Yes they absolutely will. I'm not saying it wouldn't be the right thing to do and worthwhile, but they are hoping for that as an excuse to more radically escalate state violence.
Exactly the type of content I've come to expect from our favorite username! However, I do wonder why the official position of the DSA is to pacify Russia, up to and including ending military aid to Ukraine. https://international.dsausa.org/ukraine/
Between the smorgasbord of propaganda and ratings slop, withered attention spans and critical thinking skills, temporarily embarrassed millionaires and gilded age inequality, and folks that just can't face how bad things really are, yea we are pretty fucked I guess. I don't think the US is alone in that regard, but indeed beacon on a hill for a humanity in peril. OH my god did I just quote fucking Reagan?!
On WABC (AM 770 in my area) they literally tried to put a negative spin on this! Apparently, since he's already a millionaire, he doesn't need it! Evil guy! They even played the clip of him talking about going door to door and no one told him they're concerned the mayor doesn't make enough. Beyond fucking delusional. I turn that shit on when I'm looking for maximum and immediate cognitive dissonance.
I understand and appreciate where you desire to go with it, I just don't see a current system to support it. Afaik people do make their own AIs/LLMs (recalling an artist's court case regarding the legitimacy of their work), but large scale LLMs do their thing by running roughshod and stealing tons of data and driving up hardware and electricity prices. It is difficult to see an environment where small models prosper compared their lawless corpo counterparts. It would probably be more beneficial to humankind, though.
Well all I will say is that I do understand the usefulness of LLMs as tools, though I only really use them passively through search results, and always verify the results separately. And I have a fundamental understanding of how they work. While I understand what Linus is getting at in a practical sense, I worry he is putting his head in the sand regarding the heavy handed agendas at work in the implementation of AI as we know it now. And I think that is a definite bad thing to be ignorant of. I personally won't embrace "AI" until it is liberated from the agenda of power and inequality. Though, I cannot but accept its level of influence in daily life, and will attempt to understand and recognize if it fundamentally evolves or changes.
Edit: "they’re just new and selfish people will try to find an angle with them, same as it’s always been." Just wanted to add that yeah, its pretty highly focused in that way. And until society can fundamentally change, that is and always will be a huge problem applying such technologies. I mean shit, look at the fuckin internet.
Well most of them won't read beyond the headline; they'll likely just make massive assumptions based on title and their own predispositions. Sounds to me like Linus is trying to leave room for some of the practical nature of LLMs and implement them as useful tools, but it seems like he may be a little ignorant of the various agendas of LLM developers themselves. Just my stupid take.
His residence was a giant pile of garbage. I mean, he's not like, 3M or Mr. Burns, but we I don't think we want people trash dumping in national parks. They're in enough danger as it is. If you move your campsite every 14 days and don't litter, you could live there indefinitely, it would seem.
Yes they absolutely will. I'm not saying it wouldn't be the right thing to do and worthwhile, but they are hoping for that as an excuse to more radically escalate state violence.
Oh now you fucked up!
Exactly the type of content I've come to expect from our favorite username! However, I do wonder why the official position of the DSA is to pacify Russia, up to and including ending military aid to Ukraine. https://international.dsausa.org/ukraine/
Joey Joe Joe!!
Your German is excellent!
Casualties would be light. But it's a declaration of war!
Piece of shit won't say a piece of shit's a piece of shit? YA DON'T SAY!?
I know...
So I just looked up Haley and that picture gives me serious demon vibes, and she's a centrist democrat that supports Schumer so that's CONFIRMED.
This better be Dankmus...
Edit: bum bum bum bum bless you DrWorm.
Between the smorgasbord of propaganda and ratings slop, withered attention spans and critical thinking skills, temporarily embarrassed millionaires and gilded age inequality, and folks that just can't face how bad things really are, yea we are pretty fucked I guess. I don't think the US is alone in that regard, but indeed beacon on a hill for a humanity in peril. OH my god did I just quote fucking Reagan?!
On WABC (AM 770 in my area) they literally tried to put a negative spin on this! Apparently, since he's already a millionaire, he doesn't need it! Evil guy! They even played the clip of him talking about going door to door and no one told him they're concerned the mayor doesn't make enough. Beyond fucking delusional. I turn that shit on when I'm looking for maximum and immediate cognitive dissonance.
I understand and appreciate where you desire to go with it, I just don't see a current system to support it. Afaik people do make their own AIs/LLMs (recalling an artist's court case regarding the legitimacy of their work), but large scale LLMs do their thing by running roughshod and stealing tons of data and driving up hardware and electricity prices. It is difficult to see an environment where small models prosper compared their lawless corpo counterparts. It would probably be more beneficial to humankind, though.
Well all I will say is that I do understand the usefulness of LLMs as tools, though I only really use them passively through search results, and always verify the results separately. And I have a fundamental understanding of how they work. While I understand what Linus is getting at in a practical sense, I worry he is putting his head in the sand regarding the heavy handed agendas at work in the implementation of AI as we know it now. And I think that is a definite bad thing to be ignorant of. I personally won't embrace "AI" until it is liberated from the agenda of power and inequality. Though, I cannot but accept its level of influence in daily life, and will attempt to understand and recognize if it fundamentally evolves or changes.
Edit: "they’re just new and selfish people will try to find an angle with them, same as it’s always been." Just wanted to add that yeah, its pretty highly focused in that way. And until society can fundamentally change, that is and always will be a huge problem applying such technologies. I mean shit, look at the fuckin internet.
This man should have been taken away in a straight jacket.
Edit: also, the whole Jon Ossoff questioning is here, at 1:46:05. Good to hear in it's entirety: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9BYMPKDB3g
One of my favorite little solo performances, by David Strathairn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmyswQs6_Bw
Well most of them won't read beyond the headline; they'll likely just make massive assumptions based on title and their own predispositions. Sounds to me like Linus is trying to leave room for some of the practical nature of LLMs and implement them as useful tools, but it seems like he may be a little ignorant of the various agendas of LLM developers themselves. Just my stupid take.
THIS IS A PETES COFFEE HOUSE!!
Literally the stupidest fuckin thing anyone could say about this.
His residence was a giant pile of garbage. I mean, he's not like, 3M or Mr. Burns, but we I don't think we want people trash dumping in national parks. They're in enough danger as it is. If you move your campsite every 14 days and don't litter, you could live there indefinitely, it would seem.