This was not inevitable. This is a war Israel chose. It could have been prevented. Diplomatic talks were ongoing when the bombers took off for Iran. Israel’s continuing, illegal, unjustified airstrikes are unlikely to achieve their stated aim – permanently ending Tehran’s presumed efforts to build nuclear weapons – and may accelerate it. They must stop now. Likewise, Iran must halt its retaliation immediately and drop its escalatory threats to attack US and UK bases.
This conflict is not limited, as was the case last year, to tit-for-tat exchanges and “precision strikes” on a narrow range of military targets. It’s reached a wholly different level. Potentially nothing is off the table. Civilians are being killed on both sides. Leaders are targets. The rhetoric is out of control. With Israel fighting on several fronts, and Iran’s battered regime backed against a wall, the Middle East is closer than ever to a disastrous conflagration.
Reasons can always be found to go to war. The roots of major conflicts often reach back decades – and this is true of the Israel-Iran vendetta, which dates to the 1979 Islamic revolution. The so-called “shadow war” between the two intensified in recent years. Yet all-out conflict had been avoided, until now. So who is principally to blame for this sudden, unprecedented explosion?
Answer: three angry old men whose behaviour raises serious doubts about their judgment, common sense, motives and even their sanity.
222 Comments
Akasazh@feddit.nl · 93 pts · 1y
Don't forget Putin...
Fuck thes old, power-hungry war-mongering pieces of excrement. Their death will be celebrated by millions.
Please put an age restriction on politicians, it would solev sooo much nonsense.
EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com · 19 pts · 1y
Yeah, people who are young enough to actually have to worry about the future.
Honytawk@feddit.nl · 12 pts · 1y
Putin is by far the worst one.
Neither Netanyahu nor Khamenei have the capacity for war the way the other 2 have.
And Putin already has achieved what Trump wants to achieve: being a dictator with full control of the state.
Oh how much the world would improve if all 4 of them suddenly get a bullet between the eyes.
RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y
How is Putin worse than Netanyahu? Just compare the children death toll in Palestine vs. Ukraine.
Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz · 24 pts · 1y
Don't mistake Ukraine's ability for self-defense as Putin's mercy.
Honytawk@feddit.nl · -1 pts · 1y
putin just kidnaps children and converts them to be Russian to fight in his wars.
RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
Good thing Israel never kidnapped children.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yemenite_Children_Affair
https://www.trtworld.com/middle-east/israel-kidnaps-palestinian-infants-from-gaza-takes-them-to-unknown-place-16510307
https://www.democracynow.org/2024/8/22/headlines/new_report_details_israels_pattern_of_kidnapping_torturing_and_humiliating_gazan_children
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 1y
Which, while bad, is still vastly superior to just straight up exterminating them.
vga@sopuli.xyz · -1 pts · 1y
Who knows for sure? But we can assume that Putin had something to do with Hamas launching the strike just by the fact how much it helped him. It did cause half of the world to turn their eyes away from Ukraine, to believe that Gaza is now the most important crisis on this planet.
RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
Why would a population living under a military occupation since 1967 do such a thing? And why would the world see a genocide as the most important crisis?
Putin, of course.
vga@sopuli.xyz · -1 pts · 1y
You're biased, based on your handle. You think Gaza is important.
I'm also biased, because I live next to Russia. I think defending against Russia in the current situation is much more important than anything that could happen in Gaza. And if you want to take the historical perspective, Russia has violated my country and the people of my country several times during the last 300 years at least, and probably more. Middle East obviously has the potential to beat us on the historical record, given how the whole of human civilization practically rose in that area, but still. It's not like this is happening for the first time over here either.
It's not that I don't care about their tragedies, it's just that it's nowhere near a top priority right now. If Russia stops being a crazy asshole, things farther away from my country's borders may become more important to me. Still, note that if what I'm suggesting is true, Putin and Russia are partially to blame about what's happening In Gaza. With a handle like yours, you probably cared about Gaza already before Putin's manipulations, but half of the eyes of the lefties in west were looking at Ukraine. They are not looking at Ukraine anymore, like they should be doing.
Truth to be told, geopolitically speaking it seems much more sane to be on Israel's side because they're against Iran, who's on Russia's side. And Palestine seems to be kinda on Russia's side as well so remind me again why I should support them at all?
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 1y
Well at least liberals are being open in their belief that only white people matter...
But you're literally a Gaza genocide supporter, so maybe you're more of a fascist than a liberal.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 1y
This is like a parody of what a BlueAnon liberal would say, my god
Honytawk@feddit.nl · 0 pts · 1y
With all the awful manipulation putin and the Russian state have done in the world play, I would be surprised if they didn't have a hand in Hamas.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 1y
Yup, that is indeed a Qanon tier conspiracy theory. Liberals literally just reinventing the Judeo–Bolshevik conspiracy theory to blame Russia for those dirty browns fighting back against being genocided.
shroomato@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y
They would immediately get replaced with someone just as bad if not worse. The world has an endless supply of power hungry warmongering assholes.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · -4 pts · 1y
Only if you believe that white lives are far more valuable than non-white lives
Honytawk@feddit.nl · 2 pts · 1y
Which non-white lives? The ones in Ukraine?
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 1y
The ones in Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, and Iran. That should have been obvious, but you forgot that those non-Ukrainian people even existed.
vga@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 1y
While I partially agree on this, let's consider some cases:
Youth is clearly not enough. Age limit + term limit might be a useful combination, but it all falls down when you allow somebody to just grab all power anyway and reset all the rules and limits, like Putin and Xi Jinping have done.
Akasazh@feddit.nl · 1 pts · 1y
Yes agreed
wanderwisley@lemm.ee · 4 pts · 1y
Grumpy old men.
colonelsharki@lemmy.world · 66 pts · 1y
Khamenei maybe an angry old man considering his country is facing an existential threat but Netanyahu is a wanted war criminal and Trump is a rapist with nefarious ties to the notorious Epstein
FreeBird@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 56 pts · 1y
My Iranian ass spending minutes to get my VPN working so I can access lemmy and watch people whitewash the man responsible for all my misery only to shit on Netanyahu and Trump:
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
Mohammad Reza Pahlavi?
FreeBird@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 20 pts · 1y
Ali Khamenei.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 1y
Had nothing to do with the overthrow of the Iranian democracy in 1953.
FreeBird@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 27 pts · 1y
So it justifies the crimes of the mullahs? Why do you want it to seem that America is the devil and the mullahs are OK? Can't them both be bad in your mind?
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y
Tell me why Reagan armed the most fringe sect of the country and pitted it against the Ba'athists in Iraq and pretend to care about the Revolutionary Guard's crimes.
As it stands, Americans are perfectly willing to get into bed with Sectarian Radicalism when it's Saudi or Qatari or Hindi or Opus Dei Catholic. Why are we suddenly squeemish about doing business with Iran, again?
I wish it was as simple as "Both Sides". But NATO clearly had a policy that favored the Shah and his bloody fisted rule.
Iran has a right to exist. If you're not dead set on exterminating Persians like has been tried on any number of other native peoples, you might find they're no more inherently villainous than your friends among the British Royals or the Egyptian dictatorship.
ProvableGecko@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
Brother Israel and America are coming to liberate your soul from your body. Fire up that VPN and first check up what the US and Israel have been up to in Gaza in the last couple of years, then google "how to build a bomb shelter fast". Stop wasting your limited time cutting propaganda to westerners.
JacksonLamb@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
Don't worry, you are just encountering another case of the cultural narcissism known as "American Exceptionalism".
To some, America must be at the centre of everything, the biggest, the best, and also the worst. Their country's culpability is more important to them than what goes on in yours.
ryannathans@aussie.zone · 15 pts · 1y
Didn't the CIA do that
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 1y
To install Pahlavi as Shah, absolutely.
This was in an effort to keep Iran from selling oil to the USSR.
teslasaur@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 1y
The exiled government of Iran have more in common with Taiwan today. You seem to think that they would force a monarchy, which isn't true.
belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 1y
Khomeini hijacked the revolution that ousted the Shah and turned it from a triumphant moment and chance for change into a "under new management" situation.
Khamenei now presides over this theocratic regime and continues to oppress Iran.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 1y
The lion's share of the proletariat were religious conservatives. He didn't hijack the revolution, he was a foundational pillar of its execution.
Show me a Middle Eastern government more liberal than President Masoud Pezeshkia's Independent Reformist coalition. Half their neighbors are Kingdoms, ffs. The other half are military dictatorships. Iran is one of the few proper democracies on the continent. It's theocratic because the majority of its constituents are conservative theocrats sending up religious politicians to the parliament. Iran is no more theocratic than Pakistan or Mississippi.
belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y
I don't have time or will to dive into all of this but this one part: "It is theocratic because the majority of it's constituents are conservative theocrats" There are no non-theocratic politians in Iran, they do not get approved for standing in an election. Every candidate, on every level, has to be approved by the Guardian Council. Who elected that council? Well, half of the council are clerics, appointed the Supreme Leader. The other half are jurists, who are selected by the Majilis from list approved by the Chief Justice. Who appointed the Chief Justice? The Supreme Leader.
Meaning all 12 positions of the body that decides who can stand for election are either appointed by the supreme Leader or appointed by someone with direct allegiance to the Supreme Leader.
Take the president for example: Pezeshkian would legally not be able to stand for election if he wasnt a Shia Muslim or didn't affirm that the Supreme Leader is the ultimate authority in matters of religion and social issues. Meaning by law, both social and religious reforms can only be done with the consent of the supreme Leader.
The constituents send up theocratic politicians because there are no other politicians. A theocrat has the ultimate power of determining who is and isn't a viable candidate.
KumaSudosa@feddit.dk · 1 pts · 1y
So? US foreign policy has done a number of the whole world. It's not an excuse for Khamenei and his goons to uphold this regime.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 1y
If you don't want to be governed by conservatives, quit lining all the progressives against the wall and shooting them.
Blaming Khamenei for governing like a conservative Muslim, when you're in a region absolutely choked with religious conservative governments, seems to miss the forest for the trees. Especially after the US was instrumental in undermining and dismantling all the modernist secular democracies from the first half of the 20th century.
teslasaur@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
Have an Iranian (actual Iranian, not arab) coworker. He does NOT have many nice things to say about how the Iranian regime treats their own. Can't imagine how bad it must be for those who are considered "others".
RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
But do you at least acknowledge that it is the Arabian Gulf?
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io · 0 pts · 1y
I mean screw the men responsible for your misery, but Iran is objectively the good guy when it comes to Palestine. We don't have quite as much opportunity to shit on Khomeini now that Assad isn't around, but we still hate him don't worry.
FreeBird@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 14 pts · 1y
From what I understand from your message it looks like to me that this is all something like a game for you people to virtue signal.
Edit: Funny how you got Khomeini and Khamenei mixed up. It shows how much you know and care about the matter.
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io · 6 pts · 1y
No? What do you even mean by whitewashing him? The atrocities he commits just aren't relevant to the topic at hand, so they're not brought up.
Wow, TIL. I thought their names were both Khomeini but that makes more sense.
Ksin@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
Not every conflict has a good guy, there are no good guys, the Khamenei regime is evil and so is the leadership of Isreal. Just because the latter attacked the former does not make them innocent, let the bastards burn and pity the civilian.
KumaSudosa@feddit.dk · 8 pts · 1y
Stop pretending like Khamenei isn't a criminal. He's not just an angry old man because they're "facing an existential threat" he's a fuckwad through and through and no Iranian would shed a tear if he was shelled. Israel certainly started this iteration of the conflict but Khamenei and the regime has a rap sheet far longer than Trump's.
bombermanz@lemmings.world · -1 pts · 1y
KumaSudosa@feddit.dk · 5 pts · 1y
What do I know? My parents came to Denmark fleeing from this shitty regime. What do you know?
bombermanz@lemmings.world · -1 pts · 1y
KumaSudosa@feddit.dk · 4 pts · 1y
I am, but I won't claim that I'm not first and foremost Danish - apart from when it comes to food.. But I do feel like I'm allowed to have a strong opinion on the regime.
bombermanz@lemmings.world · -3 pts · 1y
KumaSudosa@feddit.dk · 4 pts · 1y
Of course I have family in Iran, even though I don't know them too well. How are you reading that I'm happy that terrorist (Israeli) bombs are falling on people? Regular people are always the losers in warfare, no matter the circumstances. Just wouldn't be sad if it happened to fall on Khamenei - nor if a missile landed on Bibi's house.
belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y
It's so hilarious how they try to spin any criticism of the IR as blind Zionism. Gotta love it.
bombermanz@lemmings.world · -3 pts · 1y
KumaSudosa@feddit.dk · 5 pts · 1y
Israel is undoubtedly the most evil regime in the world but upholding another evil regime oppressing 90+ million people just because they lay claim to standing up to Israel - without producing any particularly strong results - doesn't seem like the tradeoff to go for. Two wrongs don't make a right. Iran can still be on the right side of history without Khamenei and his goons.
biofaust@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 1y
Khamenei is a priest. 'Nuff said. Israel is a theocratic state. Religious people attacking each other, with normal people in the middle. Once more, Rome did it first, 900 something years ago.
teslasaur@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 1y
In any other country, Khamenei would be considered a pedophile.
You know, the whole marrying children business.
REDACTED@infosec.pub · -13 pts · 1y
You are out of touch if you think Trump is worse than Khamenei
EDIT: Lemmy, wake me up when Trump orders to kill the protestets, because by every passing day most of you look more and more delusional to me, lost in your own hate. Feels weird defending trump, but there is a day and night difference between the two. See what Iranians themselves are saying.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 1y
Trump is actively helping to exterminate hundreds of thousands in Gaza. He is orders of magnitude worse than Khamenei
bombermanz@lemmings.world · -2 pts · 1y
REDACTED@infosec.pub · -6 pts · 1y
I'm not sure what did you mean by this. Violently attacking police officers usually results in the same thing anyways. Read the first lines from that article, he's not talking about normal protesters and neither was that government official. Very poorly worded and stupidly timed.
bombermanz@lemmings.world · -2 pts · 1y
REDACTED@infosec.pub · -9 pts · 1y
Because someone didn't wear a gender discriminatory dress that the president enforces upon it's population? Dude, get reality checked. Trump is a piece of shit, but he's pretty far from such extreme levels of evilness. When I'll see news like "Trump administration executes Harvard students for protesting", then I'll re-consider my views
EDIT: Lemmy, please stop supporting radical islam. Not even muslims like you. Wtf is wrong with you people?
MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 1y
Lots of people in this site are sympathetic to any tyrant as long as they aren’t ruling over a western country.
bombermanz@lemmings.world · -2 pts · 1y
Doorbook@lemmy.world · 37 pts · 1y
damn they just pretend the UK is not the country that fuel Jets over Iraq to facilitate the bombing. Or it is not the UK base in Cyprus and vessels that provide a command center and communication tool to facilitate the mission.
If you want to attack Iran and accelerate to a wwiii don't shy from telling the truth about your involvement, we know it, you know it ...
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · 34 pts · 1y
Trust The Guardian to "both-sides" a blatant war of aggression and just completely fail to mention the massive genocide Israel is carrying out.
bombermanz@lemmings.world · -2 pts · 1y
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 1y
Seriously. The Guardian has had no problem with Muslims being killed up till now. So long as it was Israel doing it.
iAvicenna@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 1y
Huh? I have seen tons of articles in Guardian calling Israel's actions a genocide. This is much more than what one can say for the rest of western mainstream media. And before someone says something along the lines of "yea only after everyone started saying it" there are many articles in 2024 and some of these articles go as far back as 2023 Nov, Dec (the Hamas attack was 2023 Oct and Israeli genocide started in October right after this) saying that dehumanizing language used by Israeli state ministers and events unfolding in Gaza are genocidal. I wonder what do you base these comments on when there are dozens of articles in Guardian calling this a genocide.
A consensus is emerging: Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Where is the action?
Israel committing genocide in Gaza, says EU’s former top diplomat
Israel’s leaders committed genocide in Gaza and must pay for it. Their political and media allies must too
Israel’s war in Gaza amounts to genocide, Amnesty International report finds
Military intervention must be used to stop the genocide in Gaza
What did you do during the genocide in Gaza?
We’re anti-Zionist Jews and we see genocide unfolding in Gaza
There is even an editorial one laying out how inhumane and aggressive Israeli state is:
The Guardian view on Israel and allegations of genocide: a case that needs to be heard
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
They call the Gaza genocide a "war" to this day. Opinion articles and quotes from others are not Guardian editorial.
Here is what actual news calling it a genocide looks like. Not hiding behind opinion articles and quote marks.
iAvicenna@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
You mean tens of articles published in a main stream media since the genocide started all calling it a genocide has no impact? It has more impact than a smaller scale news site publishing similar editorial pieces. It has more reach and it contributes more. Having an editorial article with the same tone is the ideal situation but I will take the former any day when other media fire their long time employees for just a single comic for god's sake. And we know how much international bullying there is to call writers of such articles anti-semitist. So creating an environment where people can publish such articles in a mainstream media outlet takes a lot of effort, resources and shielding. If we are going to race quotes here you go:
Israel’s leaders committed genocide in Gaza and must pay for it. Their political and media allies must too
There was a palastine support march in London about a month ago with almost half a million people joining it and a kilometers long line of people. I would like to think that main stream media allowing opinion pieces calling genocide a genocide has some contribution to that.
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 1y
Try posting them here or anywhere else and see what the mods do with opinion articles if they are critical of Israel.
Is written by Owen Jones who heavily pushed for this himself. TheGuardian did not decide to publish that out of their own free will. Owen is one of those "tiny guys" you are talking about. He makes videos against the Palestinian genocide almost daily.
iAvicenna@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
If the Guardian did not decide to publish this opinion piece and tens of others from Owen and other authors with similar tones how did all these get published? Did they blackmail Guardian into publishing these? How is it not their free will?
rumimevlevi@lemmings.world · 31 pts · 1y
Khameni didn't want a war
Saleh@feddit.org · 15 pts · 1y
So far also Iran only matched target groups after Israel targeted them first. E.g. Israel strikes MoD offices in Tehran -> Iran strikes back at the MoD in Tel Aviv. Israels strikes Iranian gas and electrical infrastructure -> Iran strikes back at Israeli Gas and electrical infrastructure.
Iran doesn't want this war and keeps reiterating to go back to diplomacy, however the US and multiple G7 countries, especially UK, France and Germany are rattling the sabres more, defending Israels onslaught while condemning Irans responses. These countries claiming they would seek a diplomatic solution makes for rather cynical lies when they cover the attacker and condemn the defender.
KumaSudosa@feddit.dk · 1 pts · 1y
No doubt Israel started this iteration but to say that Iran doesn't want war is viewing the regime too favourably. Of course they don't want war on Iranian territory - but they do want to directly sponsor Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis, al-Assad (until he fell), and other mostly Shia militias while severely oppressing their own population - especially minorities. Fuck Israel but it's not like Iran comes with peaceful intentions. My parents fled from this regime, and while virtually no Iranian supports Israel's actions or wants war, most of us wouldn't shed a single tear if the entire regime were wiped out.
rumimevlevi@lemmings.world · 4 pts · 1y
Did you forget that israel also backed the shah which was also oppressive and killed iranian? The west and it proxy israel always trying to control iranian natural ressources.
Iran provide weapons to resistance groups but do not control their actions. It's not different than the united state selling weapona to it's allies
Iran was forced to intervene in syria because the plan was always to put another regime that will protect israel and not because they love the butcher Assas butchring syrians
You can't claim to not support israel when they are the one right now trying to change the regime right now. How many iranians do you think should die for a regime change that will be replaced by a puppet not chosen by iranians?
KumaSudosa@feddit.dk · -1 pts · 1y
For me it's about being realistic. Iran is never gonna defeat Israel as long as the Americans support them. You're right that Iran will never flourish because the powers won't ever allow it - Israel, USA, Western Europe, Saudi Arabia, sometimes Turkey.. puppet or not, I'm not gonna support the devil I know just because I can't know what happens in the time after.
rumimevlevi@lemmings.world · 3 pts · 1y
So do you agree that Israel should stop the war then Iranians themselves decide to overthrow the regime?
KumaSudosa@feddit.dk · -2 pts · 1y
Of course I do? My only statement is that I wouldn't be sad if a rocket happened to hit Khamenei. Never gonna shed a tear for a tyrant, even if it was my other enemy that caused his downfall.
rumimevlevi@lemmings.world · 4 pts · 1y
If Khamenei die , it will be replaced by another. In the process of trying to kill Khamenei ton of civilians will die. Are you ready for the rest of your family who are still in Iran to risk dying in the process?
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · -3 pts · 1y
Would you take the same view if Iranian rockets started killing Zionist politicians in Europe?
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y
You're supporting the devil right now.
Saleh@feddit.org · 3 pts · 1y
No doubt Iran has acted in aggressive ways in other places. However it seemed to not have directed its aggression directly at Israel. People keep claiming that Iran would have orchestrated October 7, but if it had, Hezbollah, Houthis and Iranian proxies in Syria and Iraq would have joined in full force. So Iran wasn't interested in a confrontation with Israel in the past years either.
KumaSudosa@feddit.dk · 5 pts · 1y
Oh absolutely, this one is on Israel for sure. Just important to note that it's not like the Iranian regime is made up of pacifists
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · -2 pts · 1y
Israel and the US would like my very much if it was made of pacifists
bombermanz@lemmings.world · 0 pts · 1y
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 0 pts · 1y
Empire has been attacking Iran for centuries. The current state is a direct result of imperial violence. Iran has had no choice but to defend itself for decades.
Blackmist@feddit.uk · 1 pts · 1y
Because they know they'll lose it as things currently stand.
That's why they've been trying to build nukes.
Fiona@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 pts · 1y
First of all: It’s not clear that they want nukes. Like, seriously, they have been accused of almost having nukes for thirty years, it’s much more plausible at this point that they are much more interested in the ability to acquire them quickly in case they need them.
But even then: It makes no sense for them to use them aggressively, but it makes an unbelievable amount of sense for them to want them for defensive purposes. Like: They have time and time suffered from western interference, including the extremely bloody Iran-Iraq-war and have a hostile, nazi-run rouge state running a genocide and storing nukes without NPT-approval that is receiving unlimited support from the US in their vicinity.
The fact of the matter is that there is no country on earth that is as justified in pursuing a nuclear deterrent on earth as Iran.
And none of that changes anything about the government being made up from horrible tyrants that are almost as bad (but definitely not actually as bad, let alone worse!) as the one in Israel. They absolutely should be overthrown, but that’s not the job for the genocidal nazis in Israel.
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y
Gotta be a complete idiot not to build nukes when a rogue genocidal cult is constantly threatening to nuke you.
A nuclear Iran is one of the only hopes for peace.
rumimevlevi@lemmings.world · 0 pts · 1y
They never tried to build a nuke
Blackmist@feddit.uk · -3 pts · 1y
Yes, I'm sure a nation with huge oil and gas reserves wants nuclear just to have very expensive energy.
They want nuclear weapons to prevent regime change due to external interference. Russia can't protect them. There's no NATO style protection for Russian allies. I think we're only seeing this now because of how weak Russia is on the global stage.
rumimevlevi@lemmings.world · 2 pts · 1y
We heard this dumb argument for decades
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 1y
I think you mean western imperialism and genocidal zionism which have been attacking Iran for decades/centuries.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · -4 pts · 1y
Sounds like they should have a nuke
redlemace@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 1y
Putin has a day off?
doo@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 1y
He's too busy begging these three for help.
RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 1y
False equivalencies.
MetalMachine@feddit.nl · 24 pts · 1y
Ah yes, blame all three even though its been clearly israel and Netanyahu who have been beating the war drums for 30+ years. Israel has been talking about Iran developing a nuke for 30 years and saying that "its around the corner". Israel did the same with Iraq btw and dragged the US to war.
teslasaur@lemmy.world · -10 pts · 1y
You mean unlike the islamic dictatorship that was founded with an objective to destroy Israel?
Doorbook@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 1y
Oh no, another "we are the victim" comment
teslasaur@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 1y
I'm definitely not a victim. But pretending that Iran is somehow morally superior to Israel is fucking laughable.
MetalMachine@feddit.nl · 2 pts · 1y
The Iranian regime is also criminal. When it comes to civilians however, the Israelis are far more criminal. They are settlers who steal other peoples land, they participate and actively endorse genocide. 82% of them want to ethnically cleansed Gaza.
We need a de-zionisation like we had de-nazification.
teslasaur@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 1y
Yeah, i wouldn't be happy if people came and took my land. The difference between them is that Iran has already done the deed and taken everything from those that aren't Muslims.
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org · 0 pts · 1y
Morally superior, probably not. Causing less geopolitical problems and starting less unprovoked wars, definitely. At least right now.
teslasaur@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
They learned from USA and the soviets how to invest in proxies that does the work.
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 21 pts · 1y
Peak liberal both sidesism. Desperately clinging to the illusion that USA good, Iran bad. This is a big part of why we have genocide against palestinians and trump in office.
nyamlae@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y
You are either being dishonest or have bad reading comprehension. The OP clearly labels Trump as part of the problem, alongside Netanyahu and Khameini. They also blame Israel for escalating with Iran when talks were still ongoing. They are not saying what you claim they are.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 1y
I think it's probably that Americans only do this "both sides are to blame" when their side is the one to blame
raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
Where did you read "USA good" in that post?
Crankenstein@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 1y
The Zygon Inversion - A Transcript of The Doctor's Speech [edited for brevity]
The Doctor: You just want cruelty to beget cruelty. You're not superior to people who were cruel to you. You're just a whole bunch of new cruel people. A whole bunch of new cruel people, being cruel to some other people, who'll end up being cruel to you. The only way anyone can live in peace is if they're prepared to forgive. Why don't you break the cycle?
Bonnie: Why should we?
The Doctor: What is it that you actually want?
Bonnie: War.
The Doctor: Ah. And when this war is over, when -- when you have the homeland free from humans, what do you think it's going to be like? Do you know? Have you thought about it? Have you given it any consideration? Because you're very close to getting what you want. What's it going to be like? Paint me a picture. Are you going to live in houses? Do you want people to go to work? What'll be holidays? Oh! Will there be music? Do you think people will be allowed to play violins? Who will make the violins? Well? Oh, You don't actually know, do you? Because, just like every other tantruming child in history, Bonnie, you don't actually know what you want. So, let me ask you a question about this brave new world of yours. When you've killed all the bad guys, and it's all perfect and just and fair, when you have finally got it exactly the way you want it, what are you going to do with the people like you? The troublemakers. How are you going to protect your glorious revolution from the next one?
. . .
The Doctor: This is a scale model of war. Every war ever fought right there in front of you. Because it's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know who's children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken! How many lives shattered! How much blood will spill until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning -- sit down and talk! Listen to me, listen. I just -- I just want you to think. Do you know what thinking is? It's just a fancy word for changing your mind.
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io · 20 pts · 1y
Apparently defending yourself is the peak of insanity now.
ininewcrow@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 1y
Angry old men ... ruling the biggest countries in the world .. and all of them not caring what they are going to do or not do because they're going to be dead or senile or incapable to do anything within the next ten years.
Doorbook@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
blaming the top government officials only is stupid. Thet completelyignore that they got voted in and have majority support among their population. At least Iran has less of a choice, and even then was negotiating a deal and agreed to one in the past!
wpb@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 1y
Great man theory nonsense. Was Netanyahu in power during the Sabra and Shatila massacre? During the Nakba? During the June 1967 war? Was Trump president when the US invaded Iraq? Was he president when the US sent billions of dollars in military aid to Israel to commit their genocide with? It's the countries, not the leaders. They're just the personification of a system. You could shoot each of these men in the head today, and nothing would change.
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 1y
Trump, definitely. He's at least too dumb to be evil effectively, I shudder to think where Vance would take things if he decides to keep the MAGA line going.
Netanyahu dying would lead to a collapse of his government and a more moderate faction coming to power and probably ending the wars... for now.
I know less about the internal politics of Iran, although this war they didn't start obviously wouldn't end.
wpb@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
There is broad support in Israeli society for the ongoing genocide in Gaza. There are polls showing as much (I think one of them showed a rate of 82%). This is not one man's whim, this is not the will of some small shady elite, this is a consequence of material conditions in Israel. If you don't take those away, some other face will lead the charge.
Plus I'm not convinced that an assassination of Netanyahu would lead to a different party taking charge. I can't imagine their system of governance is set up this way. But this is entirely beside the point. The point is that one man's death doesn't change history. The allies didn't win WWII because Hitler killed himself, Hitler killed himself because the allies won WWII.
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 1y
I did say "for now".
I'm guessing "genocide" wasn't in the wording of the poll question, but a two-state solution is just as fringe as a one state solution at this point. The vibe of the average Israeli is that they want Palestinians gone and don't want to talk or even think about how.
How much do you know about the system?
It's a party list parliament with a pretty high degree of political fragmentation, comparable to the Netherlands. Netanyahu started with a slim majority propped up by the far-right parties, and his party has polled poorly since they let Oct 7 happen. Security was his main thing. He's globally famous for his skill holding together coalitions, which he couldn't do while dead, and it's pretty typical to hold snap elections after something like that anyway. His successor also wouldn't need to worry about being thrown in jail for corruption the moment they're out of office.
Great man theory is indeed dumb, but "leaders don't change anything even in the short term" is too far in the other direction.
MrMakabar@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 1y
There are actually some differences here. After the Cold War ended Israel was making some peace deals. The Oslo Accords(1993 and 1995) and a deal with Jordan 1994 were big parts of that. In 1996 Netanyahu came to power and basically all of that stopped. There was a bit with Ariel Sharon being in power, when Israel gave up its settlement in the Gaza strip. Netanyahu was not prime minister all the time, but he was in government and more often then not in position to sabotage that. The only time he failed was Ariel Sharon ordering to close the Jewish settlements in Gaza. He is really the main reason there is no somewhat working two state solution today.
Trump currently sents billions of aid to Israel to commit genocide AND fight a war within Iran. So yes he is that president. Biden at least used the US military to send some food to Gaza, Trump stopped that.
Khamenei is the leader of Iran since 1989. He is hardly innocent of supporting the Assad clan, destroying democracy in Lebanon by supporting Hezbollah, massive war crimes in Sudan happening right now, with the biggest starvation crisis in the world, although not as hard as Gaza, the huge civil war in Yemen and so forth. Keep in mind that before the Iranian revolution Israel and Iran were very close allies. They even developed fighter jets together. Point is that both countries are not natural enemies.
At least two of those men have formed their respective countries and systems for decades. If you killed Netanyahu today, then it would mean a new election and likely a win for the liberals, which is usually good news for Palastinians. If you killed Khamenei today, then there is a pretty good chance, that the infighting would end the Islamic Republic. Iran has had some massive protests in the last couple years. If you kill Trump, then the Vance ends up president and he lacks the charisma of Trump and is not even directly elected.
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 1y
Do you really think Trump's supporters would suddenly support Democrats, and, do you really think a power vacuum in Iran would make the Middle East more peaceful?
Similarly, don't skip over the part where the Oslo process ended when Netanyahu's current cabinet had Rabin assassinated. Natanyahu is a linchpin, but the right exists independent of him, and the left is still pretty anti-Palestinian.
MrMakabar@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 1y
Never said that Trump supporters would switch sites. I said that Vance is less popular, which means less likely to get as many people to activly vote for him.
A power vacuum in Iran would have a good chance of ending the civil war in Sudan. So I believe the odds are pretty good,especially if it is a short one.
Every Iraeli and Palestinian has experienced violence from the other site. Clearly Israel is occupying the West Bank and not the other was around, but it would be foolish of me to presume that the Israeli left loves Palestinians. Thankfully they do not need to, but just need to make a deal. Without shooting at each other relations will improve. Obviously the right is independent of Natanyahu, but current polls still show them loosing power.
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 1y
I'll admit my knowledge of Sudan is fuzzy. It's a huge catastrophe, but it just seems unlikely to spread the way the other crises can. Doesn't the UAE have a big hand in it too?
I'm skeptical inspiring middle-of-the-road voters is really that important anymore in the US. Most likely, future elections will not be fully free and fair.
vga@sopuli.xyz · 13 pts · 1y
You forgot the worst one: Putin, age 72 years.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · -11 pts · 1y
Trump and Netanyahu are both worse.
teslasaur@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
Wrong.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · -10 pts · 1y
Only wrong if you think white lives are more valuable than non-white lives
teslasaur@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
Oh yes. I forgot that ukrainians are black. How silly of me.
Lol. Nice Edit of the post.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · -6 pts · 1y
They aren't, that's my point
teslasaur@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
No, you're right. Putin is much worse.
More than 1 million dead in the war.
As bad as the war against Hamas is, it pales in comparison.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · -6 pts · 1y
Sure, if you believe only whites are human.
Lol. Where did you get that number from?
Oh, you're a genocide denier and a fascist, never mind.
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 1y
I mean, Putin is a pretty big sponsor of mayhem, corruption and autocracy in nations of all average skin tone.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 1y
Sure, but less than Trump or Netanyahu
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 1y
You're from .ml, so we might not be working from the same facts, but I'd put Putin ahead of Trump at the moment for sure. Trump has more long term evil potential basically just because he's in a very vulnerable but powerful country.
Gaza vs. Ukraine is the obvious comparison for Netanyahu, and it probably depends on how you measure it. I'd expect there's more actual deaths in Ukraine, but it's a more populous country, they're more likely to be military casualties and the non-lethal misery dealt is much lower. It's even harder to factor in Russian operations in Africa and the rest of the world, although they're a significant source of brutality as well.
LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 1y
No, Putin owns Trump. Everything Trump does is literally at Putin's request. Same with Bukele. Assad. And yeah, possibly Israel/Netanyahu, it's hard to know how much they know. Because BRICS united those countries to do this to weaken USD globally and thus US control. And each country that helped BRICS will get a military objective from the west, and Iran wants Israel apparently (it's likely Saudi Arabia is a secret member who will get part of Israel along w maybe Egypt). Russia wants everything the arctic ocean touches. China wants Taiwan, the South China Sea, and probably Australia (gold). I habe write ups in my history about it with links proving Trump/Russia connection. Iran and Russia worked together to get Trump elected in 2024:
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy2766
Bibi got Trump elected same way as Iran Contra hostage situation, by holding the hostages against Biden by proxy so he couldn't resolve the Gaza issues. It's likely Epstein worked for Maxwell whose father worked to fly Jewish kids in bad situations from Europe to Israel. I have a link in my posts from a news article at the time.
So both Russia and Israel have blackmail on Trump, and it seems likely Russia has something on Netanyahu to get him to betray his own people like this. Or maybe he just wants money and power. Idk.
But they are seemingly pawns of BRICS/Russia/China, selling out their own people for greed. My guess is that China will come out ahead. And before you give me a bunch of rich authoritarian propaganda about actually China is great, remember the Uyghers? They had gold. The first genocides of BRICS (called "gold BRICS" in China) were over minority groups that lived on land with gold. And the reason they live there, is bc land that has gold is usually volcanic and dangerous, and usually has severe mercury contamination from the 1800s practices of gold mining. So they coralled these people off to deadly shitholes, and now they are genociding them and enslaving us and moving us to random countries so we can't escape and live outside to make us work those deadly shitholes so they can be entombed in liquid gold while climate change eats us. Sorry, I mean, their bunkers and space ships to save them from bombs will totally work and the Titanic sub wasnt a testament to the wealthy's ignorance of science and deadly hubris
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · -3 pts · 1y
Ok, but I'm talking about the real world, not the fevered conspiracy theory world of Qanoners painted blue.
LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
I gave reputable sources.
jellygoose@lemmy.ca · -1 pts · 1y
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · -3 pts · 1y
If anyone needed further evidence that "tankie" just means "anyone to the left of the US Democrats", I present the above.
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
How is defending one fascist leader as less evil than two others left of anything?
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 1y
So the person defending Trump and Netanyahu as less evil than Trump is a tankie as well? Or are you just a hypocrite?
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 1y
No, theyre likely leaning towards overly focusing on American pain.
Someone overly focused on Netanyahu as evil, honestly like fair, he's doing some hardcore genocide at the moment.
If someone is overly focusing on Khemini as evil, they're likely an Islamophobe, gender reducionist, or Iranian.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · -2 pts · 1y
Ok, so you're just a hypocrite
That's literally what got me called a tankie!
andrewrgross@slrpnk.net · 12 pts · 1y
This article is fine, but kind of superfluous.
We get it. Everyone can see this. If you don't have actionable advice or some additional insight, you're really just reporting that water is wet.
Zorque@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 1y
Unfortunately not everyone is aware that water is wet. And often there are groups who try and convince people otherwise.
I agree that more ideas need to be put into action that can actually accomplish change for the better, but that requires that people be informed first.
LSNLDN@slrpnk.net · 0 pts · 1y
Akkshually
andrewrgross@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 1y
So... by a highly common definition it is wet. That's not much of a debate.
There are plenty of words that mean different things in scientific contexts that are different from common use. It's like saying "the sky is blue" is a false statement. Yes, there are contexts where the sky isn't blue. At night. On other planets. Perhaps earlier periods in our planet's history. But are we in those contexts right now? And is my meaning ambiguous?
There are a lot of times where language is unclear, and we must work to bridge communication barriers. But to insist on debating things when no genuine confusion is present is just an a bizarre antisocial practice.
LSNLDN@slrpnk.net · 0 pts · 1y
Tldr
dickalan@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 1y
Water is not wet
andrewrgross@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 1y
That's a fun song (but also obviously silly and wrong).
dickalan@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
I guess you go around calling fire burned
andrewrgross@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 1y
This is silly.
First, I don't know why you're using the past tense. I don't call water "wetted" I call it "wet". And while I wouldn't call fire "burned", I would call it "burning".
But here's the thing: you're welcome to have your idiosyncratic opinion on this. The fact that you seem to want me to argue my side when I feel perfectly comfortable letting you have a subjective opinion most people consider ridiculous says to me that (A) you know which one of us holds the broadly agreed upon position and (B) this isn't about resolving a dispute. It's just online debate for sport.
Enjoy believing a hotdog is a sandwich. Sleep well in your claims that cereal is a soup. I'm not going to explain to you why water is wet because it's a waste of my time.
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 1y
What an insanely stupid article. Israel bombs Iran completely unprovoked. Khamenei and Iran are incredibly responsible and measured in their response. Meanwhile Israel is flailing around like a wild bully with their American big brother behind its back, threatening Iran that they are not allowed to strike back
And the liberals from TheGuardian write a both sides article about it as if all parties share blame.
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 1y
If Israel has a right to defend itself, what does (still awful government of) Iran have?
I guess blaming Netanyahu and Trump only would have lead to too much blowback. The Guardian really doesn't seem like it's the same anymore.
Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 1y
The Ayatollah regime that has been building and funding terrorist proxies for years, that has a bloody countdown timer for the destruction of Israel in the middle it Tehran? The same regime who is, pretty obviously, rushing toward military nuclear capabilities in order to fulfill said countdown? You're saying that they haven't provoked Israel?
And you really think that firing drones and ballistic missiles at civilian populations is a measured response?
Fuck off with that bullshit.
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 1y
Cool whataboutisms. Yes, Iran is shitty. No, Israel didn't have to do this. Yes, it's a great strategy to regain support for the Likud coalition government and not go to prison for corruption.
Pardon, which county are we talking about here?
Iran at least has the excuse that their missiles can't aim that well.
Naevermix@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 1y
you know it's bad when western MSM is both-siding it
Siegfried@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 1y
This freaking assholes are going to do the thing that the last string of Putin's morality didnt allow him to do and give a white card to any future psycopath to use nuclear weapons.
Russia and the USA created this monsters. We need to deweaponize the fuck out of all of them before it is to late.
LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y
And Putin (72), and Xi Jing Ping (72)
JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y
Lol. What about the millions that got them into office in the first place? It's not a gender issue. It's a human nature one - acting out their insecurities by lashing out at the perceived enemy.
PlagueShip@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
The thing is, there are people who need to be killed, and we just can't agree on who. And the people who say no one are the worst of all. Let's make some progress in this world.
Taleya@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 1y
Better men than these shitmuppets have tried
bombermanz@lemmings.world · 0 pts · 1y
ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works · -11 pts · 1y
I think many people learned the wrong lesson from GWB's Iraq War. It was presented as (among other things) a way to stop an enemy of the USA from obtaining nuclear weapons and it was a mistake, so they conclude that using force to stop enemies of the USA from obtaining nuclear weapons is a mistake. However, using force (if necessary) to stop enemies of the USA from obtaining nuclear weapons is a prudent idea and the problem with that Iraq War was that it was not actually fought for that purpose. GWB was the boy who cried wolf but real wolves still exist.
RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y
Why should Israel have nuclear weapons but not Iran?
ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works · -3 pts · 1y
Israel is an ally of the USA but Iran is violently hostile to the USA.
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io · 5 pts · 1y
Zionists being pro-imperialism. Who woulda thunk?!
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 1y
Imagine arguing that people thinking you shouldn't launch unprovoked wars of aggression, is a bad thing
DragonSidedD@lemmy.ml · -14 pts · 1y
Illegal, maybe. But... Unjustified? Maybe the author is unaware of Isreal's recent divulgence of Iran's plan to sprint for a nuke while its militant religious zealots in Hamas and Hizbullah are hobbled? Or how openly the mullahs state that they will use it?
FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 12 pts · 1y
I mean, given the attacks I can see why they would feel nuclear weapons are necessary.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
Nobody is pulling this shit on North Korea.
SectoidLexi@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 10 pts · 1y
Bruh when Israel can just do a genocide and bomb countries left and right with no consequences AND they have nukes, it's perfectly normal to want nukes to even the odds. Nothing justified about any of Israel's crimes.
supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz · 7 pts · 1y
citations needed!
FreeBird@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -3 pts · 1y
Yes the mullahs want nukes. Source? I am Iranian.
colonelsharki@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
I’m sorry but that is the most insane reply I have ever read in response to a perfectly valid question for citations. “Trust me bro! I’m Iranian!”
FreeBird@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y
The mullahs have never shown the people any actual usage of the nuclear program. We are having planned blackout outs everyday for almost 1 hour and a half. So they don't use the nuclear infrastructure to make up for the electricity shortage. From the day I was born Iran was sanctioned for it's nuclear program but I have never seen an actual usecase of it outside of regime propaganda.
From the beginning of the regime they made many enemies. But Israel was the one they vowed to earase from the map. So if someday Iran makes nukes Israel will be the most in danger.
Khamenei seems to legitimately believe that he is some kind of chosen person to make things ready for the 12th Imam (Mahdi) to come. Yeah it sounds wild but remember, Khamenei is the leader of a theocracy. So to "make things ready" they tried to intervene and influence in the middle east. Assad in Syria, Hashad al Shabi in Iraq, Hezbollah in Lebonan, etc.
colonelsharki@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
Sorry but you still haven’t provided any clear evidence. You’re discussing your personal experiences and opinions. Not sure what’s happened in your personal life but I think it’s clouding your objectivity. Good day to you
Doorbook@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
Yes it scream ignorance if the user actually from Iran. The points extremely weak and fall flat against any logical read of Iran history.
pinkapple@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 1y
More like "Trust me bro I'm on the Iran desk at Eglin Airforce Base." There are Iranians yapping on Facebook etc, even the critical ones don't use US State Department lingo to refer to the Iranian government like "the mullahs" lol.
RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
And the fatwa that prohibits nuclear weapons?
I'm Saudi and I believe both Iran and Saudi Arabia, and honestly every country on Earth, has the right to nuclear weapons. Why should only Israel be allowed to have them?
jordanlund@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
Surely nobody has ever lied about the military capability of a country it wanted to attack...
RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
Israel has nuclear weapons, its neighbours that it threatens have every right to nuclear weapons. You just want Israel to achieve its expansionist goals with no pushback.
DragonSidedD@lemmy.ml · -6 pts · 1y
Despite having nuclear weapons and not being a party to the NPT, Israel has never threatened to use them.
Unlike Iran and most of its neighbors which threaten to destroy Israel every chance they get.
RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
Since before its founding it has been engaged in ethnic cleansing, massacres and expansion. Right now it illegally occupies the West Bank, parts of Lebanon and Syria, enforces a brutal siege on the Gaza Strip and is guilty of genocide. You are talking about it as if they are victims and not a violent and racist settler colonial project based on apocalyptic and messianic ideologies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Nations_resolutions_concerning_Israel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tantura_massacre
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_occupation_of_the_Golan_Heights
https://www.972mag.com/second-nakba-mainstream-israeli-right/
https://mepei.com/greater-israel-an-ongoing-expansion-plan-for-the-middle-east-and-north-africa/
https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/07/1152296
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 1y
With Zionists, every accusation is a confession
FreeBird@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -2 pts · 1y
Never thought a lemmy.ml user would not be campist and see the evil of the leaders of Iran. Thank you my friend. It's good to see that not everyone on Lemmy is supporting Khamenei and his regime. It's though watching people white washing the regime that has ruined my homeland, Iran.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
I remember when Americans purged Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, and Syria of Evil.
FreeBird@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -1 pts · 1y
Funny how Khamenei's regime has also done their share of intervention in the same places.
Afghanistan: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liwa_Fatemiyoun
Iraq: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_intervention_in_Iraq_(2014%E2%80%93present)
Syria: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_intervention_in_the_Syrian_civil_war
Lebonan: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_influence_in_Lebanon
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 1y
FreeBird@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y
I am not pro Isis. I am an exmuslim Atheist. Isis happened to get in the way of the regime and that's why they fought it. They wanted themselves to influence and rule. Arguing with you seems to be pointless. You accused me of supporting people who would kill me because I am queer and also left Islam. I'm blocking you.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
Then why cite efforts to quell their rampage through the Iran/Iraq border territory as some kind of crime?
What would you do if ISIS was cropping up in your backyard? Shrug and ignore them for fear of looking like you cared about governing?
The Americans spent decades in Iraq suppressing local government and dismantling regional bureaucracies, leaving a vast black market cartel in their wake.
When locals try and clean up the mess of De-Ba'athification and the endemic corruption of foreign private sector looters, they're overstepping?
Then why worship at the feet of Christian kleptocracy?
colonelsharki@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
I don’t know what you’ve been through but trust me, asking the Americans and the Israelis of all people to ‘free’ you from the Ayatollah is just utterly and completely insane. Just ask anyone from Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan how they found Western intervention. The people of Iran toppled the Shah and rightly sent him packing. He was Western backed and his savagery eclipsed that of the current regime. Not sure if you’re living in Iran or are part of the diaspora but the people of Iran will get rid of their government themselves. They certainly don’t need to be patronised by a wanted war criminal smugly telling them they need to be freed. Israel is doing its best to ensure people gather around the leadership. As for alternatives, the only option floated by the diaspora, who did very well working for the Shah, is his incompetent offspring. Champagne chugging, fine wining and dining and casino frequenting elites are not the answer for a highly conservative society. I’ve had the misfortune to bump into the Iranian pro-monarchy diaspora who joined the Israeli flag shaggers opposing peace protestors calling for a ceasefire. I was horrified at the language they used. It was clear they didn’t give a crap about human rights or even Israel. They simply latch on to Israel as a way to vent their highly venomous anti-Muslim views. In one incident that is seared into my mind, a middle aged Iranian woman screamed at a poor mother with young daughters that they (and I quote) “should be r@ped by Muslims and have sticks shoved up their p*****s”. I was horrified and quite glad when police pulled this despicable human being away. Equating Netanyahu with the Iranian government is like saying a serial killer and a pickpocket are the same thing. Iran for all its faults has not done anything on the level that Netanyahu has unleashed.
RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
The US will turn Iran into another Libya or Iraq or Afghanistan. I get that you may want a different form of government, but bootlicking the West isn't how to get it. Many Iraqis hated Saddam until they got the alternative, now they are worse off, specially the minorities. Not only did Iraq had stability, security and electricity, but religious minority also worshipped freely. Was Saddam good? No, but better than whatever Iraq has now.
When I was younger I was dumb to hope for something similar, now I know better. I remember thinking Iraq will be better without Saddam, and thinking Libya will better without Qadafi; I was very wrong and I wouldn't wish the same on Iran or any other country in the region. I'd take slow and steady progress over a US-imposed regime change. Now I want Saudi Arabia to have nuclear weapons to prevent becoming another Iraq or Libya. In the grand scheme of things the House of Saud is the best thing Saudi Arabia has, and they have been around for over 300 years. Maybe Iran can have a better government, but the change must be from within, and if you see the US-Israel advocating for change be very careful and suspicious. They don't want what's best for you.
What the US-Israel wants for the region is to weaken and fracture it so that only they can dominate it. Greater Israel isn't just a fantasy held by a fringe anymore, more and more elected Israeli politicians talk openly about it. In a similar manner the ethnic cleansing of Gaza and the plans for a 2nd Nakba were a fringe position until it became mainstream and that happened before October 2023. When the existential threat to the region already has nuclear weapons then the sensible thing to do is pursue nuclear weapons. I keep hearing Iran has a fatwa against nuclear weapons and I hope it isn't true and that they don't deny themselves the right to be able to deter foreign aggression.
PS: it is the Arabian Gulf, it was never Persian ;)