That's what I did as well.
Voting with one's wallet is often the only voice that gets heard and listened to, which is why my cancellation was accompanied by an explanation.
I think the dead should be allowed to reap the respect they earned in life.
In some cases that means you intentionally got to get infected by dysentery just to be able to almost shit enough on their grave.
About time to return the favour and free the USA from the Nazis...
Waiting any longer is risking the step from concentration camp to mass murdering camp.
That's what the second paragraph of my comment was about.
I don't want to normalize his behaviour by not even telling what he's about to violate, violates or has violated.
Isn't there a 22nd amendment to the constitution, which says a president can be elected for a maximum of two terms?
But why should that amendmend specifically or the constitution at all be respected by a criminal?
What role does it play?
If you can't or don't want to explain your comments, that's fine.
But beware that will keep you looking like defending immoral and likely illegal behaviour.
Just do it following the arrest warrant by ICC.
Afair the USA doesn't recognize the ICC.
But as they don't follow an awful lot of their own laws, they could follow some foreign ones for a change ;)
You called my rational suggestion unhinged, so it implies you considered my suggestion wrong and hence what they did right.
Please explain how it's different in your mind.
Enabling ICE thugs pretty much looks like boot licking though.
To be clear: there's no indication this wasn't an ambush by thugs and yet you defend the ambush and criticise defending the attacked person.
Interesting that the shown aggression doesn't get the perpetrators arrested, isn't it?
But afair they can kill people in cold blood and don't even get prosecuted in most cases.
In that case I'd be willing to shit the extra mile without shortcuts.
That's what I did as well.
Voting with one's wallet is often the only voice that gets heard and listened to, which is why my cancellation was accompanied by an explanation.
I think the dead should be allowed to reap the respect they earned in life.
In some cases that means you intentionally got to get infected by dysentery just to be able to almost shit enough on their grave.
How long until you have to watch an ad before you can start going with the car?
About time to return the favour and free the USA from the Nazis...
Waiting any longer is risking the step from concentration camp to mass murdering camp.
I've never thought of the series Mr. Robot as a kind of guide.
Maybe I got that wrong?
That's what the second paragraph of my comment was about.
I don't want to normalize his behaviour by not even telling what he's about to violate, violates or has violated.
Isn't there a 22nd amendment to the constitution, which says a president can be elected for a maximum of two terms?
But why should that amendmend specifically or the constitution at all be respected by a criminal?
Capitalism and slave work can be independent problems occuring at the same time/place/situation.
If the economy doesn't work without slaves then let it collapse.
What you call economy is the siphoning of wealth.
Those doing actual work will survive, because they can work.
Some leeches may starve, but that's a price I'm willing to pay.
That tells more about Reddit than the comment.
You're right.
I shouldn't have asked for baddies as this implies the other party are the good ones.
In war there's often only the bad and the worse.
Interesting.
Thanks for letting us know!
What role does it play?
If you can't or don't want to explain your comments, that's fine.
But beware that will keep you looking like defending immoral and likely illegal behaviour.
Good riddance to the motor if water got into the air intake.
Her brother is a transvestite?
No?
Thought so...
Just do it following the arrest warrant by ICC.
Afair the USA doesn't recognize the ICC.
But as they don't follow an awful lot of their own laws, they could follow some foreign ones for a change ;)
You called my rational suggestion unhinged, so it implies you considered my suggestion wrong and hence what they did right.
Please explain how it's different in your mind.
Enabling ICE thugs pretty much looks like boot licking though.
To be clear: there's no indication this wasn't an ambush by thugs and yet you defend the ambush and criticise defending the attacked person.
Interesting that the shown aggression doesn't get the perpetrators arrested, isn't it?
But afair they can kill people in cold blood and don't even get prosecuted in most cases.
This is what you're defending. Disgusting!
Too many people just don't know about or don't want to understand the paradox of tolerance like you do.
I wish it was different.