So I got a job at this company back in the day that did phone and email customer service for other companies.
I was one of the last people they ever hired. Me and 7 other people were shown to our cubicles that had brand new Dell sff computers and peripherals in their boxes.
We were told the IT guys were off or on sick leave and I offered to try and set the machines up at least to save time. With the help of the others we plugged everything in and then kinda sat there all day doing nothing.
Next day we all show up for work and we see people carrying boxes out of the building. Turns out the owner was neck deep in debt and just dissappeared, people were told they shouldn't be expecting any more paychecks or bother suing.
Basically the manager told everyone to just sort of take whatever they want home and everyone just took their work PC home. Me and 7 other people basically got a free PC for half a day's work, others got shafted though...
All I'm trying to say here is maybe DON'T SELL NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER REACTORS to private companies that are 100% going to go tits up soon when yet another tech bubble bursts and those reactors end up being sold on AliExpress?
I got an old NES GameGenie around here somewhere we can hack it with. We can hook it up to an AI! No... I can hook it up to an AI. Power over life and death feels like a toy. My toy.
They should be forced to make their own clean power plants. No clean coal, no natural gas. Only renewable since it is a guarantee that they will leave 100% of the cost of the nuclear disposal to the taxpayers.
Nuclear energy is a con
It's just a cover for making their bombs
And it sends people to an early grave
So we want the power of the wind and the waves
Harness the wind
Harness the waves
We don't need this filthy nuclear waste
Solar power - yet another alternative
Think of the boundless energy the sun has to give
Then there's hydro-electricity with turbines and dams
And we can cut our consumption with conservation programmes
Harness the wind
The sun the waves
We don't need this filthy nuclear waste
The civil atomic energy programmes is nothing but an elaborate cover-up for the real use of nuclear power namely the production of fissile materials for nuclear weapons
We call for an end to the nuclear power programmes and properly funded research into renewable sources of energy
Harness the wind
The sun the waves
We don't need this filthy nuclear waste
Even the clean energy supplied datacenters will heavily pollute the water used to cool it. So, even if we do that, we should still be pushing to reduce the amount of datacenters being built right now...
They can afford the higher cost of electricity, but the rest of us can't, if they can add nuclear reactors to the power grid then it will drive the prices for normal people down so that it's nearly free.
You actually think they would lower the cost of electricity. Other than naivety, what evidence do you have that will show us how benevolent tech bros are?
Even though wind has higher capacity factors in most places, solar is more reliable.
Its a myth that ai datacenters need constant power. Inference uses less than training. And more queries happen during day than night. Less cooling power needed at night.
It is especially easy to build solar that will export to grid more than import throughout year, but it is also easy to be off grid, and store cooling for night, and for winter, and to not run max load in winter, or share grid imports in winter for regions with non electric heating. Share surpluses in 3 seasons.
I trust the military doing it to spec a million times more than any company executives. It’ll probably be left to pollute the area they hide it for decades before taxpayers have to pay for it.
The military probably will do better than a private company but also remember that the military has had numerous toxic waste problems. Camp Lejeune’s cancers and all the firefighting PFAs contaminating water supplies are just two i can think of off the top of my head but i’m sure theres many more.
I'm just a former Navy Nuke, but I see a major issue with this. Namely, by the time we retire ship-board nuclear reactors, they have been absorbing neutrons and radiation for 30 years, so the steel is weak enough that you could put a ball-peen hammer through it.
This is a big part of why the LHC experiment is so expensive. Turns out that equipment that exists to create high energy collisions (and as a product a lot of spicy radiation) goes brittle or the sensors go dark pretty quickly and need to be replaced a lot. I did sim work on a replacement detector setup for the experiment back in undergrad and the lions share of my simulations were showing how the crystals would perform at various levels of degradation
Weapons grade uranium is so expensive and energy intensive to make that I can’t imagine they would ever pay for it and the fuel is at end of life so would need refueling soon.
The navy likely puts a safety margin on the fuel so there is probably some life left in the fuel but I would be very surprised if it lasted more than a year or two which is where I am confused on how this would work
Aircraft carriers don't use reactor grade, they use HEU for more power out of smaller more compact reactors and less frequent refueling. IIRC 93%+ is common.
Yes. The new scam of smr is selling something inferior that hasn't failed yet, but needs massive enrichment infrastrucure for very high comparative fuel costs.... Mostly imported from russia until we build more failures to enrich it.
Has MS done anything with all the IPs they bought over the last 10v or so years? I haven’t seen anything new in an old IP that’s excited me in the gaming world.
Do the people that think this a good idea just not see how fast they are trying to prop up new AI datacenters?
Corners are being cut everywhere to get these things built so quickly
I honestly wouldn't even trust them with to make their own power safely even with things like hydro, wind or geothermal
But fucking nuclear of all things?
They know it would take decades to build the actual nuclear power plants to run everything so they decided to instead try buying nuclear power generators that are already several decades old
Everything about project certainty and costs is a lie here.
Moving reactors to somewhere permanent that isn't prime waterfront dock space, reactors past their design life, is simply not realistic. Low ball cost estimates with loan guarantees is the typical nuclear energy boondoggle.
These are just the initial cost estimates over decommission process, but if it were feasible, part of initial design, this wouldn't be an "afterthought scam".
51 Comments
Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world · 49 pts · 227d
So I got a job at this company back in the day that did phone and email customer service for other companies.
I was one of the last people they ever hired. Me and 7 other people were shown to our cubicles that had brand new Dell sff computers and peripherals in their boxes.
We were told the IT guys were off or on sick leave and I offered to try and set the machines up at least to save time. With the help of the others we plugged everything in and then kinda sat there all day doing nothing.
Next day we all show up for work and we see people carrying boxes out of the building. Turns out the owner was neck deep in debt and just dissappeared, people were told they shouldn't be expecting any more paychecks or bother suing.
Basically the manager told everyone to just sort of take whatever they want home and everyone just took their work PC home. Me and 7 other people basically got a free PC for half a day's work, others got shafted though...
All I'm trying to say here is maybe DON'T SELL NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER REACTORS to private companies that are 100% going to go tits up soon when yet another tech bubble bursts and those reactors end up being sold on AliExpress?
Eh_I@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 226d
No problem, got my eyes on a Trident missile.
eleitl@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 226d
Make sure to get the PAL code for the nuke, too.
Eh_I@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 226d
I got an old NES GameGenie around here somewhere we can hack it with. We can hook it up to an AI! No... I can hook it up to an AI. Power over life and death feels like a toy. My toy.
krooklochurm@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 225d
Stop worrying.
It's all fine. It'll stay fine.
Look, I don't know much about nuclear reactors, but I do know when you jam some plutonium in some stuff steam comes out and goes brrrr.
Does that sound like something dangerous? Dangerous things don't go brrrrr.
Steam is just water. Do you hate water? Hydrophobes like you make me sick.
How else am I supposed to get 3d models of giant titted anime waifus that will say filthy things to me while crank my hog?
Nuclear reactors go brrrrr. My hog goes brrrrrr. Anime waifus go brrrrrr. See? Totally safe.
Also, not to be pedantic, but it's spelled nookyalurr.
cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 225d
Sounds like you just hate freedom and progress.
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 38 pts · 227d
They should be forced to make their own clean power plants. No clean coal, no natural gas. Only renewable since it is a guarantee that they will leave 100% of the cost of the nuclear disposal to the taxpayers.
punksnotdead@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 226d
https://youtu.be/DjF6g51GHng
iloveDigit@piefed.social · 2 pts · 225d
It is also a guarantee they will not handle disposal safely
TheOakTree@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 225d
Even the clean energy supplied datacenters will heavily pollute the water used to cool it. So, even if we do that, we should still be pushing to reduce the amount of datacenters being built right now...
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 224d
America desperately needs regulations. Water and power belong to the public. Not to the businesses or the investors.
ryannathans@aussie.zone · -4 pts · 227d
What renewables can they use for 24/7 high levels of power requirements?
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 26 pts · 227d
I don’t give a shit. That should be their problem not ours.
If they’re too dumb to figure it out, they’re too dumb to make AI profitable.
SARGE@startrek.website · 11 pts · 226d
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 12 pts · 226d
It’s a bunch of indoctrination brainrot where all they ever think about is being of service to the wealthy.
rimu@piefed.social · 5 pts · 226d
Maybe they should ask ChatGPT.
SassySerf@thriv.social · 1 pts · 226d
They can afford the higher cost of electricity, but the rest of us can't, if they can add nuclear reactors to the power grid then it will drive the prices for normal people down so that it's nearly free.
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 226d
You actually think they would lower the cost of electricity. Other than naivety, what evidence do you have that will show us how benevolent tech bros are?
ryannathans@aussie.zone · 1 pts · 225d
Removing demand from the grid would reduce or prevent price hikes..
humanspiral@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 225d
Even though wind has higher capacity factors in most places, solar is more reliable.
Its a myth that ai datacenters need constant power. Inference uses less than training. And more queries happen during day than night. Less cooling power needed at night.
It is especially easy to build solar that will export to grid more than import throughout year, but it is also easy to be off grid, and store cooling for night, and for winter, and to not run max load in winter, or share grid imports in winter for regions with non electric heating. Share surpluses in 3 seasons.
halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world · -11 pts · 227d
As opposed to the military handling disposal of the reactor materials... which is paid by... the taxpayers.
You didn't think this comment through every much, or at all really, did you?
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 226d
I trust the military doing it to spec a million times more than any company executives. It’ll probably be left to pollute the area they hide it for decades before taxpayers have to pay for it.
teft@piefed.social · 1 pts · 226d
The military probably will do better than a private company but also remember that the military has had numerous toxic waste problems. Camp Lejeune’s cancers and all the firefighting PFAs contaminating water supplies are just two i can think of off the top of my head but i’m sure theres many more.
BussyCat@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 226d
The DOE doing it is already financially accounted for and there is a professional staff that are trained on how to do it
punksnotdead@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 226d
I think this song epitomises what rafoix replied with
https://youtu.be/Q3sHdN4f_TI
AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 226d
I'm just a former Navy Nuke, but I see a major issue with this. Namely, by the time we retire ship-board nuclear reactors, they have been absorbing neutrons and radiation for 30 years, so the steel is weak enough that you could put a ball-peen hammer through it.
RubberElectrons@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 226d
The wiki on radiation embrittlement is pretty good reading for any mechanical engineers out there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_embrittlement
Gust@piefed.social · 2 pts · 225d
This is a big part of why the LHC experiment is so expensive. Turns out that equipment that exists to create high energy collisions (and as a product a lot of spicy radiation) goes brittle or the sensors go dark pretty quickly and need to be replaced a lot. I did sim work on a replacement detector setup for the experiment back in undergrad and the lions share of my simulations were showing how the crystals would perform at various levels of degradation
dass93@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 225d
But then we just dick a hole if there happens anything.
potatopotato@sh.itjust.works · 27 pts · 227d
Ah yes, let's give rich people weapons grade uranium (what these compact reactors run on)
BussyCat@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 226d
Weapons grade uranium is so expensive and energy intensive to make that I can’t imagine they would ever pay for it and the fuel is at end of life so would need refueling soon.
The navy likely puts a safety margin on the fuel so there is probably some life left in the fuel but I would be very surprised if it lasted more than a year or two which is where I am confused on how this would work
Transform2942@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 226d
Just FYI reactor grade uranium is generally enriched below 5% whereas weapons grade is enriched to ~85%
potatopotato@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 225d
Aircraft carriers don't use reactor grade, they use HEU for more power out of smaller more compact reactors and less frequent refueling. IIRC 93%+ is common.
humanspiral@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 225d
Yes. The new scam of smr is selling something inferior that hasn't failed yet, but needs massive enrichment infrastrucure for very high comparative fuel costs.... Mostly imported from russia until we build more failures to enrich it.
Transform2942@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 225d
Huh didn't know that, thanks
disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 227d
Oh good. I was hoping we’d find a way for AI to consume more water.
Rambomst@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 227d
It's a Christmas miracle!
sem@piefed.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 226d
What if we put the AI in the ocean
potatopotato@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 225d
SPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACE
sem@piefed.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 225d
Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works · 18 pts · 226d
Fallout is actually gonna happen before we get HL3
P00ptart@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 226d
Definitely before we get fallout 5.
invertedspear@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 226d
Has MS done anything with all the IPs they bought over the last 10v or so years? I haven’t seen anything new in an old IP that’s excited me in the gaming world.
P00ptart@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 226d
I honestly couldn't tell you, they've bought so many...
reddig33@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 226d
And who will pay for the disposal and storage of the waste produced?
ulterno@programming.dev · 2 pts · 226d
Us of course. With the small 's'.
eleitl@lemmy.zip · 12 pts · 226d
What could possibly go wrong?
Devworker@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 226d
Do the people that think this a good idea just not see how fast they are trying to prop up new AI datacenters?
Corners are being cut everywhere to get these things built so quickly
I honestly wouldn't even trust them with to make their own power safely even with things like hydro, wind or geothermal
But fucking nuclear of all things?
They know it would take decades to build the actual nuclear power plants to run everything so they decided to instead try buying nuclear power generators that are already several decades old
humanspiral@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 225d
Everything about project certainty and costs is a lie here.
Moving reactors to somewhere permanent that isn't prime waterfront dock space, reactors past their design life, is simply not realistic. Low ball cost estimates with loan guarantees is the typical nuclear energy boondoggle.
These are just the initial cost estimates over decommission process, but if it were feasible, part of initial design, this wouldn't be an "afterthought scam".
falseWhite@programming.dev · 1 pts · 225d
p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 pts · 226d
Is this "journalist" an industry plant?
cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 225d
Literally every single one saying anything good about this shit is.
altphoto@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 226d
And all the brave men and women of the various branches of the armed forces can just dance and juggle for the mighty king! Yey!