Additionally to the other answer: Not all published source code is open souce, and I'm pretty sure, the scrapers didn't stop to read the licence.md files on github
I'm now trying out SUSE microOS for my mini servers. These are initially setup via combustion / ignition. you add these scripts to a usb stick and insert them during the first boot where they initialize fhe system.
As far as I saw, at least ignition is quite open and supported by most distros
As far as I understand, they already are sharing it:
The database is currently hosted on GitHub and only Bitwarden engineers are capable of adding entries. Your extension’s copy of the database is stored locally and your extension sends no data to Bitwarden or GitHub on usage.
So, if I can choose between a company that fucks me over with their search ranking, sells my data and still tries to present me bought ads as actual results, and is required to provide all this information to a corrupt goverment; versus a company that minimizes the amount of collected data, so they don't have to hand over so many information while being supoenad, I choose the 2nd option
Probably not youtube, because in a truly open market with socialist rules, youtube would have fallen with its constant enshittification and be replaced with a more user/creater friendly alternative.
That's the theory...I usually have to first replace some packages that have been removed / renamed then homemanager is acting up because some stuff now is called differently.
And every time it just shows me the one error that failed...
If you want to make a point...present a real source not a vague hint to google.
What is the issue? Do you mean NPC predators in games? Probably should be 18+ rated then...
If you mean multiplayer....no age bucket check will prevent predators on the servers....
There is such thing as parental responsibility, if someone just lets their child consume higher rated media online without any discurse its a parental failure.
What is next? Does the blueray player need to verify with photoID that everyone in the room is older than the movies rating?
There are laws that make cism illegal in pretty every country. And most countries and companies are pretty quick with takedown requests. So why do we need age verification? CISM is illegal for everyone
Now for other stuff that is legally age gated in one country, but it is hosted in another country which has another legal age limit. Which one counts now?
Does the lawmakers have the reverse law in place, that when a page requests the age bucket, even if there is no legal requirement, does the pagebget fined as well? Otherwise it just leads again to the "cookie banner issue".
That is a completely different premise.
A) putting "Catholic church" and "protect children" in the same sentence is already a bold move
B) if I place my child in the boy scouts I do have some expectations on them to protect the child, correct. But that's not the all or nothing situation you mentioned in your example
My point is the same as with DNS Blocking: It is proposed under the umbrella of "think about the kids", but it doesn't work for what they propose it and it is a first step in creating the base of a censorship infrastructure. The govements (and by that I mean all of them not just the US) should hold the platform's accountable for shit they mess up now and don't accept "Sorry we can't do that at scale" as an answer. Google and meta should act much harder on reports by the community. interestingly, they CAN act fast and hard for copyright stuff or other things which would reduce their earnings.
As long as the governments won't act based on existing measures, I can't take any new ones serious
Correct, but arson vandalismn and a call for violence is.
I couldn't what exactly the charges awere in the MLAT request, so i have to go what 404 wrote
One can argue if the swiss goverment should have honired the MLAT request...unfortunately, that thing was put in place before the USA whent insane, and most countries do honor agreements they sign
The mail is encrypted, so probably not, but they have an extensive privacy policy and some blog entries, against which threats they can protect you, which they can't
Also, proton didn't hand anything to the FBI, they got served by the swiss government and gave it them....
Which might be a technicality, but they do not hand out information to foreign agencies
Additionally to the other answer: Not all published source code is open souce, and I'm pretty sure, the scrapers didn't stop to read the licence.md files on github
I'm now trying out SUSE microOS for my mini servers. These are initially setup via combustion / ignition. you add these scripts to a usb stick and insert them during the first boot where they initialize fhe system. As far as I saw, at least ignition is quite open and supported by most distros
As far as I understand, they already are sharing it:
Link to repo: https://github.com/bitwarden/map-the-web/
So, if I can choose between a company that fucks me over with their search ranking, sells my data and still tries to present me bought ads as actual results, and is required to provide all this information to a corrupt goverment; versus a company that minimizes the amount of collected data, so they don't have to hand over so many information while being supoenad, I choose the 2nd option
Now I have seen everything
Probably not youtube, because in a truly open market with socialist rules, youtube would have fallen with its constant enshittification and be replaced with a more user/creater friendly alternative.
He actually says that in ine of his bamboolab videos
During my service, the first rule was extended: "every weapon must be regarded as loaded, until you ensured it isn't"
You could even trigger the widget with tasker periodically to make it more automated
That's the theory...I usually have to first replace some packages that have been removed / renamed then homemanager is acting up because some stuff now is called differently. And every time it just shows me the one error that failed...
Do the old tricks with " and + or - work?
I usually use the pacman repo and if it's not in there decide for this specific app if I use the AUR or flatpak version
If you want to make a point...present a real source not a vague hint to google.
What is the issue? Do you mean NPC predators in games? Probably should be 18+ rated then...
If you mean multiplayer....no age bucket check will prevent predators on the servers....
There is such thing as parental responsibility, if someone just lets their child consume higher rated media online without any discurse its a parental failure.
What is next? Does the blueray player need to verify with photoID that everyone in the room is older than the movies rating?
There are laws that make cism illegal in pretty every country. And most countries and companies are pretty quick with takedown requests. So why do we need age verification? CISM is illegal for everyone
Now for other stuff that is legally age gated in one country, but it is hosted in another country which has another legal age limit. Which one counts now?
Does the lawmakers have the reverse law in place, that when a page requests the age bucket, even if there is no legal requirement, does the pagebget fined as well? Otherwise it just leads again to the "cookie banner issue".
That is a completely different premise. A) putting "Catholic church" and "protect children" in the same sentence is already a bold move B) if I place my child in the boy scouts I do have some expectations on them to protect the child, correct. But that's not the all or nothing situation you mentioned in your example
My point is the same as with DNS Blocking: It is proposed under the umbrella of "think about the kids", but it doesn't work for what they propose it and it is a first step in creating the base of a censorship infrastructure. The govements (and by that I mean all of them not just the US) should hold the platform's accountable for shit they mess up now and don't accept "Sorry we can't do that at scale" as an answer. Google and meta should act much harder on reports by the community. interestingly, they CAN act fast and hard for copyright stuff or other things which would reduce their earnings. As long as the governments won't act based on existing measures, I can't take any new ones serious
No, absoluetly not. Because the whole thing is notnto protect the children, but to gather more data.
Correct, but arson vandalismn and a call for violence is. I couldn't what exactly the charges awere in the MLAT request, so i have to go what 404 wrote
One can argue if the swiss goverment should have honired the MLAT request...unfortunately, that thing was put in place before the USA whent insane, and most countries do honor agreements they sign
It's not false advertising. Just because a company advertises with privacy, it doesn't mean they are bullet prove.
they don't sell your data, they actually have very little data to share at all, but they do follow the swiss law.
They even publish which kind of requests they get: https://proton.me/legal/transparency
The mail is encrypted, so probably not, but they have an extensive privacy policy and some blog entries, against which threats they can protect you, which they can't
Also, proton didn't hand anything to the FBI, they got served by the swiss government and gave it them.... Which might be a technicality, but they do not hand out information to foreign agencies