Air fresheners. I might just be sensitive but if I'm in a car with one, instant car sickness. I recently stayed in a room that had one in a very enclosed space. I had to put it in a ziplock and even then everything that was exposed to it stinks days after. I don't understand why people consider a heavy scent desirable at all.
I think there needs to be more research with twin studies looking to see if it's an actual biological defect. As an analogy, we are all aware of the kind of guy who always "thinks with their dick and not their brain." We all have some biological instincts, some biological imperatives, and some people those imperatives seem to be stronger than others, some have them so strong it is a detriment to themselves because they cannot act rationally. Strangely, it does indeed appear some people have a biological imperative to see others suffer, like they derive some sort of emotional response out of it and seek it out.
In some cases, it even becomes self-destructive, because they want to see others suffer so much that they don't even care about their own preservation. They will happily see everyone's living standards plummet, including their own, if it means they can see their neighbors suffer. Take a look at this video. It's an example of an extreme case of this. The person in the video hardly even comes across as human but just an animal completely acting unconsciously on an instinct, and of course they are later thrown into prison because it is self-destructive.
My parents are very "bigoted and hateful," I would not think it is an exaggeration to say they are fascists. I used to hate them for it but then stopped as much when it became clear to me that they are entirely even in control of it, but it is like an animal part of them, they are not fully conscious and in control of that part of them. I no longer hate them, when they spew their rhetoric I realize it is something they cannot control and so I no longer fight with them. I more so just feel bad for them, and wish we could study this more seriously so it could have a cure. Recognizing this helped me improve my relationship with my family a lot since I realize fighting is pointless. When they begin to spout off their hatred, I recognize it is just one of their "episodes" and I ignore, do not acknowledge, and wait for it to pass, then change the subject to something else.
But sadly a lot of these people with these biological defects form political parties and hold high offices, and so it makes it "taboo" to treat it as a serious medical issue that needs research and so we can find a cure, to find what is causing this defect and to fix it. I think most people have a slight biological imperative to inflict destruction and suffering, which is why so many people enjoy hunting even though it's not necessary. Maybe it evolved as a way to make people feel less bad about hunting since used to we needed to do it for survival. For some people there is just something broken in their brain that turns this biological imperative to overdrive and they are just consumed with thoughts of wanting to kill, dominate, destroy, etc.
For real. I was raised in an evangelical household and it didn't stick with me beyond 14, even with all the indoctrination and sheltering. I genuinely don't get how a person grows into adulthood still thinking that way.
It is a currency just like any other. It is created via virtual mining (the more work you do the higher chance you strike a vein). It's value is purely speculative. There are more bitcoin scams that legitimate uses.
Ideally, insurance is wonderful and socialist. Everyone in a risk category pays into a pool, and whoever ends up realizing that risk gets to use the pool funds to set things right or be compensated for loss. It's truly "we all support each other." Protip: everyone is in the same risk pool. It's called "being human".
The problem is for profit insurance. When you put profit motive on insurance, the means change to reach that profitable end. Now it's "charge the highest premiums possible, pay out the fewest claims, underpay on the claims you can't avoid, and exclude anyone who makes 'too many' (read: any) claims". The problem is not insurance; the problem is profit.
I can explain it very simply. In the US (and I assume worldwide) insurance is an industry that exists to collect premiums and deny claims. The business model is highly successful because if consumers do not wish to participate, the government will assist them by making it mandatory.
How things have gotten so bad/why so many people relish in cruelty to the point it has become a mundane fact of life present in every social and economical system we have created.
I have been obsessed with truth since as long as I can remember. It was the core motivation of my academic life. Especially in an absolute since. The more I learn the more it slips from my fingers and existence seems to pull further away from it be it political redefining or quantum behavior.
Yep, so when I say I find WWE stupid I usually get the response that "It's just like a soap opera!" So basically I find the story lines for both to be terrible writing, but the WWE at least has some athletics... but not as good as you'd find in even an action movie. So it fails to be an interesting story and fails to have interesting stunts.
As someone who really loves pro wrestling, it's not really for everyone. It's about telling small stories which may or may not be consistent with previous lore, but the best ones are. Instead of having a solid structure, it's like a TTRPG where there are characters, and there are events, and the drama comes from how these people react to the unfolding events, while other people react to their own events.
And sometimes reality creeps in, whether by design or chance, and everyone's gotta scramble to adjust to it, how their character would react.
And then there's the crowd. Pro wrestling is the only story I know of that can (and will) change outcomes in real time in response to crowd reaction. A Babyface will act heel-ish to put over a guy being cheered by the crowd, but at the end of the day they'll still be a Babyface
38 Comments
BlackJerseyGiant@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 357d
People.
eierkuchen@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 356d
They're the worst!
Zachariah@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 357d
Drivers specifically
cloudless@piefed.social · 3 pts · 357d
6nk06@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 357d
VW too. Both tailgating maniacs.
cloudless@piefed.social · 3 pts · 357d
squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de · 18 pts · 357d
"How I could just kill a man"
zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev · 18 pts · 357d
Air fresheners. I might just be sensitive but if I'm in a car with one, instant car sickness. I recently stayed in a room that had one in a very enclosed space. I had to put it in a ziplock and even then everything that was exposed to it stinks days after. I don't understand why people consider a heavy scent desirable at all.
Afflictedlife@lemmy.ml · 11 pts · 357d
How people find the energy to be consistently bigoted and hateful
bunchberry@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 357d
I think there needs to be more research with twin studies looking to see if it's an actual biological defect. As an analogy, we are all aware of the kind of guy who always "thinks with their dick and not their brain." We all have some biological instincts, some biological imperatives, and some people those imperatives seem to be stronger than others, some have them so strong it is a detriment to themselves because they cannot act rationally. Strangely, it does indeed appear some people have a biological imperative to see others suffer, like they derive some sort of emotional response out of it and seek it out.
In some cases, it even becomes self-destructive, because they want to see others suffer so much that they don't even care about their own preservation. They will happily see everyone's living standards plummet, including their own, if it means they can see their neighbors suffer. Take a look at this video. It's an example of an extreme case of this. The person in the video hardly even comes across as human but just an animal completely acting unconsciously on an instinct, and of course they are later thrown into prison because it is self-destructive.
My parents are very "bigoted and hateful," I would not think it is an exaggeration to say they are fascists. I used to hate them for it but then stopped as much when it became clear to me that they are entirely even in control of it, but it is like an animal part of them, they are not fully conscious and in control of that part of them. I no longer hate them, when they spew their rhetoric I realize it is something they cannot control and so I no longer fight with them. I more so just feel bad for them, and wish we could study this more seriously so it could have a cure. Recognizing this helped me improve my relationship with my family a lot since I realize fighting is pointless. When they begin to spout off their hatred, I recognize it is just one of their "episodes" and I ignore, do not acknowledge, and wait for it to pass, then change the subject to something else.
But sadly a lot of these people with these biological defects form political parties and hold high offices, and so it makes it "taboo" to treat it as a serious medical issue that needs research and so we can find a cure, to find what is causing this defect and to fix it. I think most people have a slight biological imperative to inflict destruction and suffering, which is why so many people enjoy hunting even though it's not necessary. Maybe it evolved as a way to make people feel less bad about hunting since used to we needed to do it for survival. For some people there is just something broken in their brain that turns this biological imperative to overdrive and they are just consumed with thoughts of wanting to kill, dominate, destroy, etc.
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 357d
I think it just comes naturally. It would take energy to deconstruct and change their views and actions.
m0darn@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 357d
Why people think it's rational to believe in a god.
unknown@piefed.social · 4 pts · 356d
Because it absolves them of personal responsibility and allows them to feel morally superior?
bunchberry@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 357d
For real. I was raised in an evangelical household and it didn't stick with me beyond 14, even with all the indoctrination and sheltering. I genuinely don't get how a person grows into adulthood still thinking that way.
Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de · 8 pts · 357d
I consider myself tech aware, if not savvy. I do not understand Bitcoin, like at all. I'm pretty sure it's a scam, top to bottom.
derpgon@programming.dev · 1 pts · 356d
It is a currency just like any other. It is created via virtual mining (the more work you do the higher chance you strike a vein). It's value is purely speculative. There are more bitcoin scams that legitimate uses.
rumschlumpel@feddit.org · 7 pts · 357d
Chinese language
RandomStickman@fedia.io · 3 pts · 357d
中文很簡單的,不用怕
rumschlumpel@feddit.org · 3 pts · 356d
No comprendo : (
marighost@piefed.social · 7 pts · 357d
Health Insurance. Actually make it all insurance. My wife even worked in the industry for a bit...
Nougat@fedia.io · 13 pts · 357d
Ideally, insurance is wonderful and socialist. Everyone in a risk category pays into a pool, and whoever ends up realizing that risk gets to use the pool funds to set things right or be compensated for loss. It's truly "we all support each other." Protip: everyone is in the same risk pool. It's called "being human".
The problem is for profit insurance. When you put profit motive on insurance, the means change to reach that profitable end. Now it's "charge the highest premiums possible, pay out the fewest claims, underpay on the claims you can't avoid, and exclude anyone who makes 'too many' (read: any) claims". The problem is not insurance; the problem is profit.
Nemo@slrpnk.net · 4 pts · 357d
I understand "premium" (what you always pay, whether you use it or not)
I think I understand "co-pay" (what you pay at point-of-use (unless you've hit your annual out-of-pocket maximum (unless you're out-of-network)))
I absolutely do not understand "deductible", which seems to mean something different every time I look at it.
And it gets more esoteric from there.
I usually just pay cash-on-the-barrel for healthcare. Most places do a "same day payment" discount that can be up to 40%.
marighost@piefed.social · 2 pts · 357d
You understand it about as much as I do. Esoteric is a really good way to describe it 😅
taco@piefed.social · 1 pts · 357d
Nemo@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 357d
If you understand that, great, I'm very happy for you.
Professorozone@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 356d
I can explain it very simply. In the US (and I assume worldwide) insurance is an industry that exists to collect premiums and deny claims. The business model is highly successful because if consumers do not wish to participate, the government will assist them by making it mandatory.
unknown@piefed.social · 7 pts · 356d
How things have gotten so bad/why so many people relish in cruelty to the point it has become a mundane fact of life present in every social and economical system we have created.
janus2@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 357d
my own brain
dohpaz42@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 357d
The “funny” response is “everything”. The “serious” response nobody wants to hear.
HubertManne@piefed.social · 4 pts · 357d
I have been obsessed with truth since as long as I can remember. It was the core motivation of my academic life. Especially in an absolute since. The more I learn the more it slips from my fingers and existence seems to pull further away from it be it political redefining or quantum behavior.
tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 356d
WWE and soap operas
unknown@piefed.social · 5 pts · 356d
They're kinda the same thing, no?
tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 356d
Yep, so when I say I find WWE stupid I usually get the response that "It's just like a soap opera!" So basically I find the story lines for both to be terrible writing, but the WWE at least has some athletics... but not as good as you'd find in even an action movie. So it fails to be an interesting story and fails to have interesting stunts.
NotSafeForWorld@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 356d
As someone who really loves pro wrestling, it's not really for everyone. It's about telling small stories which may or may not be consistent with previous lore, but the best ones are. Instead of having a solid structure, it's like a TTRPG where there are characters, and there are events, and the drama comes from how these people react to the unfolding events, while other people react to their own events.
And sometimes reality creeps in, whether by design or chance, and everyone's gotta scramble to adjust to it, how their character would react.
And then there's the crowd. Pro wrestling is the only story I know of that can (and will) change outcomes in real time in response to crowd reaction. A Babyface will act heel-ish to put over a guy being cheered by the crowd, but at the end of the day they'll still be a Babyface
It's amazing
Professorozone@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 356d
Quantum entanglement.
ChicoSuave@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 357d
Privilege and exception existing when people say they want equality and justice. They don't. Why not? It's like they want to live an unstable life.
Klear@quokk.au · 1 pts · 356d
Quaternions.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 357d
why people wear earrings
bunchberry@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 357d
cute
tiramichu@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 353d
In short: social media platforms and the people who control them have poisoned the world.
eierkuchen@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 356d
Kiswahili