even assuming that a group of free people without classes or coercion would choose to make a law, it can't possibly apply to people who didn't consent to it.
so it's no law at all. and such a law dies when one of the last two agreed people die.
it simply makes no sense for a system of consent and consensus to implement laws.
right. and while the ussr may have been socialist (i honestly don't want to take a position on that), the features of the society that you cited are not explicitly socialist. you mostly cited the existence of institutions within the state and some statistics about the standard of living. those could appear in a fascist society, as well.
for real. I'm a person. my existence is not meant to be a function in your economic analysis.
for real
fireball is light. I like bankers club Gin and Evan Williams bourbon. it's an act of self control not to drink half a bottle a night.
I'm not an alcoholic, I just like to drink, and keep my tolerance up for social situations.
if you weren't making it up, you could provide evidence.
youre making this up.
did you ever hear the tragedy of untrackme ?
misandry doesn't real
even assuming that a group of free people without classes or coercion would choose to make a law, it can't possibly apply to people who didn't consent to it.
so it's no law at all. and such a law dies when one of the last two agreed people die.
it simply makes no sense for a system of consent and consensus to implement laws.
no one is relitigating wwii
I'm 14 and this is deep
the kind of people who might vote for him obviously don't think that.
because if to get actually pass the agenda they run on, they can't threaten not to get it passed in the next election
Trump claimed not to know anything about project 2025
"people that want power will find ways to get power"
nah. probably not.
literally a country song
"Mussolini enjoyer"
this is some bad faith bullshit
when does kropotkin infantalize and dismiss marxists?
oh god, it's like reading parenti
make it stop
i'm not saying it's a common feature in fascist societies. i'm saying nothing about the explicit ideology precludes it.
right. and while the ussr may have been socialist (i honestly don't want to take a position on that), the features of the society that you cited are not explicitly socialist. you mostly cited the existence of institutions within the state and some statistics about the standard of living. those could appear in a fascist society, as well.
I didn't say anything about whether the ussr was socialist. I said the evidence you gave doesn't preclude the ussr from being fascist