Because legal discovery data retrieval is almost entirely automated. You are always going to end up with some irrelevant shit in there because it matched a keyword search somebody used for discovery.
Source: I used to do this when companies I worked for got subpoenas for email data.
That's hilarious. I'm guessing its a result of an auto-redacter which is set to redacts urls or something? since the original would be
--enable-largefile
Enable support for large files (http://www.sas.com/standards/large_
file/x_open.20Mar96.html) if the operating system requires special compiler
options to build programs which can access large files. This is enabled by
default, if the operating system provides large file support.
I can't see any obvious keywords there, it would be very telling to be able to determine what theye filtering on, if we had enough unredacted/redacted pairs to find out
31 Comments
rtxn@lemmy.world · 215 pts · 194d
Something about child processes, maybe?
greenashura@sh.itjust.works · 53 pts · 194d
I hate this, here have an up vote
FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io · 7 pts · 194d
That is probably the actual answer though lol
JackbyDev@programming.dev · 35 pts · 193d
Forking children
huquad@lemmy.ml · 12 pts · 193d
Killing children and such
CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world · 67 pts · 194d
Because legal discovery data retrieval is almost entirely automated. You are always going to end up with some irrelevant shit in there because it matched a keyword search somebody used for discovery.
Source: I used to do this when companies I worked for got subpoenas for email data.
meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 33 pts · 194d
Yup probably because "children" and/or "child" is referenced in there
Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone · 47 pts · 194d
It even has a redaction!
Pika@sh.itjust.works · 32 pts · 194d
That's hilarious. I'm guessing its a result of an auto-redacter which is set to redacts urls or something? since the original would be
skarn@lemmy.today · 7 pts · 192d
I can't see any obvious keywords there, it would be very telling to be able to determine what theye filtering on, if we had enough unredacted/redacted pairs to find out
ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 192d
Large files huh? "Large" like "4k videos of blackmail material" large or what are we talking here?
Fedora just runs my large 4k videos of totally not pirated movies just fine, I've never had a file too large to access.
Fmstrat@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 190d
Auto redaction of dated urls maybe?
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 192d
there is another URL at the end of the document without redaction.
Pika@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 192d
yea I'm not sure, maybe something to do with the term SAS but yea not enough unredacted stuff to really know.
Digit@lemmy.wtf · 28 pts · 193d
data dump flood to hide the pertinent stuff.
like dumping a very large bale of hay on the needle.
dzsimbo@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 13 pts · 193d
And the needle was
::: spoiler Tap for spoiler REDACTED :::
mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 28 pts · 194d
Because child processing and sacrificing child are very epstein thing to do...
thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 193d
forking children
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip · 27 pts · 193d
I like how it asks of you are 18 or older
luciferofastora@feddit.org · 15 pts · 193d
It'll have been an important question to Epstein, for very wrong reasons
Agent641@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 187d
craftrabbit@lemmy.zip · 18 pts · 192d
Bash officially cancelled for being in the Epstein files
Digit@lemmy.wtf · 6 pts · 191d
Time to move to fish
craftrabbit@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 191d
Yeah, finally, a command line shell for the 90s.
MotoAsh@piefed.social · 12 pts · 194d
skavau is a clown
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 192d
someone wrote RTMF instead of RTFM?
4am@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 194d
He had it on a hard drive or someone emailed it to him.
ghost@slrpnk.net · 6 pts · 193d
You know that dude was running a private on-site server.
whitecollarcry@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 192d
lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com · 5 pts · 192d
Goddamn so everyone’s a bastard, eh?
Skullgrid@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 194d
did RMS visit epstein island?
EDIT : hey, when you have a billion, you might as well get a thinkpad and try out this "lin-ux" thing
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip · -3 pts · 193d
I wouldn't be completely shocked