We build free, open-source privacy tools — encrypted chat, anonymous mail, untraceable voice, a whistleblower drop, a browser, a network layer. All given away.
But "free and open source" means nothing if you can't check it. So:
- Source is public — read every line: github.com/Anon-Gratis
- Hashes are signed — verify the binary matches what we published
- Build it yourself — don't want our binary? Compile it from source
We don't want your trust. We want you to not need it. The only privacy tool that survives "trust me bro" is the one you can read.
🌐 anonymous.gratis · ✉️ admin@anon.gratis (PGP on site)
15 Comments
ag10n@lemmy.world · 62 pts · 77d
Hacktivists on GitHub. Show me your forgejo
patruelis@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 77d
Haha, perfect!
unitedwithme@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 76d
Dude, right, I'm not great at code, but I won't/don't trust MsHub
davel@lemmy.ml · 43 pts · 76d
All these JVM-based packages just appeared out of nowhere three weeks ago and have no almost no git commit history. Your fediverse accounts are weeks to hours old. 🤔
helix@feddit.org · 5 pts · 76d
Telltale sign of LLM usage.
Steve@communick.news · 37 pts · 77d
So many people conflate privacy with anonymity.
They're largely unrelated.
birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 77d
I think this would be a relatively straightforward explanation. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Privacy - whether your door's keys are given to someone.
Anonymity - whether or not someone can see what's behind your door.
Security - whether or not your door is locked and has alarms.
::: spoiler Good & Bad practice examples
Good privacy: people can only enter and leave your door with your consent.
Good anonymity: people don't know what's behind your door.
Good security: people can't break in easily, and if they do, you know.
Bad privacy: adversaries can enter and leave your door without your consent.
Bad anonymity: adversaries know what's behind your door.
Bad security: adversaries can break in easily, and if they do, you don't know. :::
Steve@communick.news · 19 pts · 76d
Privacy is about activity.
Anonymity is about identity.
Security is about ensuring the other two.
I would say: Privacy is everyone seeing you come and go from a house with no windows.
Anonymity is when you're covered head to toe when you come and go. So nobody know who lives there.
Security is a measure of how good your locks and coveralls are.
Real world examples: Going to a protest with a mask is anonymous, in public.
Sessions with your court appointed therapist are private, not anonymous.
portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 76d
Privacy is related to activity
Anonymity is related to identity
Security is related to access
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 76d
that's also privacy. anonimity is whether the neighbors know who lives in your house
jsnfwlr@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 20d
Privacy - only those you allow can see what happens behind the door
Security - only those you allow can open the door
Anonymity - only those you allow know who the door belongs to
Secrecy - only those you allow know the door exists.
dogs0n@sh.itjust.works · 15 pts · 76d
Um... vas? Maybe I don't get it, but you're just forking and tweaking already open source software? How does this change the model of anything?
porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml · 11 pts · 76d
We already have all this stuff, stop larping as a 1337 h4x0r and go fix some bugs in your preferred xmpp client or one of those Firefox forks
helix@feddit.org · 8 pts · 76d
Oh no, another AI slop project.
We're really getting drowned in AI stuff aren't we 😒
snowydroopz@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 77d
So, is this like what proton shoulda been? Not exactly ik, but is this like a suite?