...it is not good enough just to be critical of Trump and his destructive policies.
(Thought that was a good addition from the article, left out of the subtitle.)
Here are just a few of the issues that must be addressed:
We must create a vibrant democracy by ending Citizens United and preventing billionaires from buying elections.
Whether the Democratic establishment likes it or not, we must guarantee healthcare as a human right through Medicare for All.
We must build millions of affordable homes and apartments and give our younger generation the opportunity to own a home of their own.
We must make public colleges, universities, trade schools and medical schools tuition-free and have the best childcare and public school system in the entire world.
We must expand social security and bring back traditional pension plans so that every senior in this country can retire with dignity.
We must raise the minimum wage to a living wage and guarantee every worker the right to join a union.
We must demand that the wealthiest people and most profitable corporations in America pay their fair share in taxes.
I think we have to start over. We aren't one people anymore, nor is our society fit for a modern world. There is just too many structural issues in our politics and economy, that can't be addressed by gentle reform anymore.
Once you've finished your starting over, would you reinstate Citizens United or abolish it?
Once you've started over, would you have free healthcare for all, or reinstate privatised insurance company-led doublepay healthcare?
Once you've started over, would you build millions of affordable homes, or are you planning on killing enough people that there's a surplus already?
Once you've started over, would you charge for education or make it free?
Once you've started over, would you expand social security and reinstate traditional pensions, or reduce social security and continue to assume that everyone will be able to afford a good 401k?
Once you've started over, would you raise the minimum wage to an amount that people can realistically live on, or leave it so that corporations can underpay workers and leave social security to foot the bill instead or have starvation and homelessness as the warning to any prole stubborn enough to consider only working a single full time job?
Once you've started over, would you demand that the wealthiest people and three corporations pay their fair share of taxes, or would you allow all the tax avoidance schemes from before?
"Start over" is much, much, much emptier words that don't have any hope of making anything better AT ALL than Bernie's words.
If your only criticism of Bernie is that there just isn't enough death and destruction for your tastes, but using that as a reason to disagree with his ideas is nonsensical.
If your criticism amounts to "death first", then I have to tell you that Trump and ICE wholeheartedly agree with you.
A rewritten Constitution. For example, the 4th Amendment should treat our devices and bodies as "papers and effects", so that unwarranted searches aren't constitutional. Ditto for LGBTQ+ and minorities being treated as people from the outset, and more.
In any case, to broadly speak to your points: An replaced Constitution should have a section dedicated to economic fairness and mechanics to uphold a more egalitarian society. For example, workers having the right to vote for leadership positions and pay packages, UBI, universal healthcare, education as a paid job for students, and so on.
The Magna Carta, American Constitution, and French democracy were born of suffering and strife. We are now in a age where that happens again.
The original constitution failed to account for an aristocracy forming and controlling the flows of information. I believe they called for an educated active constituency. Do you think you could amend the constitution in this environment? State convention or through the legislator. How many voters do you think actually know about constitutional convention? And with the states so fractured, do you think that they could get together and agree on anything?
That's a great list and all, but this is the guy who urged revolution and then turned tale and ran away three times and three times told us to vote for people who would never give us even a fraction of one of these things on this list. I was all in for him, but he let us down bad.
Both parties only do what their masters tell them to do. It isn't their fault, man. They are helpless. It's the systems fault. /s (just so no one gets confused)
They don't care if the country goes to shit they can just leave and find somewhere else nice to be. They would sell the country for a dollar and just go to Switzerland or whatever.
lol, you dont know swiss people. if they would come here, openly fuck around with elections, our direct democracy or state and personal rights, they would have a bad time. no matter the money.
Lol, no. Switzerland has the same issues. It's just no as apparent/blatant. Naively believing that switzerland doesn't have those issues is the very reason it has those issues as well.
Strongest Party more or less openly supports trump/maga. Go figure.
The wealthy can’t really leave America. Their wealth is based on the American empire projecting force at home and abroad. They need the military banks and police intact if they want any money
Meh, good luck to Bernie and similar minded Americans.
But as a Canadian, I ain't going to America again, and I'm doing everything I can to get off of American products.
Like the news in America is currently going on about Trump's comments about nationalizing elections, and how people are afraid he may try to meddle in their elections. As though he hadn't tried to lead a violent insurrection when he lost last time around. Most of them seem to want to watch it all burn, and are willing to follow a convicted felon, alleged child rapist, and "prolific" pant shitter to see it happen. They're willing to shrug off Musk's Nazi salutes, and the epstein stuff is just a side-show without any real accountability for anyone involved. They're openly attacking other western democracies and attempting to undermine THEIR OWN ALLIES national security, while making absolutely bullshit claims about their neighbours causing "national security emergencies" by having trade deficits. It's utterly fucking absurd.
It should be really simple. You don't attack your allies. But Americans are too stupid to even figure that one out it seems. So idk, I think Bernie may be dreaming of an America that doesn't exist anymore. But best of luck to em.
I think he supports 2 state solution, right? So some people consider that a form of Zionism. Which seems a bit questionable because I believe that has also been Hamas's position for the last few years, although they don't call it that.
Maybe there's more to it. To be honest I'm not overly worried about the exact positions of one of the more outspoken critics of Israel in congress. I'd much rather focus my ire on its defenders, which are many.
Best guess? They're either truly dedicated satirists, gone off the metamodernist deep end into deep post-irony, or they've genuinely decided that modernist Grand Narratives weren't really all that bad (let's just ignore all the atrocities they brought about). After all, far-left modernist narratives aren't at all like those other, far-right modernist narratives! They're different, just like everybody else who is selling a utopia (that's only practically attainable through an authoritarian regime).
It's a thing, it's just inaccurate — that doesn't change the hard facts that both sides somehow find their way to differently flavored authoritarianism.
I mean, it's a thing the way all propaganda is a thing, but it's not just inaccurate it's deliberate because that's how propaganda works.
that doesn't change the hard facts that both sides somehow find their way to differently flavored authoritarianism
If you truly believe this you have no concept of what Socialism and/or Communism actually is and have fallen HARD for CIA propaganda.
Start with the FOIA section of the CIA website before they take it all down and read up on what the actually admit to when it comes to propagandizing US citizens.
Yeah you'll need to be more accurate than 'start with the FOIA section' — right now I'm laughing at John Mulholland being paid $3k by the CIA to write a fucking 'guide on trickery and deception'.
Unless you're trying to say I've fallen for propaganda because they're good at sleight of hand, at that point I can just direct my laughter in your direction.
While I'm doing that, how about you look up burden of proof buddy?
You'll figure it out. Actually, on second thought, you likely should have already known about this. Which does beg the question 'Why are you acting like you don't?' .
What Bernie is trying to say is it's possible we could save her, in theory, so we have to pretend like we will do that. But in practice obviously it's not. Namely because we fight under the controlled opposition, and people by and large still trust them.
In fact I am beginning to think the population is being dosed with something to make them docile, or cuntish, if you will.
I wouldn't frame it like that, but yes, we require someone that knows how to build and run a political machine, someone that is a strong leader, that can actually lead the troops, with direction, with vision.
Weak candidates like Biden won't do it, neither will newsome. Not even close.
At this point America has terminal cancer in every single major organ. The only cure from here is to cut it all out and replace it with someone fresh or a near fatal dose of chemo to wipe it all out. Anything less will just delay the inevitable death.
I like Sanders, and think he could have been a terrific peacetime president in a better timeline. Unfortunately, I suspect we will need to shed blood and lose many innocent lives in order to get somewhere decent now.
We need a leader who is willing to fight, and to sacrifice lives like mine, to create a future.
If there is another democratic administration (and that’s a big if), that doesn’t spend day one dismantling every corrupt executive order, policy change, and agenda from the last administration, and holding those responsible accountable, then I believe the American experiment is truly circling the drain.
Did you just call yourself "blue maga"? Weird, you're supposed to be blindly calling people with valid opinions that, to shame them out of thinking clearly.
114 Comments
Bonesince1997@lemmy.world · 106 pts · 199d
(Thought that was a good addition from the article, left out of the subtitle.)
ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml · 20 pts · 199d
No one is getting a single one of those bullet points out of Democrats
TrickDacy@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 199d
They damn sure aren't getting a shred of one out of Jill Stein.
Tricking0148@lemmynsfw.com · 4 pts · 198d
So, human decency and objectively good measures are considered far left in the usa. Good thing I'm not an american.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 199d
I think we have to start over. We aren't one people anymore, nor is our society fit for a modern world. There is just too many structural issues in our politics and economy, that can't be addressed by gentle reform anymore.
davidagain@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 198d
What the fuck do you mean by start over?
Once you've finished your starting over, would you reinstate Citizens United or abolish it?
Once you've started over, would you have free healthcare for all, or reinstate privatised insurance company-led doublepay healthcare?
Once you've started over, would you build millions of affordable homes, or are you planning on killing enough people that there's a surplus already?
Once you've started over, would you charge for education or make it free?
Once you've started over, would you expand social security and reinstate traditional pensions, or reduce social security and continue to assume that everyone will be able to afford a good 401k?
Once you've started over, would you raise the minimum wage to an amount that people can realistically live on, or leave it so that corporations can underpay workers and leave social security to foot the bill instead or have starvation and homelessness as the warning to any prole stubborn enough to consider only working a single full time job?
Once you've started over, would you demand that the wealthiest people and three corporations pay their fair share of taxes, or would you allow all the tax avoidance schemes from before?
"Start over" is much, much, much emptier words that don't have any hope of making anything better AT ALL than Bernie's words.
If your only criticism of Bernie is that there just isn't enough death and destruction for your tastes, but using that as a reason to disagree with his ideas is nonsensical.
If your criticism amounts to "death first", then I have to tell you that Trump and ICE wholeheartedly agree with you.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 198d
A rewritten Constitution. For example, the 4th Amendment should treat our devices and bodies as "papers and effects", so that unwarranted searches aren't constitutional. Ditto for LGBTQ+ and minorities being treated as people from the outset, and more.
In any case, to broadly speak to your points: An replaced Constitution should have a section dedicated to economic fairness and mechanics to uphold a more egalitarian society. For example, workers having the right to vote for leadership positions and pay packages, UBI, universal healthcare, education as a paid job for students, and so on.
The Magna Carta, American Constitution, and French democracy were born of suffering and strife. We are now in a age where that happens again.
davidagain@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 198d
That's all good stuff, 100%, but if the existing constitution had been upheld, Trump would be in prison instead of the White House.
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 198d
The original constitution failed to account for an aristocracy forming and controlling the flows of information. I believe they called for an educated active constituency. Do you think you could amend the constitution in this environment? State convention or through the legislator. How many voters do you think actually know about constitutional convention? And with the states so fractured, do you think that they could get together and agree on anything?
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 198d
Hence, starting over. We need fresh politicians and an overhauled Constitution to go with them.
mrdown@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 199d
That's cool but how are you going to do it?
compostgoblin@piefed.blahaj.zone · 22 pts · 199d
By building a movement that demands it
mrdown@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 199d
I mean concrete actions
ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml · -10 pts · 199d
The problem is that people say they demand it and then end up voting for people that do not care
TrickDacy@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 199d
Yes we should all vote for Russian asset Jill Stein instead /s
Bonesince1997@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 199d
I don't know. Some of these points seem like discussion enders for many people. I suppose all I can think about is what I will do.
bluegreenpurplepink@lemmy.world · -9 pts · 199d
That's a great list and all, but this is the guy who urged revolution and then turned tale and ran away three times and three times told us to vote for people who would never give us even a fraction of one of these things on this list. I was all in for him, but he let us down bad.
bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 40 pts · 199d
So many "no shit" policies that we should have already been doing for decades, stymied as per usual by monied interests. Disgusting.
GhostPain@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 199d
Both parties only do what their masters tell them to do. It isn't their fault, man. They are helpless. It's the systems fault. /s (just so no one gets confused)
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 199d
tempest@lemmy.ca · 38 pts · 199d
The wealthy are not playing for the same team.
They don't care if the country goes to shit they can just leave and find somewhere else nice to be. They would sell the country for a dollar and just go to Switzerland or whatever.
Ibisalt@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 199d
lol, you dont know swiss people. if they would come here, openly fuck around with elections, our direct democracy or state and personal rights, they would have a bad time. no matter the money.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 199d
Seeing the Swiss Guard executing Musk and company would please me, I must admit.
Tricking0148@lemmynsfw.com · 3 pts · 198d
Lol, no. Switzerland has the same issues. It's just no as apparent/blatant. Naively believing that switzerland doesn't have those issues is the very reason it has those issues as well.
Strongest Party more or less openly supports trump/maga. Go figure.
tempest@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 198d
And residency is only like 300k USD
QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 199d
PLEASE come and fuck with US! It would actually be interesting! Preferable, even. XD
hector@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 199d
Nestle and Syngenta I'm sure would give them some pointers to fit in.
krashmo@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 199d
I wish they would
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 198d
The wealthy can’t really leave America. Their wealth is based on the American empire projecting force at home and abroad. They need the military banks and police intact if they want any money
wampus@lemmy.ca · 24 pts · 199d
Meh, good luck to Bernie and similar minded Americans.
But as a Canadian, I ain't going to America again, and I'm doing everything I can to get off of American products.
Like the news in America is currently going on about Trump's comments about nationalizing elections, and how people are afraid he may try to meddle in their elections. As though he hadn't tried to lead a violent insurrection when he lost last time around. Most of them seem to want to watch it all burn, and are willing to follow a convicted felon, alleged child rapist, and "prolific" pant shitter to see it happen. They're willing to shrug off Musk's Nazi salutes, and the epstein stuff is just a side-show without any real accountability for anyone involved. They're openly attacking other western democracies and attempting to undermine THEIR OWN ALLIES national security, while making absolutely bullshit claims about their neighbours causing "national security emergencies" by having trade deficits. It's utterly fucking absurd.
It should be really simple. You don't attack your allies. But Americans are too stupid to even figure that one out it seems. So idk, I think Bernie may be dreaming of an America that doesn't exist anymore. But best of luck to em.
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 17 pts · 199d
Why do I keep seeing people on here call Bernie a liberal zionist?
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net · 32 pts · 199d
I think he supports 2 state solution, right? So some people consider that a form of Zionism. Which seems a bit questionable because I believe that has also been Hamas's position for the last few years, although they don't call it that.
Maybe there's more to it. To be honest I'm not overly worried about the exact positions of one of the more outspoken critics of Israel in congress. I'd much rather focus my ire on its defenders, which are many.
mrdown@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 199d
He don't believe that zionism is a colonial project and said that bds is antisemitic
BenderRodriguez@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 199d
GhostPain@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 199d
Horseshoe theory is a psyop. It's not a thing.
ExFed@programming.dev · 2 pts · 199d
Unsure if edgy sarcasm or ML propaganda... Please disambiguate.
GhostPain@lemmy.world · -4 pts · 199d
No more ML propaganda than the idea of horseshoe theory is CIA propaganda.
Also, ML propaganda? lol
Are still counting your age using "teen" at the end?
ExFed@programming.dev · 3 pts · 199d
Thanks for disambiguating! :)
GhostPain@lemmy.world · -5 pts · 199d
Di nada.
Also, no reason to use your 25 cent word of the day more than once. No one is impressed twice by its use.
davidagain@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 198d
Getting pissy at people for using a polysyllabic word twice isn't coming across as the big own you seem to have been aiming for.
BenderRodriguez@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 199d
davel@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 199d
‘Horseshoe theory’ is nonsense – the far right and far left have little in common
GhostPain@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 199d
Yes. I mean, the only thing they have in common is they are part of the human political spectrum...
It truly boggles my mind that people don't understand enough about politics and propaganda to realize this.
davel@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 199d
We’re not indoctrinated with this theory for no reason. Anti-communist propaganda serves bourgeois interests.
ExFed@programming.dev · -7 pts · 199d
They only have little in common if you're unimaginative.
Or one of them.
davel@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 199d
“Unscratched” liberals have much more in common with fascists than socialists.
GhostPain@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 199d
One day you might look back on this and laugh at all the CIA propaganda you believed was true.
ExFed@programming.dev · -1 pts · 199d
Oooohhh, spooky! 👻
ExFed@programming.dev · 3 pts · 199d
Best guess? They're either truly dedicated satirists, gone off the metamodernist deep end into deep post-irony, or they've genuinely decided that modernist Grand Narratives weren't really all that bad (let's just ignore all the atrocities they brought about). After all, far-left modernist narratives aren't at all like those other, far-right modernist narratives! They're different, just like everybody else who is selling a utopia (that's only practically attainable through an authoritarian regime).
Jax@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 198d
It's a thing, it's just inaccurate — that doesn't change the hard facts that both sides somehow find their way to differently flavored authoritarianism.
GhostPain@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 198d
I mean, it's a thing the way all propaganda is a thing, but it's not just inaccurate it's deliberate because that's how propaganda works.
If you truly believe this you have no concept of what Socialism and/or Communism actually is and have fallen HARD for CIA propaganda.
Start with the FOIA section of the CIA website before they take it all down and read up on what the actually admit to when it comes to propagandizing US citizens.
Good luck.
Jax@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 198d
Yeah you'll need to be more accurate than 'start with the FOIA section' — right now I'm laughing at John Mulholland being paid $3k by the CIA to write a fucking 'guide on trickery and deception'.
Unless you're trying to say I've fallen for propaganda because they're good at sleight of hand, at that point I can just direct my laughter in your direction.
GhostPain@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 198d
Keep reading. You'll get there eventually. I'm sure you're patient and diligent enough. I have faith in you.
YOU CAN DO EET!
Jax@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 198d
Right.
While I'm doing that, how about you look up burden of proof buddy?
You'll figure it out. Actually, on second thought, you likely should have already known about this. Which does beg the question 'Why are you acting like you don't?' .
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 199d
That's a Ken M type account. Go with it.
BenderRodriguez@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 199d
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 199d
Did he bring tree branches instead of clubs?
BenderRodriguez@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 199d
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 199d
Ken M
BenderRodriguez@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 199d
GhostPain@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 199d
Ken M.
BenderRodriguez@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 199d
ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml · -4 pts · 199d
Because he is
TrickDacy@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 199d
Yeah anyone who isn't a fraud must be a zionist.
Godort@lemmy.ca · -9 pts · 199d
Because he's American
GhostPain@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 199d
Oh honey if you think Americans invented liberal Zionism have I got news for you.
CircaV@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 199d
Bernie. Honestly. The US is fucked. You know it always been fucked. It’s waaaaaay past the point of no return.
hector@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 199d
What Bernie is trying to say is it's possible we could save her, in theory, so we have to pretend like we will do that. But in practice obviously it's not. Namely because we fight under the controlled opposition, and people by and large still trust them.
In fact I am beginning to think the population is being dosed with something to make them docile, or cuntish, if you will.
CircaV@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 198d
I know Bernie is offering hope which is nice. But fascism is ugly and requires ugly means to root out.
hector@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 198d
I wouldn't frame it like that, but yes, we require someone that knows how to build and run a political machine, someone that is a strong leader, that can actually lead the troops, with direction, with vision.
Weak candidates like Biden won't do it, neither will newsome. Not even close.
meathorse@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 198d
At this point America has terminal cancer in every single major organ. The only cure from here is to cut it all out and replace it with someone fresh or a near fatal dose of chemo to wipe it all out. Anything less will just delay the inevitable death.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 15 pts · 199d
I like Sanders, and think he could have been a terrific peacetime president in a better timeline. Unfortunately, I suspect we will need to shed blood and lose many innocent lives in order to get somewhere decent now.
We need a leader who is willing to fight, and to sacrifice lives like mine, to create a future.
Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 198d
Be realistic, how does anyone expect Bernie to be president if he wasn't friends with Epstein?
billwashere@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 193d
If there is another democratic administration (and that’s a big if), that doesn’t spend day one dismantling every corrupt executive order, policy change, and agenda from the last administration, and holding those responsible accountable, then I believe the American experiment is truly circling the drain.
Hayduke@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 199d
Well, we are certainly gaining enough downhill momentum to get us back up somewhere.
GhostPain@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 199d
Feeling the need to explain how free fall works right now.
Hayduke@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 198d
Fair point.
GhostPain@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 199d
Cool so Dems are going to stop suing viable 3rd parties off the ballots, eliminate the billionaire class and disband?
Because that's about the only way THAT is going to happen.
davidagain@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 198d
Bernie isn't actually a Democrat. He's independent.
SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 pts · 198d
Fuck it, I'll run for mayor of my city. Help me build a platform. I'll start.
davidagain@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 198d
You won me round with number 4.
monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 198d
Wow I’m in
billwashere@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 193d
Change I can believe in.
Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 198d
The only way to fix this is by spilling the blood of the rich and those they "care" about. There is no peaceful option.
DarkFuture@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 198d
I don't know.
Real hard to de-radicalize millions of conservatives and make sure the next generation are ALL educated enough not to become conservatives.
ameancow@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 198d
myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 198d
Ok. So do something besides talking.
resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 198d
He’s a senator. That’s what senators do.
ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml · -16 pts · 199d
'If you only vote harder for my good friends the status quo oligarchs that helped get us into this mess we can reverse Americas decline'
Bernie is doing what Bernie has always done, sheepdog for fascism.
saboteur@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 199d
That's not what he said in the article
ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 198d
That's been Bernie's general message for years
GhostPain@lemmy.world · -7 pts · 199d
Correct. Though I would more correctly say "Dems do what Dems have always done in the 21st century, guard dog for Fascism".
TrickDacy@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 199d
Thank you for letting me know you feel this way.
GhostPain@lemmy.world · -7 pts · 199d
Ah, I see Blue MAGA has arrived. Nice. Hey fellas.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 199d
Did you just call yourself "blue maga"? Weird, you're supposed to be blindly calling people with valid opinions that, to shame them out of thinking clearly.
GhostPain@lemmy.world · -9 pts · 199d
It bothers me that your reading comprehension skills are so bad.
Some of you kids shoulda definitely have been left behind.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 199d
Yeah third party voters generally have trouble understanding basic concepts
GhostPain@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 199d
Is this that projecting that Dems do so well?
If every 3rd party voter had voted for Kamala you'd have still lost.
Against a 41x felon and pedo.
How fucked up is that when your position sucks so bad NOTHING can prop it up?
And people wonder why I voted for a black woman for president in that election.
Oh, the one who DIDN'T support a genocide. I know how that part tends to confuse Blue MAGA when I tell them.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 199d
Oh man such mind-blowing points...lol
ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 199d