Uuuhhhh ... based? Guys, help, I can't tell if it's based or not

Map where Democrat states have been given to Canada

101 points · 57 comments · view on lemmy.world

57 Comments

tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip · 63 pts · 1y (10 replies)

Feels like it'd solve a lot of problems.

Cheems@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 1y (1 reply)

I prefer this one because my state's in it

MrWafflesNBacon@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y

Same

sik0fewl@lemmy.ca · 23 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Alberta is the wrong colour.

borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 11 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Yeah, trade Virginia for Alberta.

cmbabul@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y

Could we airlift Atlanta out of Georgia instead?

BingBong@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 1y

JFC, find a way to take new Mexico and maybe Colorado as well.

jwiggler@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 1y

Jesusland makes me chuckle

Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y

New ones will be provided.

cabron_offsets@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
[ removed ]
bitchkat@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y

Wisconsin can fuck off and die. But this will give Canadia control of most of the great lakes.

theacharnian@lemmy.ca · 41 pts · 1y (6 replies)

Canada's population is 40 million. This would add 80ish (edit:) million more people to that. So, it's not Canada annexing the blue states, it's the blues states seceding and then annexing Canada to achieve territorial contiguity.

PhrygianFudge@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 45 pts · 1y (2 replies)

No annexing. The blue states join with Canada to establish a union of states. We could call it "United States" or something, or idk, I'm not good with names.

AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca · 24 pts · 1y

United Provinces, we don't need to keep baggage associated with United States

Zachariah@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 1y

Since the remaining states are run by a convict, they could be the Con-federated States or something like that.

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y (2 replies)

I think there were more than 80 people in Oregon alone

lemonmelon@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y

The math checks out.

theacharnian@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 1y

Lol, fixed it

xploit@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Can we swap Albertans with Coloradans though?

EonNShadow@pawb.social · 7 pts · 1y (1 reply)

As a Coloradan, I'm sold

xploit@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y

Gotta warn you though, seems the only nice piece of nature you'll get is on the border with BC and they did a real number on the environment in the north.

But you guys can probably actually fix it rather than celebrate CO2 like what these close are doing now with provincial legislature.

mvirts@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 1y (5 replies)

Let's be real, it's city vs. country no matter where you are.

LodeMike@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 1y

Not even.

Maricopa County is effectively one giant suburb and the numbers were about 50-50 for each candidate.

Comrade_Spood@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 1y (2 replies)

It really isn't, Maine is rural af. We're called the South of the North for a reason. However we are weirdly progressive for how rural we are

mvirts@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y (1 reply)

It's definitely not a clear cut rule, but generally places with higher population density vote more blue

Data from 2020 here: https://engaging-data.com/election-population-density/

I'm interested in how this is changing, my understanding is that many rural areas were more liberal historically.

Comrade_Spood@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y

Yeah it is generally higher population density means more progressive. Maine is just weird. Even historically. Historically very pro-abolition, also pretty pro-women's suffrage, also very pro-prohibition. However the state also didn't start voting democrat till around the 60s or 70s. Fairly early legalizers of marijuana and also fairly quick for gay marriage.

PhrygianFudge@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y

In the more fortunate situation, yes

_cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 27 pts · 1y (1 reply)
[ removed ]
Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee · 19 pts · 1y

Red states are the real welfare queens

CptInsane0@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Not even remotely based. States are not internally homogenous. "Let's take all the Democrats and job with Canada" is a shitlib take.

PhrygianFudge@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 pts · 1y

I'm hearing a "cringe" here, though I've heard quite a few "based"s (no consesus as is tradition for leftist discourse) ... I think "based" is winning?

Rezeroed@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 1y

I guess Colorado and New Mexico get hung out to dry.

Somethingcheezie@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Better divide Oregon and Washington states in half. The east side of each state all voted red. Not sure how California voted.

zaphodb2002@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 1y

We need the valley, just kick out all the chuds first.

RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works · 14 pts · 1y (4 replies)

Question is, does Canada want you?

Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 12 pts · 1y

I hear California's always on fire, so it'll fit right in with our west coast

PhrygianFudge@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Me?

RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 1y (1 reply)

I meant if they want the states. You’re chill though

PhrygianFudge@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 1y

Yeah, I get it, I'm just not American :D

Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 1y (1 reply)

I briefly saw this meme on my dad's phone while he was browsing facebook. He's a right wing Trump voter.

So take from that what you will.

PhrygianFudge@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 1y

Yep, this is originally a righty post. That's why I'm so confused that it's actually kind of based. The rough consensus here is that it's based, so we have bi-partisan support. Let's get this on the Congress floor!

Breve@pawb.social · 9 pts · 1y (1 reply)
[ removed ]
Revan343@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 1y

As an Albertan, please no

beebarfbadger@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 1y (4 replies)

Based on what?

IceBlade@lemmynsfw.com · 8 pts · 1y (3 replies)

"Based" is just slang. It generally has a positive connotation. So the original poster is essentially asking if this is a good idea or not.

beebarfbadger@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 1y (1 reply)

That's cringe.

PhrygianFudge@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y

Signing up on that instance and then going on political communities' posts is such a power-move

daggermoon@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Problem solved:

Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee · 9 pts · 1y

Absolutely not. Saw Florida off and let it sink.

xxd@discuss.tchncs.de · 6 pts · 1y (3 replies)

The swing states are gonna be kicking themselves that they missed this chance after they come back to their senses.

PhrygianFudge@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Is that for or against? Do we want extra states or an "I told you so" more? Genuinely difficult question.

xxd@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 1y (1 reply)

That really is difficult! Id suggest to just let the 'United States of Canada' vote on it after the next 'Jesusland' election. But I'm not from the US so I'm in no position to give a suggestion really.

PhrygianFudge@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 1y

I'm not American either, but I'm suggesting anyway

Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 1y

Seems pretty reasonable. I'd like that.

Dorkyd68@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y

Wait for me i wanna come too. I just gotta move out of my red state first, ca sounds nice, real nice

cabron_offsets@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y (1 reply)
[ removed ]
PhrygianFudge@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 0 pts · 1y

Either a pun or a "cringe" here

angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com · 4 pts · 1y

Add Southeast Pennsylvania.

Feathercrown@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y

Noooo I live in NH take me with you

jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y

This produces good feelings.