Source: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/terms-of-service-visualizing-the-length-of-internet-agreements/
Terms of Service: The Length of Common Digital Contracts Do you take the time to read the terms of service before you agree to when downloading the latest app or software?
Of course you do…
The world is awash with apps and internet services that ask potential users to agree to a service agreement. Most people click on ‘agree’ and move on, knowing that reading the service agreements could put them to sleep and defer their favorite internet fix.
42 Comments
dan1101@lemmy.world · 67 pts · 131d
Good guy VLC: https://www.videolan.org/legal.html
NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net · 4 pts · 130d
That's a nice summary, but the GPLv2 is about 2500 words....
Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it · 9 pts · 130d
it's a very clear license and it's only 1 that many softwares use, you read it once and you don't have anymore; The GPL is also just about redistribution, code changes etc etc it does not affect the final user, you only look at the license if you care about it or if you are a developer
nullPointer@programming.dev · 59 pts · 131d
3% people being liars seems kinda low.
HexesofVexes@lemmy.world · 55 pts · 131d
We need a new sub for "data is horrifying".
Buffalox@lemmy.world · 48 pts · 131d
Luckily clicking a checkbox is not legally binding with regard to such terms of service.
What is hidden in these terms is of course their abuse of your personal information, which probably is enough for plausible deniability.
But there's a reason these companies are regularly fined in EU, and that is that their practices are often illegal, despite they "allow themselves" to do it by their own terms.
SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml · 8 pts · 131d
Is their ToS fully legal in the US or are parts of them illegal there too?
Buffalox@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 131d
Do they have more money than you?
If they do, chances are you would somehow lose in court, and even if you have the spirit of the law on your side.
I wouldn't bet on consumer protection in USA, and I've seen many TOS documents that were CLEARLY illegal in EU, but legal in USA. But that was back in the 90's where I worked with parallel import of software and hardware from USA.
We were occasionally contacted because the import of software at way cheaper prices than they were available here in EU, was against the TOS.
Usually we were not contacted again after my first response to them, that they could shove their American legalese shit where the sun doesn't shine, US law has no bearing in Europe, and the TOS containing just 1 illegal clause invalidates the whole thing here. 🤣 🤣 🤣
SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 130d
Thats crazy, i was expecting that just the illegal clauses would be invalid
Buffalox@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 130d
Not here, as I understand it, it's pretty general that if a contract has an illegal clause, it invalidates the entire contract. As in it removes other special clauses even if they are legal.
NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 130d
I've read many contracts which explicitly state that any part being invalidated does not invalidate the remaining parts.
alsimoneau@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 130d
Invalidating this clause would then invalid the whole thing de facto
Buffalox@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 130d
Yep, doesn't work in my country at least (Denmark). And since that clause is illegal IDK if that alone can invalidate it?
paraphrand@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 131d
I love it when they force you to scroll. It’s such theater.
Avicenna@programming.dev · 11 pts · 130d
I wonder if any such company tried to use this as evidence in court: "the defendant has scrolled through the terms so the statement that he hasn't read them is not factual"
Zacryon@feddit.org · 27 pts · 130d
I suppose the times are reading times. Not understanding times. And especially not 'pondering about how this will fuck me in the ass one day' times.
That should be illegal.
saltnotsugar@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 131d
I’ve tried to read the full terms of service before and on top of being very long, they’re overly vague when it comes to what they collect.
OwOarchist@pawb.social · 21 pts · 131d
Yeah ... not only are they long, they're written by lawyers who are trying to obfuscate things while still covering the company's ass legally.
Bytemeister@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 130d
It's all fuckin moot because most of them say something like "these terms can be changed at any time and by agreeing to these terms, you implicitly agree to those terms".
Probably wouldn't stand up in court, but most people don't have the money to fight a court case they would obviously win, so that doesn't matter either.
Zahille7@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 131d
With my attention span, it would take me at least three three times as long to read the Microsoft TOS.
Who did they have time this shit? A speed reader?
ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 130d
Idk too many people who can read the art of war in under an hour, either :p
Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 130d
They base the reading time by assuming someone reads 240 words per minute (stated near the top of the infograph, on the right.)
My guess is they didn't actually time somebody reading the terms and conditions, but rather they took the total word count and divided it by 240.
I wondered where they got the number from, too. I found a page discussing a meta analysis of English reading speeds that concluded that for silent reading, people commonly read 238 words per minute. The infographic probably took that average and rounded it up to 240.
Though considering the jargon and opacity of most "terms and conditions," I imagine the reality to be that most people take longer to read through it than if they were reading something for pleasure.
communism@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 21d
I don't consider myself a fast reader and I can read 15k words in under an hour, even under half an hour, depending on what it is. eg an engaging short story I can zoom through if I'm hooked and want to keep reading it. Some boring T&S would take me a lot longer. Word count is much less relevant than content when it comes to determining reading time.
pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip · 15 pts · 130d
I'm pretty sure YouTube's TOS demands acceptance of every other Google product TOS.
If we tack those on, I wonder if it could get to the moon and back in 12 point font?
Edit: I cannot wrap my head around how long the combination must be.
its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 15 pts · 131d
That was my favorite part of switching to Lemmy. My Instance's terms of service were a few paragraphs.
sefra1@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 131d
Would be interesting having the GPL v3 in there for comparison.
NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net · 4 pts · 130d
GPLv3 comes out to 5215 words, so pretty long.
kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 130d
Such a joke Even if i did put 30min to read the ToS, i have no saying in anything, only thing possible is to fuckoff
Every app should have a common, regulated ToS
Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social · 7 pts · 130d
Wonder what Linux's look like
NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net · 11 pts · 130d
The GPLv2 comes to about 2500 words, which puts it at about 10 minutes read time according to this infographic.
usrtrv@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 130d
That only applies if you modify/distribute it. That doesn't apply to a user. I guess comparing the length of a company's employee handbook would be a fair comparison to the GPLv2.
LBP321@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 130d
I'm surprised at the 3% of people that supposedly actually read the ToS.
nop@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 130d
Don't worry, violating the TOS isn't a federal crime punishable by jail time .. right? Oops.
expatriado@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 131d
a bit ironic that tiktok, known for the 15 second vertical videos, have one of the longest tos
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 130d
Also, tosdr.
stenAanden@feddit.dk · 5 pts · 131d
Good guy instagram is still horrible
birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 131d
This is a terrible graphic, the "short" documents should be proportional to length, while they're not.
Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 130d
They always say not reading it is not a defense. But I wonder if you took all the termsmof service for all the products and services you use, and add in updates, then figure the total time to read AND understand (because reading is not enough when they are written in legalease)... if you presented that number to a judge, would they change their mind? It's probably a huge number, likely just reading and understanding updates alone would be a daunting task.
RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 131d
This could be posted in Cool Guides.
stupidcasey@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 130d
So just curious, in chapter twenty section four subsection LV "our kidneys" defined as the kidneys being maintained by the signatory (or signer) Will be released upon termination.
I'm just curious is it termination of the contract or termination of the kidney holder?
Damaskox@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 130d
Fun!
DioramaOfShit@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 130d
Tldr