My first instinct was Nd2 because you release the attack on the a1-h8 diagonal, hit the king, force him to walk into d4, pinning the knight and then... IF there was another pawn on f2, blocking the escape square of e3, Bxf6 delivers mate in 2...so that's my guess of what it's supposed to look like. Or any other piece that takes away e3 but I think you'd be limited to either rooks or queens and since they could deliver the mate themselves it would introduce alternative solutions so not as desirable as the pawn..
Similar for rugby in Europe. I subscribed last year and only discovered on the first day of the league that I was only getting 50/60% of my team's games in the domestic league, not to mention the other league.
Emotionally engaged for that 90-120 minutes. Most people would not be invested enough to watch a season about the same character 2 years later. It's an entirely different proposition and different mode.
Yeah. But an investment in a longer season is more likely to translate to sustained viewership for subsequent seasons. There was also less choice in the past. But really I think it's about emotional investment.
All of the shows "going" are that length these days. That means that the best ones have to be that length and that's survivor bias I think. Just because some shows that length survive doesn't mean a majority will.
My guess is that you don't hook viewers, emotionally engage and capture their investment in the plot and characters by producing 8-10 episodes. Shows used to do ~24.
If I spend less time with your character while you've got my attention at the start, the connection will more quickly fade away and when it comes to season 2 I have forgotten caring.
This feels like it's just shy of a shit post.
My first instinct was Nd2 because you release the attack on the a1-h8 diagonal, hit the king, force him to walk into d4, pinning the knight and then... IF there was another pawn on f2, blocking the escape square of e3, Bxf6 delivers mate in 2...so that's my guess of what it's supposed to look like. Or any other piece that takes away e3 but I think you'd be limited to either rooks or queens and since they could deliver the mate themselves it would introduce alternative solutions so not as desirable as the pawn..
Ne1, Nxd7...
I think there's a mistake in this... There's no mate in 2
The first guy looks like the clothes ate him back
Similar for rugby in Europe. I subscribed last year and only discovered on the first day of the league that I was only getting 50/60% of my team's games in the domestic league, not to mention the other league.
I can't wait to read about how Saddam survived.
It's crazy and unacceptable we didn't get a corvid.
Those bird designs really don't appeal.
Not sure it was necessary but okay. So long as I'm not forced to work to find things that I already knew how to find...
I will. Went through a whole thing where I hadn't tried them, but long-story-short; now I will. No fuss.
Emotionally engaged for that 90-120 minutes. Most people would not be invested enough to watch a season about the same character 2 years later. It's an entirely different proposition and different mode.
Yeah. But an investment in a longer season is more likely to translate to sustained viewership for subsequent seasons. There was also less choice in the past. But really I think it's about emotional investment.
All of the shows "going" are that length these days. That means that the best ones have to be that length and that's survivor bias I think. Just because some shows that length survive doesn't mean a majority will.
My guess is that you don't hook viewers, emotionally engage and capture their investment in the plot and characters by producing 8-10 episodes. Shows used to do ~24.
If I spend less time with your character while you've got my attention at the start, the connection will more quickly fade away and when it comes to season 2 I have forgotten caring.
Exceptional exceptions excepted.
My country doesn't have electronic voting. Are the machines networked? One would hope not.
Every system can be subverted. Ballot boxes or stacks of votes stuff or lost... The integrity is in the checks and balances, verifiable oversight.
You can fit most things in a garage. As this guy is proving... The sky is the limit
Any openings in your cult? 😉
Same