I... I know that... I'm just trying to point out how the insanity knob appears to just ratchet forward and there seemingly is no way to dial it back... we're just gonna keep cranking it up untill it blows out the amp, so to speak.
Of what? The Ms. Rachel post? I think that was it, the post was just a white screen that said Stop Killing Kids in the center. I saw it on Lemmy earlier but don’t have Twitter to look at the original myself.
"The Israelis hit civilians when destroying the rocket launcher we put on top of a hospital, so it's okay for us the paraglide into a music concert and just start killing and raping"
You can simply take the side of innocent people here, you know?
This isn't two sports teams going against each other. There are people okay with the mass killing of an entire people to further their own political and ideological goals, and there are those who are not. It really doesn't need to be any more complicated than that.
This is actually something I don't understand when this argument is brought up. Havent they both been killing each other since well before the modern period?
It made a little more sense when the argument was that Hamas is bad, but that doesn't justify collateral damage to Palestinian civilians when targeting them. But it seems to me the rhetoric I see often has switched to making excuses for Hamas, who directly tries to kill children whenever they get the opportunity, including putting their own Palestinian civilians in the line of fire to confuse attacks against them and get them killed as "martyrs". Which they use to justify their actions, even though they caused it.
I don't see how Israel' careless around getting noncombatants killed justifies deliberately targeting civilians, which Hamas does constantly, or doing things like putting a rocket launcher on top of a hospital just so it looks bad for Israel when they destroy it. It's not like Hamas wants a peaceful two-state solution and Israel just isn't playing along. And theres not a lot of anti-Hamas sentiment in Gaza since they get murdered by Hamas, and they did vote them in in the first place.
If you count the modern period as after 1900, there was no tension between the Jews and Palestinian Arabs because there were very few Jews actually living in the area. Jews made up about 3% of the population until the first Zionist conference in 1897. Following on from this, the colonial project began with European Jews moving to Palestine.
Historically every time a settler colonial population moves into a new area the demonise, oppress and attempt to kill off the native population. We had the British in Ireland, Spanish and Portuguese in south and central America, northern Europeans in North America, British again in Australia and new Zealand, European powers in the "race for Africa" and now the Jewish setter colonisers in Palestine. Israel does not want a two state solution, it is quite clear from the evidence at hand that the "greater Israel" project is their goal. The rest of the world needs to wake up to the obvious, Israel is shouting about it and the world is not listening. Boycott, Divest and Sanction the genocidal Zionists, this worked for South Africa and their apartheid regime.
She hosted Motaz Azaiza, the "journalist" who frequently praises Hamas, and was present with Hamas at the October 7th attack itself. So I correct myself, he only might have participated in directly killing civilians and children, but he was at least hanging out with his friends when they were doing that.
Is this the statement that made him Hamas? Fuck off with your goalposts
“If you want a besieged Palestinian to condemn it, you need to declare that you condemn what Israel [has] been doing against Palestinians before the 7th of October, since 1948 and during the genocide, and after it. Palestinians are not or not terrorists, Israeli killing Palestinians everyday like it’s a duty for them. Israel is a terror state,” Azaiza wrote on March 11, after he had left Gaza for his new base in Qatar.
She hosted Motaz Azaiza, the "journalist" who frequently praises Hamas, and was present with Hamas at the October 7th attack itself. So I correct myself, he only might have participated in directly killing civilians and children, but he was at least hanging out with his friends when they were doing that.
This is Hasbara. So is everything else that you've written in this thread and, looking at your post and comment history, it looks like the MAJORITY of what you type up on lemmy is Hasbara.
Sooo, and I'm pretty against fedjacketing people online, and find that it can be pretty dangerous. But I'm fairly confident you are working for Mossad.
She hosted Motaz Azaiza, the "journalist" who frequently praises Hamas, and was present with Hamas at the October 7th attack itself. So I correct myself, he only might have participated in directly killing civilians and children, but he was at least hanging out with his friends when they were doing that.
The Predator was after a worthy opponent. Something to give a challenge. The IDF are just bullies with guns. Think ICE but with different brown people.
I watched the animated Predator movie the other day, and was miffed that
::: spoiler Tap for spoiler
they would kidnap people who won against their hunters, freeze them for who knows how many years (thereby effectively ending their lives as they know it) and bring them across the galaxy to fight for their lives again. Respect that the winner won you sore losers. Absolutely no honor.
:::
No honor? The Yatuja believe that the only honor that matters is in your hunting prowess, literally every Yatuja has never lost a fight because they always fight to the death. They absolutely think it's an honor to be brought to Yautja Prime to fight against their leader, which is why they do that instead of just killing the people who beat a Predator. That's a huge sign of respect from them
I just feel like if they were acting honorably, they would have invited the victors instead of kidnapping them via what I assume was a cowardly ambush (based off the fact they have no memory of it), and freezing them until their loved ones were dead.
The Yautja have no concept of "loved ones". It is specifically brought up that Dek's older brother is a failure because he is protecting his weaker brother instead of culling him for the strength of the clan. You're using human emotional logic to justify your opinions instead of following Predator logic. The vast majority of Yautja would be champing at the bit to fight to prove they can beat the warlord. I still contend these humans have been given an incredible honor in Yautja society
that was dark humor not factual. I also enjoyed making a connection between two vile organizations. even though it looks like an anti connection the whole point of the joke is to make them look similar, precisely because of the reason you mentioned.
Not exactly. The predator won't attack the child because it would be boring to do so, not some ethical reasons as stated in the meme. I guess IDF finds it entertaining enough.
TBF they hopelessly outclass a lot of their opponents. 300lb super-strong trained alien fighter with thermal vision and crazy weapons hunting some dude with a rifle if you think of the OG Predator. Their victims probably didn’t even know what they were fighting. Not really that great.
I don't know about your country specifically, but here in France hunters regularly shoot at cyclists. Their main union even complained about a new law imposing a legal limit of blood alcohol content during hunting sessions.
our hunting regulations are all over the place but there was a period in history when a number of prominent politicians got killed during hunting "by accident". oddly enough they had ties with russia...
Predator Badlands was dope I’m looking forward to a sequel. Gonna watch Prey this weekend, see if it holds up. They’re kinda hit or miss, Aliens vs Predator should have been way better, hopefully they’ll give it another go with the current cast.
One thing the Predator movies always did well was giving the creature its own strange code of honor. Moments like that made it feel less like a mindless monster and more like a hunter with rules.
Yeah, sorry - NO. It's basic threat assessment, nothing to do with ethics. Those who attack a child do so because they are weak bullies taking advantage of an easy target - which obviously requires a lack of decent ethics, but not attacking that child doesn't mean the choice was made based upon ethics.
104 Comments
MTZ@lemmy.world · 297 pts · 151d
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 45 pts · 151d
So we've gone from:
I like pancakes.
Why do you hate waffles?!
... to ...
Killing children is bad.
Obviously you must have brain damage that causes you to spread hateful bigotted conspiracy theories.
Somehow, reality ended up being more ridiculous and less believable than Metal Gear Solid 2.
core@leminal.space · 5 pts · 151d
Its b/c they specifically responded about Jewish people. They're outing themselves as child murderers b/c they feel attacked by the statement.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 151d
I... I know that... I'm just trying to point out how the insanity knob appears to just ratchet forward and there seemingly is no way to dial it back... we're just gonna keep cranking it up untill it blows out the amp, so to speak.
autriyo@feddit.org · 13 pts · 151d
I get blanking everything unimportant to get the point across, but I do wonder what the rest of the text said...
yeather@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 151d
Of what? The Ms. Rachel post? I think that was it, the post was just a white screen that said Stop Killing Kids in the center. I saw it on Lemmy earlier but don’t have Twitter to look at the original myself.
autriyo@feddit.org · 4 pts · 151d
Yeah, I didn't even consider that it could've been that way from the beginning...
SlurpingPus@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 151d
‘Are you in Hamas?’
BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 150d
Idk, the further context would be knowing how outspoken she (rightfully) has been about Israel. It's not like the post was shared in a vacuum.
GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works · -78 pts · 151d
halcyoncmdr@piefed.social · 28 pts · 151d
That's the same excuse as
"The Nazis genocide is, so it's fine if we genocide others back"
ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 151d
It still gives context to why the person conflated the statement with Israel.
Though I think anyone in tune with the news cycle would conflate killing children with Israel.
conartistpanda@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 151d
I read this with yoda's voice.
dumbass@piefed.social · 3 pts · 151d
Yeah that made it easier to understand.
GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works · -10 pts · 151d
"The Israelis hit civilians when destroying the rocket launcher we put on top of a hospital, so it's okay for us the paraglide into a music concert and just start killing and raping"
bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 151d
Two things can be bad at the same time.
MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 140d
You can simply take the side of innocent people here, you know?
This isn't two sports teams going against each other. There are people okay with the mass killing of an entire people to further their own political and ideological goals, and there are those who are not. It really doesn't need to be any more complicated than that.
Goodeye8@piefed.social · 27 pts · 151d
And why exactly does Hamas exist in the first place? Surely not because Isreal has been killing Palestinians before Isreal was even an official state.
GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works · -2 pts · 151d
This is actually something I don't understand when this argument is brought up. Havent they both been killing each other since well before the modern period?
It made a little more sense when the argument was that Hamas is bad, but that doesn't justify collateral damage to Palestinian civilians when targeting them. But it seems to me the rhetoric I see often has switched to making excuses for Hamas, who directly tries to kill children whenever they get the opportunity, including putting their own Palestinian civilians in the line of fire to confuse attacks against them and get them killed as "martyrs". Which they use to justify their actions, even though they caused it.
I don't see how Israel' careless around getting noncombatants killed justifies deliberately targeting civilians, which Hamas does constantly, or doing things like putting a rocket launcher on top of a hospital just so it looks bad for Israel when they destroy it. It's not like Hamas wants a peaceful two-state solution and Israel just isn't playing along. And theres not a lot of anti-Hamas sentiment in Gaza since they get murdered by Hamas, and they did vote them in in the first place.
Lucius_Sweet@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 150d
If you count the modern period as after 1900, there was no tension between the Jews and Palestinian Arabs because there were very few Jews actually living in the area. Jews made up about 3% of the population until the first Zionist conference in 1897. Following on from this, the colonial project began with European Jews moving to Palestine.
Historically every time a settler colonial population moves into a new area the demonise, oppress and attempt to kill off the native population. We had the British in Ireland, Spanish and Portuguese in south and central America, northern Europeans in North America, British again in Australia and new Zealand, European powers in the "race for Africa" and now the Jewish setter colonisers in Palestine. Israel does not want a two state solution, it is quite clear from the evidence at hand that the "greater Israel" project is their goal. The rest of the world needs to wake up to the obvious, Israel is shouting about it and the world is not listening. Boycott, Divest and Sanction the genocidal Zionists, this worked for South Africa and their apartheid regime.
GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works · -2 pts · 150d
Interesting. Kind of like what's happening in England.
Junkasaurus@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 134d
Lmao what an absolute moron you are. If you really believe that though enjoy the taste of your own medicine :)
shadysus@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 151d
Source?
GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works · -3 pts · 151d
She hosted Motaz Azaiza, the "journalist" who frequently praises Hamas, and was present with Hamas at the October 7th attack itself. So I correct myself, he only might have participated in directly killing civilians and children, but he was at least hanging out with his friends when they were doing that.
shadysus@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 147d
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motaz_Azaiza
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/palestinian-journalist-motaz-azaiza-gaza-1.7092862
https://www.newarab.com/news/gaza-motaz-azaiza-anti-war-comments-divide-palestinians
What are you talking about.
Is this the statement that made him Hamas? Fuck off with your goalposts
https://www.timesofisrael.com/french-jews-decry-normandy-region-plan-to-honor-pro-hamas-journalist/
Deceptichum@quokk.au · 1 pts · 151d
GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works · -3 pts · 151d
She hosted Motaz Azaiza, the "journalist" who frequently praises Hamas, and was present with Hamas at the October 7th attack itself. So I correct myself, he only might have participated in directly killing civilians and children, but he was at least hanging out with his friends when they were doing that.
MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 140d
This is Hasbara. So is everything else that you've written in this thread and, looking at your post and comment history, it looks like the MAJORITY of what you type up on lemmy is Hasbara.
Sooo, and I'm pretty against fedjacketing people online, and find that it can be pretty dangerous. But I'm fairly confident you are working for Mossad.
GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works · -1 pts · 139d
No, I just hate Palestine redditors lmao
MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 139d
Maybe then, you should consider where your hate is coming from, especially if the stuff you're saying is word-for-word state propaganda.
Deceptichum@quokk.au · 2 pts · 150d
prettybunnys@piefed.social · 1 pts · 151d
When?
GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works · -3 pts · 151d
She hosted Motaz Azaiza, the "journalist" who frequently praises Hamas, and was present with Hamas at the October 7th attack itself. So I correct myself, he only might have participated in directly killing civilians and children, but he was at least hanging out with his friends when they were doing that.
billwashere@lemmy.world · 96 pts · 151d
The Predator was after a worthy opponent. Something to give a challenge. The IDF are just bullies with guns. Think ICE but with different brown people.
binarytobis@lemmy.world · 41 pts · 151d
I watched the animated Predator movie the other day, and was miffed that
::: spoiler Tap for spoiler they would kidnap people who won against their hunters, freeze them for who knows how many years (thereby effectively ending their lives as they know it) and bring them across the galaxy to fight for their lives again. Respect that the winner won you sore losers. Absolutely no honor. :::
makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 151d
No honor? The Yatuja believe that the only honor that matters is in your hunting prowess, literally every Yatuja has never lost a fight because they always fight to the death. They absolutely think it's an honor to be brought to Yautja Prime to fight against their leader, which is why they do that instead of just killing the people who beat a Predator. That's a huge sign of respect from them
binarytobis@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 151d
I just feel like if they were acting honorably, they would have invited the victors instead of kidnapping them via what I assume was a cowardly ambush (based off the fact they have no memory of it), and freezing them until their loved ones were dead.
makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 151d
The Yautja have no concept of "loved ones". It is specifically brought up that Dek's older brother is a failure because he is protecting his weaker brother instead of culling him for the strength of the clan. You're using human emotional logic to justify your opinions instead of following Predator logic. The vast majority of Yautja would be champing at the bit to fight to prove they can beat the warlord. I still contend these humans have been given an incredible honor in Yautja society
binarytobis@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 151d
If the Predators thought it was an honor, why kidnap them? Surely they would come willingly?
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 151d
A warrior's face is the same, regardless of whether or not they chose to be in the situation they are in.
'Willing' implies choice, including the choice to be a coward.
Battles imply constraints and conditions you cannot change, combat proficiency implies adaptability to any situation.
The Yautja force the scenario, as a test.
Being granted the second test is itself an honor.
You were worth their time, their considerstion.
You passed round one, which is ... significantly uncommon.
To them, they've granted you the privilege of knowing that cowardice, flight, is not an option: You must fight.
This makes the battle strategically simpler, for you, as a courtesy.
If this sounds inhuman... welcome to Comparative XenoEthics 101.
If you cancel the class, you're expelled, if you fail, you're expelled.
And if you even think about dropping the class: I can see the internal ongoing processes in your brain, in realtime.
Do not trifle.
dumbass@piefed.social · 4 pts · 151d
One mans kidnapping is anothers escorting.
swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 151d
When you're a Predator, they let you do it
dumbass@piefed.social · 6 pts · 151d
Just grab em by the skully
makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 151d
Why would you care about a lesser species' opinion? Why would you hold them to a lower standard than you hold yourself?
Gathorall@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 151d
Well you just brought up they do have familial feelings. They just choose to be a culture centered around pointless murder around the galaxy.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 151d
Gotta disengage those mamallian parts of your brain, just use the newer, fancier bits, and the more basal, reptillian bits.
bigFab@lemmy.world · 41 pts · 151d
mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 151d
confirming that terrorist is yank for "very based person"
W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 150d
ATAW
All Terrorists Are Woke
Avicenna@programming.dev · 30 pts · 151d
IDF hates kids, think opposite of Epstein circle. Predator is impartial towards kids.
Virtvirt588@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 150d
In no way the Epstein circle is the opposite. Rape is not love, those people are rapists not pedophiles.
Avicenna@programming.dev · 4 pts · 150d
that was dark humor not factual. I also enjoyed making a connection between two vile organizations. even though it looks like an anti connection the whole point of the joke is to make them look similar, precisely because of the reason you mentioned.
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 29 pts · 151d
They have more sense than your average American cop, too.
abfarid@startrek.website · 23 pts · 151d
Not to ruin the shitpost, but Predator didn't attack the child only because it posed no challenge.
TheLowestStone@lemmy.world · 65 pts · 151d
Yes, that's the point. The predator won't attack a human child because they are incapable of defending themselves. The IDF doesn't care about that.
abfarid@startrek.website · 1 pts · 151d
Not exactly. The predator won't attack the child because it would be boring to do so, not some ethical reasons as stated in the meme. I guess IDF finds it entertaining enough.
Loco_Mex@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 151d
IDF delight in killing children.
vinyl@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 150d
Both are psychopaths but one seems to have slightly higher standards
Mniot@programming.dev · 16 pts · 151d
The alien sport-hunter who kills people to collect their bones as trophies is not a role model!
backalleycoyote@lemmy.today · 13 pts · 151d
This is why I’m team xenomorph. No agenda, no philosophy, no sermons. Just equal opportunity face-hugging and chest-bursting.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 151d
Don't fuck with team Yeerk, they'll get in your head before you know it, live there rent free.
NannerBanner@literature.cafe · 1 pts · 151d
The andalorians were the real assholes the entire time.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 151d
Andalites.
... But yes. They're fucked up too.
NannerBanner@literature.cafe · 2 pts · 150d
Doh. Thanks.
vinyl@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 150d
This is the way.. no wait thats from the Mandalorians
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 9 pts · 151d
As someone really big into sportsmanship, no. They really are good role models. They have impeccable sportsmanship.
RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 151d
TBF they hopelessly outclass a lot of their opponents. 300lb super-strong trained alien fighter with thermal vision and crazy weapons hunting some dude with a rifle if you think of the OG Predator. Their victims probably didn’t even know what they were fighting. Not really that great.
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 6 pts · 151d
But they're not teabagging the low level humans and saying GGEZ after taking their skulls and spinal column as a trophy.
dumbass@piefed.social · 4 pts · 151d
There's gotta be one out there teabagging Xenomorphs.
finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 151d
So, like, a 'hunter' in a high hide shooting an elephant 300 metres away?
PieMePlenty@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 151d
Of course they do. The first movie shows they are honorable killers / hunters. Afaik, this has always been part of their lore.
kossa@feddit.org · 19 pts · 151d
I mean Predator seems kinda woke with that rainbow view, so it only makes sense.
texture@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 151d
this isnt even a shitpost, its just a good post.
brynden_rivers_esq@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 151d
Lol, I just recognized the name from spending ages discussing the monarchy with this guy. Seeing this post I checked his other comments; jeeeeeeeesus.
TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 151d
Predators do it for the hunt, not because of hate or fanaticism.
SeeYouOsciLator@lemmy.wtf · 14 pts · 151d
There's a difference between predators and fascist psychopaths
FreddiesLantern@leminal.space · 14 pts · 151d
Hah memes are funny.
deep sigh
BilSabab@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 151d
Predator is a hunter so his threat assessment is superior to trigger happy freikorp LARP.
SomethingBurger@jlai.lu · 6 pts · 151d
I don't know about your country specifically, but here in France hunters regularly shoot at cyclists. Their main union even complained about a new law imposing a legal limit of blood alcohol content during hunting sessions.
Fnaargh@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 150d
If predators have a union in your country the problem is deeper than you think.
BilSabab@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 149d
our hunting regulations are all over the place but there was a period in history when a number of prominent politicians got killed during hunting "by accident". oddly enough they had ties with russia...
raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 151d
That's not a shitty movie detail, that's a depressingly accurate observation.
frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io · 11 pts · 151d
And American police and gun-toting civilians
Gates9@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 151d
Predator Badlands was dope I’m looking forward to a sequel. Gonna watch Prey this weekend, see if it holds up. They’re kinda hit or miss, Aliens vs Predator should have been way better, hopefully they’ll give it another go with the current cast.
SillyMe@piefed.social · 6 pts · 151d
Prey is the better movie of those two, and I say that as someone who enjoyed Badlands.
Gates9@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 151d
boonhet@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 151d
Awesome, I've only seen Badlands myself so I've gotta watch prey now
Grimy@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 151d
I haven't seen them all but prey is easily my favorite.
how_we_burned@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 151d
Great film, especially the native American language version
altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 151d
That, the goofy beartrap headshot, and the fact it was put together in DaVinci Resolve instead of Adobe and the likes 🙄
Gates9@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 151d
bluepop@anarchist.nexus · 8 pts · 151d
I thought they just liked killing kids
AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 151d
Oh, I'm gonna carry that weight.
itisileclerk@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 151d
IDF are low bar or A.K.A. no-bar.
mechoman444@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 151d
Make sure to turn on rebar.
RAFAELRAMIREZ@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 150d
One thing the Predator movies always did well was giving the creature its own strange code of honor. Moments like that made it feel less like a mindless monster and more like a hunter with rules.
collapse_already@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 150d
Better than cops too.
MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 151d
Tbf it recognises the gun as a toy.
MyEdgyAlt@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 151d
IDF has a long history of blowing up kids playing soccer on the beach, and shooting kids for throwing stones and let them bleed to death. It doesn’t really seem like they try to determine threat status.
MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 138d
They're worse than I thought
Akasazh@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 151d
Some people call me Maurice
theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 151d
I don't think its ethics more a lack of challenge.
SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip · 10 pts · 151d
Not engaging in an easy kill because it would lack challenge is an example of...
*drumroll*
The envelope, please.
*rustling of paper*
...ethics.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 151d
children_cheering.mp3
SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 150d
Did you miss me?
This is weak sauce. So... whatever LOL.
SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world · -3 pts · 151d
Yeah, sorry - NO. It's basic threat assessment, nothing to do with ethics. Those who attack a child do so because they are weak bullies taking advantage of an easy target - which obviously requires a lack of decent ethics, but not attacking that child doesn't mean the choice was made based upon ethics.
TL;DR: Correlation != Causation.