Sad to hear development is staled. I used to write articles on Plume several years ago and it worked just fine (not sure about Lemmy federation though). WriteFreely was very similar, though it does not support comments IIRC.
You would be surprised. Google privacy practices have a bad press. I'm hearing random people saying they got a "de-googled' phone at my local hairdresser. Also, the cheapest chinese model are not "Android-certified", so potentially also de-googled.
He still has to demonstrate this actually adds any value compared to just using Meshtastic with MQTT enabled. Right, it integrates with SSH natively...
Well, that's definitely a for-profit. But since most software is GPL, they are compelled to distribute their modifications, and they contribute to upstream projects too. Canonical and Oracle are part of the big ones too.
There are lots of large companies selling support for Linux. They have salespersons and SLOs (IBM/Redhat, Suse and many more), This won't help decision makers not giving a shit about long term strategy (also called capitalism).
This one has native onion rotation and no need to host a server (it uses a simpler message queuing, might be less efficient when both parties are often offline). Also SimpleX is not designed to run over TOR if I remember correctly (more complexity).
I've been using a raid1 btrfs pool to store offline backups for around 10 years. It's 4 rotating drives (2x4TB+2x12TB). I replaced / rebalanced 3 disks with larger / newer ones already (went fine). I identified a bad usb/sata controller, and lots of bitrots on one old disk (scrub was able to correct a few thousands errors).
I'm getting around 80MB/s read/write throughput (not great but OK for offline backup). I'm able to mount it on low-powered / low-memory devices (not the case for ZFS). Scrub takes around 2 days IIRC (for around 10TB of actual data), so I run it once a year.
I keep it simple and thus am not using advanced features (dedup / encryption / snapshots / subvolumes / raid5/6/10).
So far its a good match for my needs.
Sad to hear development is staled. I used to write articles on Plume several years ago and it worked just fine (not sure about Lemmy federation though). WriteFreely was very similar, though it does not support comments IIRC.
Hello, not sure you are aware, but you can write blogs articles on Plume to be on ActivityPub directly.
on my side, videos are crashing after around 90 seconds since a week or so...
You would be surprised. Google privacy practices have a bad press. I'm hearing random people saying they got a "de-googled' phone at my local hairdresser. Also, the cheapest chinese model are not "Android-certified", so potentially also de-googled.
Murena is a great alternative. They have relatively cheap and ready-to-use models.
He still has to demonstrate this actually adds any value compared to just using Meshtastic with MQTT enabled. Right, it integrates with SSH natively...
French one here: https://www.welcometothejungle.com/en-GB
Nice to have lightweight Proxmox and LXC, but this rtx3050 is draining power 24/7?
duplicate: https://slrpnk.net/post/40680281
Integrating reviews into OSM would cause never ending bot spaming issues.
I found @FirefoxOfficial@mastodon.social ; created on July 14th and verified domain ownership. Shouldn't we mention this as well?
How will this compare with the PineNote?
Is it linked to the OpenBookTouch crowdfunding campain launched last week? https://lemmy.world/post/49429593
Well, that's definitely a for-profit. But since most software is GPL, they are compelled to distribute their modifications, and they contribute to upstream projects too. Canonical and Oracle are part of the big ones too.
There are lots of large companies selling support for Linux. They have salespersons and SLOs (IBM/Redhat, Suse and many more), This won't help decision makers not giving a shit about long term strategy (also called capitalism).
I just dumped one day back into the rabbit hole of reticulum, yggdrasil & all. Thanks ^^
This one has native onion rotation and no need to host a server (it uses a simpler message queuing, might be less efficient when both parties are often offline). Also SimpleX is not designed to run over TOR if I remember correctly (more complexity).
yes HDR is here!
I've been using a raid1 btrfs pool to store offline backups for around 10 years. It's 4 rotating drives (2x4TB+2x12TB). I replaced / rebalanced 3 disks with larger / newer ones already (went fine). I identified a bad usb/sata controller, and lots of bitrots on one old disk (scrub was able to correct a few thousands errors).
I'm getting around 80MB/s read/write throughput (not great but OK for offline backup). I'm able to mount it on low-powered / low-memory devices (not the case for ZFS). Scrub takes around 2 days IIRC (for around 10TB of actual data), so I run it once a year.
I keep it simple and thus am not using advanced features (dedup / encryption / snapshots / subvolumes / raid5/6/10). So far its a good match for my needs.
Hi, what's wrong with Briar?