What? The point I was trying to make is that AI generated content is going to be treated as CC licensed. It is difficult to incorporate under other FOSS projects. Mostly considering that it doesn't exactly distinguish between code, library, binary and patents. It's simplier to avoid it altogether if your primary mission is FOSS
Considering your comment about verification of authorship, it's likely to be treated the same as it is now. You are the author, unless proven otherwise. And you are right. Even if you are the author and wrote every single code yourself, you can infringe on someones paten
Seeing how codeberg is FOSS only, I'm not suprised. Vibe-coded projects is a HUGE legal trap considering licensing. And seeing how it's based in Germany (notorious about siding with license owner against regular individuals) it only makes sense
Look, you're doing it! That's the whatabout campism it is refering to!
I'm not here to argue which shitass empire is better (frankly all should collapse). Just introducing what a tankie means to regular people here to you to reduce tension you're having over different definitions
Tankie here is mostly used against people who are extremely anti US, to the point that they choose to ignore or excuse all the crimes against humanity caused by other Imperialistic nations. Ex. Russia, China
Mostly to quickly point out, that the person is a campist and will ignore other side arguments
You're arguing, about false use of a term, but the term has another meaning. You shouldn't ignore it
They hand it off to other companies that specialize in auditing and overseeing the hack resolvement. If their partner company decide, that it's worth paying. Then they pay.
If the partner company decides to try and negotiate, they can I guess... Hard to say, never saw how insurance plays out when a true hack occurs.
There is insurance for ransomware. Most companies I know, has bought it (surprisingly popular). I'm not surprised that the companies would be willing to pay
I doubt it would be of any use. Most companies underfinance IT and security, while CISO just writes "rules" on how things should be, instead of overseeing actual hardening.
CEOs on the other hand being financially or criminally responsible, may lead to something.
At least the EU NIS2 directive has the right idea about it
To add to the bullshit list. Placing the main wall is only a small saving (at best) in labor time, not to mention that printed cement houses do require extra time having the foundation leveled to a higher degree.
Prefabricated and prepared panels in a factory on the other hand could save a lot of time in routing plumbing and electricity, not to mention the on-site construction time. (Although it won't happen when everyone wants their house individualized)
Does anybody know, if there is a metric this could have been based on? Or is it just one of those "I don't like the country so they are not a real working class"?
What? The point I was trying to make is that AI generated content is going to be treated as CC licensed. It is difficult to incorporate under other FOSS projects. Mostly considering that it doesn't exactly distinguish between code, library, binary and patents. It's simplier to avoid it altogether if your primary mission is FOSS
Considering your comment about verification of authorship, it's likely to be treated the same as it is now. You are the author, unless proven otherwise. And you are right. Even if you are the author and wrote every single code yourself, you can infringe on someones paten
Seeing how codeberg is FOSS only, I'm not suprised. Vibe-coded projects is a HUGE legal trap considering licensing. And seeing how it's based in Germany (notorious about siding with license owner against regular individuals) it only makes sense
All lies and western propaganda! In fact fuel is free!!!
I'm guessing request for fuel is also staged by Ukraine... LMAO
I might have found a clue ;D
Riddle me this. Why did Russia move it's troops from Finland (NATO) border to Ukraine. If NATO is such a threat?
Does it hurt, when different perpectives/ideas aren't deleted like in your bubble .ml instance?
Mostly I saw it used against campist (US vs Them) people here. Much less often against idealistic socialists or communists.
This might better explain: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Dbkkh6GWn5Y
Look, you're doing it! That's the whatabout campism it is refering to!
I'm not here to argue which shitass empire is better (frankly all should collapse). Just introducing what a tankie means to regular people here to you to reduce tension you're having over different definitions
Ah shit, my bad. Ignore me
Tankie is a term for anti US campist, that chooses to ignore crimes againt humanity by other Imperialistic nations. (China, Russia)
Historically used against socialists, but the term gained another meaning
Tankie here is mostly used against people who are extremely anti US, to the point that they choose to ignore or excuse all the crimes against humanity caused by other Imperialistic nations. Ex. Russia, China
Mostly to quickly point out, that the person is a campist and will ignore other side arguments
You're arguing, about false use of a term, but the term has another meaning. You shouldn't ignore it
Russia... Democratic... LMFAO xDDD
Thanks for sharing!
They hand it off to other companies that specialize in auditing and overseeing the hack resolvement. If their partner company decide, that it's worth paying. Then they pay.
If the partner company decides to try and negotiate, they can I guess... Hard to say, never saw how insurance plays out when a true hack occurs.
There is insurance for ransomware. Most companies I know, has bought it (surprisingly popular). I'm not surprised that the companies would be willing to pay
I doubt it would be of any use. Most companies underfinance IT and security, while CISO just writes "rules" on how things should be, instead of overseeing actual hardening.
CEOs on the other hand being financially or criminally responsible, may lead to something.
At least the EU NIS2 directive has the right idea about it
Seeing stories like that, I'm not surprised that no one wants muslim immigrants in their countries
To add to the bullshit list. Placing the main wall is only a small saving (at best) in labor time, not to mention that printed cement houses do require extra time having the foundation leveled to a higher degree.
Prefabricated and prepared panels in a factory on the other hand could save a lot of time in routing plumbing and electricity, not to mention the on-site construction time. (Although it won't happen when everyone wants their house individualized)
Does anybody know, if there is a metric this could have been based on? Or is it just one of those "I don't like the country so they are not a real working class"?