then downvote, move on, maybe set up a filter to catch the comic strip idk. not everything is for everyone. it's shitty to complain about something because you are not its target audience
it’s shitty to complain about something because you are not its target audience
But I am it's target audience? I like comics, I'm discussing a well known brand of comic, in a public comic forum. Negativity is not shitty, perhaps if you don't like it perhaps you can just downvote and move on? Or perhaps there merit to negative discussions?
I think there's a difference between "these are a huge waste of time, and always has been. Reddit slop!"
And
"Man, these comics aren't for me. The punchline never lands, or the art style is a bit strange and takes me out of it", etc.
The first kind of negativity contributes very little to any sort of discussion other than to be inflammatory. The second one actually invites the discussion you mention in the comment I'm replying to.
The first kind of negativity contributes very little to any sort of discussion other than to be inflammatory
Yet here we are, having a discussion about it. Eventually there will be something low effort, and it will be called low effort, that's not inflammatory. Negativity is not abuse.
28 Comments
aeronmelon@lemmy.world · 33 pts · 297d
Well, it would be insensitive to get mad.
droning_in_my_ears@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 297d
- Phife Dawg
notreallyhere@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 297d
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net · 5 pts · 297d
https://youtu.be/SSPhuj0BDTw
localhorst@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 296d
To be fair, he did come a long way.
regdog@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 296d
Fantastic
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 4 pts · 296d
I can cum in your eye all the way fron Australia because
🎵I come from a land down under. 🎵
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 296d
Where's afar?
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 296d
It's near wherever you are.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 296d
I know my heart will go on.
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 297d
I came upon this comic.
nieceandtows@programming.dev · 3 pts · 296d
Well, when you put it that way
nieceandtows@programming.dev · 2 pts · 296d
Eats shoots and leaves
Hupf@feddit.org · 1 pts · 297d
https://youtu.be/Ky0T5kR1JqE
abbotsbury@lemmy.world · -34 pts · 297d
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 43 pts · 297d
0ops@piefed.zip · 4 pts · 297d
lol
kambusha@sh.itjust.works · 16 pts · 297d
Come again?
abbotsbury@lemmy.world · -12 pts · 297d
Those comics are slop
morphballganon@mtgzone.com · 15 pts · 297d
Nah these are totally worth the 5 seconds it takes to read them
abbotsbury@lemmy.world · -15 pts · 297d
I don't think they are, they lack substance and often have the most bottom of the barrel of low hanging fruits as "jokes". Cheaply made slop.
KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 296d
Well call me a cheap sloppy lover.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 297d
then downvote, move on, maybe set up a filter to catch the comic strip idk. not everything is for everyone. it's shitty to complain about something because you are not its target audience
abbotsbury@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 296d
But I am it's target audience? I like comics, I'm discussing a well known brand of comic, in a public comic forum. Negativity is not shitty, perhaps if you don't like it perhaps you can just downvote and move on? Or perhaps there merit to negative discussions?
Focal@pawb.social · 8 pts · 296d
I think there's a difference between "these are a huge waste of time, and always has been. Reddit slop!"
And
"Man, these comics aren't for me. The punchline never lands, or the art style is a bit strange and takes me out of it", etc.
The first kind of negativity contributes very little to any sort of discussion other than to be inflammatory. The second one actually invites the discussion you mention in the comment I'm replying to.
'least.. that's how I see it.
abbotsbury@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 296d
Yet here we are, having a discussion about it. Eventually there will be something low effort, and it will be called low effort, that's not inflammatory. Negativity is not abuse.
Randelung@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 296d
samus12345@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 297d
ദ്ദി˙ ᴗ )˙
TheBat@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 297d
abbotsbury@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 296d
Of course it can, it's OG slop, slop from the old days. Like soap operas, OG television slop. You're taking the "original" too literally.
regdog@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 296d
Thanks for telling us.
abbotsbury@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 296d
No problem.