From what I understand, it was a ticketed VOD stream and was never uploaded to YouTube. I don’t think you can buy it anywhere, but there are file sharing download links in some of the top google search results.
The question is ... which one is the good angel? and which is the bad? ... or are they both bad? ... or both good? .. or do they just randomly change positions and perceptions every time you need them?
Welcome to the wide-wide world of moral relativism!
There is no good or bad, just differently moraled. These two shoulder spirits advocate for different actions with outcomes of mixed better and worse consequences.
Makes sense. You need fat (energy) to build and maintain the muscles. Muscles get used as energy source first, fat second, because fat is for emergencies.* Which is why muscly without fat looks so fake (and ugly imo).
* At least that's what i was educated for cows as a farmer, no clue what the fitness guys learn nowadays.
No, your body prefers fat as an energy source. Turning muscles into energy is a lot of effort for your metabolism, and building new muscles when you refeed also.
Uhm, no, it builds first fat, needs fat as an "ingredient" to build muscles (makes no sense to build all that muscle if you barely have enough energy to survive). Then burns preferably muscles. Fat is hard to convert, protein (muscle) is easily accessible (bodybuilders take protein as supplement). You need excercise and not just starving to lose weight, no?
And btw, even just keeping muscles needs more energy. Fat not.
No, muscle protein synthesis needs amino-acids. Fat is not used to build muscle
Then burns preferably muscles
No
Fat is hard to convert
Not nearly as hard as it is for the body to atrophy muscle mass, turn the proteins into amino-acids, and turn those amino-acids into glucose and then ATP
protein (muscle) is easily accessible (bodybuilders take protein as supplement)
It isn't, and the digestion of whey protein supplements can not be compared to muscle atrophy
You need excercise and not just starving to lose weight, no?
At this point I'm sure you're just trolling, because that couldn't be further from the truth
And btw, even just keeping muscles needs more energy
True
Fat not
Keeping fat cells also uses energy, just not nearly as much as muscle mass
If you wanna know my credibility on this topic I would suggest a look at my profile picture
being bisexual is being attracted to two very specific types of men, and all women- those being femboys and "i know it when i see it but it's certainly not muscle dudes"
Ah yeah, that was dumb, I should've specified that you can do that, if you're looking at the post in the Lemmy web-UI.
The button would take you to the webpage of the original post, so before it got federated. Images often load when I do that, because my instance has an image proxy that's sometimes at fault for loading errors. If I'm interpreting your screenshot correctly, slrpnk.net has an image proxy, too.
Maybe your app has a different button to open the original post, or a button to open the Lemmy webpage for the post in your browser and then you can click the rainbow pentagon there...
45 Comments
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works · 59 pts · 349d
I'm sorry, does that man have a tattoo of a derpy wolf with an overbite?
dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 pts · 349d
Is that Courtney left and Shayne right?
S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 348d
Looks like Ian in the center so it could be a Smosh bit.
Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 348d
Anthony Padilla’s Funeral Roast.
S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 348d
Oh I didn't saw that one
Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 348d
From what I understand, it was a ticketed VOD stream and was never uploaded to YouTube. I don’t think you can buy it anywhere, but there are file sharing download links in some of the top google search results.
dalekcaan@feddit.nl · 7 pts · 348d
I'm more concerned with the fact that it appears he's just had his left nipple surgically removed.
TheMinister@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 348d
Where are your nipples, friend?
ininewcrow@lemmy.ca · 50 pts · 349d
A MILF and a Roman Gladiator?
Apeman42@lemmy.world · 34 pts · 349d
I'm on board.
ininewcrow@lemmy.ca · 20 pts · 349d
The question is ... which one is the good angel? and which is the bad? ... or are they both bad? ... or both good? .. or do they just randomly change positions and perceptions every time you need them?
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 349d
Yes
Apeman42@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 349d
He's good at being bad and she's bad at being good.
ininewcrow@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 349d
Sounds a lot like modern Christianity.
dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 348d
No, that's more like: "bad cop, worse cop."
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 348d
i got that reference dot jaypeg
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 14 pts · 349d
They're both very bad in very good ways..
ininewcrow@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 349d
Sounds a lot like The Satanic Temple
dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 348d
Welcome to the wide-wide world of moral relativism!
There is no good or bad, just differently moraled. These two shoulder spirits advocate for different actions with outcomes of mixed better and worse consequences.
Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 348d
At a certain age every ILF becomes a MILF.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 348d
the problem being?
tdawg@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 349d
Tbh muscle-y dudes have never really done it for me
samus12345@sh.itjust.works · 43 pts · 349d
Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 348d
This might be my favorite comment on lemmy
toynbee@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 349d
Thank goodness on behalf of dudes like me.
Lemminary@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 349d
It depends. Muscle underneath a small layer of fat is amazing.
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 348d
Makes sense. You need fat (energy) to build and maintain the muscles. Muscles get used as energy source first, fat second, because fat is for emergencies.* Which is why muscly without fat looks so fake (and ugly imo).
* At least that's what i was educated for cows as a farmer, no clue what the fitness guys learn nowadays.
Anivia@feddit.org · 3 pts · 348d
No, your body prefers fat as an energy source. Turning muscles into energy is a lot of effort for your metabolism, and building new muscles when you refeed also.
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 348d
Uhm, no, it builds first fat, needs fat as an "ingredient" to build muscles (makes no sense to build all that muscle if you barely have enough energy to survive). Then burns preferably muscles. Fat is hard to convert, protein (muscle) is easily accessible (bodybuilders take protein as supplement). You need excercise and not just starving to lose weight, no?
And btw, even just keeping muscles needs more energy. Fat not.
Anivia@feddit.org · 4 pts · 348d
No, muscle protein synthesis needs amino-acids. Fat is not used to build muscle
No
Not nearly as hard as it is for the body to atrophy muscle mass, turn the proteins into amino-acids, and turn those amino-acids into glucose and then ATP
It isn't, and the digestion of whey protein supplements can not be compared to muscle atrophy
At this point I'm sure you're just trolling, because that couldn't be further from the truth
True
Keeping fat cells also uses energy, just not nearly as much as muscle mass
If you wanna know my credibility on this topic I would suggest a look at my profile picture
Lemminary@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 348d
Lmfao Yes.
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 6 pts · 349d
Visually nothing; but being embraced by them is a whole 'nother story. I can practically feel my spine realigning just thinking about it.
possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 348d
being bisexual is being attracted to two very specific types of men, and all women- those being femboys and "i know it when i see it but it's certainly not muscle dudes"
dink@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 349d
Ian from smosh has really rebranded.
OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 349d
Fairly certain that is literally Ian from Smosh. Flanked by Courtney Miller, and Shayne from iCarly (both also from Smosh)
Rakonat@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 349d
No, no. They've got a point.
jaschen306@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 347d
The Emperor's New Groove reference. SICK
dharmacurious@slrpnk.net · 12 pts · 349d
Image won't load for me :(
Lemminary@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 349d
OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 349d
Here ya go, hope this helps :)
dharmacurious@slrpnk.net · 5 pts · 349d
In what way did I hurt you? Did I fuck your dad or something? :(
OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 348d
I guess I'm just a little bit broken on the inside.
Ephera@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 348d
Click the rainbow-colored pentagon...
dharmacurious@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 348d
Where?
Ephera@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 348d
Ah yeah, that was dumb, I should've specified that you can do that, if you're looking at the post in the Lemmy web-UI.
The button would take you to the webpage of the original post, so before it got federated. Images often load when I do that, because my instance has an image proxy that's sometimes at fault for loading errors. If I'm interpreting your screenshot correctly, slrpnk.net has an image proxy, too.
Maybe your app has a different button to open the original post, or a button to open the Lemmy webpage for the post in your browser and then you can click the rainbow pentagon there...