Some dude is standing outside a country-western bar when 3 black women start calling him a racist redneck. He runs over there to start shit, and they push him to the ground. How angry would we be if he pulled a gun on them in that moment?
I can't find the actual video, but the descriptions I can find of the video will make it difficult to rely on self defense and stand your ground, per the language of the law in Wyoming.
She could be considered by a judge or jury the "initial aggressor" by approaching the three men, which negates stand your ground in WY. Or the guys could be considered the initial aggressors as they were yelling slurs at her. The video descriptions say she was walking toward them with her hand near her hip as if ready to pull a weapon, but the descriptions also say you can't see where she was keeping the gun (it was found afterward in her bag... after she told the police she pulled a knife not a gun, and no knife was found).
The descriptions I've read (again, I haven't found the video yet) say that the dude pushed her down and to the side as part of his walking forward motion and continued walking forward away from her. After she hit the ground she pulled her gun, while they were walking away from her.
Counterpoints:
It was a three on one situation while she was on the ground. That's scary shit for anyone.
She didn't shoot the gun at all, just pulled it to let it be known that the situation has changed and she is afraid enough to use it. She testified she pointed the gun at him briefly, so that is almost as dangerous as actually pulling the trigger.
You would think that a news story about filing complaints related to biased decisions would, you know, report about those decisions. At no point in the article do they say what calls Red Star is complaining about. I have no idea if this is a valid complaint or not.
EDIT: The only video I can see is of an absolutely clear penalty. What I'm reading on other places say both: 1. the red card was deserved, as were the penalties, if a bit soft on the third penalty. 2. This referee has an extensive history of wildly bad ref performances.
Murder is not defined as the intentional killing of an innocent person, by either Merriam Webster, Wikipedia, American Heritage Dictionary, or Dictionary.com
Not one definition anywhere has the word "innocent" in it.
It is defined in one place as "The killing of another person without justification or excuse, especially the crime of killing a person with malice aforethought or with recklessness manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life." How we define "justification" is important. I would call most war, "recklessness manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life."
Other places has it as "unlawful or unjustified killing of a person."
They are suing a local business owner who has been in business with this logo for decades... and are saying it is not "business-friendly" to support a local small business over a national mega-chain.
This is correct. While some of them are ashamed of their own feelings/desires and want that banned so it isn't a temptation, the vast majority are going after this as a way to hurt people they want to hurt. Why they want to hurt them can be stem from many things.
It's almost like there is a difference between an object that has only one purpose and a show that has many purposes, none of which involve killing people. I'm not saying we should ban guns, but your analogy is stupid.
And the reply to every single one of those people is, "If you think abortion is wrong BECAUSE it is murder, then what are your feelings on the death penalty or war?"
This isn't for one school, this is for the entire school district. Kansas City SD has 14,000 students across 33 schools. You also have to take into account paying for installation and shipping of 60 of those lockers.
I think it might be that his greatness comes from a combination of always being in the right place, making the right runs, dribbling around people, seeing the entire field, making inch perfect shots... pretty much everything. But when you take all of that out of the picture and just make it about kicking the ball, he can't use his other skills.
That's an extremely common medical device for athletes who are either recovering from a face injury or are often in situations where they can get elbows to the face. Basketball centers, soccer goal keepers, rugby players in general.
If you don't get back here and face violent persecution, we're going to take away the hopeful future you paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for already.
I hear he also blows Clinton.
And turn the situation around:
Some dude is standing outside a country-western bar when 3 black women start calling him a racist redneck. He runs over there to start shit, and they push him to the ground. How angry would we be if he pulled a gun on them in that moment?
I can't find the actual video, but the descriptions I can find of the video will make it difficult to rely on self defense and stand your ground, per the language of the law in Wyoming.
She could be considered by a judge or jury the "initial aggressor" by approaching the three men, which negates stand your ground in WY. Or the guys could be considered the initial aggressors as they were yelling slurs at her. The video descriptions say she was walking toward them with her hand near her hip as if ready to pull a weapon, but the descriptions also say you can't see where she was keeping the gun (it was found afterward in her bag... after she told the police she pulled a knife not a gun, and no knife was found).
The descriptions I've read (again, I haven't found the video yet) say that the dude pushed her down and to the side as part of his walking forward motion and continued walking forward away from her. After she hit the ground she pulled her gun, while they were walking away from her.
Counterpoints:
It was a three on one situation while she was on the ground. That's scary shit for anyone.
She didn't shoot the gun at all, just pulled it to let it be known that the situation has changed and she is afraid enough to use it. She testified she pointed the gun at him briefly, so that is almost as dangerous as actually pulling the trigger.
20-30 million people dead, not followers.
And with gaps in fossil record that last for millions of years, who knows whether we will ever figure out the pathway to flight.
You would think that a news story about filing complaints related to biased decisions would, you know, report about those decisions. At no point in the article do they say what calls Red Star is complaining about. I have no idea if this is a valid complaint or not.
EDIT: The only video I can see is of an absolutely clear penalty. What I'm reading on other places say both: 1. the red card was deserved, as were the penalties, if a bit soft on the third penalty. 2. This referee has an extensive history of wildly bad ref performances.
Murder is not defined as the intentional killing of an innocent person, by either Merriam Webster, Wikipedia, American Heritage Dictionary, or Dictionary.com
Not one definition anywhere has the word "innocent" in it.
It is defined in one place as "The killing of another person without justification or excuse, especially the crime of killing a person with malice aforethought or with recklessness manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life." How we define "justification" is important. I would call most war, "recklessness manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life."
Other places has it as "unlawful or unjustified killing of a person."
They are suing a local business owner who has been in business with this logo for decades... and are saying it is not "business-friendly" to support a local small business over a national mega-chain.
This is correct. While some of them are ashamed of their own feelings/desires and want that banned so it isn't a temptation, the vast majority are going after this as a way to hurt people they want to hurt. Why they want to hurt them can be stem from many things.
It's almost like there is a difference between an object that has only one purpose and a show that has many purposes, none of which involve killing people. I'm not saying we should ban guns, but your analogy is stupid.
And the reply to every single one of those people is, "If you think abortion is wrong BECAUSE it is murder, then what are your feelings on the death penalty or war?"
Bzzt. Wrong.
Try this instead: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-33Ef7gS0vE
I loved the Farseer trilogy, but yeah, it was depressing. I actually liked that, though. It is hard to find stories that don't have happy endings.
I really enjoyed that book. It wasn't as horror-y as his other stuff and had good character interactions.
I'm sorry to be nit-picky, but I think learning that was a requirement BEFORE you get to Heaven.
This isn't for one school, this is for the entire school district. Kansas City SD has 14,000 students across 33 schools. You also have to take into account paying for installation and shipping of 60 of those lockers.
I think it might be that his greatness comes from a combination of always being in the right place, making the right runs, dribbling around people, seeing the entire field, making inch perfect shots... pretty much everything. But when you take all of that out of the picture and just make it about kicking the ball, he can't use his other skills.
Kinda, yeah.
That's an extremely common medical device for athletes who are either recovering from a face injury or are often in situations where they can get elbows to the face. Basketball centers, soccer goal keepers, rugby players in general.
If you don't get back here and face violent persecution, we're going to take away the hopeful future you paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for already.