Fortunately for you I've got a bridge for sale. Are you smart enough to take this opportunity?
It'll go very soon, I've got a lot of buyers that want it. Buy today, or forever be the person who didn't buy that bridge at a bargain price. You in?
Because selling sex is much more about the teasing than the actual presentation. I'm convinced that the reason we don't have nude models selling you stuff on billboards is that the lingerie/just-before-the-bedroom clothes are more effective, so advertising companies don't care to get case law or actual legislation allowing nude advertisements.
I mean, if you just watch the scene that's linked there it makes it pretty clear. Nick (the fox) is pretending to stalk and kill Judy (the rabbit) by biting her neck. This specific frame is her intentionally over-acting dying after the reveal that it's fake.
Aye, it's like the 'sex scene' in lion king. When in the context of the film, you wouldn't even notice it as potentially lewd, but a single frame can appear pretty different.
Yeah, they play ācan you feel the love tonightā over it and fade out shortly after the shot in question. The Zootopia frame may be taken out of context, but Lion Kingās is absolutely what it looks like.
"All ages admitted. Nothing that would offend parents for viewing by children." for G
vs
"Some material may not be suitable for children. Parents urged to give "parental guidance". May contain some material parents might not like for their young children."
for PG
I mean when I see a G rated movie and a PG rated movie, I am not sure what it was that gave the PG rated movie the "higher" rating on the scale. It's already entirely subjective, but if it's rated PG I can't think of any content it would have that a G rated movie would not also have.
As a parent with young kids, G movies will literally have nothing scary at all. Both PG or G won't have vulgar words, but PG might have like "butt" or something very minorly offensive.
For example, in Zootopia, there are some "intense" scenes where the animals go feral and chase other animals. The chased animals look terrified for their lives. This can cause some younger kids to get scared/frightened by those scenes. In a G movie, there would be nothing that intense. Zootopia also has some innuendo humor, e.g. the scene where the fox takes the rabbit cop to an animal "nudist" yoga club. G movies wouldn't have that type of humor.
Hope that clears it up for you.
Edit: for the record, the scene in this post was edited and the fox's head position is never like that. I've seen the movie dozens of times, and while there may be some minor sexual innuendo, there is nothing so blatant as this
I think usually thereās more crude humor, possibly words like ādamnā, āhellā, or āassā, and it can be a little scarier/darker in PG movies versus G. But I agree that it seems pretty arbitrary and thereās no public list of whatās allowed in each that Iāve been able to find.
The reason there's no public list is the MPAA literally has a secret team called CARA (Classification and Rating Administration) who review works and assign ratings to them. The members of the CARA team are kept secret to prevent studios from bribing or otherwise influencing the panel members. CARA members are generally given a ton of leeway to assign ratings as they see fit, so while there might be a general practice of one swear word in a PG-13 film for example, this isn't a hard rule. There's also notable examples of CARA assigning ratings that were unexpected
If a movie still feels like its PG rating should be G then maybe it's just because of a minor detail (as viewed from a normal adult's perspective who isn't super sensitized in that matter) that changed it to be PG.
I bet a lot of studios aim for a G rating but fail because of some scenes. That would mean that many movies (PG and G) feel like they are aimed at roughly the same age group but some fail to cut a scene where, let's say a panda is taking a shower. The rating team says it's depicting nudity, even though a panda naturally doesn't wear clothes. It gets rated PG and feels like a G otherwise.
Something like that with a bit more back and forth between the raters and the studios, I guess.
It gets pretty spooky. They're are some creatures that are scary, some mood lighting that gets dark. Theyre are chases, and people being stabber and killed with snake venom. While theres no gore/blood, the themes are still there. That kind of thing makes it PG
90 Comments
balderdash9@lemmy.zip · 158 pts · 219d
oh boy, hope this doesn't awaken anything
diemartin@sh.itjust.works · 126 pts · 219d
Too late for Millennials. Lola Bunny in Space Jam (1996) already awakened something in
mesome peopleMim@lemmy.zip · 57 pts · 219d
It was over with Disneps Robin Hood from the 70s.
That Marian fox lady š„µš„µš„µ
thermal_shock@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 217d
I thought it said Disnep when I was little too!
And Lola bunny didn't do it for you? Haha
Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club · 54 pts · 218d
W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 35 pts · 218d
Passerby6497@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 218d
Oh no.... I'm in need of rescueeee
W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 218d
Arenāt we all
Frostbeard@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 217d
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 217d
Disney Adults, an trending segment at Pornhub. I approve. š
Frostbeard@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 217d
The porn section joke is even more valid.
https://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/10/29/hoochie-coochie-man
kieron115@startrek.website · 6 pts · 218d
gotta get that rescue russy
Odo@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 219d
James Lee, is that you?
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 218d
FosterMolasses@leminal.space · 5 pts · 217d
baatliwala@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 219d
š„µ
Godort@lemmy.ca · 61 pts · 219d
If it does, you'll be pleased(horrified?) to learn that there are over 39,000 posts tagged judy_hopps on e621.
three@lemmy.zip · 38 pts · 219d
Buddy, if they didn't want people jerking off to the rabbit they wouldn't have made her so sexy.
qualia@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 217d
Can anyone tell me what Jim Rash has been up to in the past decade of so? I've got an itch for some Rash.
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org · 142 pts · 219d
Look up a video of the scene (quote "You know you're milking it.") The position of the fox's head in the screenshot is edited.
Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 146 pts · 219d
How am I supposed to be gullible with folks like you on the internet?
D_C@sh.itjust.works · 41 pts · 219d
Only the smart people know when to buy a bridge.
Fortunately for you I've got a bridge for sale. Are you smart enough to take this opportunity?
It'll go very soon, I've got a lot of buyers that want it. Buy today, or forever be the person who didn't buy that bridge at a bargain price. You in?
Pringles@sopuli.xyz · 14 pts · 218d
Can I pay in fridges?
WoodScientist@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 218d
If you're looking to get into the scrap metal business, I could sell you the Eiffel Tower.
NannerBanner@literature.cafe · 54 pts · 218d
Yeah, but you can still get pretty close to the same idea with the normal, I'd say. Good on the creator for making it a bit better.
FosterMolasses@leminal.space · 21 pts · 217d
Lmfao, how is the original shot somehow WORSE and more suggestive? Bahahahaha
NannerBanner@literature.cafe · 2 pts · 217d
Because selling sex is much more about the teasing than the actual presentation. I'm convinced that the reason we don't have nude models selling you stuff on billboards is that the lingerie/just-before-the-bedroom clothes are more effective, so advertising companies don't care to get case law or actual legislation allowing nude advertisements.
WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today · 9 pts · 218d
I didn't watch this. Tf happened here? It looks like furry r34...this is in the original!?!
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social · 18 pts · 218d
I mean, if you just watch the scene that's linked there it makes it pretty clear. Nick (the fox) is pretending to stalk and kill Judy (the rabbit) by biting her neck. This specific frame is her intentionally over-acting dying after the reveal that it's fake.
NannerBanner@literature.cafe · 7 pts · 218d
Aye, it's like the 'sex scene' in lion king. When in the context of the film, you wouldn't even notice it as potentially lewd, but a single frame can appear pretty different.
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social · 22 pts · 218d
NannerBanner@literature.cafe · 6 pts · 218d
Yes, that one, thank you.
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social · 8 pts · 218d
It's telling that searching for "Nala bedroom eyes" gets you plenty of screenshots of it immediately.
ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 218d
I think those were deliberately ābedroom eyesā actually
usernamefactory@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 217d
Yeah, they play ācan you feel the love tonightā over it and fade out shortly after the shot in question. The Zootopia frame may be taken out of context, but Lion Kingās is absolutely what it looks like.
FosterMolasses@leminal.space · 6 pts · 217d
The more we explain this the worse it sounds, lmaoooooo
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org · 15 pts · 218d
Well, Zootopia inspired so much of that (and maybe vice-versa?!) that you often can't tell.
LodeMike@lemmy.today · 88 pts · 219d
This film is PG dumbass
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 21 pts · 219d
What even is the real difference between G and PG? š¤
FreshLight@sh.itjust.works · 30 pts · 219d
"General Audiences" and "Parental Guidance"
So the Tweet isn't correct.
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 11 pts · 219d
I know what they stand for, I'm just not sure what real difference there is in the content. They generally seem to be basically the same to me.
FreshLight@sh.itjust.works · 18 pts · 218d
"All ages admitted. Nothing that would offend parents for viewing by children." for G
vs
"Some material may not be suitable for children. Parents urged to give "parental guidance". May contain some material parents might not like for their young children." for PG
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 4 pts · 218d
Mayve I'm not explaining myself properly...
I mean when I see a G rated movie and a PG rated movie, I am not sure what it was that gave the PG rated movie the "higher" rating on the scale. It's already entirely subjective, but if it's rated PG I can't think of any content it would have that a G rated movie would not also have.
Does that make sense?
bassomitron@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 218d
As a parent with young kids, G movies will literally have nothing scary at all. Both PG or G won't have vulgar words, but PG might have like "butt" or something very minorly offensive.
For example, in Zootopia, there are some "intense" scenes where the animals go feral and chase other animals. The chased animals look terrified for their lives. This can cause some younger kids to get scared/frightened by those scenes. In a G movie, there would be nothing that intense. Zootopia also has some innuendo humor, e.g. the scene where the fox takes the rabbit cop to an animal "nudist" yoga club. G movies wouldn't have that type of humor.
Hope that clears it up for you.
Edit: for the record, the scene in this post was edited and the fox's head position is never like that. I've seen the movie dozens of times, and while there may be some minor sexual innuendo, there is nothing so blatant as this
austinfloyd@ttrpg.network · 3 pts · 217d
You are thinking only of the modern G rating. Go back in time a bit to find G rated movies like:
Just like society's thoughts on what is generally acceptable, the mpaa rating system has changed quite a lot over the years.
93maddie94@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 218d
I think usually thereās more crude humor, possibly words like ādamnā, āhellā, or āassā, and it can be a little scarier/darker in PG movies versus G. But I agree that it seems pretty arbitrary and thereās no public list of whatās allowed in each that Iāve been able to find.
Trainguyrom@reddthat.com · 2 pts · 218d
The reason there's no public list is the MPAA literally has a secret team called CARA (Classification and Rating Administration) who review works and assign ratings to them. The members of the CARA team are kept secret to prevent studios from bribing or otherwise influencing the panel members. CARA members are generally given a ton of leeway to assign ratings as they see fit, so while there might be a general practice of one swear word in a PG-13 film for example, this isn't a hard rule. There's also notable examples of CARA assigning ratings that were unexpected
Sc00ter@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 218d
You must not have kids
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 3 pts · 218d
None that I know of, anyway.
FreshLight@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 216d
I see. This site should clear things up: https://www.filmratings.com/ratings-guide/
If a movie still feels like its PG rating should be G then maybe it's just because of a minor detail (as viewed from a normal adult's perspective who isn't super sensitized in that matter) that changed it to be PG. I bet a lot of studios aim for a G rating but fail because of some scenes. That would mean that many movies (PG and G) feel like they are aimed at roughly the same age group but some fail to cut a scene where, let's say a panda is taking a shower. The rating team says it's depicting nudity, even though a panda naturally doesn't wear clothes. It gets rated PG and feels like a G otherwise.
Something like that with a bit more back and forth between the raters and the studios, I guess.
RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com · 6 pts · 218d
I don't think there really is a difference since the MPAA are a cabal of nutjobs who make decisions out of their asses.
PapaStevesy@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 218d
PG just means "you can't get mad at us if your kid gets scared"
dxc@sh.itjust.works · 21 pts · 219d
Its like good and p good? Or gay and probably gay? What do i know, they should use numbers
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 219d
Yeah! Like 69, and 420.
neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 219d
A handshake agreement
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 219d
What guidance from parents would kids watching Zootopia 2 need?
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today · 23 pts · 218d
Well, it's a story that glorifies cops, and it completely fails to mention ACAB.
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 218d
Good point!
FishFace@piefed.social · 9 pts · 218d
If there's scary situations then it might not be appropriate for all kids, so films with action in night be PG.
Sc00ter@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 218d
Have you seen it?
It gets pretty spooky. They're are some creatures that are scary, some mood lighting that gets dark. Theyre are chases, and people being stabber and killed with snake venom. While theres no gore/blood, the themes are still there. That kind of thing makes it PG
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 218d
LodeMike@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 219d
This
SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world · 51 pts · 218d
Bunnylingus
ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 218d
Hare down there
SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 217d
Unless she's a Brazilian Cottontail.
Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 218d
My new word and concept for the day.
SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 218d
"Ah---AH----WHAT'S UP DOC!"
ummthatguy@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 219d
I thought it was Disney policy for animators to send any lude artwork they personally generate into a vault or otherwise isolated database?
sbv@sh.itjust.works · 32 pts · 219d
they made a whole movie out of this one
abcdqfr@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 219d
No they didn't, and I will not be satisfied until I am proven wrong with a working link for verification purposes only...
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social · 10 pts · 219d
They knew what they were up to.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 219d
Who's making art of quaaludes?
myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip · 17 pts · 217d
Where does the ice cream in zootopia come from? Who is milking who?
crumbgrabber@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 218d
This is the quality I have come to expect from you
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net · 4 pts · 218d
Glad I'm meeting expectations š«”
S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 14 pts · 218d
Owwww noooes I don't wanna remember how she gets JFKed... That fucking comic....
diemartin@sh.itjust.works · 47 pts · 218d
Sunflier@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 218d
I understood that reference. I think its missing perganant
bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 218d
What the hell did I just read and why the hell am I smiling so hard about it
Regdok@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 218d
It's from this old yt vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EShUeudtaFg
diemartin@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 218d
This is one of my favorite derivatives
thermal_shock@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 217d
Lmao holy shit.
sundray@lemmus.org · 9 pts · 219d
Not an O-face, but a NO-face.
OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 218d
Ever hear of the vinegar strokes face?
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 219d
The struggle just makes it hotter
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 218d
Do you guys think she shaves there?
vga@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 217d
Are we furries or what?!
I mean.. I'm not.