Shrek 5 trailer just dropped

151 points · 25 comments · view on lemmy.world

25 Comments

inari@piefed.zip · 33 pts · 72d

Just let it die at this point

gedaliyah@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 72d

Me, an old man: "There's too many dang Shreks!"

janewaydidnothingwrong@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 72d (4 replies)

I didnt even know there was a 3rd or 4th. Same with Toy Story, I had no idea it went past 2.

lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 72d (2 replies)

FYI Shrek 3 bad, Shrek 4 decent

janewaydidnothingwrong@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 72d (1 reply)

🫡

OldChicoAle@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 71d

Puss in Boots is good

imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 71d

There are spinoff of Puss in Boots. 1st is fine and 2nd is great!

RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 72d (12 replies)

And a new Toy Story movie as well.

What else are they going to revive? Cars? HTTYD? Ralph breaks (something)?

Kobibi@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 72d (2 replies)

Did HTTYD ever stop? I think they just did a live action version

RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 72d

I guess not, but the recent release was just a copy of the original, not a new addition to the series.

Holytimes@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 71d

The live action remake actually was really good and faithful to the original movie. A rarity for live action remakes.

Still none of it is close to the books, the books are wild!

ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net · 1 pts · 72d

Yes.

OldChicoAle@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 71d

Pixar makes plenty of originals

GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 71d (6 replies)

1000004219

yes I used AI to generate this. yes I hate AI. no, I don't feel bad for using it because I put about as much effort into this as the studios are putting into these sequels.

hansolo@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 70d

Don't feel bad. This is great.

RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 71d (4 replies)

Hate to inject politics, but it should be “wreck it trump” in some sort or Ralph caricature.

freely1333@reddthat.com · 3 pts · 71d (3 replies)

The ai image gens have gotten a lot stricter on making anything with a “well known” person in them. Oh also way stricter on anything that is politically opinionated. Like within the last 3 months.

RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 71d (2 replies)

Wonder why.

/s

Seems like some are still quite capable of making deepfake porn of non-consenting individuals.

GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 71d

*children

freely1333@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 71d

You don’t need anything special to make those images though. That cat is out of the bag. The only thing that should be illegal about that is passing them off as real images - which I’m sure is already breaking quite a few laws.

But yeah go ahead we should certainly limit free speech further - what could go wrong

coolie4@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 72d (3 replies)

What's going on with Mike Myers? Just heard there's gonna be a new Austin Powers too

prettybunnys@piefed.social · 19 pts · 72d (1 reply)

A new Austin powers makes sense, thematically.

2027 is to 1997 what 1997 was to 1967

F u c k

WoodScientist@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 71d

I hope they handle the time skip like this:

Austin again has to get frozen in time, as Dr. Evil decided to again jump forward into the future. Except this time, for plot reasons, the cryo pods malfunctioned and they still ended up aging 30 years.

tomiant@piefed.social · 4 pts · 72d

Rent's up

riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 71d

They shouldn't have changed donkey.