I read/skimmed the first 2 because they really went on. They seem to be reaching hard. A whole lot of flowery language to evoke an emotional response of unease. If they had anything real they would have gotten to the point. The only thing that was concrete (that I saw) was he said a study was on humans when it was on rats. Testing on rats is common and he could have misremembered.
*I did a ctrl+f on "Sarah" (his partner) and it comes up 56 times. Sure whatever form of cheating is bad, but this is the exact emotional stuff they went for. That's the kind of article it is. Fifty six times.
I always did my snake to the bottom left, funny how it looks off to me.
The creator JJ is an absolute joke. He hates Canada with a passion and puts on a ridiculous fake accent. Don't support him by watching.
Had to check:
Put your back into it.
Kim's Hell March https://youtu.be/EWGIXSxBlpQ
No kidding. Camacho saw the problems and wanted to solve them.
They are worried that others will treat them like they want to treat minorities.
Or g! Or at the end.
Also w! for wikipedia.
I think there's a few more.
Where was America when the freedom fries fell?
I've learned that
Hospital = Krankenhaus = Sick House
Ambulance = Krankenwagen = Sick Wagon
It actually makes sense.
With a solid podcast under my belt, apparently proven wrong with vigorous research.
[Stuff You Should Know] Birth Order: So nice, we did it twice #stuffYouShouldKnow https://podcastaddict.com/stuff-you-should-know/episode/160507956 via @PodcastAddict
Easily. They cost a small fortune unfortunately. Look up Canada Goose parkas. Or Outdoor Survival Canada.
30 below is expected.
I like how Canada used their old leopard 1s for target practice when we know now they could have been outfitted as Gepards
They'll also never care.
I read/skimmed the first 2 because they really went on. They seem to be reaching hard. A whole lot of flowery language to evoke an emotional response of unease. If they had anything real they would have gotten to the point. The only thing that was concrete (that I saw) was he said a study was on humans when it was on rats. Testing on rats is common and he could have misremembered.
*I did a ctrl+f on "Sarah" (his partner) and it comes up 56 times. Sure whatever form of cheating is bad, but this is the exact emotional stuff they went for. That's the kind of article it is. Fifty six times.
Why is he a snake?
Tell him the best employees will quit. The rest will be too burnt out to actually do anything truly productive.
Community context: Fake, Androids don't die.