Why not just call out that Larry Ellison’s son owns it and he replaced the head of CBS with a right wing nut job masquerading as a fair and balanced “journalist”?
Remember, this isn’t about funding, this is about not swearing in the new house member from Arizona who gives the Dems enough seats to force a vote on the release of the Epstein files
Tomorrow this ties for the second longest shutdown in US history. A week after that, Trump beats his own record for least functional government in the entire history of the United States.
Don't forget, the Republicans are the ones in power right now. If they wanted to, they can change the rules of the senate to pass the budget with a simple majority instead of the current 60 vote requirement. This shut down is all on them.
They're in no rush. Every day the shutdown goes on, Trump and cronies can get rid of employees they couldn't get the courts to let them fire, and that's not counting the ones who quit because they can't afford to be without income.
Meanwhile, Trump can executive order anything he considers critical to be essential and therefore funded anyway, and none of the machinery of fascism misses a beat. There are no jobs reports to alarm people that employment is collapsing, and the stock market keeps climbing.
Meanwhile, Congressional republicans cry crocodile tears. "Oh, no! Please don't play hardball with us!"
This is what happens when you try to exert leverage when you don't have any left.
Wonder if military paychecks will be withheld for Nov 1. Historically speaking, things tend to get pretty interesting when soldiers don't get paid. Just ask Sam Doe.
What are the odds that enough of the Republicans kick the bucket to force them to negotiate? Or would they allow their new candidate to be sworn in by the speaker while still denying any democratic actions?
22 Comments
modestmeme@lemmy.world · 62 pts · 295d
FYI Trump no longer calls out CBS as “fake news”. There are reasons for this.
criss_cross@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 295d
Why not just call out that Larry Ellison’s son owns it and he replaced the head of CBS with a right wing nut job masquerading as a fair and balanced “journalist”?
Sagan_Wept@lemmynsfw.com · 11 pts · 295d
What are you implying?
klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe · 41 pts · 295d
Probably saying cbs no longer reports actual facts, just what the neo-Nazi-MAGAs tell them to talk about
CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world · 50 pts · 295d
Remember, this isn’t about funding, this is about not swearing in the new house member from Arizona who gives the Dems enough seats to force a vote on the release of the Epstein files
hcf@sh.itjust.works · 49 pts · 295d
So it's "hostage taking" when you're the ones getting leveraged?
Countdown until Repubs start chanting "free the hostages!" in reference to the American people... 🙄
NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip · 47 pts · 295d
For those wondering:
No signs ANYTHING has changed in the bill. So it is just "we're going to vote on it until you approve it" yet again
Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 295d
I hope the shutdown lasts through election day.
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip · 43 pts · 295d
Tomorrow this ties for the second longest shutdown in US history. A week after that, Trump beats his own record for least functional government in the entire history of the United States.
We're less than one mooch from the record.
SynAcker@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 27 pts · 295d
Don't forget, the Republicans are the ones in power right now. If they wanted to, they can change the rules of the senate to pass the budget with a simple majority instead of the current 60 vote requirement. This shut down is all on them.
ryannathans@aussie.zone · -6 pts · 295d
Then we'd surely see headlines about how undemocratic it is to change how voting works
BradleyUffner@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 295d
Yes. Their opportunity to do the right thing is long past.
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 25 pts · 295d
Same story as ever: Republicans refuse to negotiate in good faith and then blame it on the people not bending over to be raped by them.
The entire Republican apparatus is basically a DARVO abuser in the form of a political party.
SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 295d
Hell yeah, let's sit in stalemate for 3 more years
Hopefully, if enough people lose their income, we can go back to making real social change again, like in the BLM riots.
gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 295d
A government shutdown isn't a general strike, but it could be the start of one
mycodesucks@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 295d
They're in no rush. Every day the shutdown goes on, Trump and cronies can get rid of employees they couldn't get the courts to let them fire, and that's not counting the ones who quit because they can't afford to be without income.
Meanwhile, Trump can executive order anything he considers critical to be essential and therefore funded anyway, and none of the machinery of fascism misses a beat. There are no jobs reports to alarm people that employment is collapsing, and the stock market keeps climbing.
Meanwhile, Congressional republicans cry crocodile tears. "Oh, no! Please don't play hardball with us!"
This is what happens when you try to exert leverage when you don't have any left.
dumplingry@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 295d
are we ever gonna release the epstein files?
My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 295d
Wonder if military paychecks will be withheld for Nov 1. Historically speaking, things tend to get pretty interesting when soldiers don't get paid. Just ask Sam Doe.
Inucune@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 295d
What are the odds that enough of the Republicans kick the bucket to force them to negotiate? Or would they allow their new candidate to be sworn in by the speaker while still denying any democratic actions?
unphazed@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 295d
Yes.
HubertManne@piefed.social · 3 pts · 295d
as per usual the republicans can't do anything when they are in power but beg the democrats to fix everything.
Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 295d
Twenty? Those are rookie numbers.