Korruption und Populismus sind halt konservativer Markenkern. Aber wehe, du machst in deinem Privatleben irgendwas mit Sexualität, was Konservative nicht gut finden. Dann schlägt's 13!
...und du musst dafür dieselben Plattformen eben jener US-Oligarchen zu nutzen, die diese halbherzig als Gadget getarnten Überwachungsbrillen in die Welt geschissen haben. Das macht, äh, Hoffnung!
Alles schon gehabt mit Europaabgeordneten zum Thema Chatkontrolle. Das ist verschwendete Zeit. Da kriegt man irgendwelches Salbader zurück. Entweder geschrieben von Mitarbeitern oder gleich nem LLM.
Überlegen wir lieber, wie wirkungsvoller Pushback aussieht.
And Slovakia. And Serbia. And even in states that aren't already infiltrated, Russia finances useful idiots and fifth columns everywhere, from the AfD in Germany to the Rassemblée Nationale in France. These fucks would sell out their home countries to Putin in a heartbeat, yet the call themselves "patriots" and even "nationalists". If our governments were to finally take these hybrid attacks seriously, they'd set everything in motion to follow the dark money back to its source - and crack down on foreign interference.
Since I am not inclined to spend my day on reading a 150+ pages report, I downloaded the document and did two things to it.
First, I scanned for interesting key words, particularly on ID. This was the only relevant result:
Age-assurance methods – both age verification or age estimation – must be proportionate and uphold minimum requirements, notably concerning the fundamental rights of users, including children’s rights and related safeguards. Any method employed to check age should uphold the highest privacy and data protection standards, and should not lead to the processing of identity documents and biometric data for the purpose of age estimation. Technical standards such as ‘Zero Knowledge Proof’ should be implemented to ensure that both the platform required to assess the age and the age verification provider do not receive any information that can lead to the tracking or identification of the user.
While one may be skeptical whether lawmakers will actually follow this recommendation, the document says the opposite of what OP claims, i.e. no processing of ID documents.
I also had local AI (Llama 3.1 8B Q4) comb through the document. Here's what it got me. TL;DR: again, no mention of ID requirements.
The document mentions the following points related to identifying users online:
Consent for minors: The report notes that it may be difficult to validate that an individual providing consent on behalf of a child has the legal authority to do so.
Data minimization principle: In accordance with this principle, controllers should only process necessary data and avoid processing sensitive personal information (such as documents indicating care arrangements) unless absolutely necessary.
However, there is no explicit mention of ID requirements for using specific services or gaining internet access in general. The report does discuss the importance of evaluating the operational performance of Article 40 data access and scrutiny requirements to ensure online platforms follow up on requests, but it doesn't provide details about user identification procedures.
It's worth noting that the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is mentioned as a reference for understanding what constitutes an Information Society Service, which includes apps, social media platforms, search engines, etc. However, this does not directly relate to ID requirements or access restrictions for internet services in general.
Edit: the page just got removed by the EU. That is EU transparency for you.
Not sure what things looked like before, but now your link leads to a report titled "Child safety
online PROTECTING AND EMPOWERING MINORS IN A DIGITAL WORLD".
I am aware of all that. Still, this gesture is fraught with bitter irony when coming from people who did unspeakable things in the name of some political or religious ideology. Yesterday, they stood proud, doing what they did out in the open, claiming their ideology gave them the right to do it. Today, they cower and hide, not wanting to be connected with their deeds. If a human court of law and a bit of social stigma is all it takes to make your beliefs crumble, maybe your beliefs were shit to begin with, and you could have had this realisation at a fraction of the cost in human suffering. But alas...
Patreon made the process of switching my account off of Google so convoluted, I opted to just nuke my account entirely.
This is advisable regardless of whether the service makes switching a pain or not. Linking accounts once creates a link forever. If privacy and clean separation are your goals, break the link and start from scratch.
One retail site is giving me an error creating a new non-G account, probably because my device, a Samsung-owned tablet, is already “registered”, probably through some super invasive Google process hardware fingerprinting it and linking it to my account.
If you can, ditch the service. This kind of fuckery should not be rewarded with hard currency.
If you can't, use a desktop machine to create a new account. If things don't work in a vanilla browser, you can escalate the process by
deleting all cookies / using private mode (separates you from any cookie baggage you may still have)
using a VPN (thus thwarting IP-based identification)
blocking JavaScript (if the site is still usable without it) or spoofing a user agent
= mit Merkel war das anders. Nix war anders. Aussitzen ist Standard in dem Drecksverein - vor, während und nach Merkel
LOL! Romantisierst du dir ernsthaft gerade die Merkel-CDU gerade als Hort des Anstands zurecht?
Korruption und Populismus sind halt konservativer Markenkern. Aber wehe, du machst in deinem Privatleben irgendwas mit Sexualität, was Konservative nicht gut finden. Dann schlägt's 13!
Ein kluger Innenminister, dem sein Amtseid etwas wert ist, würde deshalb mal PRÜFen. Aber wir haben leider nur Dobrindt.
No, it wasn't.
Newly declassified documents show that Russia did interfere on behalf of the orange moron.
...und du musst dafür dieselben Plattformen eben jener US-Oligarchen zu nutzen, die diese halbherzig als Gadget getarnten Überwachungsbrillen in die Welt geschissen haben. Das macht, äh, Hoffnung!
Ich hätte hier noch einen Mailänder Dom rumstehen...
Alles schon gehabt mit Europaabgeordneten zum Thema Chatkontrolle. Das ist verschwendete Zeit. Da kriegt man irgendwelches Salbader zurück. Entweder geschrieben von Mitarbeitern oder gleich nem LLM.
Überlegen wir lieber, wie wirkungsvoller Pushback aussieht.
FTFY
#popekiller
korrupte Ungarn-Geräusche
Das ist bei einem großen Teil der Gesetze, die dem Bundestag passieren, der Fall, ja.
Lustiges Detail, das im Artikel und der clickbaitigen Schlagzeile etwas untergeht: Das kann Schwarz-Rot gar nicht.
DSGVO ist nämlich dummerweise EU-Recht. Da kann Deutschland allenfalls Lobbying für eine Aufweichung auf EU-Ebene machen:
Und "die EU" sagt hoffentlich: "Schleicht euch, ihr Vögel!"
Alright folks, time to fund Antifa (lol), BLM, anti-ICE activists and the ACLU ahead of the midterms I guess. See how the fascists like that.
Wes Brot ich ess, des Lied ich sing. Es wäre so passend.
And Slovakia. And Serbia. And even in states that aren't already infiltrated, Russia finances useful idiots and fifth columns everywhere, from the AfD in Germany to the Rassemblée Nationale in France. These fucks would sell out their home countries to Putin in a heartbeat, yet the call themselves "patriots" and even "nationalists". If our governments were to finally take these hybrid attacks seriously, they'd set everything in motion to follow the dark money back to its source - and crack down on foreign interference.
Since I am not inclined to spend my day on reading a 150+ pages report, I downloaded the document and did two things to it.
First, I scanned for interesting key words, particularly on ID. This was the only relevant result:
While one may be skeptical whether lawmakers will actually follow this recommendation, the document says the opposite of what OP claims, i.e. no processing of ID documents.
I also had local AI (Llama 3.1 8B Q4) comb through the document. Here's what it got me. TL;DR: again, no mention of ID requirements.
Not sure what things looked like before, but now your link leads to a report titled "Child safety online PROTECTING AND EMPOWERING MINORS IN A DIGITAL WORLD".
I am aware of all that. Still, this gesture is fraught with bitter irony when coming from people who did unspeakable things in the name of some political or religious ideology. Yesterday, they stood proud, doing what they did out in the open, claiming their ideology gave them the right to do it. Today, they cower and hide, not wanting to be connected with their deeds. If a human court of law and a bit of social stigma is all it takes to make your beliefs crumble, maybe your beliefs were shit to begin with, and you could have had this realisation at a fraction of the cost in human suffering. But alas...
This is advisable regardless of whether the service makes switching a pain or not. Linking accounts once creates a link forever. If privacy and clean separation are your goals, break the link and start from scratch.
If you can, ditch the service. This kind of fuckery should not be rewarded with hard currency.
If you can't, use a desktop machine to create a new account. If things don't work in a vanilla browser, you can escalate the process by