Hey it's still pretty great for what it is, it would be mind blowing if the dimensions themselves were acurate and made sense, but yes when I zoomd in I laughed out loud
Nigel gave me a drawing that said 18 inches. Now, whether or not he knows the difference between feet and inches is not my problem. I do what I'm told.
29 Comments
Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz · 46 pts · 1y
Centimeters, meters, neters, and ൬eters.
Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de · 16 pts · 1y
And per hour.
Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y
What's that in Newton bushels per lumen?
Sturgist@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 1y
About 1600 medium sized baguettes
pageflight@lemmy.world · 36 pts · 1y
Looks so convincing until you start looking at details.
Warehouse@lemmy.ca · 36 pts · 1y
It's just a nightstand that is 9.57 meters long and over 6 thousand meters tall.
MNByChoice@midwest.social · 13 pts · 1y
Each side of the top is a different width.
justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io · 11 pts · 1y
And simultaneously 8.5 meters, 8.7 nanometers, 9.57m and 8.48m wide.
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 1y
And also does and doesn't have a bottom side rail.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 1y
And yet somehow still rectangular.
Kolrami@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 1y
Its height depends on the angle you're looking at it... like any normal M.C. Escher abomination.
mattd@programming.dev · 4 pts · 1y
AI in a nutshell
pageflight@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
The fastest, most power hungry BSer.
iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works · 22 pts · 1y
Trees died for this.
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works · 19 pts · 1y
I mean, it's a Google product, it's probably not inaccurate to say society died for this.
Dasus@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 1y
Height, 8.4cm. Width, 9.57 meters.
AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 1y
In Gemini's defense it delivered what the user asked for. If OP wanted specific dimensions they should have said so.
Dasus@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
Eh, I'd say something 8.4cm tall and ~9 meters wide would be closer to a stage than a night stand or whatever it is op asked.
thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org · 19 pts · 1y
at first I'm like, oh that's not too bad
upon further review LMAO
Zetta@mander.xyz · 6 pts · 1y
Hey it's still pretty great for what it is, it would be mind blowing if the dimensions themselves were acurate and made sense, but yes when I zoomd in I laughed out loud
boredtortoise@lemm.ee · 13 pts · 1y
There's definitely dimensions
HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 1y
Directions unclear, opened a gate to the multiverse
clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
Blackmist@feddit.uk · 10 pts · 1y
Nigel gave me a drawing that said 18 inches. Now, whether or not he knows the difference between feet and inches is not my problem. I do what I'm told.
isles@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 1y
You need the 8.5.600m revision of the tabletop for this build? Shit, I'm stuck on 8.5.299m.
huge_lead@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 1y
Well, thats better than what I get from interior designers :D
jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 1y
Who's this nightstand for? Paul Bunyan?
Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 1y
It just gave up on the top right it seems
walden@wetshav.ing · 1 pts · 357d
I have a nightstand that's about the same sizes as that.
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 357d
My condolences.