This can easily backfire, though. The fascist will rarely start the debate by glorifying the Third Reich. Instead, he will start off by lamenting the state of the working class, or complain about foreign policy, and only progressively reveal his true agenda. Showing contempt for him at this stage could be interpreted as contempt for these issues.
What the fascist attempts to do in these debates is to acquire legitimacy, since their political position sits outside the overton window. Using logical fallacies against him is to basically hand him that legitimacy for free by making him appear "reasonable". The easiest solution to all this is not to debate them at all.
Usually, if you want enrich yourself or your friends, you'd want to create a climate favorable to economic growth and skim little off the top of that using the usual corruption methods. You don't want to start a multitude of trade or literal wars that threaten the global economy.
If it wasn't for Trump being the cause of this, you'd almost think this collapse is intentional...
Volkswagen is trying to implement a comprehensive cost-cutting programme with up to 100,000 job losses, double the amount previously planned, by 2030 and the potential contraction or closure of several plants.
There's no solution to this. Either make cars people want to buy or GTFO. Can't have jobs for an unwanted industry.
Somewhat true, but the German auto slowdown isn't only due to China flooding the markets. The biggest losses they're making right now is due to the drop of exports.
The upper classes of the world no longer need or want "premium" European goods, because they've been revealed not to be that great anyway.
It doesn't even mean anything to drive an Audi or BMW anymore. A Hyundai or Chinese brand can give you the same functionality at an equal or cheaper cost. Their cars don't even stand out anymore due to their SUV focus. It's hard for a luxury brand to recover its image once it loses its lustre.
I believe they do this because they want all articles to be in English. The way they implement this is to allow only the Latin script to be used for submissions.
Quick guilty verdict? That’s not a presumption of innocence.
Just a quick verdict. Usually most of the time of the prosecutor is spent building the case, but here the abundance of evidence means he won't have to.
Should some court in Europe have jurisdiction over the world? It’s it even a legal system when it’s motivated by politics?
The ICC (it's this one that does the prosecution) bases its rulings on the basis of the UDHR. Since no UN member ever made opposition to it, and practically all nations are UN members, it has worldwide jurisdiction to remind the UN members of their obligations.
Also Netanyahu isn’t going to be arrested. The ICJ doesn’t have an army to enforce their decrees on parts of the world that don’t recognise their legitimacy.
Probably correct, but we never know. Nations that enforce international law, like Canada, could possibly make an arrest on behalf of the ICC. It may also just be the case the Israel itself may hand him over if he is ever impeached there.
Issuing these kinds of orders only hurt is legitimacy (don’t issue orders that won’t be followed!)
That's an appeal to force type of argument. These orders should be issued based on whether they are legal or illegal, not whether they will be followed or enforced.
It's more of a problem of having no base definitions on which everyone agrees upon. So anything goes and no one ends up knowing what they're talking about.
This can easily backfire, though. The fascist will rarely start the debate by glorifying the Third Reich. Instead, he will start off by lamenting the state of the working class, or complain about foreign policy, and only progressively reveal his true agenda. Showing contempt for him at this stage could be interpreted as contempt for these issues.
What the fascist attempts to do in these debates is to acquire legitimacy, since their political position sits outside the overton window. Using logical fallacies against him is to basically hand him that legitimacy for free by making him appear "reasonable". The easiest solution to all this is not to debate them at all.
Usually, if you want enrich yourself or your friends, you'd want to create a climate favorable to economic growth and skim little off the top of that using the usual corruption methods. You don't want to start a multitude of trade or literal wars that threaten the global economy.
If it wasn't for Trump being the cause of this, you'd almost think this collapse is intentional...
There's no solution to this. Either make cars people want to buy or GTFO. Can't have jobs for an unwanted industry.
Somewhat true, but the German auto slowdown isn't only due to China flooding the markets. The biggest losses they're making right now is due to the drop of exports.
The upper classes of the world no longer need or want "premium" European goods, because they've been revealed not to be that great anyway.
It doesn't even mean anything to drive an Audi or BMW anymore. A Hyundai or Chinese brand can give you the same functionality at an equal or cheaper cost. Their cars don't even stand out anymore due to their SUV focus. It's hard for a luxury brand to recover its image once it loses its lustre.
No one left to buy them. Since they're expensive locally, they used to export them to the Chinese. But China has its own industry now.
“Leftwing extremism is on the rise again in Germany and poses a threat to public safety and order,”
Again?... unless, they're talking about the old days...
So the damage caused by these secondaries probably lead to these deaths, hence why Ukraine is going public about it.
I believe they do this because they want all articles to be in English. The way they implement this is to allow only the Latin script to be used for submissions.
Yes, apparently.
First?
Now?
The problem with that is that there's something in the way.
Just a quick verdict. Usually most of the time of the prosecutor is spent building the case, but here the abundance of evidence means he won't have to.
The ICC (it's this one that does the prosecution) bases its rulings on the basis of the UDHR. Since no UN member ever made opposition to it, and practically all nations are UN members, it has worldwide jurisdiction to remind the UN members of their obligations.
Probably correct, but we never know. Nations that enforce international law, like Canada, could possibly make an arrest on behalf of the ICC. It may also just be the case the Israel itself may hand him over if he is ever impeached there.
That's an appeal to force type of argument. These orders should be issued based on whether they are legal or illegal, not whether they will be followed or enforced.
And thus increasing the political divide.
Of course. With the level of evidence the ICJ has against him, they can order an arrest; this should turn out to be a quick verdict.
All major organized society from the 20th century onwards used some form of currency, be it fascist, liberal or socialist. This isn't really debated.
Pro capitalist and socially progressive is just called liberal.
The problem here is that part of the left deny that liberals are on the left.
It's more of a problem of having no base definitions on which everyone agrees upon. So anything goes and no one ends up knowing what they're talking about.
It doesn't include attempts to move beyond capitalism.