Equalizing marriage rules

309 points · 21 comments · view on lemmy.world

21 Comments

U7826391786239@piefed.zip · 35 pts · 124d (3 replies)
[ removed ]
Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 124d
  1. Must provide sex on demand while also being sexually incompetent, if not entirely reluctant. Paradoxically, your performance will be evaluated in comparison with experienced prostitutes.

  2. Must suffer abuse gladly

  3. Be Bene Gesserit I guess???

  4. Enjoy doing paperwork for absolutely no benefit whatsoever. Hope everything goes perfectly, otherwise licenses, voting and passport might be on hold until the issue is resolved.

  5. This one sounds like just having arms, but I'm assuming it actually means "Do all the cooking and cleaning enthusiastically and to an unreasonably high standard without cooperation, assistance or even appreciation of any kind."

I bet those asshats complained about the consequences of their demands constantly, too.

Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip · 24 pts · 124d

Is that not the entire point...?

Tiral@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 123d

Yeah, you should generalize more. Don't forget we're all rapists, or rapists just waiting for an opportunity? I always forget which one we all are, tell me more generalizations please.

Gork@sopuli.xyz · 24 pts · 124d (1 reply)

Why a male child, she's clearly going for matrilineal-style enatic (female only) succession rules.

Kanda@reddthat.com · 3 pts · 123d

If she gets a female she has the choice to take the baby and dump the husband

BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 124d

She played Uno reverse, and now I'm a stay at home dad.👨🏼‍🍼

MsPenguinette@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 124d (1 reply)

One of these days Alex, to the moon!

mimic_kry@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 124d

Straight to da moon I tell ya!

#domesticviolence

Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 124d

Shouldn’t it be a female child?

MIDItheKID@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 123d

Oh man, they left out the part where they need to be attractive and pleasant/sociable. There are probably tons of disgusting incels that would be fine with this. Traditional definition of incel, not the modern redpill incel. You know, the obese neck-bearded fedora-wearing samurai sword "Anything for you m'lady" type.

The only one that is left to chance is #3, and with the miracle of IVF, the cards come out face up.

I get the point, but I think they forgot how disgusting desperate men can be.

PieMePlenty@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 123d

Lady, have I got news for you..

Vile_port_aloo@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 124d

Asl

FelixCress@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 124d (6 replies)

And in exchange you are going to be the main breadwinner, right?

morrowind@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 124d

I'd do all except #3 gladly if she provided for the household lol

I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 124d (3 replies)

lol. That’s not how this works.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_burden

FelixCress@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 124d (2 replies)

This is exactly how it works. If one partner, irrespectively of gender, is the main breadwinner, the other one is expected to contribute by doing more around the house.

I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 124d (1 reply)

In theory yes. But how that works in modern times is that both partners work full time and then women are generally expected to do all the house wifey things when they get home.

Soulg@ani.social · 7 pts · 123d

That's called marrying an asshole

Krudler@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 124d

No logic allowed only complaining.

TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 123d

Cyrus@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 124d

Can’t say if this thread is ragebaiting or just retardmaxxing