I once saw a yakuza hitman killed, and then reborn as his arch nemesis' son. It was the ultimate revenge because he had full access to the breasts of the wife of his nemesis.
Absolutely hilarious. Not sure if it would have been made without AI being accessible.
I remember reading somewhere that Netflix produced shows needs to cater to "second monitor" usage, or passive watching. As in constantly repeating plot points, simpler plot, anything that makes it easy to follow something while doing anything else
AI slop is just another way they do it. Even better, no need to deal with pesky actor unions or production unions and other such annoying anticapitalist things.
Noup, because LLMs give out avarage based on the training data. If training data is shit, like Netflix's avarage content already is, it will always give out shit.
It was always going to be the case that AI additions to media would eventually be unnoticed, it not being declared beforehand out of fear that it will lead to negative reactions is the very telling point.
People care if it's used, and those who want to profit from its use by removing artists and other workers know that they can't profit if we know it's there.
Kind of shocking the numbers above don't say anything about viewership at all, really. Just that the titles exist somewhere.
But Facedeer is a notorious troll, so his big "gotcha" moment is apparently that people can't tell or enjoy this stuff. I doubt it. Netflix trash definitely includes $200 million blockbuster flops that nobody knows about (have you or most movie fans ever heard of Fountain of Youth?), that are getting churned out from the back catalog of Skydance, owned by the son of surveillance king Larry Ellison.
If nobody wants a Guy Ritchie heist blockbuster with John Krasinski and two Star Wars alums including Natalie Portman, who's to say they "want" anything worse from Netflix?
What sea do you sail? I don't want to stream, need content for my Jellyfin but don't want viruses either. Being using local library but ripping getting tiring especially with 3 free rental limit.
This is inevitable unfortunately. It is being pushed top-down across the corporate landscape. The people pushing think it’s going to save them money. lol
I definitely noticed it when I put on Barbie A Touch of Magic for my daughter to watch one time. The stores in the background had gibberish writing on the store fronts.
37 Comments
justlemmyin@lemmy.world · 99 pts · 39d
This means they are going also half the subscription cost any day now, just you wait. It will totally happen. Totally. For sure.
SnailMagnitude@mander.xyz · 70 pts · 39d
The big question is: Could cutting edge LMM's make Netflix content less shit?
Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works · 68 pts · 39d
More likely they'll use it to make even worse content a lot faster.
saltnotsugar@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 39d
I have never seen something generated by AI and thought it had any quality at all.
ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 38d
I once saw a yakuza hitman killed, and then reborn as his arch nemesis' son. It was the ultimate revenge because he had full access to the breasts of the wife of his nemesis.
Absolutely hilarious. Not sure if it would have been made without AI being accessible.
JayGray91@piefed.social · 6 pts · 38d
I remember reading somewhere that Netflix produced shows needs to cater to "second monitor" usage, or passive watching. As in constantly repeating plot points, simpler plot, anything that makes it easy to follow something while doing anything else
AI slop is just another way they do it. Even better, no need to deal with pesky actor unions or production unions and other such annoying anticapitalist things.
Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org · 15 pts · 39d
Noup, because LLMs give out avarage based on the training data. If training data is shit, like Netflix's avarage content already is, it will always give out shit.
tuxiqae@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 8 pts · 38d
LMMs? No.
LLMs? Also no.
KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 38d
LMM I guess could stand for large media model.
SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 38d
LLM is MLM.
SnailMagnitude@mander.xyz · 2 pts · 38d
sorry, I should have used the predictive text spellcheck system on my google device to post
Rhoeri@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 39d
Never in a million years. LLM shit is additive. Not subtractive.
newton@feddit.online · 37 pts · 38d
You guys still pay for Netflix ? 🤔😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 12 pts · 38d
Arr
joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone · 7 pts · 38d
Heck no, when they started replacing all the decent movies with awful original content I bailed
nevyn@slrpnk.net · 4 pts · 38d
bridgeburner@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 38d
Shows how many people are just NPCs lol
FaceDeer@fedia.io · 25 pts · 39d
So evidently, people either can't tell when AI is being used or don't care when AI is being used.
SlacksMcTavish@lemmy.ml · 41 pts · 39d
It was always going to be the case that AI additions to media would eventually be unnoticed, it not being declared beforehand out of fear that it will lead to negative reactions is the very telling point.
People care if it's used, and those who want to profit from its use by removing artists and other workers know that they can't profit if we know it's there.
anomnom@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 38d
They don’t share viewing numbers for a reason.
We might realize we all only watch 4 shows on repeat and spend the rest of the time scrolling past all the slop.
XLE@piefed.social · 4 pts · 38d
Kind of shocking the numbers above don't say anything about viewership at all, really. Just that the titles exist somewhere.
But Facedeer is a notorious troll, so his big "gotcha" moment is apparently that people can't tell or enjoy this stuff. I doubt it. Netflix trash definitely includes $200 million blockbuster flops that nobody knows about (have you or most movie fans ever heard of Fountain of Youth?), that are getting churned out from the back catalog of Skydance, owned by the son of surveillance king Larry Ellison.
If nobody wants a Guy Ritchie heist blockbuster with John Krasinski and two Star Wars alums including Natalie Portman, who's to say they "want" anything worse from Netflix?
Lumidaub@feddit.org · 3 pts · 38d
A scam is a scam whether or not people realise it's a scam.
I actually saw Fountain of Youth. Very weird, had all the right elements, bland as fuck.
Flower@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 38d
Not directly, but it'll give a sense of cheapness and sameness to their product.
melsaskca@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 38d
I should get a 50% discount then.
darkmogool@feddit.org · 16 pts · 38d
make it 100% 🏴☠️
Fredselfish@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 38d
What sea do you sail? I don't want to stream, need content for my Jellyfin but don't want viruses either. Being using local library but ripping getting tiring especially with 3 free rental limit.
AbKingPro@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 38d
Look into the arr and usenet
Fredselfish@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 38d
Thanks.
darkmogool@feddit.org · 3 pts · 38d
Mostly privat networks, sorry 😅
Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org · 19 pts · 38d
I didtched Netflix long before GenAI was a thing.
SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 38d
If only integrity and ethics were common...
Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org · 2 pts · 36d
Them lobbying the W3C to add DRM as a web standard was when I told them to FTFO and never went back.
reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 38d
This is inevitable unfortunately. It is being pushed top-down across the corporate landscape. The people pushing think it’s going to save them money. lol
nevyn@slrpnk.net · 5 pts · 38d
KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 0 pts · 38d
Oh sweet summer children...
SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org · 13 pts · 38d
Glad I canceled years ago
Duamerthrax@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 38d
Netflix released 300 titles this year? Quantity over quality.
nevyn@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 38d
EveningPancakes@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 pts · 38d
I definitely noticed it when I put on Barbie A Touch of Magic for my daughter to watch one time. The stores in the background had gibberish writing on the store fronts.
Wispy2891@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 38d
Imagine boasting that you're proudly serving slop in your restaurant
nevyn@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 38d
nevyn@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 38d