Denmark wants to ban VPNs to unlock foreign, illegal streams – and experts are worried
https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/denmark-wants-to-ban-vpns-to-unlock-foreign-illegal-streams-and-experts-are-worried
682 points · 110 comments · view on lemmy.world
110 Comments
Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de · 222 pts · 259d
What the hell is happening in Denmark at the moment??
First forcing the chat control topic upon Europe, now this?
I looked up their government, would have expected far right or so, but it is liberal social democrat...
So what happens here?
gratux@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 109 pts · 259d
My bet is on a lot of bigtech
bribeslobbyingMultiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de · 44 pts · 259d
Big Tech has no interest in chat control, though.
They vehemently opposed it from the start.
How the Danish are acting just doesn't make sense...
Mondez@lemdro.id · 21 pts · 259d
It's more complicated than that as control acts as a barrier to entry preventing competitive start ups entering the market and disrupting it so established players probably don't care as they can bare the cost of compliance if they have to.
Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 259d
But it would be the other way around:
Established players would have to completely break and rewrite their existant transport layer in the whole world, just to be able to also cover the EU. (Or leave.)
While potential new competitors would be able to design it to comply right from the start.
WereHacker@lemmy.ml · 64 pts · 259d
Don't be fooled by the party names. You have to look at the policies and consequences. Danes like to feel progressive, have left leaning stuff like free education and totalitarian measures against stuff they fear. The social democratic party remained in power after Germany moved troops into Denmark in 1940. It should tell you a lot.
cecilkorik@piefed.ca · 42 pts · 259d
There are fascists subverting every location on the political spectrum, none of them are immune. We've been trained to think in terms of "left" or "right" but these fuckers are coming at us sideways and corrupting our whole politcal spectrum at once. Don't fall for it, pay attention to actions, not labels.
oce@jlai.lu · 1 pts · 258d
I think they always have used this tactic, there's "socialist" in Nazi, they are just highly specific with who they want to socialize with.
eleitl@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 259d
Denmark resistance lasted for the whole 6 hours.
Evotech@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 259d
Yeah, the time it took to drive from Germany
EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com · 42 pts · 259d
Something is rotten in Denmark.
Dojan@pawb.social · 29 pts · 259d
It isn't just Denmark. You see it here in Sweden, too. I'd be surprised if you didn't see it across Europe.
I'm not really happy with any of the big political parties here in Sweden. The Greens hate nuclear power so much they'd prefer to open up fossil fuelled power plants than keep nuclear ones up and running. The Left party work really hard to get out of the EU. These are both parties I align the best with.
The Social Democrats are just these milquetoast soft-core conservatives, pretending to care about issues but turning their coats the second they get the chance. Unfortunately they always end up leading any of the left-winged government coalitions, typically with the help from the Centre who then gets to dictate all the policies, so it just ends up being a centre-right government that sells out our welfare to private interests.
It's been like this for well over a decade at this point. Useless bunch, the lot of them.
tomiant@piefed.social · 9 pts · 259d
Yeah Sweden has been doing great strides toward a full surveillance state, it is creepy as fuck.
Dojan@pawb.social · 6 pts · 258d
All country leaders are looking at North Korea with loving eyes.
I remember how almost twenty years ago people were scoffing at the great firewall of China, how they’d restrict information and what not. Now all western countries are all “we must do this, for the children!”
iLStrix@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 258d
Wow, this is quite an interesting read, because you can write almost the same thing - word for word - about Germany. It's the same overall in Germany with a few differences like time (it has been going on for a lot longer here) and some of the left are a bit different.
bumblefumble@mander.xyz · 21 pts · 259d
The soc.dem. are not a left party anymore. The current government consists of three different center-right parties. And they have some weird priorities sometimes.
tjoa@feddit.org · 18 pts · 259d
The social democrats copied a lot of anti immigration talking points from the right because this seems to be just popular in Denmark. I guess they are just weird.
stoy@lemmy.zip · 20 pts · 259d
But these laws are not anti immigration, they are anti freedom in general.
tjoa@feddit.org · 2 pts · 259d
True, my guess is as good as yours. It feels like they paired seemingly good intentions (I mean who is against fighting CSAM right) with a complete lack of technical understanding and proportion. Maybe that’s not a political spectrum kind of think but generational lol. Idk tho it still confuses me how people can be so ignorant to go through with this.
evilcultist@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 259d
I wonder how much it has to do with the success and subsequent loss of this operation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Trojan_Shield
Because it seems like a lot of countries in the west are pushing this kind of thing rover the last several years and there’s a heavy push right now. https://www.privacyguides.org/videos/2025/12/16/taylor-lorenz-on-kosa-the-screen-act-and-repealing-section-230/
MudMan@fedia.io · 145 pts · 259d
How do you "ban VPNs"? That's not how software works, and VPNs are... you know, a key part of a bunch of online infrastructure. I get that they mean "ban them to bypass restrictions", but the entire point of a VPN is you can't tell from the outside what it's being used for. You may as well ban thinking about butterflies. You can write it down, but you can't enforce it.
Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world · 66 pts · 259d
I actually want one country to ban VPNs just so every other country can see the fallout or complete lack of enforcement
CosmoNova@lemmy.world · 82 pts · 259d
VPNs are banned in some countries. At least in practice. China comes to mind and please nobody tell me „I have a friend in China and they use one!“ That friend is either breaking the law, or a state agent or foreigner where that law doesn‘t apply. Hotels have that as part of their service for tourists because why the hell would anyone travel to a country with basically no internet? Of course they are exempt.
But Chinese citizens are absolutely not allowed to use VPNs to break through the great firewall. The overwhelming majority wouldn‘t even know how. But of course most of them know at least one person who can.
So in theory the law is useless but in practice it‘s very effective to control information. Whatever the case it‘s nothing a democracy should pursuit. Ever.
witty_username@feddit.nl · 47 pts · 259d
This is such an important message. We should not lull ourselves into complacency. Banning vpns will be yet another step towards a closed, non-anonymous internet where governments (and by extension companies) will force you to give up access and control over your digital life
DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works · 38 pts · 259d
Let me tell how how much people actually follow laws in China.
I was born while the One Child Policy was in effect. My mother already gave birth to my older brother. Basically, my existence is illegal.
As you can see, clearly I'm not dead. They didn't manage to kill me, just demanded my parents paid a massive fine and denied legal papers until they did so.
Honestly if you just browse and don't post anything too serious, are they really gonna go after everyone who use a VPN. I mean, say even if just 1% uses a VPN. That's 1,400,000 people. Are they gonna lock up a million people? Really? Surely they have bigger fishes to catch. (Edit: 1% of 1.4 billion is actually 14 million, good luck locking that many people lolz)
As for control of information, internarional phone calls aren't blocked, you can send letters. My mom regularly call my aunts (aka: her sisters) in China. I heard the Covid QR codes being mentioned, afaik, the didn't lose their teaching jobs nor ever got arrested.
It's like adblocking. Do you know anyone irl that use adblockers? Seriously, I don't know anyone that does except like maybe 1 perdon.
But here we are, on a platform where practically everyone uses adblockers.
Or in another analogy. Mainstream social media is like inside the GFW and Lemmy is like using VPN to bypass it.
TLDR: Okay sorry if my point isn't concise, I guess my point is: NPCs will just follow the wind, those who have the will to dig deeper will probably be able to bypass the censorship (provided that it's not completely cut off from the outside internet)
rozodru@pie.andmc.ca · 9 pts · 259d
Thanks for posting this and I believe a lot of people think that when you're online in China you're CONSTANTLY monitored by someone assigned SPECIFICALLY to you or something.
There used to be like I guess a modern day old wives tale where if you're playing an online game with someone from China and typed into in-game chat "Tianamen Square Massacre 1989" it would knock the person from China offline. I remember doing that a few years ago and the other guy, from China, took awhile to respond and when he did he simply said "that's our history".
It's like you said, the vast majority will follow the rules and won't use a VPN but others will just be like "ok, what are you going to do?" and do so. It's like pirating stuff in the US. I've heard stories of people getting sued out the wazoo by movie studios for pirating and sharing but those stories are few and far between and generally the people doing it aren't smart about it. I've been pirating content for decades and have never gotten a notice or email or letter about anything.
ApertureUA@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 257d
Actually, webpages that mention it get blocked from what I've heard. But there's no way to know if a videogame chat will have it (especially if TLS/SSL is used), so it wouldn't happen there.
TexasDrunk@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 259d
To add to your point, Xiaohongshu has plenty of people on it who aren't Chinese as well. Loads. It's not like they're in cultural blackout.
jaybone@lemmy.zip · 10 pts · 259d
When companies offshore dev or IT to China, do those employees get full VPN access with access to the “western” internet?
CosmoNova@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 259d
Good question! I‘m not that deep into the technical aspects but Chinese companies that work with foreign companies would have to work with the government and other Chinese companies that control internet access in China to circumvent the firewall legally. The process is likely limited and heavily monitored by authorities. Same would go for Chinese companies with storefronts in the global web. They would need to access our internet regularly but I assume their access is limited to some degree.
I imagine unless you‘re a big player it can be quite the hassle so many Chinese companies would rather work with domestic companies than with foreign ones. I think this is one major reason why many contracts with Chinese companies can only be done through middlemen. As an outsider, you can‘t get full access to their industry because you have no means of contacting all these little manufacturers yourself.
But again, I don‘t actually know for sure what these processes look like. Maybe someone with actual experience can shine a brighter light on this.
Damage@feddit.it · 3 pts · 259d
All company VPNs I've used limit the tunnel to the intranet, the internet doesn't go through there. But that's a matter of choice I guess.
Evotech@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 259d
Most likely split tunnelling
But idk anything
iopq@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 259d
Hotels are not exempt, not sure where you get your info
Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com · -4 pts · 259d
You are being absolutely ridiculous. VPNs may be de jure forbidden in China (idk about this even), but de-facto they're absolutely allowed, nobody is prosecuted for using them, and every young Chinese person can tell you this. You haven't talked with a Chinese living in China in your entire life.
iopq@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 259d
That's not true either
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/09/chinese-programmer-ordered-to-pay-1m-yuan-for-using-virtual-private-network
Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com · -2 pts · 259d
From the article:
This person was not "using a VPN", he was lying to the government about his working status and working for an overseas firm illegally.
iopq@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 258d
There's nothing illegal about working overseas
mannycalavera@feddit.uk · 15 pts · 259d
They'll do what Russia does with their online services. Have a registration scheme with noncompliant VPNs being outright banned.
Simple when you know which dictator to copy.
MudMan@fedia.io · 10 pts · 259d
I guess that works for VPN services offering servers outside the country. That's not what VPNs are, though, and you still can't ban the concept of VPNs having a connection outside the country. VPN software is available open source and all it takes for it to connect abroad is my phone with a VPN connection to my home computer being abroad.
I mean, Russia (and even China) still have people using VPNs all over the place. This (and a lot of the push for age verification and comms backdoors) reeks of barely understanding the desired result and entirely misunderstanding how the tech works.
sobchak@programming.dev · 3 pts · 259d
I believe China does statistical analysis to do stuff like detecting and blocking VPNs, suspicious looking ssh traffic, etc from home Internet connections not going to an approved business. It's my understanding it's very hard to get around the GFW at the moment, and pretty complex stuff is needed to mask VPN traffic to make it look normal (Project X, Xray, Reality, etc).
MudMan@fedia.io · 3 pts · 259d
Yeah, I read about some of the tightening at the time and I'm not disputing that there are technical ways of... you know, making your country's Internet a mostly separate bubble for non-techie users.
The point is it's both hard and extremely invasive to get there. You can't just wish upon a star for VPNs to not be used for a particular application without going to those extremes. Especially if the thing you're trying to prevent is people watching Superman two weeks early or wanking to a mainstream porn page.
iopq@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 259d
They just block encrypted connections out of Russia to unknown servers
HK65@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 254d
That'd block google and youtube, even outside a VPN.
iopq@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 254d
They can selectively allow connections to those hosts. They already block ECH connections anyway
Wigglesworth@retrolemmy.com · 10 pts · 259d
VPN bans amount to only allowing private companies to operate vpns for the purpose of infrastructure and commerce. It wouldn't ban vpns entirely, but no average person would have the means within his country to be able to purchase or use one... legally.
While it would be sorta bad, it's like taking the top layer off of the cake while leaving the rest.
There's ways out, still, and there always will be. They can't ban buying a vps from next door, and putting wireguard on it.
I am a relatively cheerful if a bit offputting person, I do not mean to say this is good news by my tone. This fucking sucks lol. Sorry.
Wooki@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 259d
Precedent is already set by countries blocking them, it's been done.
Digit@lemmy.wtf · 110 pts · 259d
i guess we all should have fought back on internet censorship, rather than fallen back on "well i can still vpn".
flamiera@kbin.melroy.org · 61 pts · 259d
Urist@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 258d
Yea, and by pressure you mean giving a big fat fuck you and sail the high seas? 🏴☠️
obinice@lemmy.world · 79 pts · 259d
Denmark seems to want to fuck everything up lately, what's their problem?
victorz@lemmy.world · 50 pts · 259d
They can't understand each other. Because of their language.
HejMedDig@feddit.dk · 11 pts · 259d
Kamelåso?
victorz@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 259d
🎯😂
Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 259d
There's a good chance this guy is just a moron.
mrmaplebar@fedia.io · 66 pts · 259d
Gotta give Denmark credit, they're really going for the Shittiest Western European Country Award. Granted, I'm from the USA and we're obviously an unmitigated disaster, but like, what the fuck are you guys doing? Competing for attention?
Frozentea725@feddit.uk · 36 pts · 259d
The UK has entered the conversation, we will not be unseated in Europe. But yeah as hard as we try we pail in comparison to you guys, hopefully your inevitable implosion will serve as a warning to the rest of us aspiring authoritarianists.. Probably not.
tomiant@piefed.social · 7 pts · 259d
Are you kidding? Whatever collapse they are trying to cause over there will inevitably be done here too once they're done. It's like a concerted global fascist effort, and people are sleepwalking straight into it, it's like they have some brain control machine.
Wait, shit, they do- the Internet.
ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 258d
Correct. The exact same fascists who are doing this to the USA have explicitly stated that they're targeting the EU next.
CosmoNova@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 259d
Some US states are in the process of banning VPNs too, though. I’m afraid the USA remains the uncontested champion of being a shitty western country and it‘s not even close.
mrmaplebar@fedia.io · 2 pts · 258d
None of the even remotely good ones. Why is Denmark trying to be Alabama, again?
billwashere@lemmy.world · 65 pts · 259d
The powers that be really don’t like the idea of unmonitored secure networks do they?
Honytawk@feddit.nl · 62 pts · 258d
The whole country wants to ban VPNs?
Or just a small subset of politicians in the pocket of big corporations who see their profits melt because of their own greed?
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works · 19 pts · 258d
What's the difference?
nulluser@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 258d
Wut? Are you actually suggesting that the entire population of Denmark (aka, the whole country) is just
???
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works · 23 pts · 258d
Well, I'm an American, and we're collectively blamed for the fuckshit our government does, so absolutely yes.
But also, if the Danish government passes a law that goes into effect, how does it matter how many or how few Danes wanted it?
Tja@programming.dev · -8 pts · 258d
Well, you collectively elected Trump for president.
Twice.
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works · 15 pts · 258d
Uh huh, and how'd the Danish government arrive in power?
Tja@programming.dev · 0 pts · 258d
Same way. But there's a difference between proposing a VPN ban and nuking a hurricane.
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 258d
Yeah, Denmark might actually try their stupid idea.
Fokeu@lemmy.zip · 51 pts · 259d
Denmark is trying to implement a lot of straight up fascist laws lately...
tym@lemmy.world · 37 pts · 259d
Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 258d
I notice this mainly from western countries. Asians and South Americans seem to recognize they arent immune from corruption and bullshit policy. Yet for some reason their western counterparts like to point the finger at other countries (namely the US) and diminish their VERY real problems. "You Americans elected a facist, what are you doing?!" Yet far right parties have been surging for the past decade in Europe and Australia.
Facism was literally birthed in the west yet they never think it will come back
AntiBullyRanger@ani.social · 2 pts · 258d
Asia has had empires, several times. I am sure the issue is lack of introspection and commitment to their convictions.
But wat do i kno, im a stupid Hokkaidan who can't even swing my neighbor anarchistically.
FarceOfWill@infosec.pub · 7 pts · 258d
Pls, technology?
Climate change and a war against china are the two triggers.
Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 258d
The third one is AI being used to dominate the world
rumba@lemmy.zip · 19 pts · 258d
Shit's getting extra shitty everywhere. Its like a couple of countries went a little fash and every politician across the globe went FUCK YEAH, LET US IN ON THAT SHIT!!!
puppinstuff@lemmy.ca · 44 pts · 259d
Denmark is attempting Schrodinger’s VPN ban. Seems like every week it’s defeated and re-emerges. What a waste of administrative time.
Lyubo@lemmy.ml · 34 pts · 258d
What is happening with Europe and the countries within it?
kilgore_trout@feddit.it · 10 pts · 258d
Surveillance capitalism
Dionysus@leminal.space · 7 pts · 258d
Give it time, there are bills proposed in some states to do the same.
nforminvasion@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 257d
They are not the bastion of liberty that everyone thought they were. Oh look, proved once more. Capitalism corrupts and corrodes every single social program, legislation, and benefit in society.
In a turn that so many people saw coming, social democracy is not immune to the wiles and whims of capital and corruption. Just like any other form of capitalism, it too will decay and dissolve. The rich want nothing but literal, chain and whip slavery over the poor of the world. These assholes are so mentally ill, they genuinely CANNOT stop hoarding, and they are so twisted by power and wealth, they wholly envision themselves as gods.
This is what liberals fail to see: if the rich truly got/ will get their way, we will be chattel slaves for them and then when their AI gets good enough, they will hunt us for sport.
I don't mean to sound like a tweaking lunatic, but I am so positive that if there is anything that we enjoy or have, the rich want us not to. They are so petty and obsessed, any situation we are in that is not literally beneath their feet is too good for us worthless poors.
We are standing on a MAJOR precipice, the liberal capitalism of old is gone, and they are gunning for everything we are and have now.
ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 257d
Not just capitalism but more Centralization of power in any of its many forms. We have way too much Centralization.
Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 26 pts · 259d
They already pulled back the part about banning VPNs last night, before this post was even made.
Source
AntiBullyRanger@ani.social · 2 pts · 258d
they didn't pull back on chat control
Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 258d
Yea they did, it was revised to whatever this bs is, which is now also being revised.
jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works · 25 pts · 259d
Once again, I would like to thank stupid politicians and greedy media conglomerates for their contributions to media piracy. If not for all their hard work, we would still be playing Russian Roulette with shitty DIVX rips on Limewire.
ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online · 24 pts · 258d
What the hell is a foreign illegal stream?
Renat@szmer.info · 1 pts · 258d
I think they are series that are not available in some countries.
yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca · 21 pts · 258d
~ Denmark’s Ministry of Culture, probably
(nevermind the fact that countries with anti-piracy policies have not ever proved that they "repair" the so-called "market-damage" that they purport piracy has done)
Bullerfar@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 258d
It's already been taken off. The guy who requested this is a complete asshole that needs to be thrown out of office immidietly.
Alaknar@sopuli.xyz · 4 pts · 257d
I hate journalism so much these days...
Random dude in the parliament: "Let's all shit our pants."
"Journalists": "Denmark wants to shit its pants!!"
ConstantPain@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 258d
The Supreme Court equivalent tried that in Brazil, but soon discovered all government digital infrastructure depends on it and backpedaled.
laranis@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 258d
I'm hearing a lot about zero trust infrastructure lately and I wonder if this is the reason - the desire to eliminate VPNs. I honestly don't know enough about IT to know if that even makes sense but it wouldn't surprise me if these big corpos see the writing on the wall and are figuring out how to work sans VPN.
varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 14 pts · 258d
Denmark: everything is hygge unless you are Inuit or a Refugee. Now add free Internet to the exception list.
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip · 13 pts · 259d
Until someone tells them how corporate IT works.
sobchak@programming.dev · 8 pts · 259d
If the corporate VPNs keep logs and allow government access, they will be allowed. That's how it works in some (authoritarian) countries.
ryannathans@aussie.zone · 6 pts · 259d
What a terrible terrible idea
GreenShimada@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 258d
It's really telling how over the last few months, the overlap of "Oh, WTF is this?" between Privacy and Technology communities have aligned more and more.
ArchBtw@ani.social · 2 pts · 62d
They are getting more bold and now people are realizing privicy nerds (I'm one myself) are, in fact, not crazy.
GreenShimada@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 61d
We never have been. Hell, not even ahead of the curve. Just not feeding the beast after it's already bitten your hand.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website · 5 pts · 259d
I mean, logically, it would make sense to push VPNs into illegality or create a lot of gray area there if you're also planning to introduce the Aussie social media ban. Logically. I personally think both are no good.
I've read some headlines about illegal streaming being targeted and shut down in Europe. If there was lobby money invested, I suspect it is the likes of sports rights holders who would like you to pay them extortionate amounts of money and not sail the high seas for the price of a VPN.
Modstå, kære dansker.
If omnipotent deity of your choice forbid this ever lands at the ECJ I'm not sure they will side with the privacy/freedom of speech side of the argument.
NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone · 4 pts · 258d
They want to unlock the illegal streams? All hail the Danish pirate kings.
Smoogs@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 257d
What is going on with this vpn banning bullshit. This would render so many banking apps completely useless.
AstaKask@lemmy.cafe · 4 pts · 259d
utskitet av kalk och vatten...
Alpha71@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 258d
FINALLY! What took them so long!? I mean it's a totalitarian grab, but seriously, if I was behind this. I would have immediately made VPN's illegal. Then tracking what my citizens do online, would have been made much easier!
mannycalavera@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 259d
Don't worry, the EU would never let this happen....
mjr@infosec.pub · 12 pts · 259d
The EU that seems to be considering the evil "chat control" law to spy on everyone's private messages? Yeah, right. Von der Leyen is a snooper at heart.
witty_username@feddit.nl · 4 pts · 259d
CrumblyLiquid@lemmy.ml · 11 pts · 259d
They're probably referencing Chat Control (https://fightchatcontrol.eu/)
NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone · 1 pts · 258d
It’s great if you only want to rip-off other people. I can see reasonable usage though within that - I have some PoC Unity games knocking around from a while back where my placeholder graphics were just squares and the sounds simple waves, and I might have taken them further with animated spirites. Of course, without AI might also have gone in a radically unconventional aesthetic direction based around my lack of artistic talent and accidentally created something original.