I hate that it takes away from the overall point being made, but the "Top 8" list doesn't agree with the table it's (apparently) pulled from. New Mexico should be 6th, not 8th.
On top of that, there's room for disagreement with how the table is calculated: Mississippi, for example, lists 25.4 deaths/100k, but the figures presented only list the number of crashes, not deaths. Crashes/100k results in either 23.2 or 34.1 depending on if you use population or drivers.
I won't challenge the deaths/100k exactly, but putting it that way does seem to "punish" states with more people per car that are in a crash. Carpooling is good, but does result in more deaths per crash. Number of fatal crashes per 100k drivers is a bit more fair to reality, IMHO. It doesn't change the big picture, but does put New Mexico up to 3rd.
The Red/Blue state thing gets more complicated when you take into consideration that Red states tend to be bigger and more rural, resulting in more miles driven. IIHS has "Deaths per 100 million vehicle miles traveled" for 2023 (https://www.iihs.org/research-areas/fatality-statistics/detail/state-by-state), and the top is still dominated by Red states, but New Mexico drops to 9th, while Oregon jumps all the way to 6th.
tl;dr: It doesn't matter how you slice the data, Mississippi sucks.
Plus, lots of driving mixed with lots of drinking. Honestly, that's my guess. It's a mix of how many people per capita are rural, and how many people per capita are poor and therefore likely to engage in substance abuse.
16 Comments
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech · 16 pts · 362d
is there a trend here?
radix@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 362d
I hate that it takes away from the overall point being made, but the "Top 8" list doesn't agree with the table it's (apparently) pulled from. New Mexico should be 6th, not 8th.
On top of that, there's room for disagreement with how the table is calculated: Mississippi, for example, lists 25.4 deaths/100k, but the figures presented only list the number of crashes, not deaths. Crashes/100k results in either 23.2 or 34.1 depending on if you use population or drivers.
I won't challenge the deaths/100k exactly, but putting it that way does seem to "punish" states with more people per car that are in a crash. Carpooling is good, but does result in more deaths per crash. Number of fatal crashes per 100k drivers is a bit more fair to reality, IMHO. It doesn't change the big picture, but does put New Mexico up to 3rd.
The Red/Blue state thing gets more complicated when you take into consideration that Red states tend to be bigger and more rural, resulting in more miles driven. IIHS has "Deaths per 100 million vehicle miles traveled" for 2023 (https://www.iihs.org/research-areas/fatality-statistics/detail/state-by-state), and the top is still dominated by Red states, but New Mexico drops to 9th, while Oregon jumps all the way to 6th.
tl;dr: It doesn't matter how you slice the data, Mississippi sucks.
BussyCat@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 362d
Rural cuts both ways though, it also means it’s much less likely they will encounter another driver on the road
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 362d
But my freedumbs!
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech · 6 pts · 362d
Saving lives means slowing down traffic, and Jimbo didn't get a 20% Apr car loan for 80k just to drive slowly dammit
BussyCat@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 362d
It also means having usable public transit so people have a way of getting home when they are intoxicated
dan1101@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 362d
Why does Biden hate these states? /s
reddig33@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 362d
MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 362d
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 362d
Surprise surprise.
Mississippi wins again.
Followed by Wyoming and Arkansas.
Fredselfish@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 362d
How Wyoming on the list? There no one out there.
ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com · 9 pts · 362d
That's because they've all been killed in car accidents
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 362d
Hawthorne Effect.
They know there aren't any cops for miles, so they drive how many of us would if we knew we wouldn't get caught.
Just a theory.
blarghly@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 362d
Plus, lots of driving mixed with lots of drinking. Honestly, that's my guess. It's a mix of how many people per capita are rural, and how many people per capita are poor and therefore likely to engage in substance abuse.
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 362d
Ever notice how it's only called substance abuse when you can't afford it?
evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 362d
Highest average distance driven per person per year, combined with the fact that basically all driving in Wyoming is at highway speed.
Glent@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 362d