Former Republican state legislator Austin Smith pleaded guilty Monday to what he previously called “ludicrous” charges that he personally forged more than 100 signatures on his petitions for reelection last year.
Former Republican state legislator Austin Smith pleaded guilty Monday to what he previously called “ludicrous” charges that he personally forged more than 100 signatures on his petitions for reelection last year.
32 Comments
orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 94 pts · 288d
Fuck this. He should not be able to see a ballot again in his life.
BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 288d
I'm not really sure that I think disenfranchising anyone is cool, but this rubs me wrong.
mos@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 288d
I'm not sure I have a strong opinion for disenfranchising voters, since I believe everyone deserves a right to vote, but there has to be a point at which someone forfeits their own ability to vote? I think cheating the system (and by proxy, other voters) might be a good case for that.
Whostosay@sh.itjust.works · 14 pts · 288d
Especially with the intent to cause the amount of destruction that has already been carried out that was known when the crime occurred
Zoomboingding@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 288d
Yeah, campaign fraud is a slice of narrow instances someone should lose their right to participate in democracy.
Omgpwnies@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 288d
Maybe not fully prevent them from voting, but curtail the means by which they can cast a vote to some minimum. For example, require them to cast an in-person ballot at a pre-defined time and location, under court-appointed supervision.
This would be in addition to being prohibited from running, campaigning, volunteering, or doing anything else in the election process besides cast their single vote.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 8 pts · 288d
No American citizen should ever lose their right to vote, for ANY reason, not even incarcerated prisoners. Hell, prisoners probably need governmental representation more than anyone.
These are supposed to be God-given, inalienable rights, according to the Declaration of Independence, so how does a human-conceived entity presume to veto God?
davad@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 288d
I think disenfranchising anyone is immoral and counterproductive to a thriving democracy.
But someone who attempted to commit voter fraud should be banned from any position of public trust. Ban him from public office, from the election board, etc. Don't even let him volunteer as a poll worker.
orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 11 pts · 288d
Normally, I agree with that stance. However, in attempting to subvert an election, he stands to disenfranchise hundreds if not thousands of peoples' votes. You're more correct, but I hate the idea of someone like this getting the ability to vote for more people like him into power after he's already done something so egregious.
Anyway, I don't disagree with your position, just that this dick weasel is anathema to free and fair elections.
nulluser@lemmy.world · 53 pts · 288d
So, what, it's only actual fraud if you don't get caught? He submitted fraudulent documents. Full stop. He successfully committed fraud.
glimse@lemmy.world · 33 pts · 288d
Legally, it is attempted fraud. He got caught and it's only "fraud" if the damage is done. But "attempted fraud" isn't nothing and he's getting hit with multiple charges.
The thing we should be mad about is the possibility that he won't have a felony on his record (the judge can decide if it's a felony after his probationary period, as explained in the article)
nulluser@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 288d
glimse@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 288d
The name of the charge definitely sounds likes it's way less bad but it's only a little less bad lol
WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 288d
Do they give you the Nobel Prize for attempted chemistry?
TrickDacy@lemmy.world · 33 pts · 289d
Gaslight obstruct project
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 288d
Gassy Old Poops
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 33 pts · 288d
Who's managing the betting pool? What's the Over/Under on a Pardon?
CluelessLemmyng@lemmy.sdf.org · 19 pts · 288d
Considering it's a State level and Arizona Governor is a Dem... Probably close to 0% chance on that.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 17 pts · 288d
I like those odds, but I'll bet a Democrat could still figure out to lose.
cashsky@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 288d
Just don't let Chuck Schumer anywhere near it
Fedizen@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 288d
If politics were a card game playing chuck schumer would lose you the game every time.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 288d
Schmuck Schumer
Sanctus@anarchist.nexus · 1 pts · 193d
Idk this AG said to shoot ICE Agents so somehow I think this one particular Dem is a little different than the party average. At least on these select few opinions.
sirico@feddit.uk · 22 pts · 288d
Should be treason for any country that uses a democratic system
Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de · 20 pts · 288d
Another case of projection re election fraud. We need to pay closer attention to ballot signatures for those protesting a bit too much. I’m sure the opportunities are aplenty.
13igTyme@piefed.social · 15 pts · 288d
Turning point leader is a traitorous fraud, that's a real shot in the neck.
shittydwarf@piefed.social · 12 pts · 288d
Sweet do Musk next
aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 288d
crusa187@lemmy.ml · 8 pts · 288d
So, the election from was coming from inside the house.
AmericanEconomicThinkTank@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 288d
Who could've ever thought?
lka1988@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 288d
NOTADRAGQUEEN
UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 288d
Will be pardoned.... For a price
imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 288d
Pikachu face