Not all ppl in an open relationship agree on what it is though. Ethical non-monogamy and cheating treat ppl very differently and I reserve my right to shame accordingly.
Actually I think that happens pretty often. For example, in this one. It's unfortunate, but there are so many people with guns and willing to use them that to say they never stop mass shootings is unrealistic.
All positive change is accomplished through violence? That's a pretty extreme view.
Just curious, what would you say was the violent group responsible for the end of the Delano Grape boycott, after which union members won better working conditions and higher wages?
What he's saying is just wrong, but I think behind his words somewhere is the assumption that pacifism isn't an effective way to bring social change. There are many counterexamples.
A source might give evidence for something that happened in the real world, while these last questions were about what goes on in that silly head of yours.
Well, it's true that this is very simple. I wanted the poster's source -- if there is one. Unless you're claiming to be them, you don't have that information.
But since you seem very interested, do you personally think the CCP death estimate you keep presenting is accurate?
You say the commenter above was wrong, but your tone suggests you still agree with them. Do you believe the rest of their narrative that student protestors were peacefully dispersed in song by the unarmed army choir?
Do you recognize that CPC has a conflict of interest in providing accurate information about this, and that they continue to censor information about it to this day?
IDK why you're trying to source someone else's comment for them, but if you read the comment and the wiki you would see that they are not in agreement.
This is why I asked for their source. Sorry if you find that offensive for some reason lol
Since we're evidently reading the same Wikipedia article, I'll point out that those are among the lowest estimates on the page and the Beijing hospital record was 478 dead and 920 wounded.
But these are all very different numbers from what was commented.
It's not that Canada has no options to escalate the trade war, it's that they recognize the obvious truth that escalation hurts both countries
O yeah, I actually saw some ICE agents nearby when it happened. How many would you say it would have taken to do this?
Not all ppl in an open relationship agree on what it is though. Ethical non-monogamy and cheating treat ppl very differently and I reserve my right to shame accordingly.
I think they could, but it's a lot of money and effort. Also buying more than one or two might get you stopped at customs on the return flight.
In some states you can go to a gun show and buy with no paperwork, no id, no background check.
❤️
https://deflock.org/
Yeah but then someone would have to make it to Mt Doom through nuclear fallout.
Probably in his heart Frodo would begin to understand... The quest would claim his life
Actually I think that happens pretty often. For example, in this one. It's unfortunate, but there are so many people with guns and willing to use them that to say they never stop mass shootings is unrealistic.
Thanks, that was about as insightful as I assumed you'd be.
All positive change is accomplished through violence? That's a pretty extreme view.
Just curious, what would you say was the violent group responsible for the end of the Delano Grape boycott, after which union members won better working conditions and higher wages?
What he's saying is just wrong, but I think behind his words somewhere is the assumption that pacifism isn't an effective way to bring social change. There are many counterexamples.
The right keeps snubbing her for having worked as a waitress but at least it puts her further away from the Epstein class
The version I tried was very similar. I doubt most people would even notice the difference.
Do they look like equivalent questions to you?
A source might give evidence for something that happened in the real world, while these last questions were about what goes on in that silly head of yours.
Lol I finally ask something you're qualified to answer and suddenly you have no opinion.
Well, it's true that this is very simple. I wanted the poster's source -- if there is one. Unless you're claiming to be them, you don't have that information.
But since you seem very interested, do you personally think the CCP death estimate you keep presenting is accurate?
You say the commenter above was wrong, but your tone suggests you still agree with them. Do you believe the rest of their narrative that student protestors were peacefully dispersed in song by the unarmed army choir?
Do you recognize that CPC has a conflict of interest in providing accurate information about this, and that they continue to censor information about it to this day?
So just to clarify, you think that:
1.) you can provide the correct source for another person's statement
2.) what you posted qualifies as a source even though you did not give one
3.) it's OK if the statement does not agree with the source
4.) you can justify your misattribution by cherry-picking a number that "roughly" agrees if you massage it
Bruh.
IDK why you're trying to source someone else's comment for them, but if you read the comment and the wiki you would see that they are not in agreement.
This is why I asked for their source. Sorry if you find that offensive for some reason lol
Since we're evidently reading the same Wikipedia article, I'll point out that those are among the lowest estimates on the page and the Beijing hospital record was 478 dead and 920 wounded.
But these are all very different numbers from what was commented.