FWIW I had to pay the ransom once and it worked fine they gave the password over and even bargained the price down and also fucked up because crypto fees so didn’t have the ability to send the actual full amount and they were chill.
Minus the whole being held for ransom they were probably more consumer friendly than the average large corporation.
Except everyone thinks this applies to them. Baking gay wedding cakes is a good example because is forcing religious people to do it not tolerating their intolerance or is it being intolerant of their religion.
You don’t need anything special to make those images though. That cat is out of the bag. The only thing that should be illegal about that is passing them off as real images - which I’m sure is already breaking quite a few laws.
But yeah go ahead we should certainly limit free speech further - what could go wrong
The ai image gens have gotten a lot stricter on making anything with a “well known” person in them. Oh also way stricter on anything that is politically opinionated. Like within the last 3 months.
We don’t know if he can’t until he tries or really until he’s out of office and can’t keep trying. If I had a nickel for everything the Dems told me Trump couldn’t do that he did I would have enough of bribe them to support universal healthcare.
Because the person who makes it gets touchy on some things and started drama with someone or doxxed them or whatever type deal. It’s not like you can’t talk about it you just can’t use the word because he was going through and being weird about conversations about it. It’s nothing against him or them it’s just one of those developers being a unique type of person - which makes sense in the hyper privacy space.
Casual quit punishments are dumb imo but they did make casual games a bit better on average. And you probably only got banned from chat if you said some heinous shit. I’m pretty sure they just chat ban first no?
Anyway it’s super easy not to get banned on rl since the game emphasizes quick chat anyway
Yeah I would say they’ve given ground on that quite a bit. They’re busy trying to defend a trans persons right to exist so they don’t really have the momentum to start calling you phobic if you don’t start sleeping with every gender under the sun.
FWIW I had to pay the ransom once and it worked fine they gave the password over and even bargained the price down and also fucked up because crypto fees so didn’t have the ability to send the actual full amount and they were chill.
Minus the whole being held for ransom they were probably more consumer friendly than the average large corporation.
Except everyone thinks this applies to them. Baking gay wedding cakes is a good example because is forcing religious people to do it not tolerating their intolerance or is it being intolerant of their religion.
Slavery took about 100 years of gradual policy reform and a civil war to change.
Dinosaurs were 100 million years ago etc etc. 36 years is not even a blip in time.
In fairness three decades isn’t actually that long of a time.
You don’t need anything special to make those images though. That cat is out of the bag. The only thing that should be illegal about that is passing them off as real images - which I’m sure is already breaking quite a few laws.
But yeah go ahead we should certainly limit free speech further - what could go wrong
The ai image gens have gotten a lot stricter on making anything with a “well known” person in them. Oh also way stricter on anything that is politically opinionated. Like within the last 3 months.
Almost like someone is lying about the inflation numbers for the past decade
Luckily there is a new publicly known backdoor so they might be in the clear.
We don’t know if he can’t until he tries or really until he’s out of office and can’t keep trying. If I had a nickel for everything the Dems told me Trump couldn’t do that he did I would have enough of bribe them to support universal healthcare.
Because the person who makes it gets touchy on some things and started drama with someone or doxxed them or whatever type deal. It’s not like you can’t talk about it you just can’t use the word because he was going through and being weird about conversations about it. It’s nothing against him or them it’s just one of those developers being a unique type of person - which makes sense in the hyper privacy space.
Default assumptions of home ownership
Critical mistake that Dems make is thinking independent means centrist
Kinda has to be for wealth to trickle up. I think they might have meant discretionary consumer spending.
Well the thing is it’s now been zero days since they had to write a new backdoor.
Doctor disrespect
Casual quit punishments are dumb imo but they did make casual games a bit better on average. And you probably only got banned from chat if you said some heinous shit. I’m pretty sure they just chat ban first no?
Anyway it’s super easy not to get banned on rl since the game emphasizes quick chat anyway
Yeah I would say they’ve given ground on that quite a bit. They’re busy trying to defend a trans persons right to exist so they don’t really have the momentum to start calling you phobic if you don’t start sleeping with every gender under the sun.
It was pretty common on Reddit around that time with people saying you were trans phobic if you didn’t want to sleep with trans people.
But Trump became president partially because of the backlash to the Obama era language and tone policing.