren't a lot of good options if you want port forwarding.

Jason2357@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 36d

For torrents specifically, I would suggest getting some friends together to rent a seedbox or VPS on a torrent friendly provider. You may have total monthly bandwidth limits, but you have much better speed because p2p works so much better with a publically routable IP and open ports anyway.

traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 37d

AirVPN and IVPN are both great options.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 37d

i mean, while there's no ethical consumption under capitalism, why does it seem like so many people are trying their hardest to rack up the most unethical consumption? Like there's a counter somewhere or something idk.

that was rhetorical, i know why. fucking cern weasels.

FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 37d (1 reply)
godsammitdam@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 37d

You're absoluetly right, and thank you, I'll be using that link in my personal life.

As for VPN alternatives, as we know, not many have faced a raid by authorities like Mullvad, which does speak to the fact that they weren't collecting user data. However, that may be only a matter of time in our increasingly surveiled world -

ProtonVPN - has its own controversies (CEO may be right-wing in supporting Republicans in the US) but has stood up to legal action previously

IVPN

AirVPN

And, while potentially biased, there is a google doc users from reddit made to compare many of the options listed here and more.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1ijfqfLrJWLUVBfJZ_YalVpstWsjw-JGzkvMd6u2jqEk/htmlview#gid=231869418

9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works · -1 pts · 37d

The irony of these holier-than-thou lemmy folks using a term like "calling a spade a spade"

"be 100% pure, organic, free-range, antifascist like me, otherwise we cant be friends or have discussions at all!!!"

LodeMike@lemmy.today · -1 pts · 37d (1 reply)

Hey just FYI you wouldn't be saying any of this unless you knew about the donation. What grocery store do you shop at?

godsammitdam@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 37d

Farmers markets and some local shops we have around us.

SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org · 43 pts · 37d (3 replies)

There is no middle ground to be had with Nazis. It's us or them. If the Nazi won't leave Mullvad, then I will leave as a customer. Simple as

Hiplobbe@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 37d (2 replies)

Where are the nazis? Are you talking about the leninist party ÖP as nazis?

HieroProtagonist@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 37d (1 reply)

I think that is the modern use of the word "Nazi", best translated with "i don't like them"

Hiplobbe@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 37d

Yes, but this is super dangerous. I have seen young boys in my politcal party (liberal conservative) basically stand guard for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_clubs because "well the left calls everything nazi, including us. So these guys probably wants the same as us. And we on the right needs to stand together."

Ironically rhetoric like this is in fact normalizing the word nazi, and has more become a word to describe a group that the left doesn't like. Rather than a fascist leaning party.

Melusine@tarte.nuage-libre.fr · 37 pts · 38d (3 replies)

Neither right or left but mostly not left. Bunch of fuckers.

How can you try to defend VPN usage and privacy if you need to collect data to identify migrants or descendants of migrants to strip their citizenship and deport them? It's not like we don't have examples of fascists using technology to profile and identify their targets: nazi Germany and IBM, Israël and Azure, or the DOGE that siphonated as much data as they could...

rozodru@piefed.world · 39 pts · 38d (2 replies)

that's the infuriating thing about all this. with Mullvad all you are to them is an account number. that's it. no email, no name, no address, nothing. you go to the site and they give you an account number and that's that. hell you can pay for the damn thing in cash.

So then the co-founder donates to a political party, with users money, that likely wants to do what you just said. How can I support that? my Mullvad subscription ends in like 2 hours today, i'm no renewing. And NOW I gotta spend the day finding a decent non-US based vpn. fantastic.

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 38d

I saw people in another thread say AirVPN might be an ok replacement.

But yeah, I really like how much Mullvad doesn't seem to even want my data, and the ID number system is great. I'm not aware of any other VPNs that currently do that.

tremble5218@programming.dev · 1 pts · 37d

Canada okay? Try Windscribe. No user information collected, generates an account hashed value akin to Mullvad's account number. You can pay by crypto, but their payment gateway collects an email address only to notify you of payment status from crypto. They've also got an ample number of servers. There is also no device limit like Mullvad has. Their Android app is pretty good too. I've been trying them recently after this Mullvad debacle and the connection and privacy seems pretty good.

ChicoSuave@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 38d

Private wealth is a mistake

raynethackery@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 37d

Racist co-founder. Let's just start calling a spade a spade. He's a racist.

Avicenna@programming.dev · 27 pts · 37d (8 replies)

"donation"? this is called lobbying. And it should be illegal.

placebo@lemmy.zip · -13 pts · 37d (7 replies)
[ removed ]
MBech@feddit.dk · 25 pts · 37d (1 reply)

Sounds like a seriously bad argument against laws....

lando55@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 37d

"You're saying I can only murder people in secret? I thought this was America."

Avicenna@programming.dev · 3 pts · 36d (4 replies)

good, then make the punishment heavy enough so that even if a few are caught, they are made examples of. I am thinking if the illegal lobbying money is higher than a certain amount he is forced to step down and the company is run by a board of truestees for a year. Will they be able to find ways around it? Sure they are resourceful and have an army of lawyers shamelessly trained at finding loopholes, but it will be much harder than now which is basically a walk in the park for them.

placebo@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 36d (3 replies)
[ removed ]
Avicenna@programming.dev · 2 pts · 36d (2 replies)

where political parties receive funds from the state - makes them dependable and controllable by the state.

Lol, what so you think its easier to implement a fair support scheme for political parties through private means than govermental means? You prefer political parties be dependent on whims of private companies who only make these donations with strings attached? You think donations don't make parties controllable by their donors if they are private? There is simply no logic to this statement.

I am sure you are gonna make an argument along the lines of "but look what if all these donations depended on the current US goverment, surely it couldn't be worse than a private company". That means you are missing the big picture and how Trump got into goverment in the first place. Pointing at a government that is so shit because it has million strings attached to other entities including zionist lobbies and tech giants and then saying being dependent on goverment for election funds is dangerous is just bad logic. It is also quite delusional to think that one could have a fair donation scheme where interest of private companies are involved. Lobbying has been the menace of democracy for well over a century.

Also the very fact that politicial parties need on the order of hundereds of millions of dollars for campaigning is already outrageous enough. Things like super PACs is just another loophole to get the party with more connections in power. All of these can be much better regulated with laws and not letting private companies run rampant on politics.

What company? Daniel Berntsson used his personal funds.

All you are doing with this statement is you are pointing at a loophole. Does not matter, personal funds can still be used to do lobbying for a company. So whatever stricter implementations one should come up with it should try to cover and punish loopholes like this to reduce frequency of it happening.

placebo@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 36d (1 reply)
[ removed ]
Avicenna@programming.dev · 2 pts · 36d

Hmm calling a direct quote from you a made up statement... Seems like you have some issues to sort out.

digital_alchemist@discuss.tchncs.de · 23 pts · 37d (16 replies)

ffs - first Proton, now this.

I've never liked the idea that I have to trust my VPN, and this news raises a pretty significant trust issue. Makes me think I've been approaching this from the wrong angle.

Anyone have experience with the TOR daemon?

huey_m@reddthat.com · 8 pts · 37d (6 replies)
[ removed ]
Hiplobbe@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 37d (5 replies)

The party is "pushing" for something that is already law. Re-migration, at least in a Swedish context, aims to let people VOLUNTARILY return to their home country but with the intensive to get some cash to start up their new lifes there.

Sources....

https://www.migrationsverket.se/du-har-tillstand-i-sverige/internationellt-skydd-asyl/atervandringsbidrag.html

https://www.regeringen.se/pressmeddelanden/2025/10/ett-kraftigt-hojt-atervandringsbidrag

godsammitdam@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 37d (1 reply)

Totally already legal to cross corpses to remove the "fake Swedes." Sweden is for Swedes after all.

https://www.friatider.se/markus-allard-om-andra-generationens-invandrare-de-ska-ocksa-ut

Örebro Party leader Markus Allard goes to the election on expulsions. He opens to withdraw citizenship and also expel second generation of immigrants – even if they were born in Sweden.
"I'm prepared to cross corpses," he said.

One suggestion that he has is that citizenship and permanent residence permits can be torn up – with reference to "Sweden is the country of Swedes".

In a section of Yoshi's Podcast, Allard develops his view on expulsions and explains that he prepared to "go over corpses" to bring home unwanted immigrants. The host notes that there will be no beautiful sight when, for example, immigrant mothers who have been on maternity leave for 15 years are to be deported together with their children. "It's not going to be pretty to send these people home," he said. Markus Allard agrees, but says: I think you can handle that optics. Even the children will need to be deported, he explains.

He further explains that many of the problems relate to second-generation immigrants. They are going out too. Even if they were born in Sweden, because they have no natural connection to Sweden. They are not Swedes. They have not become Swedes. It says Sweden in the passport, but they have not been interested in becoming part of Sweden. There's a difference. It's a qualitative difference," Allard said.

Hiplobbe@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 37d

Yes soo the article you sent now has more info, and more to grab at. I don't know why fria tider made him sound way more harsh that he actually is in the interview. But if you check the clip they have linked he is clearly talking about people who does not want to be part of Swedish society and/or criminals. I do not feel that it is a fascist view to want to throw out non-citizens that commit crimes.

In many if not all countries in Europe this has been standard since like, forever. There is no logical reason why you should keep criminals within your borders.

huey_m@reddthat.com · 2 pts · 37d (2 replies)
[ removed ]
Hiplobbe@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 37d (1 reply)

You are of course free to do what you want with your money! :)

Nationalism is about believing and wanting the concepts of nations/borders. And with that the analysis of the ethnicities within or outside those borders (by ethnicity I mean cultural not race), and that a nation should be a collection of people that work together to make that nation better. So blaming apartheid and genocide, is like blaming a hammer because it can be used to kill someone.

huey_m@reddthat.com · 3 pts · 37d
[ removed ]
rumba@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 37d

I've been looking at TOR, I2P, Reticulim, Freenet, Snowflake, IPFS

Tor get's blocked a lot. It's the fastest of the options. The level of anonymization is ok. If you piss off a nation-state, it may not protect you sufficiently. It's had a history of leaks, If an intelligence ag owns enough of the exits, timing attacks might out you.

I2P is more secure, harder to block, but it's really slow and has very limited access to the clearnet. It's also super easy to DDOS. There are some torrents, forums and chatrooms out there on i2p, latency is rough.

Reticulum is pretty cool. It's a protocol and you access things like nomad net on it. It's crypto is good, there's no clearnet access. It may have issues when/if it scales

Snowflake is slow AF, mainly used to get anonymous access out from restricted nations-states.

IPFS web3 crypto storage. you can host files/sites on it. It's kinda hard to make stuff on there go away, it's also kinda hard to get stuff to stay. If you're not paying a pinning service, even daily scripting the pins to keep data up there is a losing battle. It's slow, fragile, not very anonymous.

joker125@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 37d (7 replies)

I’m out of the loop. What happened with proton?

digital_alchemist@discuss.tchncs.de · 17 pts · 37d (2 replies)

Public statements of support from its CEO for a regime actively weaponizing technology to build a mass-surveillance state.

Removing its no logging policy after being compelled by court order to log and disclose a user’s IP and browser fingerprint.

Personally, I gave up on Proton after they amended their TOS to include a mandatory arbitration clause, including a ban on class action lawsuits. IMO only the dirtiest of corporations rely on mandatory arbitration clauses. Without the spectre of a class action lawsuit, if a VPN were to get caught breaking its promises to its users, the only real damage the company would likely suffer would be reputational. These are for-profit corporations. The only way we can hold them accountable is to put their profits at risk.

edit: looks like @oce beat me to it

caschb@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 37d (1 reply)

I do wonder what could they have done in the email case? I don't think that there's any country where they could just let you not comply with a court order. And due to how email works they can't just encrypt the subject lines or the sender/receiver.
In that one case I lean more into pointing more fingers to the Swiss government, rather than to proton. They're still not blameless tho, maybe they could have used some sort of canary to let people know they were being surveilled, and be more clear on how to avoid these situations.

rumba@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 37d

Don't log it, you can't be compelled to hand over data you don't have. They said outright that they didn't log it.

Run SMTP purely on IO sockets. Don't make files. You draft your email into your own cryptographically secure blob, When it's time to send it, you fire it through an SMTP daemon built to use memory only, once it's gone it's gone. If the govt wants that data, they can go to the ISP for it. Maybe it communicates securely with SMTP servers set up in countries that are actually good at observing privacy.

Good Guy security provider could also terminate your account or lose your password.

The thing is, they oversold their security. They're STILL overselling their security. The release rabid PR dogs / Trolls out there to discount/discredit people bitching about the situation.

oce@jlai.lu · 9 pts · 37d (3 replies)
joker125@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 37d

Thank you.

That is very disappointing. Time to find a good alternative

FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 37d
FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 37d

Yet another certified bruh moment

carrylex@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 37d (5 replies)

Wikipedia - is as always - doing a great job at gathering info and they wrote down what the party's policies are.

IMHO what they propose makes no sense:

  • (Massively) cut taxes
  • Reimmigration
  • Reduce the normal work week by 25%

How is that economy supposed to work? Where do you get the money from to finance this? Who should offset the missing work?

A $500k donation can bankroll your party for some time but certainly not an entire country...

nevyn@slrpnk.net · 11 pts · 37d
[ removed ]
yermaw@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 37d (1 reply)

who should offset the missing work

I don't know about the rest of your questions, but generally there wont be much missing work. Unemployment is rising thanks to automation and AI, and a lot of work is bullshit busy-work anyway.

With a lot of upheaval and confusion in the interim, I truly believe we could cut working hours by 50% and still be basically fine.

kilgore_trout@feddit.it · 2 pts · 37d

You can't cut working hours if you get rid of all the immigrants doing the "busy-work".

peripheralneuropathy@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 37d

Energy & Fuel policy

In 2025 the leader of the Örebro Party, Markus Allard, in a post on X wrote that he wished to see a complete elimination of taxes on energy & fuel.[48] Allard once again said that this was a priority for the Örebro Party in an X-post in 2026.[49] As taxes on energy and fuel make up 40 to 50% of the price in Sweden, abolishing them would lead to the prices being significantly decreased.

Again, never a path of substance to make this happen. This is how this spreads. It always sounds great in quips but no actual policy substance to get it across the line.

idealpink@feddit.nu · 1 pts · 37d

It depends on what kind of work it is of course. But a large portion of jobs don’t see a reduction in productivity because people don’t really work 8h efficiently. Some see productivity increases. In combination with better well being, less sick days etc. it can be done.

NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml · 11 pts · 37d (2 replies)

It only benefits Mullvad if I walk away right now. I've got ~200 days left on my prepaid account. Hopefully in the next 200 days i'll find a better or equivalent VPN service with CEOs that have yet to come out as complete shit-bags.

YeahToast@aussie.zone · 5 pts · 37d (1 reply)

I believe they said they would offer refunds if that's what you're referring to by the 200 days

https://piunikaweb.com/2026/06/30/mullvad-browser-vpn-options-after-controversy/

Meilindis@piefed.social · 1 pts · 36d

Unfortunately that doesn't apply if you used a voucher 😞

TheKaul@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 pts · 37d (17 replies)

Highly recommend everyone read the direct response this article is quoting. Direct from the other owner of the company on Hacker News. Makes the whole "scandal" seem very understandable in my opinion.

Additionally,

SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org · 45 pts · 37d (1 reply)

Not good enough. If I give them money, the fascist co-owner will use it to donate to other fascists. Either remove him from the company or lose some customers. That is their choice. There is no middle ground with fucking Nazis. It's us or them!

DharkStare@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 37d

I don't think he can be removed. Mullvad is 100% owned by its two co-founders.

uzay@infosec.pub · 26 pts · 37d (7 replies)

That reply just shows me that he fundamentally misunderstands the issue. By giving money to Mullvad I would directly support the pos party that this guy donates to. Do they not understand where the money in their bank account is coming from?

G_M0N3Y_2503@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 37d (6 replies)

I read it as he implicitly does understand that and is the reason he suggests getting a refund if that is your priority. He is just urging people to see nuance that there is collateral damage for the rest of the people that make mullvad too. A loose analogy would be, I disagree with Trump and I wish my country would divest from the USA, which is all well and good, but the workers don't have great protections and would likely be the first to hurt. Sure a majority of them voted for him I could rationalize, but that's not the same rationalisation companies use to layoff before they actually start to hurt.

nevyn@slrpnk.net · 10 pts · 37d (5 replies)
[ removed ]
G_M0N3Y_2503@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 37d (3 replies)

Sure, that's fine, I tend to agree, I was drawing out the picture of the collateral, so it's considered as much or as little as it is worth, but at least considered.

nevyn@slrpnk.net · 5 pts · 37d (2 replies)
[ removed ]
G_M0N3Y_2503@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 37d (1 reply)

In the last couple of months I just bought 12 months through a voucher that is no more so doubt I'd get a refund, so I've got some time to decide. I swear everything I look into deep enough has something going wrong with it, but I guess all we can do it take the battles we can handle.

nevyn@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 37d
[ removed ]
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 37d

and we appreciate y'all doing it, at least here in California.

the line for the secret delicious berries was shorter this year than usual (they are in watsonville and delicious. go get some at gizdich ranch and give Nita my love) but that's probably because the growing season is all el nino wonky.

hamid@crazypeople.online · 13 pts · 37d

Sounds reasonable for me to cancel Mullvad and tell everyone else to cancel. I don't care if that piece of shit white supremacist Nazi did it as a personal choice or as part of the company. He is my enemy, I am at war with him and I will not do anything to support him. Hopefully enough people stand up so they put him out on his ass and he loses everything which is less than Nazi's deserve.

Hund@feddit.nu · 12 pts · 37d (2 replies)

Understandable how?

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 37d

Also i want to point out that understanding doesn't equal support. it's closer to validation, like, you can think what they're saying makes sense but disagree with it.

TheKaul@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -1 pts · 37d

Understandable in that there's no way a company or employer can tell you how to spend your money. That there's 2 owners with divided beliefs who are working for a similar cause. They are indeed private individuals using their individually earned money for private purposes.

If, let's say, Mullvad as a company was donating to this political party, that would be alarming and worth freaking out about, but it's one guy, basically donating with his funds he makes from his job. In a corporate environment there are many different people with different beliefs, of different economic statuses. Somebody might be donating thousands to one candidate, another donating hundreds to another.

Just because the co-owner of a company you like supports somebody you don't like, doesn't mean you should jump ship. Who knows if everybody else in the company is donating to other political causes?

sudoer777@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 37d

All I see is a bunch of both-sidesing, conflating "speech" with economic power, and making claims that clearly don't align with their actions.

NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org · 2 pts · 37d
nevyn@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 37d
[ removed ]
blacklotus_@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 37d (3 replies)

Huh, was wondering why I was taking my sweet time moving away from Windscribe to see if the grass was as green as they say

nevyn@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 37d (2 replies)
[ removed ]
Reddfugee42@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 37d (1 reply)

Agree with windscribe regarding what?

nevyn@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 37d
[ removed ]
sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io · 4 pts · 36d (1 reply)

Frustrated. I signed up for protonvpn because I was using their services. Then dropped their services and moved most things to self hosting and moved the vpn to mullvad. Now mullvad is in the shitter so I guess I have to switch again. Where to go? Suggestions?

Hund@feddit.nu · 2 pts · 36d

It seems that IVPN is getting a lot of new customers. I have never heard about them before though. Don't take this as any sort of recommendation or anything.

bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 38d (2 replies)

I'll take the moment to plug icedrive and icevpn. They have been good to me.

Ghoelian@piefed.social · 4 pts · 38d (1 reply)

Do they offer wireguard or openvpn configs? They don't list a Linux client on their website, so I'm not sure if I can use them at all.

bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 38d

You dont need the client. They have the config . openvpn, I think

Its a bit annoying but it works. I wish they had a client tho cuz to change country you have to go log in the web portal for Linux desktops. Mobile devices it has an app that works fine

pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 38d (4 replies)

And all you mfers were on about Andy Yen making a single tweet glazing Gail Slater.

rainwall@piefed.social · 34 pts · 38d (2 replies)

Turns out lots of people can be shitty at once.

It also wasent a single tweet. It was tweets/comments plural, with him also talking about how the GOP was immune from the influence of big tech (ultra mega LOL) and would take them to task (a stunningly, knee slappingly stupid statement), that the GOP was the new "party of the little guy (holy fucking shit was that tone deaf)," then him using right wing phrasing and talking points to defend himself before finally defaulting to the same defense as Mullvad just did. "We are a political company that should not say political things, I.e. we have shitty political opinions that will cost us money once people find out about them so we will shut up now."

The proton CEO has not once apologized or said he was wrong about the Trump admin, even after they fired Gail Slater in the first year, the person he praised in his first effusive tweet about how great the incoming Trump admin was.

pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -5 pts · 38d (1 reply)
rainwall@piefed.social · 7 pts · 38d

That an edited timeline that leaves out many of his Reddit comments, but it still doesnt paint him in a good light.

Everything he said about the Trump admin was wrong flat out, and not once has he acknowledged it. A very convenient stance he took, praising them and now opting to "not say anything." Its almost like that just leaves the praise of the GOP with no rebuttal from Proton.

Ilandar@lemmy.today · -8 pts · 38d

Hilarious, isn't it?

HighlyRegardedArtist@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 37d (12 replies)

Would be fun to know who's sponsoring this smear campaign. After all, Mullvad has been stepping on many toes with their pro-privacy advocacy and enablement. I'd put my money on some combination of Thorn, Palantir, and whatever other surveillance capitalism corpos there are who'd benefit from less protected populace, both in policy and technology...

WrathEnchanter@europe.pub · 19 pts · 37d (11 replies)

Why do you think it's a smear campaign? Did he not donate?

Hiplobbe@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 37d (10 replies)

Because (at least on lemmy) they spam articles about this, and treat it like some "gotcha" moment that would make the company no longer able to fulfill their purpose.

One of the owners investing in a political party should not be this big of a deal, and the articles provided are clearly made to put suspicion on not only Mullvad but also on ÖP.

The campaign is actually more about positioning ÖP as some sort of "far-right"-party by the now left, because they are afraid to lose votes to them. They also of course wants to make it "shameable" for people to donate to this party so they cannot possibly win some votes this election.

huey_m@reddthat.com · 3 pts · 37d (3 replies)
[ removed ]
Hiplobbe@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 37d (2 replies)

So people are mostly driven of "what is popular", so if you spam the article and astroturf them. You give the illusion that it is a big problem that a lot of people care about. And that leads to people taking it more seriously.

So the end here is to make people who would leave the left-party (Vänsterpartiet) to vote for ÖP, feel alienated. "Oh my god, I can't vote for a far right party! I better vote for the 'only' left party that is left." is the thought they want them to have.

huey_m@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 37d (1 reply)
[ removed ]
Hiplobbe@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 37d

Well you can check the comments, and their mastodon page. It works.

The second aspect is that they want to hurt Mullvad as a deterent for other to donate to ÖP, I think that is why they go extra hard on mastodon and lemmy. Because a lot of people who would be interested in Mullvads products would be here.

Sxan@piefed.zip · 3 pts · 37d (3 replies)

I want to know if money I'm paying a company is directly contributing to fascists. According to Wikipedia,

Nationally the party has set out large-scale remigration, closing the Swedish borders to immigration, a stricter assimilation policy and ending taxes on energy and fuel as some of its key issues.

Nationalism is a Key Smell of fascism.

Hiplobbe@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 37d (2 replies)

Nationalism is a big part of leftist parties also, fascists does not have claim on that within itself.

Also as I have written in previous posts what ÖP is calling for is already part of the government today, and in a Swedish context means that migrants are given help if they VOLUNTARILY wants to leave.

https://www.migrationsverket.se/du-har-tillstand-i-sverige/internationellt-skydd-asyl/atervandringsbidrag.html

https://www.regeringen.se/pressmeddelanden/2025/10/ett-kraftigt-hojt-atervandringsbidrag/

Yes I checked the English wikipedia page, however the Swedish one makes no claims that ÖP would like to close the borders to migration. So I would urge to either check the parties own website about what they want or do a quick search. Clearly some bad actors have edited the page to put some views they have not voiced there.

The only source I find that says that "closed borders" are something they want, is flamman.se (what a suprise /s).

Sxan@piefed.zip · -1 pts · 33d (1 reply)

Sure, fascists don't have a monopoly on nationalism. It's necessary, but not sufficient. Þese days, if a group is nationalist, odds are better þat þey're right-wing. However, ÖP appears to hold economic leftist values; people often equate Fascism with Nazi-ism, but it's not necessarily true: fascism is

A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls, violent suppression of the opposition, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.

"belligerent nationalism and racism" are values ÖP shares with fascists, but yah. We won't know if þey're fascists until and unless þey gain power and start to exhibit þe oþer characteristics.

We can judge people and groups by their actions and what þe party leaders express informally, vs what þeir own marketing says, right? Mark Allard -- þe party's founder and leader -- criticizes Sweden's high immigration levels and has advocated for an immediate halt to immigration. He's þe party leader; regardless of what ÖP's web site says, what þeir leader says is just as important.

Hiplobbe@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 32d

THe party leader has expressed these views FORMALLY as well. And no it is not racist to want to throw out non-citizens that do crime.

HieroProtagonist@lemmy.ml · -2 pts · 37d (1 reply)

I don't think you need a targeted campaign for that... give some of the lunatics extremists left leaning lemmy folks only the slightest hint that some service may not pass the purity testing and they will jump on it like a fly on a big pile of shit.

Hiplobbe@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 37d

Yes of course, it is to me just clear that it is not about Mullvad. The post are about ÖP.

hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works · -4 pts · 37d (2 replies)

Örebro Party looks more Marxist then right wing to me. Also it's founder, Markus Allard, was expelled from the Left Party. Due to him liked a Far-Left antifascist organization called Revolutionary Front. The only right wing thing about them is they being for remigration policies. Otherwise it's Marxist and left as hell.

NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org · 10 pts · 37d

So you are saying they are combining nationalist and socialist ideas? Do they classify themselves as a workers party?

Might have heard something like that before somewhere, just can't put my finger on it.

crimson_iris@piefed.social · 1 pts · 37d

"Remigration" is their made up word for ethnic cleansing.

homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 38d (3 replies)

Hey, so long as you don't use X, any Meta product, Google, or Amazon, (or any Musk-infected garbage, obvs), or Protonmail then sure, cancel Mullvad and trash talk the guy silly.

However. I very much doubt that's the case.

If it's not the case, that means this is performative. a.k.a. Bullshit.

I hope Mullvad buys him out, distances themselves as far as possible. But they are far from the only tech company with some right wing cunt mixed up with them. If you're gonna be pure you gotta go full-stack FOSS and a lot of us aren't there yet. So let's not pretend like all of us are.

oong3Eepa1ae1tahJozoosuu@lemmy.world · 38 pts · 38d

This is not an all or nothing situation, people can criticise this for what it is, even if they're using any of the products/companies mentioned by you. Navigating a tech-fascist ecosystem is difficult and every criticism here is valid and important.

(Not using any of the aforementioned products/companies btw)

electric_nan@lemmy.ml · 17 pts · 38d

This is a bad attitude. It's like saying being vegetarian is performative if you aren't full vegan. And for the record, I use Mullvad (for now), I don't use any of the other services you mentioned, and I am vegan ;)

homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 38d

Loving the “hey, man, you’re completely wrong! But yes i agree” replies

motruck@lemmy.zip · -9 pts · 37d (9 replies)

You can not like it and you can run away from mullvad that's a fine thing to be motivated to do hut what the other cofounder said is true. We don't win by being tribal and team based. We when by tolerating and coexisting. I don't know how this "Nazi" had harmed people but giving money to a political party is only a part of the story. If no one cares to hear the other side you are just perpetuating the same hate.

KaChilde@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 37d

I believe in allowing people to live comfortably and safely no matter their cultural or ethnic heritage. I believe in gay marriage and women’s rights.

What middle ground am I supposed to find with people who want to remove anyone who they deem not white enough from their country? What compromise do I make for the people who want to imprison homosexuals and violently convert their gay children? What is there to agree on with the man who believes that women are inferior, should stay at home and have 10 children, and owe him regular sex just because he is a man?

If you tolerate these ideas because you think it will make for a more peaceful world, those fascists are going to take your naivety and run away with it. There is no tolerance for intolerance.

godsammitdam@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 37d (6 replies)

Never heard of the tolerance paradox have you?

The way to resolve the tolerance paradox is to not tolerate intolerance.

"Donating money to" and "bankrolling the entire party, 10x-ing their entire funding in 2024 alone" are different things.

There are SO many people here who would happily dine with actual fascists just because they "make a good product." Completely ignoring what their funds that support them go to and lead to direct harm.

And if you think I'm hyperbolic, please, tell me how this is an incorrect line of thinking: https://lemmy.zip/comment/27359847

stickyprimer@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 37d (2 replies)

I agree with you about the tolerance paradox. I am sure you’d also agree that we must decide when to apply it because not every disagreement is a tolerance paradox.

But now that we’ve named the tolerance paradox, now that it’s a meme we can just invoke on a dime, I find it gets used constantly. The word fascist is also everywhere now. Anything remotely draconian and you are a fascist and then a Nazi. The word Nazi gets thrown around very lightly around here. And the conversation slips very quickly from “don’t tolerate Nazis” to “it’s okay to punch them in the face” to “it’s a moral imperative to kill them.”

I think we should be extremely judicious about deciding it’s a moral imperative to kill anyone. And I don’t see that extreme judiciousness around Lemmy generally. This political party’s beliefs are repugnant. And I am not ready to call for the death of someone who gives them money.

I’m not saying I know exactly where to draw the line. But when I even try to engage people on where the line should be, I quickly find myself on the other side of it in their eyes. I’m an apologist, a collaborator, a fascist myself, and so on.

This climate overall is deeply uncomfortable for me and even worse is the lack of self reflection about it.

Maybe my problem is thinking that discussion actually matters and trying to fully engage the topic, when others are just here to talk big and pronounce death upon their perceived foes.

godsammitdam@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 37d (1 reply)

I get what you're saying. However, we are dealing with rising actual, full fledged fascism on a world stage. And a common rebuttal from a fascist is that "everything I believe can't be fascist" or "I'm not suddenly a fascist, what I believed yesterday wasn't fascist."

The truth of the matter is that fascism never truly left. The ultra-nationalism became more discreet and diffused with pride for one's country. It eventually became unquestioning loyalty. See: American exceptionalism. Racial purity and bigotry was shamed on a larger scale, so fascists retreated to quieter spaces, but it never left. Through operation paperclip, America did the opposite and welcomed former Nazis and SS and allowed them to start families and provided them land (more than they did for African Americans, that's for sure.) So is it any wonder that the Confederacy, which the Nazis admired and learned from, and the Nazis themselves, would lay low and eventually make a resurgence, as they are now?

All that to say, the tenant that I go by is what I said. If we have a disagreement, as another person said, about baking a cake, does that make someone a fascist? No, not unless that cake somehow is promoting some form of intolerance/harm/dehumanization of human life and identity (i.e. a Swastika cake probably won't go over too well with the public, and you'd lose my business for sure.)

I think the ProtonVPN vs Mullvad recent issues are good to look at. Did the Proton CEO say some dumb stuff about Republican antitrusts? Yes. Did ProtonVPN provide an affiliate link to a French far right influencer? Yes. Do these actions make them fascist or fascist supporting? Probably not, that's a bit of a stretch. The company also revoked the affiliate link and put out a statement that they do not share those individuals views. But we should still, and rightfully so, call them out and hold it to them that these are issues. They're certainly warnings at minimum. And a CEO can be removed.

Mullvad's founder has a lot more sway on the company's path than a french youtuber. Mullvad's founder isn't just donating a small donation to the republican party either. He's, essentially, funding an entire fringe alt right party on his own, one that is in support of ethnic cleansing. That means there is a very high likelihood that the founder shares these beliefs, and even if he doesn't, by funding a party so aggressively, it provides them with an outsized voice amongst legislation and can lead to direct harm all by using money that you or I gave to them for a product where there are several other choices available to us. Does that make someone fascist, or at least aligned with fascism? Well, supporting a party that believes in ultra-nationalism with social and racial hierarchy/purity...I mean...I can't honestly say it doesn't.

So, is ProtonVPN fascist? No Is ProtonVPNs CEO a fascist? I doubt it Is MullvadVPN fascist? No, not yet at least Is Mullvad's founder a fascist? I'm leaning towards yes Is the Örebro party fascist? Yes. By definition.

stickyprimer@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 37d

Could you take a shot at stating that definition?

And similarly, just to help me ground the way you see things, could you point to a current day example of what you mean by “actual full blown fascism?”

freely1333@reddthat.com · -1 pts · 37d (2 replies)

Except everyone thinks this applies to them. Baking gay wedding cakes is a good example because is forcing religious people to do it not tolerating their intolerance or is it being intolerant of their religion.

godsammitdam@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 37d (1 reply)

That's a terrible example. No one, individual or government, is forcing anyone to do anything of the sort.

It is entirely within the right of the business owner to decline a request to bake a cake they don't want to bake.

Can there be social repercussions for said action? Of course. Do people have the autonomy to decide not to give a business their money for whatever reason? Absolutely.

I wouldn't give them my money because, I'm sorry, if your "religion" is based on oppression and denial of other humans their basic rights, then no, I won't support you. Fuck off.

(Ironic as I know this incident and it's based on Christian religiosity, which following the actual teachings of Jesus would welcome the stranger, the wanderer, the sick, and the hungry. Regardless of whether they believe or not, they are all God's children. Given that Lucifer has no power of creation, only trickery, and God created all of his children, would that not imply Chrisitians should be accepting of Gods children in all their myriad forms, and to hate another is to fall for the trickery of Satan? That's not religion, that's just rationalizing bigotry. So double fuck off.)

stickyprimer@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 37d

It’s actually illegal in the US to discriminate against certain customers at a place of public accommodation. The famous gay cake case that went to the Supreme Court ultimately went in favor of the baker, but on very narrow procedural grounds that his religion had been targeted in the case. In the opinion, the court affirmed states rights to make anti-discrimination laws generally.

I still don’t think anti-discrimination laws are the government forcing anyone to bake a cake. They’re saying if you want to bake cakes, you need to be prepared to serve everybody. No one is forcing them to open a bakery.

nevyn@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 37d
[ removed ]
abc@suppo.fi · -18 pts · 38d (5 replies)

Örebro is certainly an interesting party. Forked off of the very leftist "Left Party", it's a mix of Marxism, Populism, Swedish Nationalism, Anti-Corruption, Anti-Establishment and Eco-Socialism. Part of the Nordic Green Left Alliance.

Pretty much all over the place, at least on paper.

I don't know, it sounds to me like the kind of party Lemmy should enjoy.

WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com · 26 pts · 38d

Sort of a "national socialist" party, one might say?

electric_nan@lemmy.ml · 24 pts · 38d

Fascists coopting the language of socialism is as old as fascism. That people continue to fall for it amazes me.

Dojan@pawb.social · 5 pts · 37d (1 reply)

Their website literally doesn't have a party programme. From the looks of it they get their votes by spreading propaganda on facebook, which I guess is easy given the donation of five mil. Bananas.

idealpink@feddit.nu · 1 pts · 37d

As a Swede I get clips of Markus Allard in my feeds from time to time. It is always clips of him debating other politicians in their city council. Like it or not it is certaintly not propaganda, it is recordings of him doing his job.

VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz · 0 pts · 38d

Or else enjoy finding dirt on, and discussing them.

InternetEnjoyer@lemmy.world · -21 pts · 38d (13 replies)

Do you people actually know anything about this party or are you just getting your panties in a twist over a nothingburger?

I could say that any party in the Swedish government is controversial, does that mean you are going to boycott everything Swedish now?

0x0@infosec.pub · 12 pts · 38d (12 replies)

i do.

Party is run partly by an ex narc cop that got fired bought out for being a far-right ass

acab

Ghoelian@piefed.social · 8 pts · 38d (6 replies)

Also there was an article written by a seemingly reputable outlet, so yeah I'll choose to believe them. And there's also the fact that the CEO denied nothing. You would think he would clarify the party's stance once the backlash started coming, if everyone were wrong.

InternetEnjoyer@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 38d (5 replies)

Well you should not believe everything you read in articles. Even reputable outlets will be wrong when they write about something outside of their area of expertise. I think most people in here will just read the headline and some comments saying "far-right!" and believe that is true. Go to the Wikipedia pages for the Örebro Party and read them. I'll link both the Swedish and English pages for you so you can compare them. I'll also link to their own website, it is only in Swedish so you'll have to translate it yourself. But you'll see that nothing is out of the ordinary and the whole thing is blown out of proportions.

https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96rebropartiet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96rebro_Party
https://orebropartiet.se/

uzay@infosec.pub · 5 pts · 37d (4 replies)

large-scale remigration

Thanks, didn't need to read any further (still did)

InternetEnjoyer@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 37d (3 replies)

Would you like to elaborate? There's is nothing wrong with not liking it, but that does not put the party into some far-right category that people seem to be making up.

uzay@infosec.pub · 1 pts · 34d (2 replies)

You think advocating for large-scale forced displacement of non-white citizens does not put the party into a far-right category? I feel like you're the one who'd need to elaborate.

InternetEnjoyer@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 33d

I want to make the point that it doesn’t have anything to do with skin color, that is a made up thing by people who don’t like it. Coming to Sweden and getting to stay is not a human right. That applies to everybody no matter where you’re from. So no, I do not think wanting people to remigrate makes the party far-right.

InternetEnjoyer@lemmy.world · -10 pts · 38d (4 replies)

Far-right doesn't mean anything these days, it's just something people default to saying when they're not really interested in debating political views(God forbid you have a slightly different view).

Dojan@pawb.social · 8 pts · 37d (3 replies)

Having a difference of opinion is like "no Margaret, I'm glad you enjoy buttercream frosting but I'm going to stick with this apple pie." That's a difference of opinion.

"Non-whites are subhuman and don't belong in the same country as me" is not a difference of opinion, Internet Explorer.

InternetEnjoyer@lemmy.world · -5 pts · 37d (2 replies)

And nobody has said that, you’re just making stuff up. So just because you disagree, are you not going to have an honest discussion?

Dojan@pawb.social · 6 pts · 37d (1 reply)

Örebropartiet espouses assimilation, not integration. They push for remigration of people who don't assimilate.

That's worked out wonderfully under our current Tidelagsregering, no? We're sending home children who we've raised, educated, and given jobs, to countries they've never been to, because their parents fucked up, be that by accident or on purpose. Sins of the father, and all that.

I'm not disagreeing with tjänstemannaansvar, or reduced salaries for politicians, or free dental care. Those are all low-hanging fruit though, obvious to any working class person. The stickler is the extremely racist rhetoric that comes with it.

That isn't a difference of opinion, it's plain bigotry and dehumanisation.

InternetEnjoyer@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 37d

There is nothing wrong with wanting people to assimilate or get sent back. Integration does not work with certain cultures which we have seen for the last 20 years. If you come to Sweden you are a guest and you should behave like one, right? Then if you do intend to stay you should be supportive of our values and our way of life. There is also no denying that certain people in office hold plain racist views and we have to work hard on kicking those people out of any institutions we have.
So a difference of opinion in this case is what to do with people who come here that don't contribute to society, don't follow our societal norms, and break our laws. It doesn't have anything to do with race.

What I do agree with is how they have really messed up with some cases in regards to people growing up in Sweden and then getting sent to a country they have never been in, but that is on the people in the government for not doing their job correctly. Remigration does not have to mean going all-in or doing nothing, there is a nice middle ground where you can do things on a case-by-case basis.

DarkCloud@lemmy.world · -83 pts · 38d (6 replies)

I'm not Swedish. I'm not in a country nearby whose effected by them. Their politics has nothing to do with me. I don't know the culture or issues there.

perishthethought@piefed.social · 51 pts · 38d

Yeah, but it seems you can read. Closing your eyes won't make this go away.

Rothe@piefed.social · 38 pts · 38d

And why did we need to know this? You can remedy your ignorance by reading up on it.

Quokka@quokk.au · 36 pts · 38d (1 reply)

I’m not Swedish, but I don’t have to be to take offence to racism being promoted in their country.

Pantrygheist@programming.dev · 5 pts · 38d

Also, people act like other political groups aren't looking at how these things develop as guides on how to implement then in their own country

nevyn@slrpnk.net · 17 pts · 38d
[ removed ]
Hund@feddit.nu · 15 pts · 38d

He donated to a party that's basically a mini version of Trump.